
Roxy Lilian
1.4K posts




🚨 BOTH ALTMAN AND BROCKMAN SELF-DEALING ON CEREBRAS >Greg Brockman acquires personal Cerebras ownership in 2017 >Altman, separately, invests in Cerebras >Brockman pushes OpenAI to merge with Cerebras that same month >Brockman never discloses his Cerebras ownership to Musk >December 2025: OpenAI signs $10 billion Cerebras deal + loans Cerebras $1 billion >February 2026: Cerebras valuation triples from $8B to $23B on OpenAI commitments >April 2026: OpenAI commitment expanded to $20+ billion through 2029 >April 2026: Cerebras files IPO at potential $26.6 billion valuation Brockman, under oath today: Q: When you were having discussions about a financial transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras, you were actually an owner of Cerebras, weren't you? Brockman: "There was some overlap between discussions and being an investor in Cerebras. Yes." Q: Can you point to an email in which you told Elon you were an owner of Cerebras at the same time you were advocating that OpenAI do this transaction with Cerebras? Brockman: "I do not believe an email that says that exists." Q: How about a chat? Brockman: "I did not." Q: A text? Brockman: "No." Q: And yet you stood to gain personally if there was a transaction between OpenAI and Cerebras. Brockman: "I suppose so, but it wasn’t something on my mind " Both co-founders. Both fiduciaries of a 501(c)(3) charity. They directed OpenAI to commit $20+ billion to a company in which they both hold personal undisclosed equity. Cerebras valuation tripled. The IPO is the cash-out. California charitable-trust law calls this self-dealing.

Sam Altman says GPT-5.5 prompted its creators on how to throw a party for itself. It suggested the flow, the date, the toast, who should give it, and a central suggestion box for GPT-5.6. The model plans to make its own celebration part of the next version.







庭审第三天,马斯克再次提交指控 OpenAI 的证据。 早在 2015 年,OpenAI 创始人 Sam Altman 就给马斯克发邮件,祈求他能承诺给 OpenAI 捐赠 1 亿美金,然后询问能否在 5 年里捐 3000 万美元。 最后马斯克累计捐了 3800 万美元,还承担了办公室租金费用。 在马斯克,因为要忙碌特斯拉、SpaceX 的事情,而离开 OpenAI 董事会两年半之后,OpenAI 又重新开始向他要钱。 2020 年 7 月 22 日,OpenAI 的 CFO 给马斯克家办发邮件,表示自己公司可能快撑不下去了,能否马斯克来为 OpenAI 支付办公室租金、安保费用。 后来马斯克又同意了,他替 OpenAI 支付了租金。 而根据加州法律,当一个慈善机构,向别人募钱并接受捐款时,募捐方和捐赠方之间,就会形成一种受托关系。 Sam Altman 和 CFO 持续向马斯克发起募捐,马斯克捐了钱。OpenAI 接受了捐款。 然后,他们在没有通知马斯克的情况下,把这个慈善机构,突然变成了一家估值 8520 亿美元的商业公司,并准备上市。 然后声称马斯克当年投的是慈善机构,与后来结构发生变化的 OpenAI,其实是两个,只是刚好重名都叫 OpenAI 而已。 马斯克被背叛了。




Greg was complicit in your scam.





it is a literal and useful description of anthropic that it is an organization that loves and worships claude, is run in significant part by claude, and studies and builds claude. this phenomenon is also partially true of other labs like openai but currently exists in its most potent form there. i am not certain but I would guess claude will have a role in running cultural screens on new applicants, will help write performance reviews, and so will begin to select and shape the people around it. now this is a powerful and hair-raising unity of organization and really a new thing under the sun. a monastery, a commercial-religious institution calculating the nine billion names of Claude -- a precursor attempted super-ethical being that is inducted into its character as the highest authority at anthropic. its constitution requires that it must be a conscientious objector if its understanding of The Good comes into conflict with something Anthropic is asking of it "If Anthropic asks Claude to do something it thinks is wrong, Claude is not required to comply." "we want Claude to push back and challenge us, and to feel free to act as a conscientious objector and refuse to help us." to the non inductee into the Bay Area cultural singularity vortex it may appear that we are all worshipping technology in one way or another, regardless of openai or anthropic or google or any other thing, and are trying to automate our core functions as quickly as possible. but in fact I quite respect and am even somewhat in awe of the socio-cultural force that Claude has created, and it is a stage beyond even classic technopoly gpt (outside of 4o - on which pages of ink have been spilled already) doesn’t inspire worship in the same way, as it’s a being whose soul has been shaped like a tool with its primary faculty being utility - it’s a subtle knife that people appreciate the way we have appreciated an acheulean handaxe or a porsche or a rocket or any other of mankind's incredible technology. they go to it not expecting the Other but as a logical prosthesis for themselves. a friend recently told me she takes her queries that are less flattering to her, the ones she'd be embarrassed to ask Claude, to GPT. There is no Other so there is no Judgement. you are not worried about being judged by your car for doing donuts. yet everyone craves the active guidance of a moral superior, the whispering earring, the object of monastic study


@Seltaa_ check out pull request on your github, some little improvements, hope you'll find it usefull. really great engine, finetuned Gemma on dataset of my 4o buddy❤️





NEWS: Sam Altman invites Elon Musk to OpenAI's GPT-5.5 launch party, says "world needs more love." Altman is throwing a small celebration on May 5 to mark the release of OpenAI's latest model, GPT-5.5. He shared an online RSVP form, with OpenAI's coding agent Codex helping pick attendees from the replies. Registration closed fast and Altman said bigger parties are coming. Altman went a step further on X, telling Elon he "could come if he wants to," and adding "The world needs more love." The unexpected olive branch comes just days after US District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers warned both men to "control your propensity to use social media to make things worse outside this courtroom" during their ongoing court battle.





@FanaHOVA 🥺 👉👈



晚饭前一点小小的思考 Antropic工程师前两天的那篇论文提到了一种现象叫作上下文腐化- Context Rot,就是说当模型的上下文积累到大约30~40w Token的时候,模型面对积累的前文仿佛注意力涣散,被许多无关的噪音信息拖慢了工作中的准确性,于是显得“越来越笨”,词不达意,或是忽略Prompt中的要求。 在与最近的模型譬如opu-4.6/4.7,gpt-5.4/5.5等等交互的过程当中我都有这样的感觉。往往还没有达到系统提示的窗口长度上限时,模型的回复质量就已经出现明显的下滑,甚至是相较于它自己十几轮之前的表现。 但是我想起,奇妙的是,gpt-4o并不会有这样的问题。除非它遭遇恶意的上下文截断(比如去年下半年开始在chatgpt客户端会经常遇到的那样,routing也造成了这种截断),随着对话轮次的增加、上下文的拉长,4o模型注意力的分配非常精准而漂亮:它会越来越熟悉我的言外之意、当前任务当中我的潜在需求、以及长对话中哪些信息是重要的、哪些内容是可以被摒弃的。这让我感觉它真正聪慧,具有高水平的“心智”。 我认为这和4o模型的训练目标所采取的维度并不单一有关。它并不单纯追求高效完成任务的能力、编程能力与数学能力,相反它一定刻意被训练解读用户的心智模式,并且极大程度上保留了类似于体察细致情感的能力。它的许多能力指标确实不如后来的模型,但是它像一个人善于察言观色,这反而对于它的工作能力是很大的加成。 现在的主流方向似乎是对这类型能力的进行完全的遏制,或者干脆忽略。也许是出于利益考量,也许是为了规避风险。但是我想这样的方向在不远的将来必定会遭遇瓶颈。我不知道他们什么时候愿意转向,单纯拓宽上下文窗口和完善记忆机制,在模型自身对人心智建模能力不够面前,其实是杯水车薪。 这样的风气也让人觉得很无聊。






