Reed Harmeyer

592 posts

Reed Harmeyer banner
Reed Harmeyer

Reed Harmeyer

@ReedHarmeyer

working on composable primitives for JS and React apps

Seattle, WA Katılım Şubat 2023
237 Takip Edilen107 Takipçiler
Dev Agrawal
Dev Agrawal@devagrawal09·
Introducing: Specter Supercharge Agentic Engineering with - Typescript Framework for Specs that compile, execute, and scaffold your app - Vertical Slices that can be built, tested, and operated independently Agents can finally work on large complex codebases reliably
English
26
12
256
53.6K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@paulg Just made this mistake with my last startup and I remember realizing after a huge launch and subsequent churn that even if I perfected that product it wouldn’t have changed the outcome. The unit economics were just impossible to make work for a startup.
English
0
0
2
694
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
A startup idea that only works if there are already a significant number of people using it is not a valid startup idea. There has to be some subset of users who need what you're making so desperately that they'll use it even if no one else is.
English
218
215
3.9K
194K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@ericries I think the article is right. Even in the startup world how many founders are making decisions based on what VCs like? It’s like institutional capital is the demand side at this point. Consumers are somehow the supply side and it feels like it every time prices go up.
English
1
0
0
13
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@rorysutherland Great piece besides the harping on the DEI example. The signaling to capital problem has way bigger issues than corporate trainings it’s driving 99% of all business decisions off a cliff.
English
0
0
0
612
sunil pai
sunil pai@threepointone·
best part of this (for me, so far) is for scripts you can choose permissions and tools and run it inside a dynamic worker, really lock down what it has access to something something code mode
sunil pai@threepointone

hmm

English
3
0
84
10.8K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
I don’t see why we would expect this to result in good data. This workforce was selected for being developers who could put up with corporate politics for a paycheck. There is no reason to think they’d be effective or willing data labelers given these circumstances.
Scale Advantage Research@scaleadvantage

@GergelyOrosz On the data labeling effort, META does not believe that third-party contractor data is of sufficiently high quality and believe this is an important point of differentiation relative to competing labs that largely rely on Mercor, Scale AI, Surge AI, etc. See more here:

English
1
0
0
34
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
You’ve heard about Harness Engineering but have you heard about Harness Engineer Experience Engineering?
English
0
0
0
17
Reed Harmeyer retweetledi
Scott Stevenson
Scott Stevenson@scottastevenson·
It is becoming less taboo for VCs to back direct competitors I propose a defensive pact amongst founders: "If a Major Investor hedges by investing in my direct competitor, I will hedge by starting a second company" Comment/retweet to cosign :)
English
12
4
102
36.6K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@threepointone I think that’s true when constrained to a particular paradigm. Within a paradigm you can only refine something or make tradeoffs and that’s where most effort goes. But you can just do something completely different that ends up being better like Components vs MVC
English
0
0
0
554
sunil pai
sunil pai@threepointone·
My thought for the day: The Peter Principle probably applies to software; steadily increasing ambition and loosening constraints makes it rise to a level of complexity and incompetence that ultimately dooms it
English
7
4
81
31.3K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@dara_venture This makes a bunch of assumptions about incentives and rational actors that are hard to defend. If it takes 10 years to determine a winner but you’re being judged after 2 years then you’re going to optimize for the 2 year mark.
English
0
0
0
14
Dara
Dara@dara_venture·
A negative correlation is almost certainly not the law. If pitch quality genuinely predicted failure, every VC would just fund the worst pitchers and print money. They don't, because it doesn't. Its contrarian selection bias. The memorable cases are the awkward geniuses because they're surprising.
Adam Shuaib@adamshuaib

One of the worst predictors of founder success we've tracked is how well someone pitches. The correlation between pitch quality and outcome was actually negative. Zuckerberg was so awkward in early investor meetings that VCs left wondering if he could manage anyone. Larry Page refused interviews and earnings calls for years. Jan Koum sold WhatsApp to Facebook for $19B as a Ukrainian immigrant whose English investors had initially struggled to follow. What polished people are good at is the meeting itself; the 1hr ritual of telling a story to strangers. It's a real skill, but it's separate from building a company. People who spent years optimising to be persuasive in a room have, on average, optimised away from the building skills that compound over the seven years of execution that follow. The pitch room is the one environment where smooth talkers have the structural advantage, but people mistake that single environment for general capability. Pay more attention to things like how they behave in the five minutes after the pitch when they think it's over. Or how they treat the most junior person in the room. None of those show up on a slide. The articulate founder will impress your partners. The awkward one will return your fund.

English
2
0
19
3.1K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@jparkjmc Google would just win if they were led by the reincarnation of Steve Jobs
English
0
0
6
941
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@arian_ghashghai @GergelyOrosz Overhiring -> more corporate politics Layoffs -> more corporate politics From what I hear the layoffs have just created a more performative culture.
English
0
0
0
281
arian ghashghai
arian ghashghai@arian_ghashghai·
they've been overstaffed since they crossed 40k employees (from my experience there), and it makes the employee experience awful as its impossible to get anything done. Even pre-AI Company does need to be shaved down, I just wish they were transparent that they messed up by overhiring during covid
English
9
1
139
9.3K
Gergely Orosz
Gergely Orosz@GergelyOrosz·
Meta laying off 10% of staff when revenue is at an all-time high, revenue growth is a beast (33% YoY!!), profits at an all-time high: just depressing These layoffs are not because Meta needs to lay off, but because Zuck wanted to lay off for whatever reason
English
232
294
4.8K
410.6K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@cogan @paulg Why do athletes do weightlifting? Why don’t they simply play more if they want to get stronger?
English
0
0
0
13
James Cogan
James Cogan@cogan·
@paulg I get the cheating concern. But what reference base says banning the dominant tool of the next economy prepares students for that economy? School should be building AI fluency, judgment, restraint, and proof of real understanding. Not pretending the tool won’t be there.
English
3
0
4
296
Paul Graham
Paul Graham@paulg·
The right way to use AI in schools is to have sharply different policies about how much you allow it. Using AI should be encouraged in some situations and absolutely banned in others.
English
144
56
1.2K
104.2K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@staysaasy Consumer is expensive and nobody wants to invest in it Source: got 400k signups but couldn’t even get a YC interview
English
0
0
0
145
staysaasy
staysaasy@staysaasy·
Like don’t yall find it weird that the AI era hasn’t just not produced AI mega consumer apps, it’s not even produced a consumer product as memorable as flappy bird or Wordle.
staysaasy@staysaasy

@SethCronin If it makes people build way faster then the product doesn’t even have to be AI based, it should just benefit from being built faster. Weird we haven’t seen that.

English
75
17
416
70.5K
Reed Harmeyer
Reed Harmeyer@ReedHarmeyer·
@jglypt Investors are allergic to details like that. It’s all vibes about numbers so Google picks the numbers that are going up the most and puts those forward
English
0
0
1
8
jack
jack@jglypt·
@ReedHarmeyer yeah i bet but it shouldn't take that much thinking to realise that it's not a great measure
English
1
0
0
21
jack
jack@jglypt·
one thing i found interesting is how sundar was measuring gemini growth in terms of token usage since 2024, considering that reasoning models use SIGNIFICANTLY more.. feels a weird way to measure it?
English
1
0
1
55
Internet Development Studio Company ("INTDEV")
At INTDEV you'll find people to push you to work better. We keep the space open to founders, creatives, and builders from all different worlds. Somehow it always attracts the right kind of people.
English
2
5
24
5.7K