Addison Gray

@RachTrfkd_Bevan @sethharpesq You are good. What I mean is part of the code run on many different machines. Eg the people’s AI wouldn’t be able to be doxed or shut down since it would be decentralized. A tool to help

@Real_Dr_Neutral @sethharpesq 2. I do need to watch Person Of Interest though. I hope that's it's not too confronting , eek. thanks.

Only older people are buying the magic beans of AI. It's rather sad, actually, seeing senior citizens bamboozled into believing that another industrial revolution is imminent. But they partly WANT to believe, perhaps to atone for their generational failure to make a better world.

@RachTrfkd_Bevan @sethharpesq So like the show Person of Interest, we need to have a citizens decentralized AI

@sethharpesq I really really fricking hate AI Bots & deception. Tech companies pushing to have AI-cameras installed in psych wards! Predictive policing & targeting. Lavendar & 'Daddy's Home'. AI assists our evil Overlords... Our oppressors: making them exponentially more powerful. Scary.

Don’t think politicians are going to save us. Only 10% of MPs attended the chief scientists briefing on Climate Change a couple of years ago. MPs are as in the dark about the collapse that is heading towards us as the public are.

Interesting that it’s gloomy as hell still. I wonder if this is anything to do with the AMOC slowing. Research obviously takes a long time to catch up with reality.

@AuburnFlea @mark_slapinski Ah yes, as he single handily started a war in Iran and raised gas prices. Now is saying that $200 or $300 a barrel is possible. FYI that $9-14 a gallon gas. So sure, everyone loves him

@mark_slapinski You really think that the majority is not still backing trump, you're an idiot. Trump has more support now then he ever did. Just because you say it or put out fake polls it doesn't make it true, it just show how disconnected you are and how you have no thoughts of your own.

@ColossusofNY @mark_slapinski I find it funny that the 4k mentions of his name in the Epstein files, and people still defend him.

@FrankV_head @mark_slapinski Weirdly enough the K3 has always backed Trump along with The Proud Boys, and Neo Nazi’s.

@mark_slapinski Look who conducted the poll. WP, ABC and presented by MSnow 🤣 all liberal progressives MAGA is 100% behind our President. Trump 2028🤣

@ElonJoin839 @HQNewsNow I mean he’s right. $100 a barrel is what it is now. $200 is about $8-9 a gallon, $300 is $11-13 a gallon.

@HQNewsNow So NOW you are quoting Tucker? Who is next, Fuentes?

Tucker Carlson on Trump saying $200/barrel oil would be "worth it": What would $200/barrel oil mean? We've never had it in world history. $10 a gallon for gas at the pump? What would $300/barrel oil look like? It would be the end of a lot of things. Here you have Trump saying 'I thought it could be $300.' No president should ever be willing to talk that casually about the economic destruction of his nation.

Biological female ✌️🏳️‍⚧️. This is proven recognised medical science.

Isn’t it great that we’re celebrating David Attenborough’s 100th birthday whilst ignoring the message he’s spent the last 20 years trying to get through to us:

🇺🇸BREAKING: Someone placed a $920 million crude oil short at 3:40 AM. 70 minutes later Axios reported the US and Iran were close to a deal. Oil dropped 12%. The trade made $125 million in profit. Minutes after that Iran launched the “Persian Gulf Strait Authority” and oil surged 8%. $760 million placed before Trump’s last announcement. $920 million placed before this one. Every major announcement in this war has been front-run by someone who knew it was coming. What kind of war is this? This is more like a trading desk with an army. Never stop connecting the dots.

@SandieAschem @washingtonpost So you are saying zero people stopped supporting him after the Epstein files confirmed he’s a pedo? You still support him?

@washingtonpost That is impossible when more than half of Americans are Republicans and support Donald Trump. Are you only asking Democrats?

Americans reject President Trump’s planned White House ballroom by a 2-to-1 margin, according to a Post-ABC News-Ipsos poll. There is also a notable enthusiasm gap: Nearly three times as many people “strongly” oppose the project as strongly support it. wapo.st/3Pe54Dw

@Bitmsk333 @washingtonpost So what you are saying is the current administration, with dozens in the Epstein pedophile list is who should be running things?

If elections were based on polls then Hillary Clinton would have won in 2016! If polls were accurate then Kamala Harris and the fraud king Tim Walz would have won the 2024 election but clearly polls are wrong all the time! The Washington Post and ABC News has historically hated conservatives so we are supposed to believe these two heavily left organizations are going to set up a poll and then report its real results! If you believe that you’re a dumocrat that can’t add one plus one! Polls are statistics and do you know what they say about statistics? There is a saying, “there are lies, damn lies, and statistics”! It was produced by ABC News do you think they have any credibility to produce an unbiased poll? This is clearly a normal dumocrat poll and we on the right hear this and don’t understand how it could be true! Well it’s heavily weighted left because of what I have already wrote and many working poor tax payers on the right won’t participate in a poll but they will vote! The left does these things to demoralize the right and keep you from going to the polls and voting because if you vote you win just like Nov 5, 2024!

@John85539988 @Xx_WiReD_xX @DemocraticWins That’s an odd take when a lot of people running the White House are in the Epstein files, including the president with thousands of mentions. So explain how you support pedophiles running the country?

@Xx_WiReD_xX @DemocraticWins You are liberal. So Ibques you are Democrat. Explain your stance in being a Democrat, since the Dem party is PRO child grooming. I want to hear the explanation.

BREAKING: In a stunning moment, Fed Chair Jerome Powell just directly warned that the Trump induced rise in gas prices could cripple our economy. Wow.

@Savvilady1 @Bobbydigit39011 @DemocraticWins Yeah that will go well lmao

@Bobbydigit39011 @DemocraticWins Lookout crypto currency (Donny’s sons) incoming to replace that dollar

@paulwhywhynot @DemocraticWins Or you know we could do biofuels, and renewables with novel energy storage…. Then we would be free of Middle eastern controlled oil markets.

@DemocraticWins So you’re saying Biden shouldn’t have cancelled the Keystone Pipeline in his first week of office! With Keystone we’d have more energy, and more jobs.

@DemocraticWins Duh. Trump had no plan. Harris did. But Harris' plan didnt include covering up Epstein files, taking bribes and starting wars to fund big oil. This is all on Republicans and Trump supporters.

President Zelenskyy responds to JD Vance, who called ending aid to Ukraine “one of the proudest” achievements of the Trump administration: “If the Vice President is proud that he is not helping us, it means that he is helping Russians,” Zelensky told Newsmax.

Sir David Attenborough turns 100 next week. "Please make no mistake. Climate change is the biggest threat to security that modern humans have ever faced."

Trump just fired all 24 members of the National Science Board. Every single one. By email. No warning. No reason given. The board has existed since 1950. The National Science Board is the independent body that oversees the National Science Foundation, the agency that distributes $9 billion in research grants every year. Its members are scientists and engineers from universities and industry. They serve six-year staggered terms specifically so they cross presidential administrations and stay independent of whoever is in power. On Friday, every single one of them got the same boilerplate email from Mary Sprowls of the Presidential Personnel Office: "On behalf of President Donald J Trump, I am writing to inform you that your position as a member of the National Science Board is terminated, effective immediately. Thank you for your service." That's it. That's the whole letter. For 76 years of institutional independence. The NSF funds the basic science behind MRIs. Cellphones. LASIK eye surgery. GPS. The internet itself. The Antarctic research stations. The deep-space telescopes. The research vessels mapping the ocean floor. Every breakthrough that made America the world's leader in science for the better part of a century traces back through grants this agency made and this board approved. The board chair, Victor McCrary, was actively advising Congress on Trump's proposed 55% cut to NSF's budget. The board was helping fight back. So Trump fired the board. Marvi Matos Rodriguez, one of the fired members, told reporters she had been reviewing an 80-page report as part of her board duties just days before being terminated. Keivan Stassun, a physicist at Vanderbilt, said NSF's leadership had already stopped responding to board oversight requests months ago. "We would ask them, 'Are you following board governance directives?' And their answer would be, in effect, 'We don't listen to you anymore.'" Now there's no board to answer to. Rep. Zoe Lofgren of California, the top Democrat on the House Science Committee, called it "the latest stupid move made by a president who continues to harm science and American innovation. Will the president fill the NSB with MAGA loyalists who won't stand up to him as he hands over our leadership in science to our adversaries?" That's the actual question. Because while Trump is firing American scientists, China is building research universities at a rate we cannot match. The CDC just buried a study showing vaccines work. RFK Jr. runs HHS. The EPA is gutted. The Forest Service is being broken. Half of American children are breathing dangerous air. And now the people who decide what gets researched in the United States have all been fired by email on a Friday afternoon.