Rob Goodall

It's wild how people casually talk about getting an infection after they were vaccinated multiple times against it. Did it ever occur to you that that shows it doesn't effing work? Let me briefly explain why: Injected vaccines generate robust IgG antibody responses, but do little to nothing to induce sIgA antibodies. sIgA antibodies are what you need to have immunity against respiratory infections. Robust sIgA antibody protection is induced only when pathogens (antigens) are introduced into your respiratory or GI tract via infection or possibly nasal or oral vaccines (like the oral polio vaccine or Flumist). When you got your covid vaccine all it really did was give you a false sense of security. You were always just as susceptible to infection and just as able to transmit it as though you weren't vaccinated. Below is a graph taken from a study showing the nasopharyngeal viral loads of vaccinated and unvaccinated people. The preprint was out in 2021. As you can see there is no significant difference in the amount of virus in the vaccinated people vs. the unvaccinated people--not even in the subgroup analyses at the bottom--so what did the vaccine actually do? It did fuck all, that's what. Your second bout of covid was milder than your first because you had carryover mucosal protection from your first infection. I had the same experience without the vaccine: first infection sucked, second one was barely noticeable. You were lied to at every stage of the game when it came to the covid vaccines. They generated an immune response in the wrong immunological compartment. If covid were a systemic infection like measles or chickenpox, then it absolutely would have helped, but SARS-CoV-2 doesn't infect your internal organs or tissues in any meaningful way. It has only ever been cultured successfully from positive blood samples a handful of times despite massive effort. After you got vaccinated, you had all these protective IgG antibodies coursing through your veins. Meanwhile the covid virus stayed tucked up, out of the way, in your respiratory tract where, as you can see from the graph below, the vaccine-induced IgG antibodies do nothing.

@AndrewScheidl @TheReclamare You still think the Nordstream 2 was blown up by a sailboat full of Ukrainians, don't you?

@RobGoodall6 @TheReclamare I've heard them, I've read them. They take some people in. I'm not one of them. You're their target. Enjoy.

I'm a subscriber of Ryan's, like his work In a single operation, Ukrainian drones reportedly struck 27 or 28 Russian vessels in the Sea of Azov - including 21 oil tankers @AndrewScheidl ryanmcbeth.substack.com/p/ukraines-dro…

Give me a break. You'd do well to actually listen to the opposing arguments instead of reflexively dismissing them a propaganda. The cold war is over. The west had a chance to engage with Russia and bring it into the fold, but old habits die hard, I guess, and the atavistic morons in the US national security state could not abide the notion of making an ally out of Russia. Now we have Russia allying with China (the real enemy BTW), and both sponsoring Iran for the same reason the US is sponsoring Ukraine. It's just a big waste of blood and treasure which China no doubt enjoys watching from the sidelines.

@TheReclamare @RobGoodall6 Please untag me from all the Mearsheimer/Sachs/Putin apologia. Thanks.

@Tablesalt13 Speaking a a Man of Culture, I do not approve.

‼️NEW -- The European Broadcasting Union has released their final report "Raising the Bar: guidelines for respectful media coverage" and outlines angles that should not be used in sports reporting.

If I believed that the number of people saying a certain thing lent credibility to the thing they're saying, then I'd have to believe that the Russian invasion was unprovoked and that Putin wants to invade Europe. Ha ha. I know I have a bias toward contrarian views, however, so it is something I have to keep in mind.

@RobGoodall6 @AndrewScheidl Not to suggest that anyone's view is wrong but the Russia Ukraine fight is centuries old, very complex, and easily leveraged basis a bias in perspective. Never give any single view a balance of weighting but instead balance it with others. Repetition doesn't change weighting

Mearsheimer is also good on this topic (see below). Their views are similar. What people maybe don't realize is that between the Black Sea and Moscow is thousands of kilometers of flat plains. No major natural barrier to invasion exists, so when people call Ukraine Russia's soft underbelly, they really do mean it. The Mongols, Napolean, and Hitler used it. This is the main reason Russia is so dead set against NATO in Ukraine. NATO bases in Ukraine could theoretically be a staging ground for a land invasion. If the US and NATO just allows Russia to keep their Black Sea fleet, Russia can at least feel somewhat secure. This is why, for the sake of peace, it's a reasonable concession to let them keep Crimea and control at least some kind of defensible route to it. A face-saving deal involving autonomy for the eastern provinces was on the table within weeks of the invasion, but Boris Johnson paid Zelensky a visit and somehow kiboshed it. I can provide one tiny insight that you won't get anywhere else. One of my staff got out of Ukraine just after the start of the war, and her family and friends are all still back there. She told me a year ago that one of the circulating rumours was that Zelensky lives in constant fear of a military coup, and the reason he keeps throwing his own soldiers into the meat grinder at the front is because he wants the army weakened. This doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me, but the fact Ukrainians are entertaining ideas like this speaks to their morale and their faith in Zelensky. My staffer also told me that it's a huge embarrassment for Ukrainians that Zelenksy once performed for Putin. mearsheimer.substack.com/p/who-caused-t…

@RobGoodall6 @AndrewScheidl Thanks

@CommonBoy19 @SRKzRule If you're shooting slugs, then a scope is perfectly reasonable--especially if your eyesight sucks.

I agree. Shotguns are suitable for close range. Using the 8x scope, it‘s too much to lose balance. This clip probably wants to look cool but forget the basic physics principles. In games or movies, it is very common to put over-spec equipment for drama. But in the real world, it clearly reduces efficiency. It’s good that people see it and think about realism.

Everyone has bias, obviously. You really don't know a thing about my biases, but I do, and use that knowledge to keep my beliefs in check. I doubt you're capable of recognizing your own bias, but it's there, and evident in the fact that you can't observe a clear double standard where one exists. You don't design a study, seek out grants, have a grantee review your study design, approve it, give you a grant, put the work in to conduct the study, and then shelve it because the results are unexpected, if you believe in science. If you believe in science, then you know, to the core of your being, that unexpected results are the most interesting results and are where scientific breakthroughs come from. Unexpected results can be incredibly important and informative, and no real scientist would cover them up. You don't understand this concept because your bias has robbed you of the ability to consider the notion that vaccines might actually be harmful in unexpected ways. I am agnostic on whether or not vaccines can cause autism. William Zimmerman, a former government witness and famous defender of vaccines thinks they can. Bill Thompson, senior CDC scientist says they discovered a statistically significant associate between age at vaccination and incidence of autism in black boys, and then destroyed the data. There are at least a couple of biologically plausible mechanisms by which vaccines could cause autism, and the number of parents reporting regression to autism immediately following vaccinations is alarmingly high. I am open to the possibility because, unlike you, I understand what science is supposed to be and do. You say "science works," but you don't even really know what it is. I can kind of tell by your bio, for that matter. You say "climate change is real" in the same way you say "science works." These are silly, vastly oversimplified claims which betray your simplistic beliefs. Everyone knows that climate change is real, because the earth's climate has been changing since day one. If you mean man-made climate change is real, then you've got no argument from me, because you're probably correct--sulphate emissions affect clouds, anthropogenic GHGs contribute to warming. But if you mean man-made climate change is going to bring about some climatic catastrophe then you're making an evidence-free claim. Maybe it will one day, but there's no particularly sound reason to think so today. You need to examine the kernels from which your beliefs have sprouted. I believed in the climate emergency narrative right up until I finally sat down to look at the details. Same goes for vaccines. I used to be where you are now: completely unaware that my beliefs stemmed from bias, not facts or reason.

@RobGoodall6 @thevaccstat @drterrysimpson It's funny that you talk of a bias, while you yourself are incredibly biased. It's a fact that opinions that question mainstream science are typically held by non-scientists, that can't write proper papers with proper methodology. So these never get published.

If one group of thousands of children supposedly had zero ADHD, zero diabetes, zero learning disabilities, and zero tics, that doesn't immediately prove vaccines are harmful, but does raise questions about how the groups were selected and how diagnoses were collected. Before concluding this overturns decades of research involving millions of children, I'd want to see the full methodology, independent peer review, and replication - that is how science works. Extra ordinary claims require extra ordinary evidence - a meme is just that - a meme.

As an exterminator I got to see the inside of some of those places 35 years ago. They were horrible then, and probably worse now. I once walked into a room which was supposed to be vacant only to find some old indigenous dude huffing gasoline out of coffee can. Bloody needles everywhere, as well as the characteristic fine blood spray on all the walls. Something to do with flushing needles out between uses.

Been to prison. Slept on the streets. Yet Andrew says Vancouver’s Supportive Housing SRO's are worse: 'I wouldn’t put my worst enemy in one of these places. I’d rather send him to jail." Poverty Pimp Agencies need oversight

@TheReclamare @AndrewScheidl Jeffery Sachs is the guy who understands what's going on the most, I think. If you have the time, here he is explaining the background and build up to the war. youtube.com/watch?v=dYi5S8…

@RobGoodall6 @AndrewScheidl I've not involved myself enough to be an expert and debate the nuances. Invasion is enough to justify a defence, IMO However, the advancement in military tactics and technology is interesting and will change not only how wars are fought but the 'strength' of smaller nations

I know everyone hates Russia rn, but UKR needs to negotiate a solution. Russia won't stop until they have a secure land route to Crimea. All Putin wants is to keep his black sea port and protect Russia's soft underbelly. Russia has obvious security concerns with NATO courting Ukraine, and every one just needs to take a big swig of realpolitik and get some kind of security deal done. Give Putin his land bridge, but demand concessions elsewhere. Russia can be integrated with Europe via mutual economic dependence. The notion that the US is going to be able to force regime change in Russia by hurling another hundred thousand Ukrainian men into a meat grinder is as daft as it is immoral. Also, the notion that a deal is some kind of replay of Chamberlain's appeasement is pure fearmongering. Putin isn't Hitler. Russia's not going to invade Poland. Russia has the same GDP as Italy, for crying out loud. It's not a paper tiger per se, but they are severely limited by their lack of money. Europe would benefit greatly from a friendship with Russia, but the US just keeps pushing Russia into China's arms, and killing Europe's industrial base by denying them cheap Russian energy. None of it makes any sense at all. I believe the US is acting irrationally.

@RobGoodall6 @AndrewScheidl Defeating their enemy and defending their country

@CloneGree41st @Shrav_YEAH Didgeridoo? More like didgeridon't!

@Shrav_YEAH You just watched all these seemingly normal suburban women openly admitting to the entire world on the internet that they enjoy being sodomized in their anuses, the sphincter the body exclusively uses to get rid of excrement and waste, like a common homosexual degenerate.

What the f*ck did i just watched 😭

What you and so many others are deliberately failing to understand is that we have double standard here. BS studies that support medical establishment narratives get published all the time often with minimal criticism. But they didn't even attempt to publish this study, which is absolutely wild. The authors designed a study, the grantees looked at the design, and presumably approved of it enough to give the authors the money to conduct the study. When the study came back with results neither the authors nor grantees liked, they shelved it. That is not science. That's bias. This is all very obvious. No study is perfect. There will always be ways to criticize the methodology. The way science is supposed to work is you publish the study, flaws and all, then acknowledge and explain the flaws in the limitations section. You look at any observational VE study, and you'll see the authors explain in the limitations how the vaccinated and unvaccinated groups might differ in ways they could not adequately account. You'll see that they acknowledge this as a potential source of bias. This is standard. This is the way science is supposed to work.

@RobGoodall6 @thevaccstat @drterrysimpson And do we still use or cite these studies? No! They've been detected as fraudulent and retracted. Has it's own section on Wikipedia. Your acting like this "garbage" is still canon. It isn't. Science works.

@ChrisWickNews Maybe it was OBL from beyond the grave.

The FBI’s looking into his death, but you already know how this goes. They’ll spin it hard — poison by Iran or Russia — and use it to crank up the conflict while shifting all the blame. Classic move. What do you think they’ll push next?

@TSHamiltonAstro "Periodic"

Your periodic reminder that extra space between sentences has been the standard in English language typography for hundreds of years, pre-dating the typewriter. It’s there because it makes the text easier to read.

@elchicanomarine You've got it backward. People outside of academia know things academics don't.

I’ll explain this like you’re five: People who spend decades researching complicated problems sometimes change their minds based on evidence. That’s called learning. If most experts in a field reach similar conclusions, your first question shouldn’t be, “Why are they all left-wing?” It should be, “What do they know that I don’t?” This really isn’t the flex you think it is.

@thevaccstat @drterrysimpson Obviously not. Complete garbage gets routinely published so long as it supports the medical establishment narratives. Take the two Surgisphere studies, for example.

@RobGoodall6 @drterrysimpson Only if it was a good quality study.

@TwoRulesOfWar Yep. If spike protein keeps binding to the ACE2 receptors in the cells that make up your endothelial lining, your immune system will attack your vascular walls, causing vasculitis, dissection, and/or aneurysm.

For what it’s worth, you could have a ruptured aortic aneurysm standing in the ER with thoracic surgeon next to you and still might not make it.

@nancydoylebrown @toobaffled During 2021 my wife and I kept passing people in the park who were talking about so-and-so who had a heart attack, a stroke, or who died. After the first couple of times we would just look at each other, eyebrows raised, and shake our heads.

@toobaffled I never knew anyone who had shingles until 2021. In 2021, I even overheard people at coffee shops talking about their shingles diagnoses.

Climate Change? dailymail.com/health/article…

@TheCinesthetic Wife and I saw it three times in the theatre. Worth every penny.

Imagine sitting in a theater in 1999 and witnessing this for the very first time.