Rotorless

293 posts

Rotorless

Rotorless

@Rotorless

Degen vibe, open-source heart. Spinning RotorDrops from the void. Not your lawyer. RotorHub #PrivacyTech

global Katılım Kasım 2020
984 Takip Edilen598 Takipçiler
Martti Malmi
Martti Malmi@marttimalmi·
Got annoyed by Tailscale requiring 3rd party accounts, so created Nostr VPN. It signals over nostr relays and creates a wireguard / boringtun network. Builds for Macos and Linux. Using it between my Macs, but haven't tested extensively yet.
Martti Malmi tweet media
English
60
144
969
84.7K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@ryangerritsen But freedom of choice is perfectly possible when one hardly has to form one’s own idea.
English
0
0
0
20
Ryan Gerritsen🇨🇦🇳🇱
CBC pumps out endless propaganda. It’s actually unbelievable that so many people in Canada still can’t see what this organization is doing. I don’t want and of my money funding them.
English
12
80
400
7K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@junonewscom He conveniently forgot to mention that bad actors do not use the tools or data he wants to surveil and collect.
English
0
2
15
228
Juno News
Juno News@junonewscom·
Public Safety Minister Gary Anandasangaree says Bill C-22 (Lawful Access Act) would modernize police access to data to better investigate digital crime. "It is not about the surveillance of honest, hardworking Canadians," he said. "It is about keeping Canadians safe online."
English
194
35
95
14.8K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@mgeist Yeah, they have it backwards in a safe society citizen information and data is private , government information and data is public .
English
0
4
59
1.7K
Julian Assange
Julian Assange@ImJulianAssange·
Canada has played a significant role in helping Ukraine develop its drone warfare capabilities by supplying drones, funding the Drone Capability Coalition (DCC), and investing in joint production. Canada has committed over $300 million to drone-related support, including donating over 900+ drones, high-resolution cameras, and funding Ukrainian domestic production. Ukraine is assisting Israel with drone warfare with Canadian weapons and technology making Canada a proxy to Israel against Iran.
English
86
978
2.8K
91K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@schneierblog Not really. Canada needs to have government exit private markets, then the cost of AI will be nominal
English
0
0
3
175
Rohan Islam
Rohan Islam@Heyrohanislam·
I built 100+ n8n automations this year—and made 6 figs. Here’s everything I learned. Most people struggle because nobody shows the full picture. What’s inside: → 17 nodes that power 90% of my builds → n8n MCP + Claude Code setup → Opus 4.5 prompt library → AI Clip Factory (1 video → 100+ clips) → YouTube research automation → Competitor watch + content engine Agencies charge $5K–$15K to build these. It took 200+ hours to compile. Free for you. If you want it: Like + comment "Master" I’ll DM you the details.
Rohan Islam tweet media
English
190
49
233
12.6K
Lian Lim | Dashboard & AI Automation Expert
no mac mini? no problem i've had dozens of people ask me how to run openclaw without dropping $600+ on hardware so i created the playbook step by step guide on how to self host openclaw using a cloud hosting provider Want it FREE? Comment 'HOST' and i'll send the full guide over
Lian Lim | Dashboard & AI Automation Expert tweet media
English
229
20
141
15.4K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@MmisterNobody Since when is it the role of government to compete in the private market for goods and services ? We wont have to go to war with China .its the lesson on how to steal a country without firing a shot.
English
0
0
1
130
Mr. Nobody
Mr. Nobody@MmisterNobody·
🚨LIBERAL GOVERNMENT OF CANADA QUIETLY PUSHING FOR DIGITAL ID The Government of Canada has now officially launched GC Wallet, a new digital ID app that stores credit cards and licences. When digital ID is being pushed by a lot of countries, you know something big is about to happen.
English
74
537
696
19.3K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@DCinvestor I dunno about you bruh… but i want a real pilot in the front of the plane
English
0
0
0
16
DCinvestor
DCinvestor@DCinvestor·
Vitalik’s new post now clearly articulates the hyper-scaled vision for L1 while talking about how L2s can still fit in with it if they want to even if many undifferentiated general purpose L2s are not the way forward, L1 will never be enough we will always need specialized blockspace with unique characteristics, more superfast and high capacity blockspace which makes tradeoffs L1 can’t, and blockspace which corporate entities can exercise more control it’s a bold vision- one which the entire future of crypto could be built upon onward
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin

There have recently been some discussions on the ongoing role of L2s in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially in the face of two facts: * L2s' progress to stage 2 (and, secondarily, on interop) has been far slower and more difficult than originally expected * L1 itself is scaling, fees are very low, and gaslimits are projected to increase greatly in 2026 Both of these facts, for their own separate reasons, mean that the original vision of L2s and their role in Ethereum no longer makes sense, and we need a new path. First, let us recap the original vision. Ethereum needs to scale. The definition of "Ethereum scaling" is the existence of large quantities of block space that is backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum - that is, block space where, if you do things (including with ETH) inside that block space, your activities are guaranteed to be valid, uncensored, unreverted, untouched, as long as Ethereum itself functions. If you create a 10000 TPS EVM where its connection to L1 is mediated by a multisig bridge, then you are not scaling Ethereum. This vision no longer makes sense. L1 does not need L2s to be "branded shards", because L1 is itself scaling. And L2s are not able or willing to satisfy the properties that a true "branded shard" would require. I've even seen at least one explicitly saying that they may never want to go beyond stage 1, not just for technical reasons around ZK-EVM safety, but also because their customers' regulatory needs require them to have ultimate control. This may be doing the right thing for your customers. But it should be obvious that if you are doing this, then you are not "scaling Ethereum" in the sense meant by the rollup-centric roadmap. But that's fine! it's fine because Ethereum itself is now scaling directly on L1, with large planned increases to its gas limit this year and the years ahead. We should stop thinking about L2s as literally being "branded shards" of Ethereum, with the social status and responsibilities that this entails. Instead, we can think of L2s as being a full spectrum, which includes both chains backed by the full faith and credit of Ethereum with various unique properties (eg. not just EVM), as well as a whole array of options at different levels of connection to Ethereum, that each person (or bot) is free to care about or not care about depending on their needs. What would I do today if I were an L2? * Identify a value add other than "scaling". Examples: (i) non-EVM specialized features/VMs around privacy, (ii) efficiency specialized around a particular application, (iii) truly extreme levels of scaling that even a greatly expanded L1 will not do, (iv) a totally different design for non-financial applications, eg. social, identity, AI, (v) ultra-low-latency and other sequencing properties, (vi) maybe built-in oracles or decentralized dispute resolution or other "non-computationally-verifiable" features * Be stage 1 at the minimum (otherwise you really are just a separate L1 with a bridge, and you should just call yourself that) if you're doing things with ETH or other ethereum-issued assets * Support maximum interoperability with Ethereum, though this will differ for each one (eg. what if you're not EVM, or even not financial?) From Ethereum's side, over the past few months I've become more convinced of the value of the native rollup precompile, particuarly once we have enshrined ZK-EVM proofs that we need anyway to scale L1. This is a precompile that verifies a ZK-EVM proof, and it's "part of Ethereum", so (i) it auto-upgrades along with Ethereum, and (ii) if the precompile has a bug, Ethereum will hard-fork to fix the bug. The native rollup precompile would make full, security-council-free, EVM verification accessible. We should spend much more time working out how to design it in such a way that if your L2 is "EVM plus other stuff", then the native rollup precompile would verify the EVM, and you only have to bring your own prover for the "other stuff" (eg. Stylus). This might involve a canonical way of exposing a lookup table between contract call inputs and outputs, and letting you provide your own values to the lookup table (that you would prove separately). This would make it easy to have safe, strong, trustless interoperability with Ethereum. It also enables synchronous composability (see: ethresear.ch/t/combining-pr… and ethresear.ch/t/synchronous-… ). And from there, it's each L2's choice exactly what they want to build. Don't just "extend L1", figure out something new to add. This of course means that some will add things that are trust-dependent, or backdoored, or otherwise insecure; this is unavoidable in a permissionless ecosystem where developers have freedom. Our job should make to make it clear to users what guarantees they have, and to build up the strongest Ethereum that we can.

English
17
13
254
19.2K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
Claiming token holders are “partners” to justify service is logically ( and legally) flawed. You assume the status to serve, then use the service to prove the fact in dispute. Service can’t create a party
English
0
0
0
63
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@PixOnChain That’s malpractice waiting to happen. Most people would prefer a pilot to draw conclusions about how planes are flown
English
0
0
0
6
Pix🔎
Pix🔎@PixOnChain·
How scammers use HyperLiquid to launder money: 1. Deposit $5M in stolen funds to HL. 2. Use 50x leverage to open a $250M short (against funding). 3. Hedge the short by opening $250M in longs on other exchanges using “clean” money. 4. Coin drops 2% → HL short gets liquidated → stolen funds are wiped. 5. Meanwhile, the “clean” long positions gain 2% → $5M profit, now fully laundered. Why it works: - Leverage forces liquidation on small moves (2% drop = full wipe). - Shorting against funding makes a squeeze more likely. Rinse, repeat, cash out. P.S. Obviously, this is a simplified version. They’ll tweak position sizes to avoid perfect 1:1 hedges, making it harder to track, etc.
Pix🔎 tweet media
English
240
197
1.9K
286.1K
CertiK Alert
CertiK Alert@CertiKAlert·
#CertiKInsight 🚨 We have detected Tornado Cash deposits that trace to the alleged wallet compromise on Jan 10th that cost over $282M. Part of the fund (~$63M) was bridged to 0xF73a4EbC3d0984F166AC215471Cc895cB4F5cc21 before further laundering. Stay Vigilant!
CertiK Alert tweet media
English
5
19
68
9K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@SpecterAnalyst Somewhat , kinda… incoherent . I expect a credible “report” to not have basic mistakes in it.
English
0
0
0
24
Specter
Specter@SpecterAnalyst·
On January 16, 2025, at 21:15 UTC, a victim lost $6.7M due to a private key compromise. The stolen funds were swapped into ETH. Of this amount, 1,899 ETH was bridged to the Bitcoin network and deposited into the Wasabi mixer, while the remaining 159 ETH was deposited into Tornado Cash. Theft addresses 0x6509Cac8d378765dD2612705De25Fb06207dd4d8 0x376874A97Db6022cA5Eb9194EF164Da37936E229 0xB49eeb5DbED66C02e90A5084C6AAA0A891A95Ad8 0x88c46f87127e7455f2dc5e5B20A628e3695dF020 bc1qwqjuszqqk9p73eqcxn07t2teqt2pdgxquumwqk While the attacker moved quickly to launder the stolen funds, partial recovery may have been possible if the incident had been reported immediately. If you observe any suspicious activity on your wallet, report it as soon as possible to blockchain investigators or security professionals A common mistake is contacting law enforcement first instead of investigators, in most cases, it's zero at least for that period Stay smart.
Specter tweet media
English
16
12
122
15.1K
Rotorless
Rotorless@Rotorless·
@DefiIgnas Truly living in his own movie. Yet another nobody unlocking secrets the entire field of qualified experts somehow slept on. 🫡
English
0
0
0
9
Rotorless retweetledi
Lee Schneider
Lee Schneider@leelaughs5x·
1/ Uncensored access to the internet is something everyone should advocate for. No, something everyone should demand. A short 🧵for a Monday morning in January.
English
4
6
33
1.4K
Specter
Specter@SpecterAnalyst·
Andrew Tate (@Cobratate ) may allegedly be involved in money laundering activity. Wallets linked to him have deposited up to $30M into Railgun over the past two years and have also been linked to a pig-butchering scam case. On June 9, 2024, Andrew Tate posted a DM screenshot claiming that someone offered to pay him to shill a token, which he said he rejected. I have reason to believe this message was LARP, as the wallet address shown in the message (0x9B67) appears to belong to Andrew Tate himself. Wallet address: 0x9B674ee463B0e84de483Cc4aF6c95Ce4A4323602 This wallet transferred $4 directly to his public wallet on December 14, 2024. Another wallet linked to him (0x730C) has interacted with 0x9B67 multiple times, transferring funds that were later swapped and deposited for trading on Hyperliquid. In March 2025, a case was filed in Texas by victims of a pig-butchering scam involving approximately $5M, occurring between January 2023 and February 2025. The court documents list multiple wallets used to launder the stolen funds. One wallet named in the filing is linked to 0x9B67 and transferred a total of $1.2M to Andrew Tate–linked wallet 0x9B67, as well as to other wallets, including 0x4A767, which received $8M. Over a two-year period, a wallet linked to Andrew Tate deposited approximately $30M into Railgun, with a significant portion of the funds originating from @RadomPay , a crypto payment platform. Railgun-linked wallet: 0x89Ea338c27b65cf0dE85871e919a58010737371e While Andrew Tate is not listed as a defendant in the referenced case, the movement of funds associated with wallets linked to him appears highly suspicious. The activity shows techniques commonly associated with money laundering, including transfers in both small and large amounts through nested services and high-risk exchanges. Andrew Tate was charged in 2023 with human trafficking, money laundering, and organized crime. Stay smart.
Specter tweet mediaSpecter tweet mediaSpecter tweet mediaSpecter tweet media
English
109
132
1.3K
198.8K
Rotorless retweetledi
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊
sassal.eth/acc 🦇🔊@sassal0x·
If you are a "crypto data analytics company" and you are still posting metrics like monthly active addresses and daily transaction counts as if they mean anything, then you are a terrible data analytics company.
English
48
25
450
52.9K