Sabitlenmiş Tweet
It's been three weeks since I last did a "weekly" recap.
Let's see what I've been paying attention to lately:
---
Overly complicated, compartmentalised and centralised bureaucratic structures survive by removing the means for its constituent members to survive independently.
The EU does this, for example, by removing the means for autonomous energy production and decentralised / more local distribution.
By creating dependence on the EU, this gives unelected bureaucrats the power to prioritise foreign policy interventionism to mobilise against Russia, for example, more so than improving the quality of life of the average European citizen first and foremost.
They invent unfalsifiable excuses like "Putin wants to invade ALL of Europe", which many people have erringly come to believe, as a premise for the EU to further centralise their control.
The reason why I emphasise energy production is because it's the greatest indicator of progress in a country's development, and by controlling that: you determine the rate of growth and progress a country experiences.
Additionally, keeping a population divided with "what perspective is right one to have" in regards to the EU, Putin, or illegal immigrants; it all ends up becoming a big distraction from the measurable effects and statistics that show a lowering in the quality of life and affordability of the average European citizens.
This is why the EU is vying so hard to censor any narratives that point out these facts, and why so many people are being arrested in the UK (over 12.000) for making posts on social media.
Censorship is incorrectly seen as the number 1 way of preventing a rebellion against the system, because a population needs to be informed of the inconvenient truth before it decides to mobilise against an oppressive or tyrannical system, however the elites underestimate the population's ability to recognise this.
Information comes first and foremost, before actions are decided, and therefor the halting of the spread of information is used to supress the possibility of actions being taken to remove the amount of money and power that the unelected government structures currently have, and are further trying to obtain.
By pitching one group of citizens (who prioritise one set of facts) against another group of citizens (who prioritise a different set of facts), they're distracting us away from the real moves being made that further centralises their obtainment of power, money and control.
Massive leverage begins where freedom of speech ends.
And in the world of AI, it's only going to become more confusing and difficult to differentiate real from unreal information, let alone important from unimportant information.
Where's the focus?
Is it on crime statistics & who's committing the crimes?
Is it on purchasing power & why it's reduced over time?
Or is it on "hate speech" & racism?
Or is it on the potential threat of Russia & why 18 year old German boys needs to forcibly be conscripted to fight in a war that their country is far away from and are not supposed to be directly involved in?
The EU is using fear mongering to pass emergency legislature to force inscription against the young men's will.
Give the people the chance to anonymously express their opinion, without the fear of being called racist, or labelled any other pejoratives, and you'll see an accurate reflection of the average sentiment.
People are scared of expressing themselves, lest they be arrested.
There are shadow forces at play (intelligence agencies and NGO networks) who benefit from a degree of populational destabilisation.
If you "get mad" at the facts I'm pointing out, then it's working...
The system itself is currently setup in a way to distract us from systemic corruption by forcing fed-slop / chicken-feed down our throats and having us endlessly engage in emotionally divisive arguments that make us mad at each other, average citizens, instead of those who abuse the system.
By artificially boosting divisive narratives, civil war seems increasingly likely, and my main fear is that the corrupt elites will take advantage of this to use emergency power grabs to further consolidate their authoritative leverage over the masses.
As long as laws are written and passed without the public's awareness of what's going on (which even people who study law and economics don't fully understand), with mass transparency and a simplification of the processes, corrupt elites will keep getting away with it.
My suggestion is, as a population, with the assistance of AI, we should raise our awareness by doing two things: reduce the number of unnecessary laws and codes to simplify how taxes work; remove loopholes that corrupt elites use to get away with funnelling the public's funds into their pockets.
One way that elite agents hold onto power is by illegally importing criminals and deploying them as assets to foment colour revolutions, so that power continues to shift through the instalment of puppet leaders who are favourable to these agencies' desires.
200 "assets" can be deployed to create a rebellion with 20.000 to overthrow a government (for example: Serbian colour revolutions, Ukraine in 2014, and many other cases in the middle-east).
Rebellion soon. I'm hoping the people vs the government, but fear a civil war amongst civilians left vs right. Either way technocratic oligarchs will try to capitalise post-battle regardless.
Ultimately their intention is for the flow of money to further continue away from the majority of the population and into the hands of those currently running the centralised system (notice the gerontocracy).
Money and control, for the leaders and those pulling the strings behind the scenes, are the main motivators across the board.
There are guideline documents showing that these tactics have been used, and are still being considered by intel agencies and NGO networks.
On the other hand, maybe a couple of days or weeks of mass non-compliance might change the things for the better. Let's see what happens in Bulgaria.
---
I am concerned for the safety of Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson, Dave Smith and Ian Carroll, amongst others, because they're some of the most able voices with large audiences who are constantly helping people to see the patterns of corruption of the Israeli elites.
They win most of the debates that they're invited to because they consistently relay the facts of what corruption is going one, and reiterate the importance of focussing on improving the lives of local citizens first before considering foreign policy interventionism.
I want to make it abundantly clear that there's a distinction between the general Jewish population around the world and the high ranking members of the political, military, corporate and intelligence world.
I do not put these in the same group nor do I want to generalise. My critiques are specifically to the highly organised, conniving members who sit in elite positions of power and influence, and who get away with siphoning funds away from the average person for their own selfish purposes.
Regardless of which country they're from, I criticise elites who perpetuate a corrupt system (which typically happens behind a wall of bureaucratic processes).
---
Dehumanising, whether it's because of someone's opinion, or dehumanising the children and women of a country being bombed because they're in a war, is antithetical to the prioritisation of human life, and therefor a genocidal and murderous mentality.
---
I have so many unanswered questions regarding Charlie Kirk's death:
Where are the ballistic gel tests that replicate and prove the "official FBI narrative" that a .30-06 is what killed him? Wouldn't these tests disprove the conspiracy theories? So far all we've gotten is evidence to the contrary.
How was the gun so quickly (transported and discreetly) assembled, disassembled and used? And how did the local police department's dogs not find it before the FBI turned up, and the FBI just happened to find it, only when the FBI appeared? FBI-slop cover-up much?
Are we just going to completely discount the possibility that Tyler Robinson was a patsy?
Why don't we have the footage of the camera's SD cards that were taken within seconds of Charlie being assassinated? Wouldn't showing this footage help to disprove the conspiracy theories?
Why was the ground dug up right after his assassination, instead of allowing independent teams to investigate? Wouldn't it have helped to allow these teams to publish what they find to help disprove the conspiracy theories?
Why was the Egyptian plane following TPUSA? The likelihood of this plane taking this random course over random days and just coincidentally lining up with TPUSA events is less than a 0.0001% chance. And that's only based on what was PROVEN to be true in Candace's original spreadsheet document. So why was it following?
Why is the damage control post-assassination so heavily focussed on the dangers of anti-semitism instead of helping to disprove the conspiracy theories? Why don't they ever directly address the main concerns?
Why don't we have the autopsy? Wouldn't it disprove the conspiracy theories?
Where's the audit of TPUSA? Wouldn't it disprove the conspiracy theories?
Are we just going to ignore the fact that Charlie himself was concerned for his life and pointing out that his Israeli donors fell into the stereotypes? It would seem that Charlie was starting to feed the "conspiracy theories" before he even died.
And, most importantly, isn't the timing suspicious?
I believe that the corrupt Israeli elites who were involved with TPUSA decided to "cash out" on Charlie whilst he was more of an asset than a liability. Because he could have been one of the biggest (and most serious) liabilities if he got pushed too far, and it became increasingly evident that he was, as he became more outspoken.
---
I want to reiterate that if people were more informed about purchasing power and why it's reduced over time, we'd be having a much more focussed and productive conversation about how to actually improve our lives and hold those in power more accountable.
We'd also be able to map out the manner in which different factors have contributed towards this reduction, which would map out a substantial amount (maybe even most) of the corruption that's been going on amongst the elites.
The reason ‘nobody is held accountable’ is because the bad guys bribe those who could theoretically hold them accountable. If that doesn’t work: use threats of lawsuits and prison time.
Over 90% of the lawsuits against the federal government and the Trump administration have been brought by or financed by NGOs - with $14 trillion in assets they can certainly afford it. Why should taxpayers be subsidizing sustained lawfare?
How do you remove the corrupt judiciary and other elements that continue this corrupt system?
Public awareness seems like a good first step, but what come after?
For example: the evidence exists, and has been mapped out since 2020, with many pointing out early on, that the 2020 election was stolen.
But when will the official high-justice court case happen?
---
My level of hope continues to decrease as more time with this admin passes.
The new Epstein file drops are just "drips", and no massive revelations nor justice has occurred yet after almost 1 year.
We know more about Soros from WikiLeaks 15 years ago than we do with this current admin.
We did get a mapping out of GONGOs, but no real meat nor USAID file revelations.
Epstein was a foreign & domestic intelligence blackmail operation in which governments, corporations, agencies, businesses, and many other global operations are controlled by.
Ghislaine oversaw the trafficking and prostitution side, Epstein brought in the rich and powerful to become compromised.
He negotiated contracts for Southern Air Transport - the CIA's Iran-Contra gun-running airline - and relocated its ops from Miami to a Columbus Ohio military base to service his companies.
This links straight to his Bear Stearns-era clearing trades for BCCI (CIA's money-laundering hub for Brits, Saudis, Israelis) and handling Adnan Khashoggi's arms-dealing cash.
No coincidence, Epstein was an intelligence asset, shielded by the deep state
---
And for all the questions I have and information I point out, isn't it just easier to call me names than to contend with these issues?
---
That's the recap. So much covered.
Recapping has helped so much in solidifying my understanding of what I've been paying attention to.
Thanks for reading.
English
