Robert Foster

403 posts

Robert Foster banner
Robert Foster

Robert Foster

@RobertFosterMS

Man of Faith, Constitutional Conservative, former MS State Representative D28, current DeSoto County Supervisor D5, & Farmer. 🇺🇸

Hernando, MS Katılım Aralık 2022
786 Takip Edilen995 Takipçiler
Robert Foster
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS·
It doesn’t matter that we already held primaries in MS — they’re going to sue no matter what. Call a special session and redistrict now. If courts delay it for this cycle, we implement next year. Voters want Mississippi in the fight. Pick a side. @MSGOP #RedistrictMS #MSLeg #StandWithMSVoters
English
13
81
274
2.1K
Robert Foster
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS·
Incredible how some “MS Republicans” are excusing our state leadership’s foot-dragging on redistricting — “being cautious,” “taking our time.” They’ve had years to draw maps, and we’ve all known the Callais decision was dropping by June. We might not all be learned lawyers, but we’re not near as dumb as they are making themselves sound right now. It’s pathetic watching grown men who claim to believe in the Constitution argue we should keep violating it just because “wE aLrEaDy hAd A pRiMaRy.” @tatereeves @Andy_Taggart @RussLatino @SpencerMRitchie
English
9
43
143
1.5K
Robert Foster
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS·
Forgot to add @Andy_Taggart to this list of course. Silly me.
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS

Can’t wait to read the opinion pieces by the likes of @RussLatino @SpencerMRitchie @grantcallen @bricewigginsMS et al arguing why MS shouldn’t redistrict right now and draw out @BennieGThompson — because “wE aLrEaDy HaD a PrImArY” — when the district clearly violates the Constitution. Already making homemade ranch dressing for their incoming word salads. 🥗

English
0
1
12
521
Robert Foster
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS·
Wow, @MichaelWatsonMS just said it was @tatereeves and @LynnFitchAG that voted to settle the lawsuit and not keep our Republcian supermajority in the state senate. All they had to do was fight a little and hang on until the Callais decision came down. This is what I suspected all along when I heard the vote was 1-2, but it’s good to have confirmation.
Secretary Michael Watson@MichaelWatsonMS

@RobertFosterMS I still don’t understand how those judicial districts got out of the legislature. On the legislative side, only one of the three members of the SBEC pushed to immediately challenge the result. I was outvoted 2-1.

English
6
33
78
4.8K
Robert Foster
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS·
Thank you sir. We need help up here to make it right.
Secretary Michael Watson@MichaelWatsonMS

@RobertFosterMS I still don’t understand how those judicial districts got out of the legislature. On the legislative side, only one of the three members of the SBEC pushed to immediately challenge the result. I was outvoted 2-1.

English
1
8
31
1.1K
Robert Foster retweetledi
Secretary Michael Watson
Secretary Michael Watson@MichaelWatsonMS·
@RobertFosterMS I still don’t understand how those judicial districts got out of the legislature. On the legislative side, only one of the three members of the SBEC pushed to immediately challenge the result. I was outvoted 2-1.
English
3
5
23
4.8K
Robert Foster retweetledi
Chris Hinkle
Chris Hinkle@TheChrisHinkle·
What does it matter if one of us is a Constitutional Lawyer? Having knowledge, understanding, and ability to articulate that understanding of our U.S. Constitution is not limited to lawyers. It's one of the reason our founding fathers had faith in the common man. There is no requirement to be an attorney nor judge to sit as a Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court. Credibility of knowledge of the U.S. Constitution is not automatically bestowed merely by being a lawyer. Even a "Constitutional Lawyer." A lawsuit can bring the matter before the court. But, that does not negate the responsibility of our elected representatives to honor the oath they took to protect and defend the U.S. Constitution. It's literally the one thing they swear an oath to do. Redraw the lines. Hold another primary. Have an election based upon district lines that are within the guardrails of the U.S. Constitution. Failure to do so means ignoring the oath and holding yet another election based upon unconstitutionally drawn district lines.
English
2
4
22
288
Robert Foster retweetledi
Michael Mclendon
Michael Mclendon@senmclendon·
Now suddenly we’re supposed to believe changing districts mid-cycle is some sacred threat to “democracy”? Where was your outrage last year when Democrats and RINOs pushed to redraw Republican districts in the MIDDLE OF A TERM and force sitting senators into new districts? Where was the concern about “rules” when Democrats and establishment Republicans teamed up to carve out a majority-minority judicial district in deep-red Mississippi? Never heard you say anything about this. Funny how all the “be careful” people only appear when conservatives start talking about removing Democrat power or calling out RINOs. Mississippi already proved it can redraw maps, reopen qualifying, and administer elections on compressed timelines. Redraw the SIP. And now, not 2027.
Russ Latino@RussLatino

Being the moron king to barking seals is easy. Being smart & governing well is harder. So let’s say we start redistricting as a state after qualifying deadlines have already run statewide. And let’s say we redistrict statewide after primaries are already completed, with winning nominees selected. Set aside that this is unprecedented. Set aside what it does to the integrity of the election. Set aside the deluge of Due Process lawsuits that have nothing to do with the VRA that will hit the state. What’s to prevent this new precedent from being used every cycle? Legislature doesn’t like the candidate the voters selected? Redistrict them out, invalidate hundreds of thousands of casted votes, and run the election over! Is this really where we want to go? This isn’t about one election or one candidate you don’t like. Think hard. You don’t change the rules of a baseball series when game 1 is already in the books. Some of these folks can’t contemplate a universe in which their own gamesmanship ends up biting them in the ass. Others can, and don’t care, because they just want social media engagement.

English
6
37
101
2.9K
Russ Latino
Russ Latino@RussLatino·
Being the moron king to barking seals is easy. Being smart & governing well is harder. So let’s say we start redistricting as a state after qualifying deadlines have already run statewide. And let’s say we redistrict statewide after primaries are already completed, with winning nominees selected. Set aside that this is unprecedented. Set aside what it does to the integrity of the election. Set aside the deluge of Due Process lawsuits that have nothing to do with the VRA that will hit the state. What’s to prevent this new precedent from being used every cycle? Legislature doesn’t like the candidate the voters selected? Redistrict them out, invalidate hundreds of thousands of casted votes, and run the election over! Is this really where we want to go? This isn’t about one election or one candidate you don’t like. Think hard. You don’t change the rules of a baseball series when game 1 is already in the books. Some of these folks can’t contemplate a universe in which their own gamesmanship ends up biting them in the ass. Others can, and don’t care, because they just want social media engagement.
Robert Foster@RobertFosterMS

Can’t wait to read the opinion pieces by the likes of @RussLatino @SpencerMRitchie @grantcallen @bricewigginsMS et al arguing why MS shouldn’t redistrict right now and draw out @BennieGThompson — because “wE aLrEaDy HaD a PrImArY” — when the district clearly violates the Constitution. Already making homemade ranch dressing for their incoming word salads. 🥗

English
19
1
28
9.9K