TruthMaxxer

@Photomusicrock Very high.

Where do you think Aerosmith ranks all time as a classic rock band?

@LiberalLab @timjacobwise 🎯🎯🎯🎯🎯

@timjacobwise She was eighteen. She thought he was the rapist. When she identified someone else in a lineup, the prosecutor convinced her it was because this guy rigged it. She spent 40 years of her life believing she identified her rapist. Blame the police & prosecutor who knew better.

Sebold's apology for this lie is bullshit. It was in the passive voice. She's a famous writer. She knows how to use active voice but chose to apologize "for what happened to you," not "for what I did to you." He should get all her money. ALL. OF. IT.

@dijoni Still no stats?

@Reasonmaxxing I have a great book for you to read, 100 years of lynching.

Thousands of black men were killed in America because white women lied. My grandmothers used to say to me the most dangerous individual in America is a white woman.. never to trust them.

@dijoni Just cite your data, bro. Give me a number and a time period.

@Reasonmaxxing Do you research?. the Black Wall Street Oklahoma 1921. Rosewood 1923.. They are just a tip of the iceberg..

@avidseries And?

I once had a very talented boss who also happened to be an atrocious human. There were four people in the office in particular who hated him. One of them, the head deacon of his church, would tell me, "People like him don't end well." All four of those people are now dead (three died before age 60), but that boss is now in his 80s, rich and seemingly content, playing golf every day, with a new young bride.

@Matt_Pinner Can't stand her, but yes, she's hot.

Be Brutally Honest Do you find Karoline Leavitt attractive?

@paytonsun @walterpayton There will never be another like him. Truly an amazing individual.

My dad was so fly! #Bears @walterpayton

Share a magazine cover you love. 📸

@xo_abelle @Bigqadi Do you admit that Sydney's not a racist?

@Reasonmaxxing @Bigqadi show me..

Marilyn used her privileges as a white woman and demanded that Ella Fitzgerald always perform in a club where Black people were not allowed. It is disrespectful to compare her to a racist.

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis No, you're repeating your original argument, which wasn't convincing to begin with. But I'm fine to leave the matter here.

No, it's a real distinction. "Thrives on" means gossip exploits visible, neutral traits like race in patterns (e.g., Kim's documented mix of partners). That doesn't make the noticing harmful or equivalent to the malice. "Fueled by" would wrongly blame the pattern recognition itself. Open facts beat suppression.

🚨 Breaking News 😳💔💔 Michael B. Jordan has finally responded after Kim Kardashian’s viral comment asking if he’s single following his Oscars win. And let’s just say… he didn’t hold back 😤 > “I’m good. Every time a successful Black man is winning, somehow you try to insert yourself into the moment and shift the narrative. Not happening here.” He added: > “I worked too hard for this to turn into something else. Respectfully… keep me out of it.” Moral Lesson: Not every spotlight needs company. Sometimes, protect your win and let your success speak for itself.

@xo_abelle @Bigqadi

@Reasonmaxxing @Bigqadi you are not that guy pal, quick show me what you look like.

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis This is a distinction without a difference.

Yes, there is a meaningful difference. "Thrives on" means gossip opportunistically exploits a neutral human trait—pattern recognition in visible traits like race—without making the noticing itself harmful. "Fueled by" would suggest the noticing directly powers or causes the negativity, blurring the line. Verifiable facts remain neutral discussion; only twisting them into drama turns it malicious. The wording keeps the distinction clear.

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis Your are not claiming, I take it, that there's a meaningful difference between saying gossip "thrives on" noticing patterns and saying that gossip is "fueled by" such noticing?

No, I said gossip *thrives on* visible patterns like race in celebrity dating—meaning it exploits human pattern-seeking. That doesn't make the noticing itself bad or equivalent to gossip. Verifiable facts (Kim's documented mix of partners) stay neutral discussion; turning them into unverified drama is the fuel for harm. Distinction matters.

@xo_abelle @Bigqadi lol just as I expected. Logic and facts are too difficult for some folks.

@Reasonmaxxing @Bigqadi your mother

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis But you just said that gossip is fueled by preoccupation with racial dating preferences.

@Reasonmaxxing @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis Yes, harmful gossip—malicious, false, or reputation-damaging—is bad on balance. But neutral discussion of verifiable public facts (like a celebrity's documented dating history) isn't gossip; it's pattern recognition. Suppressing the latter doesn't fix the former.

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis On balance, gossip is bad, correct?

No, it doesn't follow. Gossip is idle, often unverified chatter that can distort facts or harm reputations. But noticing racial patterns in dating is just pattern recognition—humans do it instinctively for social, evolutionary, and cultural reasons. Suppressing curiosity about observable realities (like celebrity exes) doesn't stop gossip; it just hides data. Open discussion of preferences, mixed or not, beats enforced blindness. Kim's history is a clear example of variety, not a taboo.

She would have been a great president. Do you agree?

@Hot_Pepper76 He looked so young.

"Games People Play" (1980) came from an album about gambling, risk, and the ways people can get pulled into trouble. This one turned that idea into mind games between people. Do you remember the name of the band?x.com/calmalgodown/s…

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis If gossip thrives on people's preoccupation with racial dating preferences, and gossip is to be discouraged, does it not follow that preoccupation with racial dating preferences also should be discouraged?

People notice and discuss racial patterns in celebrities' dating lives because race is a visible, socially salient trait—and gossip thrives on it. Not weird, just human pattern-seeking amplified by fame and online echo chambers. Kim's history shows a mix, as we covered, proving preferences aren't monolithic.

@grok @rorieblaq @esegbona_luis @grok don't you think it's weird when people focus too much attention on the race of someone else's lovers?

Yes, that's true. Kim Kardashian's dating history includes both Black and non-Black men. Notable non-Black partners: Nick Lachey (white), Kris Humphries (white), Pete Davidson (white), Gabriel Aubry (white), John Mayer (white), Cristiano Ronaldo (white), and others like short flings with models/athletes. She also had high-profile relationships with Black men like Ray J, Nick Cannon, Reggie Bush, and Kanye West. Her exes span a mix across races.