ErrE

774 posts

ErrE banner
ErrE

ErrE

@RodrigoJaraM

- Familia - Medicina de urgencia - Tesla - Visita @Urgencia_Educa en youtube

Santiago, Chile Katılım Aralık 2009
543 Takip Edilen237 Takipçiler
ErrE
ErrE@RodrigoJaraM·
@FeroceResearch congratulations, will you be triming the position at this levels???
English
0
0
1
89
ErrE
ErrE@RodrigoJaraM·
@MattsterT3 @alojoh 100% returns, little triming ?? or let the winners ride?
English
1
0
1
11
Mattster
Mattster@MattsterT3·
@alojoh Holy smokes it’s rocketing today!
English
1
0
1
34
AJ Investment Research
Micron is up over 100% in the 4 months since we shared this analysis with subscribers.
English
10
2
187
13.4K
rexstocks
rexstocks@rexstocks·
$TSLA weekly MFI just hit 7.2 — the lowest reading in 15 years of data. The previous all-time low was 20.9 (Jan 2023 bottom at $113). This is 3x more extreme. Here's what happened every time weekly MFI dropped below 25: 1) 6-month return: 100% win rate — 14 out of 14 instances were positive, median +52% 2) The closest comparable (Jan 2023, MFI 20.9) returned +143% in 26 weeks 3) Short-term pain is normal — the first 1-2 weeks after extreme MFI readings showed continued weakness before reversal 4) 4 consecutive weeks of RSI below 40 reinforce the setup — historically, streaks of 4+ weeks preceded 35-95% rallies within 6 months Price is still holding above the weekly SMA (+5.5%) — structure intact despite record capital outflows. If $331 breaks, reassess. ⚠️ Watch out: MFI at 7.2 is uncharted territory. Every historical comparison we have is based on MFI readings of 20-25. We are 3x beyond any prior extreme — this could mean peak capitulation (and an explosive reversal), or it could signal a structural breakdown with no historical precedent to guide us. The statistical edge is real, but the sample it's built on has never seen anything this extreme. Size accordingly. Until then, this is the most statistically favorable setup ever recorded on $TSLA $TSLL $QQQ
rexstocks tweet mediarexstocks tweet mediarexstocks tweet media
English
9
7
85
10K
ErrE
ErrE@RodrigoJaraM·
@alojoh The HC is close i think. Did you think my comment is irrational?
English
1
0
3
612
AJ Investment Research
@RodrigoJaraM Still a no-brainer imo but it’s true since I moved specific trade signals to HC. Can‘t do handholding all the time for irrational people. The HC is an effective filter.
English
3
0
7
853
AJ Investment Research
🔥Nailed it! This trade is up over 20% since Friday. We recommended to add to our subscribers on the hysteria selloff on Friday and explained why. The high return was thanks to margin.
AJ Investment Research tweet mediaAJ Investment Research tweet media
English
10
3
153
20.8K
ErrE
ErrE@RodrigoJaraM·
@alojoh in youre opinion its micron a good buy right now.. looks like a sell the news movment, and a 300% grow last year, sounds risky... but.... PEG / PE extreamly cheap
English
0
0
0
30
Genma_Jp
Genma_Jp@nymbusjp·
Why Tesla can produce more than 2,500 Cybercabs per year — even without a steering wheel: Many traditional FMVSS (Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards) were written decades ago for cars with human drivers and literally assume the presence of manual controls. Without them, full compliance is impossible. Concrete examples: 1. Steering wheel/column — FMVSS 204 (Steering Control Rearward Displacement): This standard limits how far the steering column can move backward into the cabin during a 30 mph frontal crash test (max 5 inches / 127 mm). The entire requirement and test procedure are built around the physical steering control. No steering wheel = no way to test or comply as written. 2. Pedals — FMVSS 135 (Light Vehicle Brake Systems): Requires service brakes to be activated by a foot pedal, with specific performance criteria for stopping distance, pedal force, and application rate. The official test procedures explicitly depend on applying force to the brake pedal. No pedals = the standard cannot be met as written. For pure ADS vehicles (no manual controls ever), manufacturers must request a special exemption from NHTSA. Federal law caps these exemptions at just 2,500 vehicles per manufacturer per year (49 U.S.C. § 30113). However, NHTSA created a clear regulatory pathway in its 2022 Occupant Protection Final Rule for “dual-mode” vehicles (those with stowable/installable manual controls). Manufacturers can certify the same vehicle in both configurations: - Controls installed = treated as a traditional driver’s seat (full FMVSS compliance). - Controls stowed = that same seat is treated as a passenger seat. Key language from the rule: “When they were stowed, the vehicle would be subject to the FMVSS requirements at the DSP as applied to a passenger seat.” This allows full self-certification with no exemption needed and no 2,500 limit. Yes, this system is kind of dumb. A vehicle that operates identically in the real world gets treated completely differently just because one version has a removable wheel for certification day. NHTSA openly treated the 2022 rule as a temporary bridge — they didn’t want to rewrite dozens of decades-old standards from scratch all at once. Updating the entire FMVSS framework for true driverless vehicles is a slow bureaucratic process that’s still underway. This dual-mode certification path is exactly why Tesla can ramp Cybercab production starting April/Q2 2026 without hitting the exemption wall. References & links: - 49 U.S.C. § 30113 (2,500-vehicle exemption cap): law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/49… - NHTSA 2022 Occupant Protection Final Rule (PDF): nhtsa.gov/sites/nhtsa.go… - Same rule on Federal Register: federalregister.gov/documents/2022… - FMVSS 204 (Steering): ecfr.gov/current/title-… - FMVSS 135 (Brakes): ecfr.gov/current/title-…
English
12
24
209
108K