Revive Britain

This account is concerned with reversing the decline of the values which made the West great. This is not a 'going back' to some imagined golden era, our past had its dark side. We want a Revival: re-applying our values to the modern world and offering a positive vision out of decline.

Why Men Stay Silent — And Why That Must Change youtu.be/Wmu7HF89epE?si… via @YouTube @menandboysnet

We need to stop simply complaining about this and plan some action. We should draft a law (amendment) which specifically outlaws things like this, worded in religion-neutral language and re-asserting the supremicy of Christianity in UK. Then get political parties to adopt it and individual parliamentarians to try to get it adopted.

This Is Not Diversity. This Is Dominance. Hundreds of Muslims gathered in Trafalgar Square on Monday evening to pray and break their Ramadan fast. The Adhan, the call to prayer, rang out across a national memorial built to commemorate Britain's naval victory at the Battle of Trafalgar, a battle fought to preserve this nation's independence and sovereignty, in the shadow of St Martin-in-the-Fields, one of London's most historic Christian churches. The declaration that there is no god but Allah and Muhammad is his messenger echoed across one of the most symbolically loaded public spaces in the country. The Mayor of London Sadiq Khan attended. The Prime Minister Keir Starmer applauded. Nick Timothy said what millions thought but were too polite to say. Mass ritual prayer in public places is an act of domination. The Adhan, when called in a shared civic space, is by definition a declaration of exclusive religious truth in territory that belongs to everyone. That is not Islamophobia. It is theology. Trafalgar Square was not chosen by accident. It is chosen because it is the most symbolically resonant public space in Britain, and because the statement being made is precisely about whose space it is and whose it is becoming. Starmer's response told us everything we need to know about the quality of his argument. He did not engage with Timothy's point. He reached immediately for Tommy Robinson, invoking a convicted criminal as a moral authority to condemn a former senior adviser to a Prime Minister. He compared the Trafalgar Square prayer to Diwali, Chanukah and Easter processions, knowing the equivalence is false. Diwali, Chanukah and the Passion are celebrations. They do not involve a declaration that there is no god but the god of the celebrants. The Adhan does. And Starmer knows it. But Trafalgar Square is only the beginning of the picture. British cathedrals have been hosting iftar. Manchester Cathedral opened its doors for Ramadan prayers. It is technically against canon law to invite members of another religion to pray in front of a cathedral altar. The canon law was not enforced. Nobody was held accountable. Next Ramadan it will happen again, in other cathedrals, with renewed rounds of polite applause from the same bishops whose predecessors built the institutions now being used for the purpose. In our schools, children are taken to mosques as part of RE programmes while nativity plays are cancelled for fear of causing offence. In our public spaces, the Adhan rings out while churches fall silent and close for lack of congregants. In our institutions, canon law is set aside to accommodate a faith tradition that has no reciprocal arrangement. Mosques in Britain are not opened for Christian worship during Easter or Christmas. The gesture runs in one direction only. It always does. This is the slow Islamisation of Britain. Not by conquest. Not by conspiracy. But by incremental accommodation, each step individually defensible, cumulatively transformative. The school that cancels the nativity. The cathedral that hosts iftar. The Prime Minister who demands the sacking of anyone who names what is happening. The institutions that should defend the nation's Christian heritage are the first to abandon it. And the political class that should protect the public space treats those who object as the problem. Timothy was right. The domination of public places is straight from the Islamist playbook. He was not suggesting every Muslim at Trafalgar Square is an Islamist. He was identifying the strategy. Shared civic spaces, national symbols, ancient institutions, they are not being seized. They are being offered, one accommodation at a time, by people who have either not read the Lebanon chapter or have decided not to care how it ends. Starmer did not call for Timothy to be sacked because he was wrong. He called for it because he was right. And that is the most telling detail of all.

9-year-old lad walking home from football sees something not right. Three blokes trying to drag a girl into a van. Most people would freeze… he didn’t. Started shouting, ran straight at them, caused a scene. They panicked and ran off. She got away. Nine years old. Fair play to the kid that’s proper courage.

@JamesLNuzzo Matriarchal oppression?

Percent of university employees in Australia who are women. All employees are included in these numbers - i.e., faculty, administrative staff, maintenance workers, etc.

Parliament loves to display its fleeting moral outrage and heart-on-sleeve compassion. Every week MPs chest beat, emote, ostentatiously parade their concern. And then that same Parliament votes through the decriminalisation of abortion up to birth and suddenly the chest beaters and emoters and carers have nothing to say about the body of the unborn child or what could happen to vulnerable women once this plan hits real life. Last night the Lords voted through this plan - something MPs originally agreed to after a cursory couple of hours of debate. I stand by every word of my speech against this last year, when I was glared and shouted at by the amendment's cheerleaders. The tyranny of niceness is taking us to extreme places. It should make us weep.

Everyone knows Thomas Edison invented the lightbulb. 💡 Everyone is wrong. His name was Joseph Swan. Born in Pallion, Sunderland. Son of a failed entrepreneur. No university. No laboratory. No backing. Just a chemist's apprentice in his home town who couldn't stop thinking about light. He worked on it for twenty years. Along the way he invented bromide photographic paper. Artificial fibre, the process that led to rayon. Over seventy patents. And still nobody had made a lightbulb that worked. Then on the 18th of December 1878, in a lecture hall in Newcastle, he switched it on. It burned bright. Then it broke. But the idea was proven. ⚡ Six weeks later, 3rd February 1879, he demonstrated it again. This time it worked. Seven hundred people watched the room light up. Eight months before Thomas Edison. Edison heard about it. Filed a patent. Then sued Swan in America. The US Patent Office found against Edison. ✅ Edison sued Swan in Britain. The British courts found against Edison again. ✅✅ As part of the settlement, Edison was forced into a partnership with Swan. The company was called Ediswan. Swan's patents. Swan's filament design. Edison's name first. Eventually Edison bought him out. Swan was knighted in 1904. The Savoy Theatre, the first building in the world lit entirely by electricity, used his bulbs. Edison got the credit. Swan got a knighthood nobody remembers. And history forgot Sunderland. 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 Did they teach you his name? Together we keep our history alive. proudofus.co.uk/support Be part of us. 🙏 Be Proud Of Us. 🇬🇧

There are two versions of Andrew Tate: > The actual person and the things he actually says to young men. > A fictional, darker version portrayed as the cause of harmful things individual men and boys do. Surveys show most boys do not admire him. If people stopped highlighting the fictional version, the influence of the real version would diminish.

@Revive_Britain @KathyConWom Really? I think that even without the manosphere, Andy Tatohead would still find a way of telling young men that women are lesser than men & that it's ok to abuse them.

So where are the documentaries on the ‘Womanosphere’? Where are the school classes on misandry? Where’s the balance? #Manosphere conservativewoman.co.uk/how-about-a-tv…

The official definition of Islamophobia — now repackaged as “anti-Muslim hostility” — will be used to suppress legitimate criticism of Islam and its practices. We are already seeing this play out. Less than a week after the Communities Secretary, Steve Reed, published the definition — assuring the public it would not stifle legitimate criticism of Islam — Nick Timothy is facing calls to resign after criticising mass ritual prayer by Muslims in Trafalgar Square. He has been accused of “anti-Muslim hostility” by a Labour MP and reported to the Parliamentary Commissioner for Standards. This is a Muslim blasphemy law by the back door. Today, the Free Speech Union has sent a pre-action letter to Steve Reed, threatening judicial review if the definition and guidance are not withdrawn immediately. This is one of the biggest fights we’ve taken on in our six-year history. Help us stop the Government’s de facto Muslim blasphemy law 👇

These are the scandals which are undermining Britain. There is focus on the welfare scroungers, but what about those who made their money from this and similar schmes such as the planning application process for the Thames crossing. We need to understand this better and see where else it is happening. There seems to be a professional sub-culture which makes a living stopping things happening or spinning them out. Family Court lawyers is another group.

After £179,000,000 was spent on the Stonehenge Tunnel Plan, it has been scrapped. £179 million Spent on nothing. Is this acceptable?

@StennerMax !!!??? So you judge 'seriousness' by the number of pages? Some would argue the opposite: that 133 pages gets a 'TLDR' response, while a concise document is more effective.

A little thing I’ve noticed… Reform UK’s deportation paper is six pages long, a one of those is a title page. Restore Britain’s deportation paper is 133 pages long. Which party is serious about governing this country?

While some countries are making positive moves towards shared parenting after family breakdown, the UK is heading in the opposite direction. This change in the law risks serious harm to children and fathers, counsellor @ZacFine tells the UK government centreformalepsychology.com/male-psycholog…

@doctor_rahmeh Very odd: They vote FOR killing a baby against its will. They vote AGAINST assisted dying where consent has been given.

The UK House of Lords has just legalised abortion up to birth. Women can now end the life of their unborn baby at any stage, for any reason, without legal consequences. A truly dark day for Britain.

@Keithhambone Most people, in most places, for most of history were farmers. Look in any family-farming community anywhere in the world and see if the men are stopping the women working. Everybody works. Different jobs.

Proof feminists are clueless!

Got anything positive to say? Is this how you are reviving Britain with this misery? My posts are all upbeat and seeking truth, if you bothered to read them. It shows how this poisonous climate fog seeps into every corner of life, finding the weak and the vulnerable and infecting them with toxic ideology, all based on doom and misery. You're in good company.

We’re told we’re boiling; Geology says the world's shivering. Earth is still in the Quaternary Glaciation - 2.58 million years so far. Yet for most of the last 500 million years the Earth has been at least 10°C warmer than it is today. There weren't any polar ice caps though. Instead, there were lush biomes from pole to pole and life didn't just survive, it exploded. Pulp fiction's 'hottest years ever' relies on a tiny 175-year window in a geological world of 4.6 billion years. In the context of the late Cenozoic (the last 34 million years) a 1.4°C rise isn't a catastrophe - it’s a minor blip of life-giving warmth in a mostly icehouse world. Why the fear? Because human bureaucracy thrives on fear. By ignoring the 500-million-year baseline of earth's recent geological past, the UN has turned 'natural variability' into a climate sledge hammer for global control. If you only look at the last 175 years, the climate looks like a crisis. But if you look at the last 500 million, it looks like a two-week junket in the Bahamas. We should really be talking about 'Icehouse Earth'.

Domestic and family violence is often framed in simple terms. But real relationships are more complex than a “perpetrator vs victim” model. This clip explores the limits of that framework. #mensissues #familyviolence #relationships #socialissues #culturalconversation

We should listen carefully to most things Ben Habib says - except when he says 'therefore you should vote Advance'. He is wise on the analysis and policy solutions, but naive on the political strategy.

Britain needs radical change. Not riots. Not bloodshed. Not political violence. If we destroy the country to save it, we lose everything.

@TessEmerson @YouTube If the dad is driving the family car, and the mum is navigating and making sure the kids are OK, would we say that she is 'obeying' her husband? We need to clarify what we mean here and use words which anyone can understand.

„Gen Z Men Want Obedient Wives“ DEBUNKED youtu.be/Py9Kl0fv3Nk?si… via @YouTube

Young people adopt socialism easily, almost without thought because it hijacks three evolved charateristics of humans: 1 Care for the vulnerable 2 Empathy 3 Tribalism 4 Reward system Stages 1 Divide society into competing groups (tribes) and viewing the 'other' as hostile. 2 Empathise with the group viewed as 'oppressed' and treat it's members as vulnerable. 3 Gain membership to the socialist 'tribe' and get that sense of belonging to the 'good people. 4 Get a huge dopamine rush by feeling virtuous.

Socialism is a hot stove that each generation insists on touching for themselves, for some reason.