Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Your parents arranged your marriage and it's tomorrow, the last anime character you saved in your camera roll is your partner.
No...
Nononononononono IT'S NOT WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE, SHE'S NORMALLY 6 FEET TALL I SWEAR.
English
Rents Rants
21K posts
Rents Rants
@RentsPaid
Whether it's good or bad, it's so unfortunate to wake up during a dream. -Judeau Berserk Twitter for Youtube's disappointment 'Rents'.
Chicago, IL Katılım Mart 2018
461 Takip Edilen268 Takipçiler
@cornbreadbro @prettyfuldoll @tspurg911 @juuchan4 @Dexerto He can literally just take the Switch away, sell it, or give it away. Why destroy something in front of your child? That's how you get a kid that just hides their stuff from you & doesn't show you anything they care about.
English
But this wasn't about destruction, this was about respect and consequences for your actions. A child who continues to disrespect their parents deserves consequences. If you feel what happened was too harsh or extreme, I feel the same for the disrespect of a parent, especially at a certain age where the child should know better. Disrespecting to someone who has raised you deserves consequences
English
@Sasukebix I just didn't like that the anime made Sakura 10x meaner to Naruto to the point Sasuke had to set her straight when the manga didn't have her so oblivious & socially inept.
English
Naruto is a good example of how a lot of guys react when they don't get "rewarded" by women for doing average human things.
Ppl hate her for e.g because she didn't romance Naruto for being a good friend. Ignoring she was also a good friend and one of his biggest supporters.
English
@ChristinaTasty The discussion is about future consoles & games, the PS2, Dreamcast, etc have been archived.
PS4, PS5, Switch, Switch 2, etc can be updated to not play specific games even on disc & the average person isn't jailbreaking their console for a game they paid for.
English
"They can choose not to run the program"
...on my fat PlayStation 2? On my Dreamcast? What, are they gonna come into my house and take the consoles away?
Prism@fwprism
Asmongold goes OFF, saying "It's mind boggling that people still don't understand this. No matter whether it's physical or digital, you never truly own it” after people complained about "having" less ownership following Sony's PlayStation decision to move away from physical media copies 👀😬 “This is what makes me so mad about this just because you buy a digital version doesn't mean that you should be giving up any of your consumer rights. And this concept and this dichotomy between physical and digital editions they are just almost assumed that you have less ownership of them is bullsh*t. It is a false dichotomy that has been created by companies in order to give you the illusion that you have control. Whenever you buy a disc of something, but the disc is running on software, they can choose not to run the program”
English
@FEMCProtagonist @KoB_BladeZ @LeftThe52833 Majority of older games do, but Xbox, no. Nintendo Game Key Cards? No. This isn't just a Sony issue, & even with owning a physical disc the console can be updated to prevent certain games from running any time legally.
There's multiple compounding issues Asmon is referring to.
English
@KoB_BladeZ @LeftThe52833 Except he's objectively WRONG. Majority of physical copies has the whole game on the disc. And you can play it without ever needing to use the internet. You are more likely to own a physical game that's not dependent on the internet.
Source: doesitplay.org
English
Asmon stepping on the same rake that PirateSoftware did, but his audience is too stupid to tell him he's wrong
Prism@fwprism
Asmongold goes OFF, saying "It's mind boggling that people still don't understand this. No matter whether it's physical or digital, you never truly own it” after people complained about "having" less ownership following Sony's PlayStation decision to move away from physical media copies 👀😬 “This is what makes me so mad about this just because you buy a digital version doesn't mean that you should be giving up any of your consumer rights. And this concept and this dichotomy between physical and digital editions they are just almost assumed that you have less ownership of them is bullsh*t. It is a false dichotomy that has been created by companies in order to give you the illusion that you have control. Whenever you buy a disc of something, but the disc is running on software, they can choose not to run the program”
English
@RadAxl1 @CounterPunchDev @fwprism your argument falls apart bc they can make an infinite amount of copies with no time limit or anything preventing them. The physical option from the store has DRM, which means if your disc has a defect, breaks, or degrades you're fucked. You cannot legally backup the software.
English
The data has been put on a physical disc. Physical Discs are tangile.
This really shouldn’t that hard for you too understand, so I’ll try an analogy.
Data is like Water. Water is shapeless, unless you freeze it and it becomes Solid Ice.
The Physical Disc is Ice, a Solid that has been given a a defined shape.
Now I know you’re genuinely retarded, but that’s as simple as I can make it for you.
The rest is up to you. Smarten up, and be better.
English
Asmongold goes OFF, saying "It's mind boggling that people still don't understand this. No matter whether it's physical or digital, you never truly own it” after people complained about "having" less ownership following Sony's PlayStation decision to move away from physical media copies 👀😬
“This is what makes me so mad about this just because you buy a digital version doesn't mean that you should be giving up any of your consumer rights. And this concept and this dichotomy between physical and digital editions they are just almost assumed that you have less ownership of them is bullsh*t. It is a false dichotomy that has been created by companies in order to give you the illusion that you have control. Whenever you buy a disc of something, but the disc is running on software, they can choose not to run the program”
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News It quite literally doesn't in multiple options given, even in the most aggressive interpretation of it in the law, there's no impact on them.
You clearly have no idea what SKG is even requesting at all if you think that, you can't even cite any aspect that would.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News But it literally does, you're just too dumb to see it.
English
The US bill which requires paid games to be playable after they shut down has failed to pass a State Senate vote 🎮
Stop Killing Games says it will try again with 'the funding to do this properly'
(via @VGC_News)
English
@mikethree @IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @CultureCrave @VGC_News I mean, marxist ideology & no understanding of economics go hand in hand.
None of what I'm talking about requires any communist bs or destroying a company's ownership of its IP.
English
yea nobody is buying the triple A games or playing the live services when they do, asmon just did a whole segment on the nonexistent industry
a lot of it is troons obsessed with anatomy who become game studio artists and feminist writers/producers who get preferential hiring treatment from feminist HR departments that have completely destroyed every major title with their faggot marxist ideology and dont understand the economics whatsoever
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News A lot of Digital media & software is already designed in ways that comply with what SKG is asking for, SKG already assumed no laws would be passed as well & asked for more clarity on consumers' rights.
It wouldn't upend anything, there isn't any need to do so.
English
@mikethree @RentsPaid @CultureCrave @VGC_News They all have the same arguments, and coincidentally all of them seem to work in software, but don't understand how this stop killing games movement will completely upend their ability to make a living in software, and none of them understand that video games are software.
English
@mikethree @IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @CultureCrave @VGC_News I ain't no queer.
And my worldview for digital media is feasible because it's literally based on existing digital titles that are still created & sold today. You have to make up random shit I don't believe or care about to win an argument that isn't being made.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @RentsPaid @CultureCrave @VGC_News their entire worldview is a larp, theyre all queer idiots
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News I think licensing media is fine, & has worked very well for decades. I'm not arguing for digital licenses for media to stop, because it's unreasonable & unnecessary.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News The real argument is you don't think you should have license media. You think you should be able to own it which is never going to happen. It's a Fantasyland argument that you have here.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News I'm not asking to ignore anything, you're just avoiding any real argument.
I'm not asking for old titles or EULAs to be altered, or for all games to never revoke access ever. The goal is to be more consumer friendly & clear, even if the outcome isn't the best case for gamers.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News So you understand how and why but you're still asking to ignore it. Well we have nothing to discuss then, Because you clearly think you own games.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News I'm not missing anything, I'm well aware that when you purchase a game, you're actually buying a revokable license with limited specific use & do not own any IP or copyright for that game.
That isn't relevant to allowing buyers to legally play games offline after support ends.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News Except for you're missing the whole point where you do not own it, you've only been given permission to use it.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News Your arguments are nonsense, all you've done is argue things I didn't say or believe because you're overly emotional about this.
An EOL patch for offline play already happens for many games & multiple publishers have stated future titles will have them as well.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News Lol, okay I'm sure it's your field, that's why you hold opinions that your field know are nonsense.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News I understand the Software side perfectly fine, it's my field. I've researched plenty into IP & Copyright, from ppl opposing SKG, you're not making any arguments anyone educated in matter would, bc your arguments are irrelevant to whats even being proposed.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News You clearly don't understand software or any other IP or copyright laws.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News I didn't say some games don't have a EULA at all, I said not every game has a pop up of the EULA to read.
Many games will have a prompt with a QR code or optional link to read & allow you to accept.
You don't have to twist my words & lie lmao.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News Yes, by law every game has to have an eula and saying they don't is a flat out lie.
Eula literally stands for end user license agreement.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News You're the only one getting emotional & rambling, I clearly made a point that EULAs shown after purchased are not prominent enough, that the fact the purchase is a revokable license needs to be more prominent prior to purchase.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News You have to be one of the dumbest people I've ever seen. You are literally arguing something that you know nothing about and thinking you have points. You don't have a point. You have nothing but a bunch of emotional ramblings of a retard.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News The entire issue is revoking a license "for any reason" being unreasonable, no one needs Devs/publishers to support games forever.
It's currently illegal to make a no longer sold/supported & shut down game playable for those that have legally purchased it, which is unacceptable
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News All media physical or digital is just a license not ownership.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News You're proving my point actually, 1. not every game even pops up with a EULA
2. a EULA is not prominently disclosure of a license.
Prominent would be every purchase stating plainly it's a license before & during the transaction NOT AFTER when you've launched the game.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News This is precisely my point when I say you don't understand what you are paying for. Every game has a EULA that pops up whenever you start a game and it clearly states that you are buying a license. That can be revoked at any point and for any reason.
English
@IYDKMIGTHTKY86 @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News The misunderstanding is entirely the fault of devs/publishers. In the past you bought the game & if you had the hardware to play, you played it. If they want to change the industry to sell or revoke access on a whim, they have to advertise that with every game prominently.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News It doesn't matter if it's one patch or not. You can't force someone to do anything with their property.
The biggest misunderstanding that gamers seem to have is that they're buying ownership of the game. You're paying for permission to use the game.
English
@leoza_rl @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News If it's an MMO or Free to Play online game it's exempt.
If for Example Seige had 0 offline, the dev could make online p2p where the player has to host. Realistically tho the easier solution is to just make a short offline mode vs bots, which most online only games already have.
English
@RentsPaid @mikethree @CultureCrave @VGC_News Ok I understand and support this obviously but what happens if it’s an exclusively online game with no offline parts?
English