Ron Duncan ✝️

“Satan dreads nothing but prayer. His one concern is to keep the saints from praying. He fears nothing from prayerless studies, prayerless work, prayerless religion. He laughs at our toil, he mocks our wisdom, but he trembles when we pray.” Samuel Chadwick

@therealt9b @Breaking57 That would require the Supreme Court of the United States completely reversing prior precedent. That's not happening.

@RonDuncan7 @Breaking57 The auditors will get this right changed because they are abusing it. Just wait.

See what they're doing guys harassing people. there's a lot of states that has open carry now. camera guys are going to run into the wrong person who feels threatened.

@Roogsy @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ I stated them earlier and you pretended otherwise. This truly is a fruitless rndeavor and I'm mutung you at this point because of that.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ Evasive about what? You keep saying I am wrong but don't define what I am wrong about. You have spent more time accusing me of being uneducated than anything else. But somehow I am evasive? You must be a treat at parties. If you get invited to any that is.

James Talarico on abortion: “I trust Texas women to make decisions about their own bodies, to shape their own destinies. I don’t believe that’s a place for government. That’s a belief I hold not despite my faith, but because of my faith. Jesus never talks about abortion. The Bible is silent on abortion”

@Roogsy @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ The fact that you're being evasive says more than you realize.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ I get it. You think you're smarter than me, and my guess, everyone else. My motto in life is "you can't fight stupid" so have at it. Make all the claims you want, and live in the land where you are Judge, Emperor and God at the same time. Trust me, you're all alone on that one.

@suffolkvicar We have receipts proving otherwise.

Say it loud, say it clear ‘Excluding trans peoples from single sex spaces will not make c!s women safer.’

It's not about who is speaking it. It's that you've already been wrong twice on basic tenents that a first year student should already know. If you can't even get basics correct on logic and reason, then your bio suggests you are a liar and there's nothing to be gained with further discourse. It would be like discussing math with somebody who claims to be a mathemetician but insists that you can prove that 1=2 or that you can divide by 0. You cannot argue the merits when you lack the foundation to begin with.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ If that is what you want to believe, I am not here to post my CV. I prefer to evaluate arguments on their merits, not on who is speaking it. That speaks volumes about you too.

@Roogsy @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ That you choose not to dispute that you are self-taught speaks volumes.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ And you are a fine example of that quotation indeed.

@Real_Ames Need to account for the Freedom to Display the American Flag Act of 2005 which is federal law which prohibits that very thing by HOA's.

@tifagirlx Except it is, no matter how many times you repeat yourself.

Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️ Liking trans women is not gay 🏳️‍⚧️

I didn't. You might be able to pull the wool over the eyes of the uneducated, but I have enough academic experience on the matter to know that you don't know what you're talking about. My guess is that you're self-studied and never had anybody actually correct you. As Alexander Pope wrote, "A little learning is a dangerous thing" and your reddit-level knowledge of logic is lacking.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ Its tiresome arguing with deluded people who think theyre smarter than they actually are. Reductio ad absurdum is indeed a fallacy when an arguer takes a perfectly reasonable premise & twists it into a ridiculous slippery slope/completely unrelated extreme scenario. You did that

For the most part, yes. Vote with your wallet. That said, there's no harm in organizing and letting them know why you won't shop with them. But if you do so, you need to understand they won't react well to it. With that in mind, be polite and carry on after to shake the dust off your feet, as it were.

If I see this in a store window, I just keep walking. I don't go in to complain about it because they have every right to display it, I just keep moving. Who else?

@Drewsefer89 @BungleMan13 @Breaking57 Not necessarily. In fact, these kinds of lawsuits are becoming more common than you think. It's just done with low-level settlements and NDAs.

@RonDuncan7 @BungleMan13 @Breaking57 But It’ll save them from a lawsuit even if the charges get dropped. No lawyer will take the case (at least in this specific situation)

Another clown got arrested. thank you guys. keep him in jail for a year

@SGulbaek @iamAtheistGirl Debunked. snopes.com/fact-check/don…

i feel sorry for christians and view them as victims of a cult and atheists don’t believe in gods have you ever considered learning the meaning of the words you use? why do you hate odin? see how stupid that sounds?

It's a textbook strawman. I never brought up the Bible or discussed implementing mosaic law. You painted with a broad brush and I never left that topic. For your claims to be about Logic & Reason, I'm beginning to believe you never attended a day of Philosophy class in your life, because my Philosophy professor would have shut you down on the first day, as I am doing to you now.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ My last question is not a strawman, as it did not change the point of the argument. In fact, it is exactly what you did, which is try to take a point to a ridiculous end, which only shows you don't like reductio ad absurdum when it is used on your argument.

It's not a logical fallacy. I used reductio ad absurdum to reveal the problem with the initial statement. On the other hand, you engaged in a strawman especially with your last question. Before you accuse others of committing a logical fallacy (which I did not do), you should check yourself.

@RonDuncan7 @MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ This is logical fallacy. Nobody is saying dont have laws. But laws against murder & rape are necessary for the orderly operation of society. Moral laws that are not necessary for this shouldnt be imposed. The Bible speaks out against tattoos, government should ban tattoos then?

While the concept of the "slippery slope" is a logical fallacy when it comes to arguments and discourse - it's important to note that a slippery slope can exist in real life. It's only a week away, and yet, Pri DEMON th is already being promoted. After same-sex marriage was passed, the warning bells were rung. Degeneracy would devolve even further than it already had. They've gone after our kids. Groomers exist. The TQ+ found a useful ally - but the LGBT failed to understand they were immoral in the first place. They just opened the floodgates even more. Don't get me wrong. Sexual immorality was already on the rise with "free love" and debauchery since the 1960's. Making it about self and sexual exploration and calling it "natural" set the stage for what was to come. You were told to not let it go this far, and if you supported any of this along the way, you are complicit to what is going on now. "I only supported a little evil" isn't going to cut it. Sin is born, and when it grows, it brings death, to paraphrase James 1:15. We need to repent to Christ. Every last one of us. I'm no exception to that. I encourage nipping this in the bud, as it were. To the many businesses out there, please don't put me in the position of having to decide if I have to stop buying or using your product. I will vote with my wallet. I don't assume you will become Christian warriors, but I do ask that you not support this depravity either. Just be in the business of doing business instead of adopting divisive politics. Just a thought. For those who call me "hateful" I suggest you look at your own heart. Disagreement isn't hate, but if you find it hateful, perhaps it reveals that the hate was inside of you all along.

"we should not impose our morality on other, neither should government." Let's get rid of laws against rape and murder then. That's imposing morality on those who would commit them, and the government shouldn't do that. "Wait, not like that!" Here's a clue for you. Every law is an imposition of morality that undergirds it. Let me give an example. Seat belts and speed limits. "Well, that's just about safety." And why is being safe important? "Because it protects people. It's the right thing to do." That's a moral position.

@MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ 1) I do believe it's a woman's choice, like everything moral, we should not impose our morality on other, neither should government. but 2) the Bible does speak about abortion, and it includes it as a sin. Talarico is being either disingenuous or is uninformed.

@MarcoFoster_ @jamestalarico @TeamTalaricoHQ There's plenty in the Bible to address the issue. He's a heretic.

@sophialove69x Science says they are male. Science says they are not, nor will they ever be women. That is not up for debate.

Trans women are not male 🏳️‍⚧️ this is NOT up for debate. i hope we all agree on that

@nyaraVT Ignoring biology is anti-science. They are not biological women. They will never be biological women. Under testable, observable, repeatable science under the scientific method, they objectively aren't women as a matter of biology, no matter the fantasy in your head.

Trans women are also biological women. The term "biological woman" is made up by anti-science losers who want to other trans women, but it doesn't actually work. If you think being female is strictly about the ability to get pregnant, you will invalidate cis women as well.