robin taylor

@SawyerMerritt Just changed my order from the Model Y rwd to the Model premium rwd, with paint and interior upgrade it's still cheaper than the Model Y rwd with the government rebate. So thank you Sawyer.

I think this new RWD trim in Canada is the least expensive new vehicle that Tesla has ever sold in the North American market. Literally the most affordable new Tesla ever sold in the region, and it has the Premium interior. A base 2026 Toyota Camry Hybrid is only $1k less...

@razRBCHK @Dios_Orz @SawyerMerritt The government dropped the tariff rates to make it as cheap as it is.

@Dios_Orz @SawyerMerritt So… no hope they’ll allow the $5k rebate? 🥺

@MbarkCherguia Right ? The only logical choice is Elon.

if aliens landed on the earth tomorrow, and you had to pick one person to represent humanity, it would be: 1. Elon Musk 2. Bill Gates 3. Jeff Bezos 4. Mark Zuckerberg

@S_13_S14 Nope, just stinky girls are.

It’s 2026 and this is still a good hit in the NHL. Doesn’t matter which team, what the score is, the penalty count, if he’s a star or a grinder. This is hockey’s worst hit, yet routinely goes unpunished.

@OutdoorHorizon A

Be honest 🧐.... If Elon musk gives you free Tesla Car right now, would you accept? A. Yes B. No

How the hell can a ref be right there and not a single call be made? If this happened in Habs/Lightning seriss someone's getting a 5 minute major.

An always precious help

Tesla Model 3 stopped itself to avoid an accident thanks to FSD.

Yes or No

Why does NHL allow blatant hits from behind? Ref is right there. Happens all across the NHL. Utterly moronic how the league continues to allow it.

If OpenAI and Sam Altman lose this lawsuit to Elon, I’m pretty sure it’s going to hit them WAY harder than most people expect. I could honestly see their whole company losing more than half its value overnight bc trust would evaporate. The trial just kicked off this week in Oakland and it all comes down to the original deal. Elon helped found OpenAI as a nonprofit to build AI safely for the good of humanity and NOT profits. If the court rules they broke that promise by going for-profit with all the Microsoft $, a lot of people are going to feel like the whole story and management team at OpenAI was shady from the start and Sam would probably get kicked out. FYI, that’s actually one of the things Elon is asking for in the suit, along with major damages in the $ billions. Once the leadership isn’t trustworthy and the mission gets called out in court and media, investors will get nervous fast. Fresh funding would probably dry up real quick bc no one will want to pour $ into that kind of mess. And right now, their IPO is valued at around $852 billion... that would turn into a total nightmare, probably delayed or at a much lower price with all the extra questions hanging over them. And then I believe that lost value and momentum will likely flow straight over to Grok and xAI, especially now that xAI has merged into SpaceX earlier this year. The combined entity is already sitting at a massive scale, and it positions Elon’s whole ecosystem as the clearer leader - more focused on truth-seeking AI without the same corporate drama and lost trust in management. On top of this, talent, users, and investor interest will probably also shift over pretty naturally. I personally think Sam and OpenAI know deep down they are in trouble…

Elon Musk just now at the witness stand on if Sam Altman and OpenAI win this trial: "It is not ok to steal a charity. It will give license to looting every charity in America. The consequences of this case go far beyond me or everyone here. The entire foundation of charitable giving in america will be destroyed."

Elon Musk just put the entire university system on trial. Not the curriculum. Not the professors. The premise. Musk: “You don’t need college to learn stuff. Everything is available basically for free. You can learn anything you want for free.” For a thousand years, universities held one monopoly. Access. You paid the toll or you stayed ignorant. The internet erased that in a decade. Every lecture. Every framework. Every textbook. Free. From any screen on Earth. The six-figure tuition is no longer buying knowledge. It is buying a signal. Musk: “There is a value that colleges have, which is seeing whether somebody can work hard at something, including a bunch of annoying homework assignments, and still do their homework assignments.” That is the product. Not intelligence. Not creativity. Not vision. Compliance. You are paying $200,000 to prove you can tolerate bureaucracy on a schedule. Musk: “Colleges are basically for fun and to prove you can do your chores. But they’re not for learning.” The entire system is a sorting machine for corporate HR. It does not measure what you can build. It measures whether you can sit still, follow directions, and deliver on command. Four years of obedience dressed as education. Musk: “If you’re trying to do something exceptional, you must have evidence of exceptional ability. I don’t consider going to college evidence of exceptional ability.” The system optimizes for average. It rewards the compliant. It certifies the patient. It quietly filters out everyone who refuses to wait for permission. The ones who reshaped the modern world never finished the test. Musk: “Gates is a pretty smart guy, he dropped out. Jobs is pretty smart, he dropped out. Larry Ellison, smart guy, he dropped out.” They did not drop out because it was too hard. They dropped out because the speed limit was too low. The most dangerous thing a university does is convince a generational talent that finishing the syllabus is the achievement. It is not. It is the floor. A degree is a receipt for compliance. The future has never belonged to people who finish their homework. It belongs to the ones who never needed the assignment.

Here's a rough summary of Elon Musk’s 1 hour and 40 minute long testimony today during the OpenAI trial. He will resume his testimony tomorrow. • Argues the case has huge implications: "It is not ok to steal a charity. If the defendants are found not guilty, this case will become caselaw. It’ll give license to looting every charity in America. The consequences of this case go far beyond me or everyone here. The entire foundation of charitable giving in America will be destroyed." • Says OpenAI was founded as a nonprofit, open-source counterweight to Google, focused on AI safety. • Claims the shift to a for-profit structure violated that mission. • Says his AI concerns date back to conversations with Larry Page, who he felt wasn’t taking AI risk seriously. • Elon says he tried to warn Obama about AI, but that Obama felt AI was not good enough (back then) to seem scary smart. "Here we are in 2026, AI is very smart." • Believes AI could surpass human intelligence as soon as next year and poses existential risk in the hands of the wrong people: “If you have someone who’s not very trustworthy in charge of AI, that’s very dangerous for the whole world.” • Elon framed his companies (SpaceX, Neuralink, xAI) as part of a broader mission to protect humanity’s future. • Emphasized OpenAI’s original goal: AI for the good of humanity, not profit-driven control. • Elon's main argument is that OpenAI abandoned its founding principles, and that precedent could reshape both AI governance and charitable trust. • Larry Page refused to speak to Elon Musk again after Elon recruited Ilya Sutskever to join OpenAI. Elon viewed Ilya as the “number one” most valuable member at Google. • Elon thought in the early days, OpenAI's corporate structure would be a nonprofit funded initially with donations, but there could potentially be a parallel for-profit that is owned by the nonprofit and funds the nonprofit: “We (Sam Altman and Elon) were in agreement that OpenAI would be a 501c3 charity. • Elon was not opposed to there being a small for-profit that provided funding to the nonprofit, as long as "the tail didn’t wag the dog." • Elon: “there are very few people who understand venture capital in Silicon Valley like I do."

@outdoorkitty333 Good girl

never getting rid of my bush

@MilfsHub2 C

A, B, C or D ? Choice is yours

@waddsy19 @TopTierPucks Oilers fan here, there's no way that the refs could have seen that it was a goal. However under review it obviously was. Poor officiating to say the least.

@TopTierPucks No. The worst was the Brett Hull toe in the crease. Clear cut, black and white rule, called all year, right up until it wasn't. Last night's winning goal was inconclusive both ways but the refs had a date and wanted to get home, so called it a goal on the ice.

From this angle you can clearly see part of the puck still touching the red paint Is this the worst goal call in NHL history?