RhetHypo

7.2K posts

RhetHypo banner
RhetHypo

RhetHypo

@RhetHypo

ProGrammer, indie author, see pinned post for my latest project. I have extremely normal beliefs and am a chill part of a normal online community.

Katılım Aralık 2021
127 Takip Edilen138 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
If you have a book you want to shout out, be it yours or someone else's, please link it here. I will be going through my own follows to find books, especially indies, that I haven't read yet for a new project I have for the new year, but I don't want to miss anything. I also tend to prioritize books that the author specifically suggests to me, or one of their fans, because it gives me the sense that people are more interested in any opinions I might have on it.
English
7
2
12
849
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Being an “OC” isn’t about questionable lore creating a sort of logistical problem for a species - like cubone requiring their mother always die. Plenty of Pokémon are various levels of unrealistic. The OC aspect is about being a bit too anthropomorphized and having talents/abilities that feel more like human pursuits than something a species might evolve, like drums, soccer, etc. There is a rule of cool in place where a striking character design can override questions of its actual existence in Pokémon as a species.
English
3
0
5
2.8K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
@sarahsalviander Christianity is fundamentally undermined as morally valid if people don’t inherently develop an awareness of God. It would fully grant atheists a point that God arbitrarily judges people with standards they couldn’t possibly be expected to know, much less achieve.
English
0
0
0
3
Sarah Salviander
Sarah Salviander@sarahsalviander·
I don't know that everyone knows God exists. I have interacted with people who desperately want to believe in God, but just aren't compelled by the evidence. Every single one of these people has had traumatic relationships with their parents. I think pain, rather than pride, obscures the truth for some people.
English
1
0
0
12
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Just so you know, it's a lie. It's not because of how Christians or religious people act. It's not the establishment of traditional religions - and, in fact, the complete absence of such would be a massive point of contention against any sort of higher power, as their creation doesn't seem to inherently acknowledge them, as one would more expect. The reality is that every single person inherently knows there is a god, there is right and wrong, and much of what this entails. It can get a bit muddled when getting into hyper specific nuances, but the necessity of morality to judge people demands that they have a moral agency to be judged. You don't judge a rock for rolling down a hill because it never had any other choice, it is merely acted upon. And free will itself is not sufficient, because an uninformed decision is not really a decision. Everyone must have a moral compass, and the ability to ignore it. There is a decentralized effort to deny God precisely because a lack of free will means any of your failings were not your own, but a mere eventuality of What you are. All the excuses are just attempts to justify it, like saying religious people are hypocritical or religions are old fashioned - After all, why would hypocrisy be "wrong" if any religion establishing what is "wrong" is false? Why would you not expect an all powerful God to have the dedication of the oldest human institutions? By pure happenstance, the first publicly released episode of Twisted Plots by FreedomToons actually broaches this subject of morality and free will, and the specific impulse by scientists and others to actively deny it. I highly recommend it, absolute cinema. youtube.com/watch?v=wVgZ1s…
YouTube video
YouTube
Sarah Salviander@sarahsalviander

If the idea of an intelligent, transcendent creator wasn't tied to any religion, I'm certain most scientists would accept it as the most plausible explanation for why the universe exists and why it appears so designed and finely-tuned for life. Many scientists are put off the idea of a creator by traditional religion (or maybe more accurately, by religious people). Others (a small minority) hate the idea of anything existing that's more intelligent than they are. I'm not saying we should get rid of religion so that scientists will believe in God. I'm explaining that the objection to the mere idea of God – an intelligent, transcendent creator – mostly isn't based on logic or lack of evidence, it's rooted in rejection of religion. A recent conversation with an atheist biologist supports this. He was raised Catholic, and his objections to God stemmed entirely from his objection to miracles and Catholic doctrines, which he rejected as a teen. He didn't have any logical objections to God, himself, but to religious claims. To him, God was so inextricably tied to those claims that God got thrown out along with them. So, why don't scientists just acknowledge a deistic sort of God while rejecting religion? I wonder about this a lot. As near as I can tell, some of them dislike religion and religious people so much they'll jettison the truth over it. I recall the biology grad student I talked with decades ago who agreed that developments in biology supported design, but said he and his colleagues were hesitant to publicly acknowledge it, because it would support Christians. *sigh* What a mess. It's complicated, y'all. If you're Christian, keep this in mind when you have conversations with science-minded atheists. And here's something most of us don't want to hear: The way we conduct ourselves may be the only Gospel some people ever receive – and that includes our children. They "hear" how we behave far more than what we say.

English
2
0
2
2.5K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Perhaps I should have been more clear. I think it is the core reason, even for people who don't realize it and would never admit it, even if they did. People in general are very adept at rationalizing their mind away from uncomfortable realizations. Most atheists I've encountered do suffer from issues of pride, but it's also not a prerequisite for what I'm talking about, here.
English
1
0
1
86
Sarah Salviander
Sarah Salviander@sarahsalviander·
While some are prideful and arrogant, many are not. I suggest you talk to atheists and really listen to their stories. Many of them have been hurt or deeply disillusioned by Christians and the churches in which they were raised. Others are put off by what they see in the public sphere, especially those who are drawn to science. Ultimately, we all have to answer for our choices, but for some people, that choice has been made unnecessarily difficult.
English
5
1
37
8.3K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
It's more that you're lying to yourself. The purpose of the lie itself is less to convince some random anonymous programmer/indie author that your beliefs are genuine (because why the heck would you really care what I think enough to actively fabricate lies), and more to divorce yourself from the personal accountability an objective moral authority inherently places on you.
English
0
0
0
13
Reason
Reason@Conserberal·
@RhetHypo I'm genuinely curious, Rhet.... If I advise you of my belief in God's non-existence, your immediate response is simply to tell yourself I'm lying to you?
English
1
0
1
27
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
It's not that I don't know what it feels like to not eat breakfast, it's that I don't know what it feels like to be an entirely different person. This is because of a little thing called "experience". I've done one, I can't do the other. You don't "empathize" with third worlders from a place of understanding, but of outright ignorance. You merely project yourself onto them, rather than seriously considering them as real people.
RhetHypo tweet media
taoki@justalexoki

English
0
0
0
20
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
@AngryCops The tldr is he got triggered by people discussing some salacious rumors about him, and he escalated it to a flagging war while getting caught in all kinds of lies, and the attention causing people to dig up his entire sordid past.
English
1
1
42
4.3K
Angry Cops
Angry Cops@AngryCops·
What’s the drama with The Quartering? I don’t know what’s happening and it’s in my timeline
English
340
30
2.6K
196.5K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
@Hoodie_Milly @memeticsisyphus I think there is a difference between your grandma and a random stranger asking for such recognition, too, though.
English
0
0
5
200
Milly🎲
Milly🎲@Hoodie_Milly·
If your grandma had dementia and thought she was Betty White. Im not gonna be like "no grandma you are delusional you are not Betty White" im just gonna be like "sure Betty whatever are you hungry?". This does not mean I have bended my ideology to believe shes Betty White i just think its needlessly cruel and dont see it as a battle worth fighting
English
36
0
29
16.2K
memetic_sisyphus
memetic_sisyphus@memeticsisyphus·
I think the trans community was really harmed by people like this. I think most people in the west are happy to accommodate weirdness. Accept the asterisk that goes with being a transwoman and move on. But instead there was a large push by people like this that insisted there was no asterisk. That transitioning was actually possible. This led them to absurdities like the female penis. Simply saying yes trans women aren’t the same as women could resolve it, but the ideology stops them. It leads them to the absurd. It also torches the public’s confidence in your ability to handle anything, seeing how you bend to ideology even when it makes you look ridiculous. Why would we let you change anything in society?
Ben Mclaine@BenMclaine

English
146
363
9.3K
620.8K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
JonTron got snippy with someone for trying to dictate his word choice. Neil got snippy for JonTron getting snippy in the past with someone else, prompted by JonTron simply giving his support in the here and now. I don’t know if there is anything less respectable than a person who collects and remembers such petty grievances, ones not even committed against him personally, and then digs them up as if they are all he know about a person (they definitely aren’t).
pat 2: cruise control@ranmasaotome96

People keep bringing up the Destiny debate, but this was the point where it all went wrong for Jonny boy.

English
0
0
1
109
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Have you actually considered the meanings of these jokes? Make a joke about someone's race, and then a joke about their murdered father or husband, and tell me which they find more unacceptable.
Benny Feldman@Feldfrog

This is neat to me . This dude is inherently agreeing with my core point that jokes have meaning. Usually these guys disagree that jokes mean anything at all, so it rules to me that these guys are now being forced to adapt their arguments to focus on what's actually being said

English
0
0
0
130
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
This is a real problem on a macro scale, but there is logic to not optimizing prematurely. It’s expensive and time consuming, and there are always hypothetical ways you could squeeze out better performance. You can even scale back or diminish features to maximize performance, and in some cases that might even be necessary. Especially when dabbling, beyond the low hanging fruit, it’s just not a good use of your energy.
Proctor Zakharov@ProctorZ

I dabbled in coding once and the complete inability to get more experienced programmers to understand that I wanted my stuff as efficient as possible was a major factor in deciding not to pursue it further. It was literally impossible. Every solution they offered amounted to 'add this million line external function library to your codebase and just use the 0.001% that is relevant to your needs'. Drove me mad. I don't care if the game I'm coding for can run on a smart watch nowadays, I WANT IT TO RUN EFFICIENTLY.

English
0
0
0
172
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Endings are always the hardest part, because while you can write an entry in a series filled with plot hooks you intend to follow up on later, the final book needs to wrap all, or at least most, of those up. You can't procrastinate any of your ideas for a series beyond the last book of a series. I would advise not to force it. Save your notes securely, retain past versions as you can to reference again later for inspiration and self review (of course if you already deleted them it's not the end of the world), and never be afraid to restart an attempt you might not finish. If you have other ideas, try writing those too - just drop in the middle of the story that you want to focus on, forget fleshing it out and just create the scene that inspires you. If it inspires you enough, you'll figure out what leads up and what comes after, even if it primarily takes just a bit of time to let the ideas mature.
English
0
0
1
23
JSWebsterAuthor
JSWebsterAuthor@JSWebsterAuthor·
I wish to sincerely apologize for my prolonged delay in completing the Old Glory series. Though I possess extensive notes and several thousand rewritten words, I have remained stalled for a considerable time—much like George R.R. Martin, yet with the common decency to admit it publicly. For personal reasons, I chose to release a completed manuscript from 2021. Requiem of Old Glory, the inaugural volume, appeared five years ago this coming November. The mixed reception it received did not deter me, so I pressed onward. After several encouraging nudges from readers, I authored a sequel. Remnants of Old Glory: Second Chronicle was published in February 2023. It sold modestly but ultimately faltered, receiving virtually no reviews beyond one from a family member—an unmistakable sign of its limited resonance. Undeterred by that disappointment, I remained committed to my promise of at least one final installment. Between 2022 and 2024, I had meticulously prepared the third and concluding volume. I drafted roughly 40,000 words, only to delete them entirely. Later, following additional personal challenges and another release, I composed another 50,000 words for the finale. Yet upon review, I found the emerging narrative deeply unsatisfying. Where Requiem and Remnants had been infused with hope, Revenge was veering into something far darker—a nihilistic, listless descent reminiscent of The Walking Dead. By the end of 2024, I was thoroughly exhausted. My creative spark had been extinguished, and what remained of my inspiration lay in ruins. Still, I refused to surrender. Quitting is a thing of my past. Several months ago, I engaged a professional to help me transition from a dedicated “pantser” to a more structured “planster.” The guidance I received on outlining, character development, and narrative architecture was genuinely excellent. Yet even with such valuable support, I have been unable to reignite the creative current. On my most productive days, I might manage a thousand words—only for weeks or months to pass without further progress. I have tried nearly everything. Above all, I refuse to release subpar, half-finished work. I briefly considered publishing my notes and existing drafts on a blog, but that would feel like surrender. Though I am not a quitter, I must acknowledge the truth: at present, I am simply unable to complete this novel. The story no longer stirs any passion within me. On a far brighter note, this journey has blessed me with meaningful connections and genuine friendships among talented creators. I am especially grateful to individuals such as @ChristianMagrum @rowlands_laws @A_C_Pritchard @YuvalKordov @bowengreenwood @misterdpriley @markevans0526 @starkterror88 (whom I met years ago on another platform -a hellofaguy), and @RhetHypo who has encouraged me since 2021. Each of you pours your heart into your books, music, art, podcasts, and other endeavors. Through this pursuit, I have gained both virtual and real-world friends for whom I am deeply thankful. To my readers, I am truly sorry for the disappointment. I cannot say when I will finish Revenge of Old Glory. After all, it took J.R.R. Tolkien seventeen years to complete The Lord of the Rings after The Hobbit, and I make no claim to his genius. Thank you for your patience, understanding, and continued support.
GIF
English
7
1
12
405
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
The idea a soldier defending their country can't kill active enemy combatants is silly enough, but superhero slop escalates these threats even further to directly threaten entire nations, if not the entire world, while suggesting heroes should be more hesitant to use force than a cop responding to a homeless guy acting a bit erratically. There's just a really warped sense or morality going on here, and suspension of disbelief can only handle so much. (Also, it's a bit of an aside, but doesn't it seem like a gun would be a better weapon than a shield in this scenario? Like I get he can throw the shield and it blocks basically anything, but it seems like it isn't really well suited to actually attacking close up. He lifts it over his head like a cave man hefting a boulder.)
Cosmic Marvel@cosmic_marvel

5 years ago today, John Walker brutally murdered a Flag Smasher and tarnished the Captain America mantle in ‘THE FALCON AND THE WINTER SOLDIER’

English
0
0
0
15
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
@lilbrudder2 @SirajAHashmi AFAIK, she called trans women "men in dresses" and opposed the vandalization of the term women to be replaced by the demeaning "people who menstruate". Anyone going further than this are either joking or in active disagreement with Rowling.
English
0
0
0
8
Lil’ Brudder
Lil’ Brudder@lilbrudder2·
@SirajAHashmi That “niche issue” is whether or not people I care about should be considered people. What aren’t you getting about this?
English
38
0
8
5.1K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
After some thought, I think I'm going to call this the Identity Paradox going forward. And while this is a really good example, it goes much deeper than this, and isn't inherently a bad thing. In fiction and beyond, we tend to see more exceptions. It's actually less common, in a story, for a woman to be overpowered by a man, because that's less remarkable. That's expected. That's real life, a majority of the time. Strong female characters are a sort of wish fulfillment against that, but also just an expression of power within the Tyranny of Fiction; that being, whatever the author says happens, that is what happened. It doesn't matter how nonsensical or insane or unfair the timeline is, there is a canon set of facts and events that the author simply informs the audience of, while the audience only gets to decide how they feel about that. Introducing the most intelligent person in existence as one of the demographics we least expect it to be isn't some grand statement, but rather the opposite. Women tend more towards average intelligence, while men tend more towards extremes (both high and low). Black people as a demographic trend lower for IQ, while white people trend higher. If we take just a cursory look at history's greatest minds, they strongly represent white people. In a fashion, it reinforces the very stereotype it rebels against. It is a demonstration that we expect old white guys to be geniuses, and seeks to contrast against that. And yet, none of this represents an issue for fiction. We could make the most intelligent person in the world have Down's syndrome, it would still function perfectly fine. Such things aren't less common in fiction, even, they're more common. Writers look to surprise and subvert expectations, although the more savvy ones will restrain themselves. Because, again, while you are the Tyrant with unlimited power, you actually want people to buy into your little world. They'll suspend disbelief for a lot of things, if it's fun or interesting or just not too distracting. They'll accept the One Ring is evil and somewhat sentient and can only be destroyed in the very convenient volcano. But they won't except Legolas and Gimli getting in their 2003 Nissan Sentra to catch up with the hobbits. Because that's not fun or interesting, and it's very distracting within the established setting. I say all this to point out that, having the most intelligent person in the world be a black woman is not the point most people would lose immersion in the story. It's when that same person is being centered as a counter to racism, both within the story and on social media as a sort of highlight that shows the most core part of her character. That's when most people just roll their eyes, because it's all so petty, vapid, and weak. Genius, in this context, is the same as wealth, super strength, or shapeshifting; something that a character was given by the author, by raw fiat, with zero necessary connection to anything real.
English
0
0
0
79
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
It sorta depends if they are putting forth all these questions in an earnest attempt to hash out the details and make it happen, or instead to argue that it's too hard and nothing can be done at all. It's similar to pro abortion people raising extreme examples. They aren't actually interested in carve outs for those extreme cases, they use those extreme cases to argue a general lack of restrictions.
English
0
0
2
29
tom bombadil
tom bombadil@Authw8·
the second person here is more moral. it is easy to say things should be better. it is hard to actually make things better. you improve the world by solving problems, which means getting your hands dirty. to make the world a better place you have to be willing to get up each morning and pull the trolley problem lever
tom bombadil tweet media
English
3
0
23
1.9K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
As funny as some of these videos are, I do think some of this is technically recording people in *private spaces without their knowledge, which can run afoul of privacy laws, especially when these individuals might be in different states. First amendment auditors succeed because they antagonize people, but always stay firmly within the law. Of course, the counterarguments to the people crying about how illegal this is are: 1. These are deeply unserious people stuck in delusions that seem to both lie and readily believe lies 2. The laws are functionally unenforceable unless a person documents everything, which itself would require recording and disclosure of that recording for that purpose 3. The stakes are so incredibly low that, even if a case was built, it's more than likely it would be just dismissed as being beneath any form of legal involvement 4. *private digital spaces are, themselves, a little suspect if people intentionally breaking the rules can keep finding ways to enter. If it's just entirely impossible on a technical level to prevent this without the offenders also breaking other laws around hacking, then the spaces are fundamentally not private and should not be treated as such. And if there are tools to reasonably do so, it falls to the creators of the instances to set the rules and properly enforce them, rather than VR chat or actual law enforcement.
English
2
0
4
1.7K
𓅃 UAE Exotic Falconry & Finance
𓅃 UAE Exotic Falconry & Finance@FalconryFinance·
ok serious question how do you guys feel about first amendment auditors but in second life or whatever this online chat bullshit is
English
33
26
379
8.8K
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Why is this presented as if it's an easy job? Standing in one spot for 8 hours with nothing to do, no skills being built, and no chance to sit down or stretch your legs. The King's Guard, those British soldiers who famously stand still for extended periods, only stand for 2 hours, perform a ceremonial march every 10 minutes, and then have 4 hours off. I guess it's more metaphorical about wasting your life, but I also don't know wtf they suggest people should actually do. What should he be doing? Skateboarding? Is it expected that he won't age if he does that? Does he not need the money to survive? Does he not invest or use that money to build a life for himself and others? Does he do anything once he is off the clock, and if not, then isn't that the bigger problem? Not that he works, but that he actually lacks the ambition to do more than the barest minimum? I hate these types of pseudo intellectual videos. People should be working much harder, with the caveat that it should be more intentional. You should develop skills and try new things, even and perhaps especially if you don't know if it will work out. Make something, exercise your talents, get paid and pay others. We are social creatures and money is a social construct, there is nothing shameful about it if you use it properly.
redpillbot@redpillb0t

The harsh reality of a 9 to 5 existence.

English
0
0
0
18
RhetHypo
RhetHypo@RhetHypo·
Oh hey, it's the bell curve meme. I think the inherent revulsion is a primal response that still reflects higher order truths. We "know" something like this would be wrong, and it's not because we are guilty about the necessity of killing animals to support human flourishing. (Though yes, it is possible to abuse animals through industrial practices, and I believe those typically produce other negative, tangible impacts, like Mad Cow Disease, that would expected of the Meat Sac.) Life is beautiful and purposeful. Even if we unlocked the ability to create life that is "hyper domesticated", in that it is cruelly and efficiently whittled down to the barest necessities to be grown in factories and chopped apart for meat, you can't replace nature with that. Animals the world over are still born and die, every day, as part of a massive interconnected ecosystem, and the more we push towards this type of aesthetically horrific utilitarian production, the more we subvert and threaten that natural order. Cows and chickens are plentiful precisely because they are domesticated, and useful to humanity, which is still part of the food chain. I've seen what happens when you ask a militant vegan what we are going to do with the massive surplus of animals no longer being raised for food, and they proceed to dance around a very dark yet logically necessary mass culling event. Like, congratulations, you saved all the animals from suffering by ending most of them and maintaining a rudderless, shallow population, if even that. It seems to me like an imperfect life lived is better than the complete eradication and active prevention of life itself, under the premise that avoiding suffering is more important than living.
RhetHypo tweet media
Christopher Stoll@TopherStoll

Why does this inspire such disgust and conflict in us? It's hard to argue that this solution isn't better. Better a brainless sack of protein than a living creature capable of pain, longing to see the sky but forced to live in hideous lifelong bondage. So why does the Harvest Hen or the Domesticated Meat Pig feel worse? I think it's because it makes the instrumentalization visible. We already treat living creatures as production units, but this takes it "too far"... it stops pretending otherwise. An organism that has been openly, unapologetically designed as a object. And for some people, in some ways, something about that honesty is harder to look at than the cruelty we've already normalized. Original brainless meat pig "bodyoid" art by @Coolio_Art made me want to make my own.

English
0
0
1
129