Enjoying those brief moments...

@DoomScroling @laurenisforlife @redusa21 Deliberately killing an innocent is always ethically impermissible.

@BibleInContext1 Quit lying you rube.

Catholicism hypocritically condemns Christians for Sola Scriptura while they practice Sola Ecclesia. Roman Catholicism believes that the infallible authority of Scripture must have an external authentication. They claim that Scripture cannot stand on its own authority, yet assumes their Church can. Apparently the Catholic church establishes its own infallible authority. They teach Scripture must be authenticated and interpreted by their Church, while their Church gets to authenticate itself. In practice, this is sola ecclesia. If Scripture requires the Roman Catholic churches “infallible” authority to authenticate it then you cannot use Scripture to establish the authority of the Roman Church. It's circular reasoning. If the Roman Catholic Church can authenticate itself as an infallible authority, then the Scripture can authenticate itself as an infallible authority!

@dmh1125 One was an actual prophet, the other a fraud. JS wrote himself into Genesis. Only frauds do that.

You believe God appeared to Moses in a burning bush.

@BillArnoldTeach Exactly! They take the Church’s authority on NT scripture. And have no clue how it came abut.

@RodRuiz14 Because the Bible didn’t come with a table of contents. The Church had to identify it.

You trust the canon. You reject the Church that canonized it. Pick one.

@StARadtrad No

I came across a movie called “Catholics” starring Martin Sheen. It’s about the struggle of a group of Irish monks who refused to go along with the modernist take over of V2. Has anyone else heard of this movie ?

@ldsfilmguy You guys argue like atheists. Did Moses write himself into Genesis like that fraud JS?

But a burning bush talking to Moses is totally believable guys. Trust me.

@jakemmccleary You aren’t Christians. It doesn’t change anything.

Them: “Mormons aren’t Christians” Mormons on every single temple: “Holiness to the Lord. The House of the Lord.”

@EmilySm43 Mordor, Meloch, Nebuchadnezzar, Cain, etc…

🤔

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 We are definitely done.

@RodRuiz14 @Truth_matters20 And by the way, the clown is the person who dogmatically believes lies, the Bible refers to them as a fool, that would be you.

The Pope: "All religions are a path to God." Jesus: "I am the way, the truth, and the life. No man comes to the Father but by me."

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 Using Pope Gregory to base your ideas on the birth of the Church is absurd. We are done.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 Im basing this on actual history. Catholicism is there at the beginning. You are using your own bias to formulate a 6th C almost 7th C Church. Defies history. Read Clement, Ireneus, Polycarp, Justyn Martyr, Augustine etc. any of those and you can easily see their Catholicity.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 You are clown. The Catholic Church is there from the beginning. You are not a serious individual and it is clear from your Protestant tripe you have no clue.

I am a very serious individual, just too smart to believe anything because it came from some institution. The New Testament was settled long before the Roman Catholic church came to be, long before Nicea. It was canonized by the church at large around 250 AD, not by some formal conclave, but by the church using those particular books, and rejecting others as of no value. All Nicea did was, while arguing over what to do about Arianism, because that is why they were called together, they accepted what was already done. That is the facts, not the fables you were taught.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 The Old Testament canon was not “largely” settled by the time of Jesus. This is even attested in the NT. The only Church in the 4th C operating was…the Catholic one. Thanks for proving my point. All of those “sects” had not yet broken off because they were in union with Rome

Just stop, you are embarrassing yourself. I am not denying history at all, the Catholics just claim a lot more credit than they are due. You ought to look up the actual history instead of just listening to the dogma you have been fed. And I am not foisting a falsehood in the least, though I suppose as a Catholic, whose entire history has been filled with foisting falsehoods, you would be far more familiar with that than I am. The Old Testament canon was largely settled by the time Jesus walked the earth, not even in dispute, and the New Testament canon was decided by the 4th century, and while some Catholics were involved it certainly wasn't all, or even most, they just took credit and claimed people as their own who were not Roman Catholics. All of the New Testament was written by 95 AD, the Muratorium List was in 170 AD, which is basically what started canonization, and was long before the Catholic churches actual founding, 367 Athanasius named 27 books. And while the Catholic church claims him, he didn't exactly claim them, he is venerated and claimed by several early sects, such as the Greek Orthodox church. Then the Nicea Council, which consisted of multiple sects, chose those books to be canonized. That is reality, and that is actual history.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 Christianity.com is your source. Laughable. You aren’t a serious individual.

@RodRuiz14 @Truth_matters20 Maybe this will help you comprehend what the rest of the world already knows. How and When Was the Canon of the Bible Put Together? | Christianity.com

@OrthodoxNbdy And we love you.

I love Catholics

@AtheistTakes And they believe men can be women.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 You are now denying history and the very Church Fathers you denigrated. And you are foisting a falsehood regarding the vulgarization of the Bible. The only thing you are proven is you are intellectual lightweight.

The Catholic church didn't give us the canon. And they certainly have not safeguarded scripture for 2000 years, mostly they banned people from reading it at all right up to almost modern times. It took a Protestant King to get the Bible to the people. For someone who is so certain of the falsehoods you have been taught you prove again and again how ignorant you actually are.

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 The Catholic Church has safeguarded scripture for 2000 years. Christ is the head of the church. For someone with so many books you sure sound ignorant. The Church gave you the canon. You should be grateful.

I am not in rebellion, if anything the Catholic church is in rebellion against the teachings of scripture. Frankly any church that would place someone like your Pope as the head of their church has serious issues. I was always skeptical of St. Malachy and his prophecies, but watching this Pope makes me wonder if he wasn't correct. According to his supposed prophecy this is the last Roman Catholic Pope prior to Christ's returning, and while I would say most Catholics know, and love Jesus, his actions make me believe he is apostate. The catholic church has literally no authority at all any more. Not on the faith, not on anything. With their pedophile Priests, and a Pope that is completely detached from historical Biblical faith you folks simply have nothing to offer the world at all anymore, and certainly no moral high ground. That is what you have chained your faith to. I have chained mine to Jesus actual teachings and words, that is where my faith is, in Jesus completed work on the cross. Yours seems to be on some other guys who said some other things.

@AtheistTakes He does know that it was started by Jewish individuals and not Europeans, right?

Uhhhh

@SEllisM @Truth_matters20 Keep telling yourself. This is how you can validate your rebellion.

No you really don't follow 200 years of theology, you follow 2000 years of tradition. Very different thing. And I am following the one that leads to Christ, and I assume you are as well. I see no reason to try and sit in the Bema seat of judgment to decide about your salvation, as you seem to do, but given that seat belongs only to Christ Himself you may want to vacate it, quickly. You know that passage of scripture that people like to quote about judging? It is actually specifically relating to what you just did, judging another's salvation or relationship with Christ. Small differences of opinion on matters not central to faith, like who wrote what letter well after Jesus earthly ministry, are not things that we ought to be using to judge someone's salvation. You know who seems to do that with frightening regularity, beyond the Sith Darth Maul, are Catholics. Ever hear of the Inquisition? Filled with folks like you that could not stand others believing anything but the Catholic Orthodoxy, and you guys had to kill them all. Oh, and Just to be clear, not only am I not a Pope, I wouldn't want to be such a corrupt and venal individual.