Richard Edinger

@lakismith @PhillipCoorey There is no genocide. Rwanda, Cambodia- they were genocides. Either the Israelis, with one of the most advanced military’s in the world aren’t trying or they are incompetent. Which is it?

@SkyNewsAust @burkylie12 Why doesn’t she tell Hezbollah to go back to Iran?

Foreign Affairs Minister Penny Wong has urged Israel to avoid occupying southern Lebanon, as civilian deaths rise and tensions deepen across the region. skynews.com.au/world-news/glo…

@JohnTolhurstAU @DrNeilStone What international law?

@DrNeilStone On the other hand, Israel has wiped out thousands of civilians, and assassinated Iran's leadership contrary to international law. If you arn't seeing this, I suggest you clean up your feed from its ideology infestation. Why the bias, Doctor, what don't we know about you?

The regime in Iran has not inflicted any military casualties on Israel. Not a single one. 100% of Israeli casualties have been civilians I wonder if that has happened before in warfare.

@ColinN69630 @DrNeilStone Exactly. Iran has been attacking Israel and the US for the last 40 years.

@DrNeilStone I am pro Jewish, but I am not pro Netanyahu. If you attack your neighbor, it has the right to strike back.

@Donna_or_Daniel @4thOfJuly365 It takes balls to be one.

@4thOfJuly365 Yep. The ONLY defining characteristic of a trans woman is that they are a man pretending to be a woman.

She wins the internet today 🤣🤣🤣

These Iranians are Islamophobic.

@NadiaWhittomeMP What part of the fact they are boys and the Supreme Court ruling don’t you understand?

It’s devastating that Girlguiding has announced plans to exclude existing trans girl guides from September. The Supreme Court ruling is being weaponised to bully previously inclusive organisations into abandoning members of their own community. The government must ensure that the statutory guidance enables organisations to be inclusive and protects them from expensive anti-trans lawfare.

“Fear and hatred have no place on our streets”. This was London recently, so hate is on the streets but you ignore it when it’s from certain people.

A brave Lebanese journalist 🇱🇧 • You can’t film here • I have approval from Lebanese army • Show me proof • Who are you to ask me? • I am Hezbollah • Ya so what?

@A70578286811 @DanBurmawy Ask the 2 million Arabs who are Israeli citizens if they are ostracised.

@DanBurmawy Buying land to start a society that ostracises the people living there is a complete barbaric thing to do.

A group of Zionist invaders preparing to occupy the prosperous Palestinian city of Tel Aviv in the state of Palestine in 1907.

@TrumpsHurricane Poor career choice.

Emotional Mayor of NYC Zorhan Mamdani said he has been getting hateful messages for being a Muslim What’s your response to him ??

@mordecai_1m @Khosrowparvizii @JohnCleese Mental illness

@Khosrowparvizii @JohnCleese Antiseptic this antiseptic that. Blah blah blah. Funny thing, a big part of the Jewish community voted for him. How do you explain that??

Maybe if the Muslims stopped threatening to kill infidels, that would help ?

@SpeechUnion What has happened to the UK?

🚨📣 NEW FSU MEMBER TESTIMONIAL Linzi Smith is an LGB advocate and lifelong supporter of Newcastle United. She was banned from her football club and subjected to a sinister private investigation because of her lawful gender-critical views. On 31 October 2023, Linzi received an email from Newcastle United informing her that her membership had been suspended, pending the outcome of a police investigation into a potential hate crime. Prior to this, she had never had any dealings with the police. The police interviewed Linzi about comments she had made on the social media platform X and questioned her for two hours about whether she believed her posts were “offensive”. They quickly concluded that no crime had been committed and that no further action would be taken. Believing the matter was resolved, Linzi later received a letter from the police stating that the investigation would remain open pending any further information coming to light. Northumbria Police later apologised. After this extremely stressful — and unnecessary — ordeal, Linzi assumed she would be able to return to her club and that her suspension would be lifted. She was wrong. Despite her appeals, and a strongly worded letter from the Free Speech Union, she was banned from the club for three seasons because of her online comments. The club even suggested that she attend a course “to explore the impact” of her posts. Newcastle United cited three posts on X as evidence of alleged discrimination. While her comments were controversial — and some might be considered “offensive” — they were lawful. One post related to the trans charity Mermaids’ announcement that it was leaving X. Linzi said she believed the charity was encouraging children to transition in breach of NHS advice, and that this constituted a form of grooming. A second post expressed her frustration at biological males participating in women’s sports. The third was a lengthy exchange with another X user who had branded her a “Nazi”. Linzi responded by saying that gender reassignment has historical links to experimental procedures carried out by the Nazis. In a further troubling development, a subject access request (SAR) revealed that the Premier League had created a confidential report titled “Online Investigation and Target Profile”. This included details of her X posts, her home location and personal information — even images of places where she walks her dog. The Premier League did not simply produce this report; it also provided Newcastle United with guidance on “exploring options for restorative education”. With the support of the Free Speech Union, Linzi took legal action against Newcastle United and the Premier League. After two years of exclusion from the stadium, Newcastle United lifted her ban. This was a deeply sinister case, and we were proud to support Linzi throughout. Sadly, Newcastle United is far from the only club to have been captured by radical progressive ideology, with cases like Linzi’s becoming increasingly common. Watch Linzi below and become an FSU Member 👇

The only person who thinks restricting our ancient right to trial by jury is a good idea is David Lammy. This is the same man who thought Henry VII came after Henry VIII. The same man who claimed Marie Antoinette won the Nobel Prize for Physics — rather than Marie Curie. And the same man who said in 2020 that “criminal trials without juries are a bad idea”. Now Lammy is taking an axe to a cornerstone of our criminal justice system, spearheading the biggest assault on English liberty — particularly free speech — in over 800 years. We cannot let him get away with this. ✍️ Sign our petition to SAVE JURY TRIALS 👇

New evidence from Antarctica ice cores showing no link between CO2 and temperature over the last three million years has stumped Net Zero activists, says Chris Morrison. dailysceptic.org/2026/03/25/sho…

@reportingLibya @DrChrisParry Iran had stated that they want to destroy both Israel and the US almost every day for the last 40 years.

@DrChrisParry 3/ A nuclear weapon does not, by itself, trigger an Art 51 from a state that thinks it may be attacked. However, Art 51 allows a state that is attacked (ie US) to destroy all weapons of the state that has attacked it.

I will summarise advice obtained from a legally eminent friend: The use of armed force by US/Israeli against Iran is lawful under the terms of UN Security Council Resolution 2817, and was lawful before that Resolution was passed under UN Charter Article 51 (self defence). It is arguably lawful for a state to declare that: · a terrorist attack comprises and armed attack which triggers Article 51, · another state is developing a nuclear weapon, there is a real risk that it would use it and negotiation has not been able to stop development. In the context of modern weaponry that would be sufficient to trigger Article 51even if the development of nuclear weapons is not complete. · a state sponsoring terrorism on a large scale around the world is a party to an armed attack and that is sufficient to trigger Article 51 so that the victim states may use force in self defence against that sponsor. Iran is a rogue state which has exported terrorism around the world. In particular it has sponsored Hamas, Hezbollah and the Houthis in their aim to destroy Israel. It preaches hatred against Israel, the USA and western liberal democracies and is a constant threat to peace and security. If it were to obtain a nuclear weapon there is no doubt that it would use it, or threaten to use it, for its own malign purposes, or export terror and extrem violence under the umbrella afforded by its nuclear weapons. The US and Israel’s action to destroy Iran’s ability to continue their policy against the west was and is lawful initially in self defence under UN Article 51 and now under UNSCR 2817.

@PhillH17 @DrChrisParry Iran has been attacking Israel and the US for the last 40 years.

@DrChrisParry Advice? Or opinion? Quoting you; "It is arguably lawful for a state to declare that: · a terrorist attack comprises and armed attack which triggers Article 51 July 24, Ismail Haniyeh, was assassinated in Terhan. So under Article 51 Iran would be justified to respond you agree?

@ryanyyc @DrChrisParry Why start now? How many times has the US declared war through Congress prior to commencement of military operations since WWII?

@DrChrisParry Notwithstanding this, a prima facie case was not made to either the American Congress or the United Nations. We don’t allow people to be arbitrarily attacked without warrant, an attack against a threat from a nation state that is not imminent should be the same.