Richard M.

5.4K posts

Richard M. banner
Richard M.

Richard M.

@RichardtheMutts

Thoughts on creativity in art, work, & life. ▸ Embracing Creativity™ ⩥ Building @4CreativeWheels

4CW Newsletter → Katılım Kasım 2022
43 Takip Edilen64 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Richard M.
Richard M.@RichardtheMutts·
21 Creative Threads That Will Help You Create Better Work and Evolve As a Creator:
English
1
1
4
533
Richard M. retweetledi
deep value insights
deep value insights@NoelWieder·
I've always liked the story of Charlie Munger. At 31, he was basically at rock bottom. He was freshly divorced, had lost the house, and his son died of leukemia. Munger paid for every treatment out of pocket and was left with almost nothing. Yet he kept going. Instead of drowning in bitterness, he worked, he read, and he kept his head down. With a new marriage and some stability, he began investing his lawyer's salary into stocks and real estate. Then in 1959 he met Buffett. Inspired by someone who was already running his own partnership, Munger founded Wheeler, Munger & Company in 1962. The wealth started to accumulate. Through real estate projects and his growing investment partnership, Munger became a millionaire around age 43. Many successful investments followed, many alongside Buffett, and the relationship grew close enough that working together was the only thing that made sense. Munger wound down his partnership in 1975. Over 13 years, he had compounded at 19.8% annually, against 5% for the Dow. In 1978, he became Vice Chairman of Berkshire Hathaway and helped build the empire it was set to become. Somewhere along the way he lost an eye to a failed surgery, but that didn't bother him much. He still had one left. Plenty enough to read annual reports. When most people think of Munger, they just see a rich old wise man who almost stood in Buffett's shadow. But the truth is that Munger's wisdom didn't come from nowhere. He worked himself up from rock bottom, a place where many others would have stayed down, to become one of the most respected investors in history. And a billionaire on top of that. He never let it go to his head. He lived in the same house in Pasadena for decades. The place didn't even have AC. He cooled it with ice and fans. Hard to find a better role model than that.
English
39
263
1.9K
102.7K
Richard M. retweetledi
Big Brain Business
Big Brain Business@BigBrainBizness·
Why a 1995 documentary called Steve Jobs the most dangerous man in Silicon Valley:
English
5
34
206
11.6K
Richard M. retweetledi
Simon Warren
Simon Warren@100Climbs·
The saying "It's a marathon, not a sprint" no longer has any meaning. The marathon is a sprint, time for a longer event.
English
37
643
21.2K
229.6K
Richard M. retweetledi
Captain M
Captain M@FrankoRover·
Nike did not lose. We forget that Eliud's trial for under 2 hrs with Ineos made the idea of the possibility plausible and finally achievable. Minimising the entire work that Nike did to selling shoes is missing the point by a lot. Eliud and Nike's effort made Sawe achieve the sub 2 hr
English
1
3
23
1.7K
Richard M. retweetledi
MOSET
MOSET@KeKirwa·
Eliud Kipchoge slander not welcome on my TL. The old man showed us the way. He showed us that it's possible. He showed us that no human is limited. He crawled so that these young lads could walk.
English
49
1.4K
8.1K
116.4K
Richard M. retweetledi
Nelson Amenya
Nelson Amenya@amenya_nelson·
Eliud Kipchoge walked so that Sebastian Sawe could run! 🐐 🐐
English
18
884
7.6K
71.6K
Richard M.
Richard M.@RichardtheMutts·
I don't understand how we've turned a great human achievement into a reason to look down upon those who strived toward that achievement in the past. Nike and Eliud Kipchoge dared to try to inspire people. And that's commendable.
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka

Nike spent ten years trying to break the 2-hour marathon. They named a project after it. They built special shoes. They paid the greatest marathoner alive to chase it. Yesterday, a Kenyan runner finally did it in 1:59:30, wearing Adidas. Sabastian Sawe used to be a pacemaker. A pacemaker is the kind of runner you hire to set the speed for the first few miles of a race and then drop out before the finish. In January 2022, Sawe got booked to do exactly that at a half-marathon in Spain. He'd never raced more than three miles in his life. He stayed in for the full 13 and won the whole thing. Adidas signed him not long after. Four years later, he became the first human ever to run an official marathon under 2 hours. Nike, meanwhile, started this whole project in 2016 with a public goal called "Breaking2." They paid for the shoes, the pacemakers, the science labs, and Eliud Kipchoge himself. Kipchoge ran 1:59:40 in Vienna in 2019, but the event was a closed-course exhibition with rotating pacemakers and a pace car projecting a green laser line onto the road. The sport's governing body never recognized it as a real race. It didn't count. Then Nike's running business cratered. Digital sales fell 26% in one quarter. Their share of footwear sold at Dick's Sporting Goods went from 39% to 32% in five months. On Running grew from $330 million to $1.8 billion between 2020 and 2025. Hoka nearly quadrupled. Roger Federer left Nike for On. Nike's board fired the CEO in October 2024. Adidas spent the same period building a better shoe. The new Adizero Adios Pro Evo 3 took three years to develop. It weighs 97 grams, about 3.4 ounces, lighter than a deck of cards. A Wall Street Journal-cited study found that wearing a shoe 3.5 ounces lighter saves a runner around 57 seconds across a marathon. Sawe beat the third-place finisher by 58 seconds. Adidas also did something Nike never did for Kipchoge. They wrote a $50,000 check to the official anti-doping body for track and field, asking it to test Sawe more aggressively than any other runner alive. He got tested 25 times in the two months before last year's Berlin Marathon, and Adidas signed up to fund this for the length of his contract. The logic: the moment Sawe ran a marathon this fast, the world was going to ask if he cheated, especially after his countrywoman Ruth Chepngetich got a 3-year doping ban in 2025. Adidas got out ahead of it. The shoe retails at $500 and is barely available. Adidas's Adizero shoes won half of all major marathon races in 2024. Yesterday in London, four of the top five finishers wore the same Adidas shoe. Yomif Kejelcha crossed the line 11 seconds after Sawe and also broke 2 hours. The top three runners all beat the previous world record. Nike's only response was an Instagram post. Three sentences long: "The clock has been reset. There is no finish line." That was their entire public reaction to losing a 10-year moonshot to their biggest rival.

English
0
1
1
110
Richard M. retweetledi
David Senra
David Senra@davidsenra·
"The reward for great work is more work. I find that saying that maxim to the right person, the kind of person I want to spend time with, their eyes go wide and they understand it immediately. The reward for great work is not money, power, fame. It is the privilege to get to do more of this thing that I love doing." — @patrick_oshag
English
10
16
155
8.9K
Richard M. retweetledi
Ameer ☻
Ameer ☻@am33r__105·
we used to be so happy…what changed?
English
239
575
3.8K
170.2K
Richard M. retweetledi
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@anishmoonka·
In 1986, a Texas psychologist told 46 students to write about the worst thing that ever happened to them, 15 minutes a day for 4 days straight. Over the next 6 months, those students went to the doctor half as often as the kids in the control group. The psychologist was James Pennebaker. He repeated the experiment, and so did other labs. Same answer every time: writing about pain in a notebook was changing something inside the body. Follow-up studies found improved immune cell counts, faster wound healing after surgery, lower HIV virus levels in blood tests, and better lung function in people with asthma. For years the mechanism was a puzzle. Pennebaker had stumbled onto a much bigger pattern than he realized. Making things of any kind does something to the body. Take painting. A 2016 study at Drexel University handed 39 random adults some markers, clay, and collage paper and told them to make whatever they wanted for 45 minutes. No rules, no skill required. 75% of them walked out with lower cortisol (the main stress hormone) in their saliva. Beginners and experienced artists got the same drop. Take dancing. Doctors at Einstein College of Medicine tracked 469 seniors over a 21-year period in a study published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2003. People who danced a few times a week were 76% less likely to get dementia than people who rarely did. That was the largest protective effect of anything they tested. Crosswords came in at 47%, reading at 35%. Swimming and cycling did nothing for the brain at all. Take singing. In 2004, researchers in Germany measured antibodies in a choir's saliva before and after rehearsal. The antibody count (the stuff that fights off colds and flu) rose significantly. A follow-up study on cancer patients and their caregivers found that one hour of group singing dropped cortisol and switched on their immune systems at a measurable, blood-test level. And just going to see art helps. University College London tracked 6,710 British adults over age 50 for 14 years. People who went to the theatre, a museum, or a concert every few months were 31% less likely to die during that window. Even going once or twice a year dropped the risk by 14%. Wealth, education, and starting health were all accounted for. The mechanism seems to live in a brain circuit called the default mode network, the part that wanders when you daydream. When you fall into the zone of making something, that network hooks up with the one that holds your attention, and the brain's stress system quiets down. Cortisol falls, dopamine climbs, and the slow-burn inflammation that eventually kills most of us calms down too. None of it depends on the quality of what you make. The Spanish tweet sounded like hyperbole. 40 years of peer-reviewed data says it's roughly right.
444 𖤐@poyoetc

No pretendo exagerar pero el arte va a salvar tu vida. la música, la pintura, la cerámica, la escritura, el tallado, el tejido… el acto de CREAR te va a salvar.

English
37
1.3K
5.2K
353.7K
Richard M. retweetledi
Srinath Ravichandran
Srinath Ravichandran@srinathr155·
I spent my formative years in the era before Elon was “Elon”. We were terrific Steve Jobs design ethic fans. The inside of the product mattered as much as the outside. Keeping it simple. Use adjectives wrongly in phrases such as “Think Different” and yet make it a sensation. Reality distortion. Control obsession. Spirituality. Pixar and more… So, when Tim Cook took over after Jobs I remember the debates I have had on how Apple will change for the worse. Now, so many years down the line, Tim Cook has shown so many more ways in which a company can be grown. The biggest lesson that strikes me now is this - life is a multi solution, multi path problem. Stick to your originality, style and focus and chart your path. To take up Apple and run it the way we he did, to fill the shoes of one of the most powerful personalities at that time while also having to lead the company - this is an incredibly hard challenge. Excited to see what Apple will become now.
CNN@CNN

Apple CEO Tim Cook will step down as CEO after leading the company in the post-Steve Jobs era. He will be replaced by longtime executive John Ternus. cnn.it/42jcx7f

English
1
5
66
11.6K
Richard M. retweetledi
Jack Moses
Jack Moses@jackmoses777·
All the most successful people I know have the most agency. They don’t wait to be told what to do. They don't outsource their thinking and planning to AI. They never go unconscious or escape into social media. Their mind is a sword, and they use it to cut through reality to inch closer to their mission at every waking moment. You can spot this type of person by the way they walk, speak, text, and look at you. No motion is wasted. Their attention is sharp. Every moment is intentional. Stop looking outside yourself for answers. Stop waiting to be told what to do. Stop asking AI what it thinks. Find the highest-leverage problem and attack it with your full focus and attention. Once it's done, move on to the next. Cultivate agency first as a devoted practice, and everything you’re looking for will follow.
English
16
37
331
8K
Richard M. retweetledi
☀️AliquisNovus☀️
☀️AliquisNovus☀️@PalmyrPar·
Tim Cook hate is overdone. He was the right guy at the right time. Jobs correctly predicted no one would create a post-smartphone anytime soon - so he put in a CEO who would grow what Apple had with the most brilliant supply/logistics in corporate history. Ever. Cook was great.
English
66
278
7.2K
170.7K
Richard M.
Richard M.@RichardtheMutts·
Insightful observation here. 👌
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta

The succession everyone called for years just happened, and it's the most revealing personnel decision in tech this year. Apple is the company most behind in AI: Siri delayed three times, Apple Intelligence launched with hallucinated news headlines, and the upgraded assistant is reportedly going to be powered by Google Gemini under the hood. The obvious move was to put a software or AI executive in the CEO seat. Instead the board picked the guy who runs hardware engineering. Ternus has been at Apple 25 years. He's a mechanical engineer. He's never run software, services, or AI. His resume is iPhone, iPad, Mac, AirPods, Apple Watch, Vision Pro, and the M-series silicon transition. He is the silicon-and-systems candidate. Cook leaves with the receipts. Market cap from $350B to $4T, a 10x in 14 years. Revenue from $108B to $416B, nearly quadrupled. Services from a footnote to a $100B business. He inherited a hardware company and built a recurring-revenue platform on top of it. The market said thanks by selling AAPL down 1% after hours. The Ternus pick tells you what Apple's board actually believes about the next decade. The AI race won't be won at the model layer where Apple is hopeless and renting from Google. It'll be won at the silicon layer (on-device inference, custom NPUs, thermal envelope, battery), the form factor layer (glasses, wearables, ambient computing), and the integration layer (the chip talking to the OS talking to the model). All hardware-adjacent problems. All Ternus problems. The bear case is straightforward. Apple just promoted the executive least connected to the technology that's eating the world, at the exact moment software-native companies (OpenAI with Jony Ive's device, Meta with Ray-Ban, Google with Gemini-everything) are coming for the iPhone's distribution. A mechanical engineer running the most valuable consumer software platform in history. That's a real bet. The bull case is the same fact framed differently. Every competitor is converging on the realization that AI hardware (the device the model lives on) is the next platform, and Apple has spent 25 years building exactly that. Ternus shipped Apple Silicon, the only credible non-Nvidia AI chip in a consumer device. He runs Vision Pro. He inherited the robotics team in the April reorg. The boring read is succession planned years in advance, no surprise. The interesting read is that Apple just told you it doesn't think the AI race ends with the best chatbot. It thinks it ends with the best device. And it picked the person who builds devices.

English
0
0
0
6
Oren John
Oren John@orenmeetsworld·
We are in an intellectual video content boom As the text networks are overtaken by AI, smart people with niche expertise who can write well are crushing it on Instagram and TikTok. These are the four content styles to leverage expertise for a brand or creator and put up views in 2026👇
English
9
7
233
24.1K
Richard M. retweetledi
Reads with Ravi
Reads with Ravi@readswithravi·
This paragraph by C.S. Lewis, written in 1948, still hits hard: “If we are all going to be destroyed by an atomic bomb, let that bomb when it comes find us doing sensible and human things—praying, working, teaching, reading, listening to music, bathing the children, playing tennis, chatting to our friends over a pint and a game of darts—not huddled together like frightened sheep and thinking about bombs. They may break our bodies (a microbe can do that) but they need not dominate our minds.”
English
98
3K
18.3K
544.4K
Richard M.
Richard M.@RichardtheMutts·
@orenmeetsworld I'm glad I was born in an era when I can read such for free. To read is nice. But to apply and get to work is nicer and greater. Thanks for sharing, mate! Much appreciated.
English
1
0
1
154