@vicent_br @MiamiMarlins_UK Brewers just locked Pratt up for the next decade. They aren't trading him.
English
Redd Vencher
24.5K posts
Redd Vencher
@ReddVencher
Redd Vencher : https://t.co/7QzP0xDyvK Redd Vencher Streams: https://t.co/050qiBazwg Twitch Channel: https://t.co/ZKojNgQIfr
Katılım Aralık 2017
449 Takip Edilen296 Takipçiler
@MiamiMarlins_UK Trade for Mr.Pratt as a future Top5 MLB SS.... The Brewers could be good trade partners
English
I do wonder what the long term plan at SS is for the Marlins
Otto Lopez is a sticking plaster. Very good 2B, not so good SS
Xavier Edwards the same.
English
English
@ReddVencher @timothydownes1 @BostonStrong_34 They play more of an old school game of contact and moving runners. They may use analytics to get there but they definitely play like a team from the 80s and 90s.
English
@jay_jayrmay @timothydownes1 @BostonStrong_34 Brewers are one of the most analytically driven teams in baseball.
English
@timothydownes1 @BostonStrong_34 Red Sox rely too much on analytics so they shun bunting or moving runners.
English
@biasedsports420 @JustBB_Media I'm sure the guy with a career .238 ISO and nearly 200 HRs going on a binge is devil magic. He only hit 5 HR last year because he missed significant time with injury. (Only 101 PA fewest in a season since his cup of coffee in 2015.)
English
Gary Sánchez has hit 3 home runs in his first 11 AB's with the Brewers this season!
He hit 5 home runs all of last season 😳
English
@subzero9985 @JustBB_Media Sanchez has hit double digit HR every year since 2016 outside of last year when he only played 101 PA due to injury. On pace for double digits had he played his normal 200-300 PA.
English
@tbierly @Michael19196858 @RoseteExposed @jwludwig @dilanesper You read it wring because he continues to elaborate later.
English
English
Scalia is turning in his grave as conservatives confuse the legislative history with the text.
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee
The Fourteenth Amendment doesn’t say what the far left wishes it said Didn’t mean that then Still doesn’t mean that today
English
@dirtysanchez55 @cujoknows @RockfordBooth @mdrizzy22 Yes. The NL Central is on par with the NL East. The AL Central and AL West are significantly worse divisions than the former 2.
English
English
@X14337895 @ProjectLiberal The 1790 naturalization act has nothing to do with birthright citizenship, so what would be the point?
English
Birthright citizenship was the common law of the land in every single state long before the 14th Amendment.
In fact, children of visitors were rule to be US citizens in 1844!
Tío Kevin Окаянный@brondumkm
@ProjectLiberal Not that I disagree with the gist, but birthright citizenship only goes back to the 14th Amendment, which was ratified 158 years ago.
English
@ChristianHeiens Why did you leave out this portion of Howard's response to Cowan, who didn't vote for the ammendment.
English
According to Liberals and subversive Libertarians, it’s actually impossible for there to be any “persons born in the United States who are foreigners” because they think everyone born inside the boundaries of the US are automatically Americans, despite the fact that the 14th Amendment’s own authors literally went on the Congressional Record saying that the amendment does not apply to such people.
English
How fucking retarded do you have to be to believe that the original intent of the 14th amendment’s authors was for citizenship to be automatically granted to the children of tourists, illegals, and even enemy combatants who are being held on American soil?
The man who wrote the amendment quite literally went on the Senate floor and publicly declared that it wouldn’t apply to foreigners or aliens.
Cheese For Everyone!@CheeseForEvery1
And the First Amendment doesn’t apply to the internet and the Second Amendment doesn’t cover the AR-15. After all, the Framers never conceived of these things.
English
Reality: If Congress had known in 1868 that one day people from foreign countries could travel to the US while nine months pregnant — stay for a couple of days — and then return to a foreign country & retain US citizenship for life they would have unanimously rejected it.
English
The Supreme Court’s debate today: What did people who have been dead for 150 years intend for their law to mean for a modern situation they never conceived could ever occur?
English
@JonesMarkLB @The_JBS Neither is the baby of a Chinese woman who is 8 months pregnant and flies to the U.S. to spit it out and fly back home, retard.
English
“This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens…”
- Jacob Howard (1866)
Rep. Mark Harris@RepMarkHarrisNC
FACT: Birthright citizenship does not come from federal law or the Constitution, but a faulty interpretation of the 14th Amendment.
English
@SilvestriJon @The_JBS Because those are three separate classes of people
1. Foreigners
2. Aliens
3. (Not the one anyone is arguing about) ambassadors or foreign ministers
English
Nor did he intend for over 1 million Chinese babies to be born in the USA, sent back to live in China to be raised as communist loyalists and still claim US citizenship.
“Jurisdiction" implies legal, permanent domicile, rather than merely physical presence. So children of unauthorized individuals do not automatically gain citizenship. That’s the intention.
English
Something tells me that when Senator Jacob Howard wrote 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' in the 14th amendment, his intention wasn't that pregnant Guatemalans could cross into Texas, give birth, and have a child with the same rights as you and I.
English
@TalkinBaseball_ Just wondering, so if I guy catches a fly ball with his hat like Mae Morabito in A League of Their Own it wouldn't be an out?
English
The runner was safe because the first baseman had the ball pinned to his body instead of having control in either his hand or glove
English
@smuffyburner @Mr_bigballs12 @jayhaykid Joey Ortiz would be outplaying that AAV, and I know you definitely don't want him locked in at $50 M guaranteed.
English
@Mr_bigballs12 @ReddVencher @jayhaykid Absolute steal. To anyone who follows he’ll far outplay that AAV. Brewers continue to be ahead of the curve.
English
Definitely in new territory when a team’s #6 prospect who hadn’t previously played above Double-A is signing a neary decade-long extension with $50M guaranteed
Ken Rosenthal@Ken_Rosenthal
Source confirms: Infield prospect Cooper Pratt finalizing eight-year, $51M contract with Brewers. Deal includes two club options with escalators on option years. Has played only three games above AA. Brewers’ No. 6 prospect per The Athletic’s Keith Law. First: @BNightengale
English
@robsanders1993 @MatthewMKE98 They offered him and the other Freshman extensions before promotion that they turned down.
English
@MatthewMKE98 Wish they had their priorities straight and would have done it before Hoerner. Cost keeps going up
English
Brice Turang just feels like the next Peralta, Burns, Williams, Durbin
Where they move him in the offseason
I just don’t see a world where they give him 200 million knowing Made, Pena, Pratt, Williams, Fischer and Wilken are all coming
Not saying I agree, but I understand it
English
@Mr_bigballs12 @jayhaykid The club options extend it to 10 years $80+ M.
English
@jayhaykid Only about 20 mil guaranteed, last 2 years are club options worth 15 mil a piece.
English
@harrydoyle_ @CodySan24524528 @evantpotter @Brewers It does. Matos is out of options and needs to be on the 40 man. Peralta was moved off the 50 man to make room. The Brewers are putting Matos on their 40 man roster thus not outrighting him. He's out options so can't be sent to the minors w/o outrighting him back off the 40 man.
English
@harrydoyle_ @CodySan24524528 @evantpotter @Brewers It's why Sammy Peralta was removed from the 40 man roster to make room for Matos.
English
@harrydoyle_ @CodySan24524528 @evantpotter @Brewers DFA'ing someone doesn't remove the options requirement. DFA'ing gives the team 10 days to trade, outright after passing through waivers, or release a player. Matos wasn't outrighted through waivers or released, so is put on the 40 man and subject to option requirements.
English