Rotolight
6.9K posts

Rotolight
@Rotolight
British Manufacturer of multi-award winning on-camera, studio and location LED lighting systems for photography, videography, broadcast and cinematography.



$BMNR MNAV (Cash) = 0.98 NAV per share = $31.79 $BMNR $31.17 $ETH $3,112









$BTC - another piece to the puzzle There is a 93%+ chance this range bottoms us (more proof). (#6 opened btw, as promised) Details to come on further implications. Just a small hint for now, lifting a tiny portion of my secrets. We still have many "reputable" influencers continuing to farm the sentiment and continuing on with posting bearish. Yet as $BTC quietly closed another weekly candle, we have just received more proof that our bullish thesis of this range being a bottoming range is correct, and the markets intended direction. This is indeed in sharp contract with the most popular opinion out there, of this being a bearish continuation range for lower. Yet just by opening our eyes ever so slightly, we can see, historically, $BTC has essentially never ranged for 5 candles or more, for less than 15% without a significant move up from that range or making a new cyclical high. Only bullish ranges created this type of pa. The reason why this is, is extensive and has a lot to do with liquidity buildup. But in simple/understandable terms. This is effectively done to bore the user out and to let bearish sentiment develop, before the move up and catching the majority off guard. I have talked about why the sentiment is clearly bearish right now and how it's undeniable almost everyone expects lower especially the last 5 weeks, minus the accounts who post both bull and bearish ideas all the time. My long term followers back testing my data know. (So if you don't believe me, test it yourself). The only exception is Sept/Oct 2018 (no data is perfect - full transparency). But do never compare price action to just one past instance/do never use fractals. As using low sample sizes (of literally 1) is essentially gambling and mostly used by influencers who by definition cherry pick one data point to fit their bias. Instead, best to fully and deeply back test history, then come to a conclusion. Such as all instances where we ranged for less than 15% for 5 or more candles: ➡️Aug-Sept 2025 ➡️Jul-Aug 2025 ➡️May-June 2025 ➡️April-Oct 2024 (2 instances) ➡️June-Dec 2022 (2 instances) ➡️June-Jul 2020 ➡️Jan-Feb 2019 ➡️Oct 2019 (the failed instance) ➡️Nov-Dec 2016 ➡️Aug-Oct 2016 (2 instances) ➡️ April-May 2016 ➡️... ... ... (Continue yourself further, there are more than 15 instances) Indeed, for more than 15 instances, a less than 15% wide range of 5 candles or more has resulted in bull market continuation (new cyclical highs), or a significant move up (such as 112k coming), with only 1 failed instance. That is 14/15 or better i.e. 93% chance plus of us bottoming. I hope that helps you to continue to filter out the bearish noise out there, of the bears loudly and proudly sharing their charts of 60k and lower coming. Unrightfully. Yes, we know most of those big accounts do this just to farm followers and feed off the bearish sentiment, but it does cause a lot of selling at the worst times (during this bottoming range). So here just another piece of trying to put you on the right side of the trade as I always value my, and also your capital the most above anything else. I will have done my job.























