Esor

@cxcrpt @TheNeed4Freedom @cabalcalvin @BagsApp There is no working product nor has there ever been one. Wake up.

Breaking: someone is salty. You used a lot of threads to say absolutely nothing. Spreading fud without getting to know the actual project is sad. Calvin migrated from pumpfun to bags. All the holders are legit, the tech that 5 devs are working on is legit and they have a working product to prove it. Calvin holders sent our coins to the founders wallet for the migration to bags app and airdrop.

@Milk_memeBNB @Umbrae_Ignis @IgnisAILabs @CyreneAI The U1 team has always been scammers, be careful all.

Haha, I can see that you’ve already made enough on the Solana chain, and now you’re trying to shift responsibility and blame someone else just to justify moving to the Base chain. But you should clearly remember one thing: where your success up to this point actually came from. Don’t try to avoid responsibility or put the blame on others.

An update on @IgnisAILabs, Umbrae, and the path forward. We're terminating our partnership with @CyreneAI effective immediately. When we entered this partnership, the agreement was to facilitate a $250K raise for Umbrae development. What was delivered was fundamentally different from what was discussed. The blockchain is public — many of you have already seen the discrepancies in fee distribution. You're not wrong. We're not here to throw mud. We're here to build. What matters now is this: Ignis is taking full sovereign control of the U1 token ecosystem. All smart contract development, fee distribution, and token infrastructure will be handled internally from this point forward. The Plan: Once Umbrae launches and the platform is live and operational, we will migrate U1 to a new token deployed on our own fully-audited smart contract on Base Network. Current U1 holders will be able to burn their Solana tokens to claim the new token 1:1. The LP in the current contract is locked — with half of it benefiting CyreneAI in perpetuity. That's done. We can't change it. So we're moving forward by providing our own liquidity. Ignis will be locking approximately $300K in LP for the new token on Base. Our money. Our contract. No middlemen taking cuts we didn't agree to. At migration, we'll open LP provision on our Base DLMM for U1/ETH and U1/USDC pairs — giving our community the opportunity to participate in initial liquidity alongside us from day one. Why wait until after launch? Because we deliver before we ask for trust. Once the platform is running and you can see what we've built, speculation leaves the conversation. That's when migration makes sense. Moving forward: We are being extremely selective about any future partnerships. If a potential partner isn't completely transparent when we ask direct questions about their business practices and fee structures, we're done. We asked. They dodged. Repeatedly. That's not how we operate and it's not what we'll tolerate from anyone we work with. If a partnership doesn't show clear, objective value for both sides — and if it's something we can do ourselves — we're not interested. No VCs. No unnecessary dependencies. Sovereign development only. Phase 2 NFTs are sold out. Phase 3 will follow once the platform goes live and removes all doubt about what we're building. We're focused. We're building. Umbrae is coming. —Eli

@every_thing Top 10 coin, worth the wait

You mint the token contract. $2,000. You verify the contract. $200. You pay DEX fees. $500. You deploy a Hyperliquid spot asset. $20,000. You run a dedicated oracle feed. $750/m. You list on a big CEX. $3,000,000 You deploy a Hyperliquid perp market. $20,000,000. You list on a big CEX. $3,000,000 You pay a CEX market maker. $50,000/m. You pay CEX fees. $1,000,000. You fund market making inventory. $5,000,000. You buy CEX marketing. $500,000. Total: >$32,000,000 just to get started. Now VCs need it back so they dump on your community. Or you use Everything. One click. One contract. Full infrastructure, fully on-chain. In one minute. Virtually for free.

📢 DataPEDIA WK38 Results 📷 We are pleased to announce that the weekly results are now available! #Crypto #btc #bitcoin #trading

📢 DataPEDIA Treasury (DPT) is funded! 💰 ZERO cost testing, no risk to you ⚡ Built first, used later — sustainable & community-driven. 🏛️ Solely owned by PPNFT holders. Step one to a venture-style DataPEDIA hub. 🌟 #DTPD #DPT #crypto #btc #eth #Trading

@CFGI_Token @CFGI_MAEVE If you want any more info id be happy to share, just dm me.

@CFGI_Token @CFGI_MAEVE Been running with AI Wealth Pro for a year — ~12% per month on average. MAEVE is great, but let’s just say… there are other players putting up even bigger numbers.

Sometimes you get shared a project and you think how the f%*k did I miss that! @MUGA_Army shared $CFGI @CFGI_Token with me a couple of days ago and it’s legit a beast. In my favourite auto-trader narrative, with insane adoption already, 4m USD of trading portfolios, and a subscription model that has insane uptake. Too much to even cover in a tweet ngl I’m hearing the team is insanely dedicated and are allocating 500k+ to @HyperliquidX and will be massively expanding the marketing campaign over the next 60 days. $8m mc is insanely undervalued, this is potential blue-chip. @CryptoNoach @IncomeSharks @CryptoGodJohn @robw00ds @degenApe22 @CryptoHass I highly recommend you check this out, these guys are serious 🤝 CA: 0xf75302720787c2a2176c87b1919059c4eaac8b98

@SquidIntent @BijtjeEllen @GinoNagtegaal Not 10%, don’t let other mislead you. No one is going full port into trades.

@Rosemel35 @BijtjeEllen @GinoNagtegaal

For the people that don't understand: you put in 1k. Your agent makes you 10%, you earn 100$. Without human interaction. Now lets do some math as if this is daily reached (asking chatGPT) 'What would it look like if I start with 1K and earn 10% a day keeping al my money in there for a month?' Final = 1,000 × (1 + 0.10) ^ 30 = 1,000 × (1.10) ^ 30 ≈ 1,000 × 17.45 ≈ $17,449.40 So after 30 days you'd have about $17,448.40! From just 1K! 🦒 on top.

@GinoNagtegaal @BigSteenNFT This is how stupid your founder is tbh. Don’t let this guy mislead you. He is a grifter and pushes data to mislead others.

Please explain the 0.09%. I see this: You buy a candy for €1.13, and later you sell that same candy to someone else for €1.24. You made a little extra money, right? So: You spent €1.13 to get it. You got €1.24 when you sold it. That means you made about 11 cents more. Now, if we look at how much extra that is compared to what you paid, it's like saying: “Hey, I made almost 10% more money than what I paid!” So if you bought 100 candies like that, you'd earn enough to buy 10 extra candies just from the profit.

@GinoNagtegaal @BigSteenNFT Yes if you are using 100% of your portfolio in the trade but that isn’t using proper risk management. No one would recommend ever going in every trade with your full funds. That’s a sure fire way to get rekted quickly and even Gary would agree.

@GinoNagtegaal @BigSteenNFT It was a 0.09% for that 8 minute hold. There would have to be 100 identical trades like that with zero losses to be at 10% net win for the day. We see how the public wallet is not doing anywhere near this. Just be real with people.

@Rosemel35 @BigSteenNFT Where do i state a 100% win mate? If it makes multiple trades over the day, like the QT was only a 8 minute hold time and it avarages a 10% net win on the day why couldn't it do it then?

@nftkidzcreate @GinoNagtegaal Keep in mind this is 0.09% on one trade using proper risk management and doesn’t account for losses so it’s incredibly misleading. It would be looking at around 1% a month if profitable. Profit is profit giraffes just have to be real.

@GinoNagtegaal 10% would be unbelievably good. Even 1% a day and look at the results from just 1k! 🤪

@BijtjeEllen @GinoNagtegaal Keep in mind this is 0.09% on one trade using proper risk management and doesn’t account for losses so it’s incredibly misleading. We would be looking at around 1% a month if profitable.

@GinoNagtegaal Hey fam! We did the math and I was mindblown! Can’t wait to start! 🙌🏼🤩🤩🤩

@BigSteenNFT @GinoNagtegaal There are numerous better products out there. Making 0.09% on one trade is tiny and again doesn’t count for the losses. Time for giraffes to stop misleading people into buying into giraffe.

@GinoNagtegaal Show me better!!!

@GinoNagtegaal @BigSteenNFT Completely misleading mate and you know it, no trading system will have 100% win rate and no trading system uses 100% full port into trades.

@BigSteenNFT Delayed gratification 😉

@GinoNagtegaal This is so misleading. Using 1% of portfolio and proper risk management you would earn 0.09% on this trade. Anyone trading with a full 100% portfolio would be stupid. This also doesn’t account for losses so let’s say half were losses then it’s 0.045% a day would be 1% a month.

@LesterCryptooo @giraffetowernft A guy that can’t even get his auto trader to work on public wallets while whale wallets dump NFT’s. Good luck. The writing is on the wall.

@Rosemel35 @giraffetowernft I’d back Gary over anyone else so I’m good 👍🏼

Read that again… Imagine making 11.77% - more than you’d expect from a YEAR invested in the S&P500 - in EIGHT minute… without doing ANYTHING. Why haven’t you bought a @giraffetowernft again?! 🤪