The Regal Watcher

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 Are you on loop? Or do you just choose to not understand the fundamental difference? The royals cannot be spokespeople or brand endorsers for a product. The Botox company was using Kate as such. There have been far worse rumors she has not squashed because of that difference.

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 Yes my nonsense because I’m the one who thinks a Botox ad was worth calling out but not a lie that put my SIL’s life in more danger. 🙄 The real thing is that there was zero need for that “she made Kate cry” story to even be out there. But according to you brand outweighs safety.

What exactly is Kate doing? How is she making progress when I doubt Harry or Meghan are speaking to her. Odds are that Kate doesn't have Meghan or Harry's phone numbers. And how can Meghan attack and institution when she hasn't mentioned that family since their docuseries that was released in December 2022? Stop trying to make that racist bitch something she's not. Trying to make Kate a peacemaker when she's the one who made Meghan cry days before her wedding and lying to the press about Meghan making her cry.

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 Not mad at all. Just calling out your nonsense.

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 That’s not what I said at all. And now you’re mad because I called out your deflection because that’s what you did.

@Lorna_TVeditor Laughable attempt….because I’m right. It always appears to be “rules for thee but not for me” with you lot.

@RegalWatcher OK. And? The point of this discussion is the media business model of Meghanomics and the character assassination of one woman driven by anonymous sources. Much as you'd love to insert the Waleses into this, it's a laughable attempt.

"Anonymous sourcing becomes not only convenient but essential...speculation is presented as reporting, then cited by other outlets until it acquires the appearance of fact." A very good read about dying newsrooms and the chase for clickbait exemplified by Meghanomics.

@Lorna_TVeditor Reread my reply dear. I said the rumor started as a falling out which was reported in the Sun.

@RegalWatcher The Sun never used the word "affair" in that article and neither did any other mainstream British news outlet. Colbert is a comedian and comedians tell jokes, some in bad taste. And unless you're Bower looking for stuff to put in a book, what social media says doesn't count.

See this? Inside the mind of a squaddie = Any threats or kidnapping plots toward the Royal family do not count UNLESS it started as a rumor that another family member didn’t dispel. This is why only threats toward Meghan are an issue. Well..now this clears years of confusion! 🙄

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 Ohhh i understand the rules now. Death threats and kidnapping plots are only counted if it’s the result of a rumor that a family member didn’t dispel. Well, this makes complete sense! 👌🏼

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 By all means, continue to deflect. Unless a family member put out a story that specifically led to that kidnapping plot then while concerning isn’t relevant to the thread. OF COURSE tensions were high @ a wedding. That doesn’t excuse Kate for letting a dangerous lie stand.

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 So you’re saying that death threats against the Royal family are excused just so we’re clear. Do you know the hate and polarization that increased after the Oprah interview? Don’t come at me with “deflection” that’s what you’re doing. Also…maybe Kate also cried 🤷🏼‍♀️

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 Black people get killed behind white woman tears and the Duchess of Sussex’s death threats increased behind that story. But by all means defend the choice to correct a bs story because “rules” but allow a story that makes the world a more dangerous place for a family member.

@Lorna_TVeditor My facts aren’t wrong. The rumor began as a story of a falling out between Rose & Catherine by The Sun. Then social media had people speculating why, hence leading to affair rumors. Then Meg’s friend & Stephen Colbert started joking about it. No substantial source made the claim.

@RegalWatcher To be fair, I don't care who they sleep with. My issue remains press coverage. And thank you for getting your facts wrong - always happy to correct derangers.

@Lorna_TVeditor Correct, years of it compiled was

@RegalWatcher The original speculation in 2019 was not squashed by The Marchioness of Cholmondeley. thedailybeast.com/prince-william…

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 Not to mention the 2017 kidnapping plot targeting Prince George, but Kate not correcting the narrative about crying is the problem. Also, Meghan’s tailor spoke out about that, said tensions were high on BOTH sides. Doesn’t sound like Meghan was completely innocent in that.

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 By all means, defend that BS when her actual lie that she didn’t correct actually put her SIL’s life in danger. But, I guess I shouldn’t expect you to care about that, right?

@DebiEvansMatron Ok…..👍🏻

I don’t believe him

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 It’s not about looking bad. The Royals are not brand endorsers as that is for profit and they are nonprofit. That is why the correction had to be made. Goodness you really are a thick one.

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 So they’ll correct a story that makes them “look bad” over some made up rules but she couldn’t be bothered to correct lie that ensures her SIL got death threats “because it’s not the same.” 🙄 Why should I understand why that’s “different”? Black folks get killed over white tears

@aclawless @RNB881 @LJamroziak @AprilABrown1 Name one thing you’ve said that was factual, and not just something you parroted from me.

@RegalWatcher @RNB881 @LJamroziak @AprilABrown1 Projecting much... If nothing else you're funny today. Bye!!!

@Lorna_TVeditor Also thank you for posting this article, it discusses all the ways that the affair rumors were speculation. A Sussex Squaddie on the right side of things! Bravo!👏

@RegalWatcher No British mainstream newspaper or magazine used anonymous sources to make any such claim about William using the word "affair". Get your facts right. yahoo.com/lifestyle/rose…

@RNB881 @aclawless @LJamroziak @AprilABrown1 lol you’ve never met them. You’re all sniveling about how terrible the royal family is, also people none of you have met.

@RegalWatcher @aclawless @LJamroziak @AprilABrown1 It is clear you have made this whole caricature of Meghan, someone you have never met, as you keep circling back to her even though we are speaking about what Harry said and what Harry confirmed in the conversations.

@djoyousone @AprilABrown1 They corrected the Botox story because the company was using her as a sort of brand endorsement which is a huge no no for the royal family. It is not the same thing, they do not typically comment on headlines. I don’t expect you to understand these things though really…

@RegalWatcher @AprilABrown1 The person who said it was her was Piers Morgan. People blame her for that story because she didn’t correct it (like they did with the Botox story) AND she “benefited” from it. Not cool.

@SussexHenryVIII You must be pretty talented to predict all of the future public facing engagements of someone who’s not even King yet. Nostradamus over here!

I just want to point out that every single change Prince William wants to implement involves him being seen in public less often. Every single one.

@sussex_watch They didn’t, the paid to settle out of court the civil suit that was brought against. It doesn’t give him immunity for future crimes found pertaining to Epstein. You can keep repeating this over and over, but so can I 😉

1. British monarchy paid millions to help Prince Andrew avoid a deposition. 2. British monarchy wants 24/7 deference and zero accountability. 3. British media wants same. 4. People living in America are being used to protect this scam. @RegalWatcher