BeachyBamaBex🏝️🌊🏖️🍹

Iran already had a ground invasion. During the January massacre, thousands of Arab and Afghan terrorists flooded the country at the IR's invitation, occupied entire cities, murdered and raped at random, and tormented citizens. Interestingly, the "anti-war" crowd was dead silent back then. Fast forward to today: Let's say the people inside Iran wake up to the news that American forces are on the ground, slaughtering the demons who have been hanging innocent teenagers daily. Let's say the aim for this invasion is regime change and not to simply take Kharg. Do you seriously think Iranians will oppose it at this point, after every indignity and oppression they've suffered? Or do you think they will celebrate? I will go even further: Iranians are far more on board with a regime change-aimed ground invasion than they are with randomly striking power plants, which does nothing to the regime and only harms civilians. At this point, "Whatever it takes" means exactly that. Before January, there might have been a majority of Iranians who still believed we can overthrow the regime entirely on our own without foreign intervention. But those days are long gone. People don't think like that anymore after the largest uprising since 1979 ended with tens of thousands of murdered civilians. I've spoken to so many people, and felt my own mindset change too. Opposing alternatives that haven't been tried will only play into the islamic regime's hand. And we don't have the luxury to pick and choose while Ejei is hanging our youth from cranes every single day. If regime change requires boots on the ground, then so be it. Bear in mind, I'm only talking about the Iranian perspective here, and can absolutely understand why Americans would be hesitant to escalate in this way. But Iran is not Iraq, and a regime change in Iran won't lead to the same chaos as Iraq did.

If you have a Gmail account, you need to read this. Google's AI now scans your emails and attachments, bank statements, tax files, medical letters, all of it. It turned on by default, and there's a class-action lawsuit over how. Here are 5 moves to shut it off, the switch is hidden in two places:

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Australian Senator goes off and says it PERFECTLY “It is NOT THE GUNS that are the problem — IT IS RADICAL ISLAM THAT IS THE PROBLEM!” 💯💯💯 WAKE UP! Repel Islam. The entire western world must listen. 🇺🇸 🇦🇺

If you don’t think he’s a woman, you’re transphobic. When he claimed to be a woman, he became a woman. He now belongs in women’s changing rooms, bathrooms, hospital wards, prison cells and rape support centres. If you try and differentiate between him and a trans woman who looks more convincing as a woman, you are promoting patriarchal beauty norms. If you admit to seeing an aggressive and possibly unbalanced man in this video, you’re saying all trans people are mentally ill predators. If you refuse to let him into female-only spaces, you’re removing his right to exist. If you suggest he could comfortably use male facilities, you secretly want him assaulted. If you refuse to call him ‘she’, you are guilty of unpardonable cruelty. If you’re a woman who wouldn’t want to share a locker room with him, or a man who wouldn’t want your daughter, sister or mother to get undressed in close proximity to him, you belong to the far-right. If you point out that there is no objective difference between his claim to be a woman and that of any other biological male claiming a trans identity, you are too stupid to understand the circular arguments explaining why he’s not really trans whereas other men who say they’re women are really trans. If you’re righteous, you must argue that this man’s self-declared identity overrides any consideration of the safety and rights of females. To be godly, you must agree he’s as ‘valid’ as every other trans woman, because people are who they say they are. No matter what your eyes, ears and common sense are telling you, if you don’t want to end up on the wrong side of history, you must pretend to believe that this angry, intimidating man is actually a vulnerable, oppressed woman.