Rich Perry 🇺🇸

Thx for your reply. I, too, often use the same prompt across multiple platforms. Sometimes I will take a natural language prompt and change it to JSON. Each AI seems to have similar but different JSON dictionaries. Yes, the results are interesting and sometimes beautiful. I’ve learned that if AI doesn’t recognize a phrase or JSON code, it just ignores it or outputs garbage. Please continue your helpful posts.

No, I'm not optimizing, I'm trying the same prompt on all of them to reach a general conclusion. As the end user, I determine how the other person interprets his/her thoughts. The aim is not to produce the best, but to learn how they understand us. But of course, the results are interesting. Sometimes Grok, sometimes Banana, interpret the standard prompt we give beautifully. This gives an idea about where these tools can be more powerful.

Grok and Whisk could not do this. ChatGPT did a great job. Others also relied on realism but gave good results. 👍 1.ChatGPT, 2.Banana App, 3. and 4.Flow, Prompt; Ultra-realistic high-fashion editorial photography, luxury couture design, dark avant-garde aesthetic. Main Subject: A stunning female model in her early 20s. Flawless skin, sharp cheekbones, confident and mysterious expression with subtle intrigue. Pose & Body Language: Hands on hips. Slight hip shift to the right. One knee subtly pushing outward under the fabric. Strong, elegant, dominant posture. 👗 Outfit (Improved Fit & Integration — KEY FIX) A sleek, form-fitting red pencil dress, perfectly tailored to the body. Fabric hugs the body naturally — no looseness, no gaps. Chest Core Element: A black hexagonal gemstone placed precisely between the breasts. Highly polished, deep reflective surface. 🕷️ Spider Structure (IMPORTANT FIX — WRAPPED & FITTED) The spider legs are now fully integrated into the dress and body form, not floating or detached. Material: Glossy black, slightly organic, exoskeleton-like. Smooth but structured — luxury finish. Behavior & Fit: Legs are tight-fitting and wrapped along the body contours. They follow anatomical lines naturally (like a second skin / exoskeleton design). No gaps between legs and body. No exaggerated thickness — slim, elegant, proportional. Leg Placement (Refined): 2 legs (upper): Wrap from chest over shoulders like fitted structural straps, hugging tightly. 2 legs (mid): Flow from under the bust, wrapping along the ribcage and continuing to the back — fully body-contoured. 4 legs (lower): Start around waist area, wrapping tightly around the torso and hips, extending toward the back. Slight upward curve but always attached and hugging the form. 👉 Overall look: Not “spider legs attached” — but a sculpted biomechanical couture integrated into the dress. 💅 Styling Glossy black nail polish. Makeup: bold eyes, clean skin, high-fashion sharpness. Hair: controlled, sleek, refined. 💡 Lighting High-end studio lighting. Directional key light from above/front. Soft shadows emphasizing body curves. Rim light outlining silhouette and spider structure. Controlled reflections on gemstone and black elements. 🎥 Camera & Composition Slight low angle (powerful look). 85mm fashion lens. Medium-full body framing. Sharp focus on torso and chest design. 🌑 Background Dark luxury studio backdrop (black / deep charcoal). Subtle texture or gradient. Clean, minimal, premium feel.

The tax regulations are not in place specifically to obtain cash for the government. They are to implement public policy to distribute monies for specific groups of people or organizations. This is why some people get “refunds” despite not paying any taxes. These tax regulations reflecting public policy are created by representatives elected by we the people.

Did you know that there are people in this country who do not pay any federal income tax (no taxes even withheld), yet because of refundable tax credits, they get a refund every year? That doesn't seem right to me

@EmryRaleigh @CynicalPublius My dad never, ever watched Cronkite. I was raised watching Huntley and Brinkley.

I recall Walter Cronkite being the first in my recollection of a journalist who stopped being a journalist and opined. It turned Vietnam into a war not to win but to kick down the road. I was in the last fighter wing in Vietnam (366th at Danang) when NVN made their move with the April 72 (2nd Tet) and we flew around the clock. (North, South, Laos, Cambodia for the duration of my tour. 13 of my squadron (421 TFS) mate’s names are listed on the last two panels of the Vietnam Veterans Memorial. War is to win, not to manage.

RE: The Way of War of Our Enemies In every hot war the United States has become involved in since the Korean War, we have enjoyed absolute tactical and operational dominance over our enemies. We win every tactical engagement, overwhelmingly. Operationally we can and do dominate any theater of our choosing. No one—and I mean NO ONE—can stand toe to toe with the US military. This has been true for decades. We’ve talked before about the elements of national power—the “DIME” (Diplomacy, Informational, Military, Economic). Our military power is unsurpassed. We are masters of diplomacy. We have the world’s strongest economy. So how do we lose? The INFORMATIONAL component. Our military opponents, from Ho Chi Minh to Osama bin Ladin, knew that the only way to defeat the USA is to demoralize the American populace such that it demands withdrawal and throws the then current Commander-in-Chief out of office. The ONLY way to defeat America militarily is to convince the American people that a war is unwinnable. The slow dribble of IED deaths in OIF was not actually targeting soldiers and Marines—it was targeting YOU, the American people. And CNN eagerly complied with death counts running across the bottom of the screen. The Tet Offensive? It was a decisive US victory that could have ended the Vietnam War in our favor. But Walter Cronkite instead declared the war lost, protests erupted nationwide, and the war was lost. The Highway of Death in Kuwait? We could have taken out Saddam Hussein in 1991 and never needed to go back in 2003, but international media made the attack on retreating Iraqis look “too cruel,” so we halted just short of the finish line. The strategic imperative of every one of America’s military enemies is to break the will of the American people with skewed information, propaganda, and extreme emphasis on America’s minor losses amidst overwhelming military victory. But the Ho Chi Minhs and Osama bin Ladins can’t do that by themselves. They need willing partners in the American media and government. And for Operation Epic Fury, boy oh boy do the Iranian mullahs have an over abundance of American morale killers to draw from in order to defeat America through the informational instrument of national power. Tucker Carlson. Senator Mark Kelly and the rest of the Seditious Six. CNN. ABC. NBC. CBS. NYT, WaPo. Pakistani bot armies on social media. X “influencers” like Cerno, Candace, MartyrMade and Ian Carroll. Every idiot claiming we are fighting “Israel’s war." There is an entire Army of American politicians and media figures who are willingly fighting Iran’s informational war on its behalf (and in some cases, at its behest). America is DECISIVELY WINNING the war on Iran in every measurable respect. Yet there are so many influential Americans who are desperately determined to make you believe otherwise. In days of old in non-US countries, such people would have been strung up for treason. Thankfully it’s 2026 and we have a First Amendment, so no one fear being treated in such a medieval manner. But we can still ostracize and ridicule such people and sources for the irreparable harm they are wreaking upon the USA as they do the bidding (intentionally or unintentionally) of Theo-fascist mullahs who are determined to set off a nuclear bomb so that the Twelfth Imam will arise from a well in Qom and precipitate the global apocalypse. We all need to choose sides. Are you with America, or are you with theologic-inspired, deliberate Armageddon? And anyone who chooses the latter needs to be the target of mockery, derision and clearly-stated facts disproving their lies. And if YOU are an American Patriot, you can fight that informational war on America’s behalf, right now, right here on social media, right there in your own living room. Your voice matters, and your voice is actually a part of the war. FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT.

The prompt had to be manipulated for Grok to work. Apparently it needs better prompt directions because “on the barrel” is a bit too vague. The text would show up in different places. Even printed on the barrel was really wrong. It finally worked when I changed the prompt to “into the outside surface of the barrel”.

Grok, Whisk and ChatGPT could not produce. Although Banana and Flow had a little difficulty in terms of POV, they did not do a bad job.👍 1. and 2.Banana App, 3. and 4.Flow, Prompt; Ultra-realistic cinematic photograph, high-end action portrait, dramatic winter atmosphere, IMAX quality. 🔫 Camera & Perspective (KEY ELEMENT) Extreme close-up, macro perspective from the gun barrel (muzzle POV) Camera is positioned right next to the barrel opening, almost touching it The barrel appears large and dominant in foreground, slightly out of focus at edges Perspective naturally narrows toward the subject (subtle depth compression, not exaggerated) The woman is centered in focus beyond the barrel Vertical composition (portrait orientation) 👩 Main Subject (Woman) A stunning woman in her early 20s. Blue eyes, intense direct eye contact with camera Blonde hair, slightly messy and naturally flowing Bold red lipstick Light cold-weather redness on cheeks (natural, soft tone) Expression: Calm but dangerous Focused, confident, slightly intimidating Emotion controlled, not exaggerated 🧥 Outfit Brown winter jacket with fur collar (neck area) Underneath: black turtleneck sweater Black gloves (important detail — holding the gun) Dark, fitted pants (subtle, not dominant in frame) 🔫 Weapon Details Magnum revolver, realistic proportions Held firmly, aimed directly at camera Metal surface: Slight wear and tear Micro scratches, usage marks Matte + subtle reflections Text on barrel (engraved / handwritten style): “ITOUCH” Below it, smaller: “Control the moment.” (Integrated naturally into metal, not floating text) ❄️ Environment Snowy outdoor setting Heavy snowfall (dense snow particles in air) Background: soft blurred forest (dark silhouettes, barely visible) Ground and air filled with snow atmosphere 💡 Lighting Cold natural light (overcast winter sky) Soft diffused lighting on face Subtle highlights on gun metal Light snow reflections on skin and jacket Slight cinematic contrast 🎥 Lens & Focus Macro + portrait hybrid feel Shallow depth of field Focus priority: Woman’s eyes (sharpest point) Gun mid-section Barrel edges slightly blurred (depth realism) 🌫️ Atmosphere Heavy snowfall particles crossing frame Slight cold haze Breath vapor very subtle (optional) Cinematic realism, not stylized fantasy 🎨 Style & Finish Ultra-detailed textures (skin, metal, fabric, snow) HDR lighting Subtle film grain Cold color grading (blue/gray tones with slight skin warmth balance) 🎯 Final Goal A powerful, immersive POV shot — viewer feels like standing directly in front of the gun, capturing tension, control, and cold elegance in a cinematic winter moment.

@ImBreckWorsham In some parts of California, it is around $5.50 to $6.25. Diesel is over $7.00.

Gas is creeping up toward $4 here in coastal South Carolina. Trump says it's "no big deal." What are the gas prices in your area and how is it impacting you? Sound off.

@mattvanswol I don’t know why people don’t use the translate app on their phones. Sure, it’s slow but people can communicate!

@TroyValey @DataRepublican @nicksortor @IngrahamAngle Isn’t a FBI investigation an integral part of due process?

So no due process? Meanwhile: Is the FBI investigating Joe Kent more aggressively than: Epstein's Clients Barack Obama Joe Biden Hillary Clinton Kamala Harris Merrick Garland Christopher Wray James Comey John Brennan James Clapper Andrew McCabe Peter Strzok Lisa Page Bruce Ohr Nellie Ohr Kevin Clinesmith Gina Haspel Samantha Power Susan Rice Ben Rhodes Michael Morell Jake Sullivan Antony Blinken Victoria Nuland Eric Holder Sally Yates Rod Rosenstein Robert Mueller Andrew Weissmann Jack Smith Lisa Monaco Adam Schiff Nancy Pelosi Liz Cheney Adam Kinzinger Chuck Schumer Letitia James Alvin Bragg Fani Willis Mark Milley Lloyd Austin Mark Esper John Bolton Bill Barr Anthony Fauci Christopher Krebs Pat Cipollone Alexander Vindman Miles Taylor Michael Atkinson Marie Yovanovitch Fiona Hill Gordon Sondland George Kent Kurt Volker Eric Ciaramella Debbie Wasserman Schultz Jamie Raskin Jerry Nadler Hakeem Jeffries Ilhan Omar Rashida Tlaib Ayanna Pressley Maxine Waters Alejandro Mayorkas Elvis Chan P.S. They are torturing, rqping, murdering and eating children. Remember this story?

🚨 BREAKING: Former National Counterterrorism Center Director Joe Kent is under FBI INVESTIGATION for allegedly leaking classified information "The investigation PREDATES his departure," per @IngrahamAngle Wow

@KhnHoward @elonmusk It can and it does. It does it and Asian, and Indian so often that I now specify nationality and race for each character.

@elonmusk How come your Grok never imagines people of color?

Grok Imagine

#grok #imagine #comealive Prompt: “Make this image come alive.” (With a short extension added.)

@doganuraldesign Sweet!

Grok Image Templates are here! I was serious when I said you can put yourself in ANY style. Now it’s easier than ever. Try it and show me what you’ve got. Here's how + examples ↓

@_kaitodev @karpathy Where are CEOs on the list? 9? 10?

5 minutes ago, @karpathy just dropped karpathy/jobs! he scraped every job in the US economy (342 occupations from BLS), scored each one's AI exposure 0-10 using an LLM, and visualized it as a treemap. if your whole job happens on a screen you're cooked. average score across all jobs is 5.3/10. software devs: 8-9. roofers: 0-1. medical transcriptionists: 10/10 💀 karpathy.ai/jobs

@invideoOfficial @grok Is there a reason why these styles are not publicized for Grok Imagine?

Grok Imagine, the AI video model that doesn't want to be real. Since @grok launched its video capabilities, the discourse has been almost entirely content moderation - what will and won't generate. Spicy mode, regulatory investigations, the EUs reaction. It's loud, it's dramatic. And it's completely missing the point. Because buried underneath all of that noise is something genuinely fascinating for filmmakers and visual creators. Grok Imagine video is the only major AI video model that was built to honor imagination over physics. See how it performs in 6 styles versus other models along with detailed prompts 🧵👇

HCA Healthcare executives should pay 110% of each line item they need, not $20. And if they can’t afford it, they should go on Medicaid. But I’m sure they can pay full cost+ for their procedures and prescriptions at the salaries they are paid. It’s only fair. BTW, have you ever heard of the Golden Goose?

I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. The largest for-profit hospital system in the United States. One hundred and eighty-two hospitals. Twenty states. I oversee a spreadsheet called the chargemaster. It has 42,000 line items. Each line item is a price. The prices are not real. I need to be precise about that. They are not estimates. Not approximations. Not market rates. They are anchors. An anchor is a number you set high so that every negotiated discount feels like a victory. No relationship to cost. No relationship to value. A relationship to leverage. My team sets the anchors. That is the job. The price is correct. Take a drug. Keytruda. Immunotherapy. Treats sixteen types of cancer. The manufacturer charges approximately $11,000 per dose. That is the acquisition cost. What the hospital pays. My team enters it into the chargemaster. They do not enter $11,000. They enter $43,000. That is the gross charge. The gross charge is a fiction. No one pays it. No one is expected to pay it. The gross charge exists so that when Blue Cross negotiates a 68% discount, they pay $13,760, and the contract says "68% discount" and both parties feel the transaction was rigorous. A 68% discount on a fictional price produces a real price that is 25% above acquisition cost. That margin is where I live. My 2025 compensation was $26.5 million. Eighty percent of my bonus is tied to EBITDA. Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization. It is also earnings before the patient opens the bill. Same dose of Keytruda at the hospital across town. Gross charge: $12,000. Blue Cross rate: $10,200. Same drug. Same dose. Same needle. Same cancer. Different spreadsheet. The CMS transparency data showed the ratio between the highest and lowest negotiated price for the same drug at the same hospital can reach 2,347 to one. Not 2x. Not 10x. Not 100x. Two thousand three hundred and forty-seven to one. For the same thing. In the same building. On the same Tuesday. The price is correct. Every drug in the chargemaster has twelve prices. Twelve. Gross charge. Medicare rate. Medicaid rate. Blue Cross. Aetna. Cigna. UnitedHealth. Humana. Workers' comp. Tricare. Auto insurance. And the self-pay rate. The self-pay rate is for the person without insurance. It is the gross charge. The fictional number. The anchor. The person without insurance pays the number that was designed to be negotiated down from. They pay the ceiling because they have no one to negotiate on their behalf. Same drug. Same chair. Same nurse. They pay the price that no insurer in the country would accept. I maintain a file. CDM line item 637-4892-PKB. Saline flush. Sodium chloride 0.9%. Acquisition cost: $0.47. We charge $87. That is an 18,410% markup. The saline flush is used before and after every IV infusion. A chemo patient receiving twelve cycles will be charged $87 for saline fourteen times per visit. I know the math. My team built the math. The math is the job. The price is correct. In 2021, the federal government required hospitals to publish their prices. The Hospital Price Transparency Rule. Machine-readable file. Gross charges. Discounted cash prices. Payer-specific negotiated rates. We complied. We posted the file. The file is a 9,400-row CSV on our website under "Patient Financial Resources." Four clicks from the homepage. Column F: "CDM_GROSS_CHG." Column J: "DERV_PAYERID_NEGRATE." My team designed the column headers. They designed them to comply. They did not design them to communicate. CMS reported 93% of hospitals now post a file. Compliance. But only 62% of the posted data is usable. That gap is where we operate. We are compliant. The data is published. The data is incomprehensible. A researcher downloaded our file. She spent three weeks cleaning it. She called the billing department for clarification on 340 line items. They transferred her four times. The fourth transfer was to a voicemail box that was full. She published her analysis anyway. Cardiac catheterization lab charges: $8,200 to $71,000 for the same procedure depending on the payer. The report received eleven views on our press monitoring dashboard. I saw it. I did not forward it. On April 1, a new CMS rule takes effect. Hospital CEOs must personally attest — by name, encoded in the machine-readable file — that the pricing data is "true, accurate, and complete." My name. Sam Hazen. In the file. Attesting that 42,000 fictional anchors are true, accurate, and complete. They are complete. I will give them that. Forty-two thousand line items is nothing if not complete. A new analyst read the transparency data. She asked why the same MRI costs $450 for Medicare and $4,200 for Aetna in the same building on the same machine. I told her the rates reflect negotiated contractual agreements between the payer and the facility. She said that doesn't explain the difference. I told her the difference IS the contractual agreement. She said that sounds like the price is arbitrary. I told her the price is the result of a rigorous, multi-variable analysis that accounts for acuity, case mix, regional market dynamics, and payer contract terms. She asked if I could show her the analysis. I told her the analysis is proprietary. The analysis does not exist. The analysis is my team, in Q4, adjusting the chargemaster upward by the percentage the CFO wrote on a sticky note. The sticky note this year said "6-8%." They chose 7.4% because it is between six and eight and it has a decimal, which makes it look calculated. She stopped asking. The price is correct. My insurance. The executive health plan. Not in the chargemaster. Administered separately. I do not pay the gross charge. I do not pay the negotiated rate. I pay a $20 copay for services at our own facilities. Gross charge for my treatment: $14,200. Insured rate for our largest commercial payer: $8,600. I pay $20. The executive health plan was designed by the Chief Human Resources Officer and approved by the compensation committee. I was not on the compensation committee. I was a beneficiary of it. That is a different thing. I benefit from the system I price. I price the system I benefit from. These are two separate facts that happen to involve the same person. HCA Healthcare was named the Most Admired Company in our industry by Fortune magazine for the twelfth consecutive year. That was February. The same month I sold $21.5 million in company stock and purchased zero shares. Fortune did not ask about the chargemaster. I am Sam Hazen, CEO of HCA Healthcare. I have 42,000 prices in a spreadsheet across 182 hospitals. None of them are real. All of them are charged. Same drug: $12,000 or $43,000. Depends on which spreadsheet. Which building. Which contract. Which page of which PDF. The patient who has no contract pays the most. The researcher who found the discrepancy got a voicemail box that was full. The analyst who asked why stopped asking. The executive who prices the system pays $20. On April 1, I will personally attest that this is true, accurate, and complete. The price is correct. The price has always been correct. I am the price.

#Grok #Imagine Imagine the possibilities!

@ChayasClan But do they have bullets and training?

For the purpose of strengthening its hold on the street – the Iranian regime is distributing long weapons to its supporters – including women. This is so that they will be part of the force assisting in preserving the regime in the event of demonstrations by regime opponents – they are preparing for the stage in which the US and Israel will call on regime opponents to take to the streets. (Abu Ali) I don’t want to hear any moaning from anyone when these “women” get hit by strikes targeting the IRGC. It’s like the Gazans who fight with Hamas. None of them are innocent civilians and they should be treated as the terrorists they are

@EHuanglu But if you upload three different views, they each have to be referenced at threes different times, right?

Grok Imagine tip: you can keep a character super consistent in 360° if you upload 3 different views.. try the prompt below

One could start with a prompt like what follows. Note this is only MY representation would be, not the original poster. There is enough detail for your customization. You can animate this image and then write a short prompt for movement. Enjoy! A scorched-earth cyberpunk apocalypse goddess rising from the ashes like she personally murdered the old world and is now wearing its corpse as fashion. Golden-hour Armageddon sunset hemorrhaging crimson and molten orange across a choking sky thick with roiling black smoke and floating embers, god-rays stabbing through the haze like divine middle fingers. Behind her: colossal skeletal industrial corpses—rusted I-beams twisted into agonized sculptures, collapsed scaffolding leaning drunkenly, half-buried shipping containers bleeding rust, jagged concrete monoliths cracked open like rotten eggs, all bathed in that dying-sun blood-glow. She stands center-frame in full-body defiant swagger, boots planted wide in blood-red Martian dust that swirls around her calves in slow-motion wind-whipped spirals. Young, feral, untamed—messy chestnut hair exploding out of a high sloppy bun like it’s trying to escape her skull, strands whipping across her face. That face? Mostly devoured by a grotesque, over-engineered death-mask headset: brutal matte-black housing the size of a small helmet, dominated by THREE massive, predatory cyan-blue glowing lenses arranged in a tight triangular cluster—center one enormous and unblinking like the eye of a cyclopean machine-god, two smaller flanking orbs pulsing with cold electric malice. Heavy clamping earpieces dig into her skull, cables and coolant tubes snaking out like parasitic veins. Her lips—slightly parted, glossy, dangerous—peek out below, the only human thing left, whispering “come get some” without sound. Body-hugging tactical catsuit is a color riot of survival-sexy: electric-cobalt sleeveless crop-top stretched tight over curves, low scooped shoulders showing sun-kissed collarbones and the hint of underboob rebellion, bleeding downward into filthy mustard-yellow cargo pants plastered with dust, oil stains, scorch marks, and dried blood splatter like abstract war-paint. Thick gunmetal-gray tactical shoulder armor plates bolted on like she welded them herself mid-fight, overloaded utility belt riding low on hips with dangling pouches, mag-clips, and mystery tech, gray composite knee guards strapped tight over thighs, blue reinforced shin plates peeking above scuffed-to-hell off-white combat boots crusted in red desert grit, laces frayed and trailing like battle trophies. Left arm is pure cybernetic blasphemy: glossy black-and-gunmetal prosthesis with pistons hissing steam, hydraulic cables flexing like living muscle, rainbow bundles of exposed wiring pulsing with bioluminescent data-light, intricate segmented fingers ending in razor-sharp articulated claws that could shred steel or caress a throat. Right arm stays deliciously human—toned, bare except for a single tight blue armband biting into bicep like a gang tattoo. Pose: pure unhinged power stance—weight cocked back on one heel, hip thrust out in fuck-you contrapposto, cyber-arm hanging loose and ready to murder, human hand hooked casually on her belt like she’s bored of winning already. Head tilted just enough so those three glowing eyes lock straight into camera, staring THROUGH your soul with icy blue judgment. Dust devils spin at her feet, heat haze shimmers, volumetric god-rays carve her silhouette into legend. Hyper-detailed, cinematic sci-fi concept art on steroids—gritty photoreal textures meet painterly drama, insane dynamic lighting, rim-light halo igniting every edge, lens flares, chromatic aberration, depth-of-field madness, 16k resolution wet dream, mood so thick you can choke on it, signed “Debk” in the bottom corner like a graffiti tag from the end of days.

You know a technology is good when you don't even realize you've used it. For this scene, - I created the character as an image with Grok Imagine, then the landscape with Grok, and combined everything using Grok Imagine's image references. - I then used video extensions to avoid cuts and style changes. The character is perfectly integrated into the scene, proportions respected and style preserved.

Just because it is shortwave doesn’t mean worldwide coverage all the time. Propagation needs to be taken into account. If Western Europe might be the source, what is the propagation at broadcast times. Find where the audience might be. The jamming signal should not be overlooked as well. The jammer would know the source of the signal.

@meng_dagg695 For the Trekkies.

The exact moment it shatters Generated with Gemini Nano Banana pro Prompt: dynamic mid-air explosion effect, object breaking apart into multiple fragments, pieces flying outward in all directions, suspended debris and particles floating in space, cinematic slow motion freeze frame, realistic physics, small dust particles and crumbs scattering, dramatic depth of field, high-speed photography style, sharp focus on central object, fragments rotating in mid-air, motion energy burst from the center, ultra detailed, volumetric lighting, photorealistic, 8k