David Ross

4.5K posts

David Ross banner
David Ross

David Ross

@RossDavidT

Salesforce Developer at Global Medical Response | Blogging @TheEVChronicle, #Robotics, #ROS, #ML, #AI, #Hiking, #EMS, #Pilot, #Flying, Opinions are my own.

Sacramento, CA Katılım Ağustos 2012
547 Takip Edilen918 Takipçiler
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
@wholemars While others are catching up, Tesla will be refining autonomy, not solving it any longer, and will be manufacturing millions of RoboTaxis faster than anyone else, while owning the supply chains.
English
0
0
0
6
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
Tesla: we just launched fully driverless cars, no safety monitors critics: Ha, there’s only a few of them. Tesla is so doomed. Nvidia: We hope to launch a few cars on Uber with human safety drivers in 2027 critics: Holy shit, that’s so impressive! Tesla is so doomed.
English
70
95
1.8K
69.8K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
@wholemars I still use 12 on my 2023 Model 3. Very few disengagements. If I do, it’s usually a wrong turn lane or navigation issue. The FSD team left it at a very solid build while we await mini 14, hopefully Q2. My wife has the 2026 Model Y, so still get to use 14, and it’s next level.
English
0
1
3
275
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
My Uber driver is using FSD 12. Definitely a better ride than most Uber drivers
Whole Mars Catalog tweet media
English
37
14
493
32.6K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
@DirtyTesLa I have noticed some degradation with navigation. Where it used to take the correct route and go straight to destination, it now, at times goes some weird route the takes longer. In our location in Northern California it was pretty accurate, still is, just some hiccups.
English
9
1
42
3K
Dirty Tesla
Dirty Tesla@DirtyTesLa·
I feel like something has changed with FSD lately... Have you noticed anything? Post clips if you can
English
146
10
288
54.1K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
I don’t agree. I have over 15,000 miles driven on FSD and now use it 100% of the time. We are seeing reasoning and almost sentient like behavior, although unknown if it truly is. But, the point is the same chips and training is taking place in Optimus as they have done with FSD. Of course, the training from vehicle to Optimus is different , but Tesla has already done extensive training and continues too. Manufacturing is going to ramp up in Fremont, CA, and then Austin, TX. We are a lot closer than you think.
English
1
0
1
33
Darin Seng
Darin Seng@DarinSeng·
@RossDavidT @aelluswamy I would say we a ways off of Optimus in the household as business demand will keep prices out of reach for a while. Business uses are more or less single purpose and easier to train for. Personal use training will be more broad and take more time to train as well.
English
1
0
0
27
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
Interesting, but a lot of unknowns, including how fast Tesla expands its own RoboTaxi fleet, which will be in direct competition with owners fleets. I have owned several businesses over the years and there is a lot missing here. Increase in fleet size = increase in liability and expenses. We also don’t know the business structure yet. I also want to do this, it will be interesting to see how it launches.
English
0
0
0
543
Teslaconomics
Teslaconomics@Teslaconomics·
I plan on owning my own Tesla Robotaxi fleet one day. And the more I run the numbers, the more I realize this new business could become one of the most powerful income opportunities I've ever seen. This is how I'm thinking about it. Based on many analyst models and Tesla’s long-term vision, a reasonable base case assumption is about ~$30,000 per year in net profit per Robotaxi to the owner. This is after things like Tesla’s platform fee, charging, tires, maintenance, insurance, and cleaning. Of course, the network is still early and Tesla is just beginning to roll this out in pilot programs in a few cities, so there’s no official real-world owner earnings yet... but using reasonable assumptions around utilization, pricing per mile, and operating costs, the math starts to get really interesting. If one Robotaxi can earn around $30,000 per year, here’s what a fleet might look like: • $100,000 per year → about 4 Robotaxis • $500,000 per year → about 17 Robotaxis • $1,000,000 per year → about 34 Robotaxis It may sound a bit crazy at first, but when you break it down, it starts to make more sense. These vehicles could potentially drive 50,000 to 100,000+ miles per year in high demand areas. If the economics land somewhere around $0.25-$0.50 profit per mile after all costs, you end up right around that ~$30k per vehicle per year range. And remember, the Tesla’s Robotaxi network is going to work a lot like Airbnb for cars. You add your vehicle to the network, Tesla handles the software, routing, payments, and rider experience, and they take a platform fee (often modeled around 25-35%). The owner keeps the rest after operating costs. Another thing that makes this interesting is the expected cost of the vehicles themselves. Tesla has talked about the purpose-built Cybercabs costing roughly $25k-$30k and Elon told me production is starting in 1 month! If that’s even close to reality, a fleet capable of generating around $1 million per year could theoretically cost somewhere around $850k-$1M in vehicles. That ROI is pretty freakin good! Now to be clear, none of this is guaranteed. I'm just thinking out loud and sharing it with you... a lot still depends on regulations, how fast unsupervised FSD scales, demand in each city, insurance costs, and how Tesla structures the network. But if the system works the way Elon has described it for years, owning a Robotaxi fleet could become one of the most powerful forms of passive income I've ever seen. And I plan on sharing the numbers with everyone on 𝕏 when the day comes. Personally, that’s why I’m paying such close attention. Bc one day, owning a fleet of autonomous Teslas working for me 24/7 might be the modern version of owning a rental property, except instead of tenants, you’ve got robots driving people around all day while you sleep. This next book of Tesla is going to be so exciting!
Teslaconomics tweet media
English
463
411
3.8K
2.5M
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
The problem is that they keep switching terms and it confuses customers and then it creates posts, and finally media gets hold of it and makes negative headlines. It’s won’t matter moving forward now that its subscription, but this kind of switching for customers outside us fans of Tesla lowers trust in a company. We need all positive news around FSD to attract the masses.
English
0
0
0
29
David Cruz
David Cruz@Damasocruz·
@RossDavidT @AIDRIVR @Tesla @elonmusk It makes total sense. You purchase it for the use on your ownership of the vehicle. What’s the other example where you buy a product for one thing, pay a one time price, then get to transfer it to other products. Please share what that thing is?
English
1
0
0
24
ΛI DRIVR
ΛI DRIVR@AIDRIVR·
Tesla changed the terms for FSD transfer and is not honoring what was posted on their website when many people (myself included) made orders glad they’re giving people their $250 back, but this is not right. I don’t like the bait and switch @tesla @elonmusk
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt

UPDATE: Last night, Tesla changed its FSD transfer policy (pic on left). You now have to take delivery by March 31, 2026 to be eligible. For people who placed an order before this policy change, including Cybertruck dual-motor AWD order holders: • If your delivery window is on or before March 31, 2026, or it gets pushed into April due to a delay caused by Tesla, the company will still honor FSD transfer. • Tesla will NOT honor FSD transfer if the initial delivery window was after March 31, 2026 when the order was placed. • If your order window is beyond March 31, 2026 or you end up not being able to take delivery by March 31, 2026, Tesla will offer you a refund of your $250 order fee. Before, Tesla's website said: "customers who place an order for a new Tesla vehicle by March 31, 2026 may qualify for transferring FSD (Supervised)." Not anymore. While Tesla always said directly on their FSD transfer website page that the "FSD transfer program is subject to change or end at any time," I’d still like to see Tesla give all $60k Cybertruck AWD orders made before last night’s policy change the option for FSD transfer at time of delivery. Many people placed an order because they thought they would be able to transfer FSD. I’ve deleted the post I made a couple days ago (pic on right) about Cybertruck AWD FSD transfers to avoid anyone seeing that post, but not this update, and mistakenly placing an order. While I did link to the terms page in the thread, I should have added in my first post Tesla’s exact disclaimer wording from the FSD transfer page: “The FSD (Supervised) Transfer Program is subject to change or end at any time." I’m really bummed out for the people who already ordered the $60k Cybertruck and wanted to transfer FSD, even though Tesla is offering order fee refunds. Keep in mind, Tesla can always decide to change the terms on this stuff at any time. People can reach out to any Tesla sales advisor with any questions. They will confirm this info. Link to Tesla's FSD transfer website page: tesla.com/support/fsd-tr…

English
94
44
854
68.2K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
@milliondivs @wholemars Embarrassing will be your comments when Tesla takes the market share with autonomous vehicles and RoboTaxi as everyone else realizes Elon’s vision and engineering was correct with vision only, and the competition can’t expand as fast as Tesla.
English
1
0
0
19
Gary
Gary@milliondivs·
@wholemars No it’s not. One or two vehicles are being teleoperated. Still not impressed it’s almost been 12 months since launch and still no robotaxis without humans. It’s embarrassing
English
1
0
1
20
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
People are really passionate about FSD
English
66
10
325
17.4K
Gary
Gary@milliondivs·
@wholemars No such thing as full self driving yet. Still not operational without a human
English
2
0
1
128
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
It makes no sense to purchase FSD if you can’t transfer it. What customers are getting tired of is the switching of terms so often. They have done this for years and the company is to mature to keep doing these type of on the fly changes. It’s subscription only moving forward, so it won’t matter any longer. I am a huge fan of Tesla and FSD, but this kind of marketing/ sales tactics need to change. This is more in line with legacy automaker strategy tatics, Tesla can do better in this case.
English
1
0
1
41
David Cruz
David Cruz@Damasocruz·
This is a niche issue. What% of people do you think were buying to transfer fSD. This is the kind of nonsense that happens when trying to find a way to squeeze a benefit out of every situation. The majority of the people ordering these trucks have no impact from this made up transfer situation
English
6
0
5
977
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
The only way purchasing FSD in the past would make sense is with a transfer, but Tesla changes their transfer rules so often, how are consumers suppose to trust what they actually get? Sure they get what they tell you at the time you purchase it, but look how many posts there are with current or potential purchases in the past confused about what they actually get, and will it include Unsupervised or is it only Supervised? Even what I wrote above seems confusing. Subscriptions for FSD and Optimus make the most sense. Especially for Optimus where they could include a full package, including maintenance and repair. We have two Tesla’s on FSD subscription and have been very happy with it. I use it 100% and my wife around 60% in her 2026 AWD Y.
English
0
0
1
48
Dirty Tesla
Dirty Tesla@DirtyTesLa·
@wholemars One transfer per customer purchase would not hurt the company. You're forgetting you have to purchase *an entire car* to even take advantage of that perk.
English
22
6
338
11.8K
Whole Mars Catalog
Whole Mars Catalog@wholemars·
The cost of giving all FSD owners who bought in full the ability to transfer to a new car forever would be around $1 billion+ a year in ARR. 800,000 purchases * $99 a month = $950 million a year Current total FSD subscription revenue: $392 million ARR
English
107
12
168
34K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
@mikepat711 Had a very similar situation and V14.2.2.4 got us out. It’s come a longways. The dead end it took us into was a former road off the main road and I think some of this is Tesla’s nav/ mapping that they are working on updating.
English
0
0
1
30
Mike P
Mike P@mikepat711·
FSD encounters a full parking lot and ends up getting itself into some trouble 😬 but V14.2 ain’t no quitter.
English
9
4
142
8.9K
David Ross retweetledi
Sawyer Merritt
Sawyer Merritt@SawyerMerritt·
If you live in North America and own a Tesla, have you purchased FSD (Supervised) outright since the beginning of 2026?
English
184
18
188
64.5K
David Ross
David Ross@RossDavidT·
Subscription and use 100% last two years. We have two Teslas both subscription. Tesla needs to keep these subscription prices at $99/month or lower or adoption will be tough to get to 10 million in a short period of time. I know they will raise for unsupervised and that will be the next hurdle in adoption. I know FSD will save countless lives when widely adopted, but mass adoption will be tough if much higher price even for unsupervised.
English
1
1
8
526
Nic Cruz Patane
Nic Cruz Patane@niccruzpatane·
Did you buy FSD outright in your Tesla? Or will you be sticking to subscriptions going forward?
Nic Cruz Patane tweet media
English
368
9
306
53.7K