REV0LVER

@TuesdayGazette they actually did hire experts for exactly this, IIRC they were separate from ARCCA. They didn't call them or share their findings. Wonder why.

So weird how Karen Read’s team made the choice to not have ARCCA do the basic measurements of John’s traverse and Karen’s SUV to confirm their claim that the taillight was broken from bumping it as she slowly pulled out of the garage. The CW were the only ones who felt confident enough to have it digitally measured in person (at all angles) by an accident reconstructionist- biomechanical engineer. The conclusion was that the alignment could not have caused damage to the taillight due to the bumpers.

@babyboom90210 @DropMicrodots Lmk when that happens. I’m sure it’s gonna all be exposed any day now

@RuPaulver @DropMicrodots And what are you gonna do when one of these dirty cops is a whistleblower?

Bold Statement: Adam Deitch "have a dialogue with John O'Keefe's family, about what the facts actually are"

@Dan_Donovan_17 side by side with the same damage as her taillight

@Dan_Donovan_17 Same playbook every time. Explain how the evidence is consistent with X, and then it’s “the evidence is fake”. There’s no winning. The fact that these people think someone was meticulously editing all the data with staggering detail is… something.

For 3 years Didi has been screeching into the Abyss that the taillight wouldn't light up without the diffusers. She is shown that it does light up without the diffusers and now it's "Well the video was manipulated". x.com/Dan_Donovan_17…

@vivalamozz @benchslappedtv @Jbtoombs1980 @mabbe_8 I'm not even sure what she's really asking. Just sounds like confusion on what different databases do. The important thing to know is the databases that record your searches and webpage visits show no such thing at 2:27, and do not show any deletions.

@benchslappedtv @Jbtoombs1980 @mabbe_8 It’s been answered 334,567 times. It’s been answered more than every 5 year old in the world asking “are we there yet” 3 minutes into the trip. It is so dead you should visit its grave. That said @RuPaulver is usually patient enough to explain.

I'm seeing Aidan Kearney bring back 2:27 am, and frankly, he should be embarrassed. That claim, one he pushed for years and years, and used as the cornerstone of the #FKR "movement," has been thoroughly debunked by every digital forensics expert who has reviewed it. There isn't a single digital phone expert who will go on record to say it was a Google search. Notta one! Even Karen's own expert, Richard Green, refused to go on the record for fear of perjury. To be clear... It wasn’t a search. It was a WAL file of a tab session and stored in the BrowserState.db. A WAL file is a temporary system log that users can’t access or delete. More importantly, it was a browser refocus event, not a search. If it were real, it would appear in the History or Knowledge C databases. It doesn’t. Full stop. This should end the discussion, but here we are. You know what's not debatable but gets no traction: the GPS and phone data John O’Keefe’s phone: • Arrives at Fairview ~12:24am • John steps out of the Lexus at 12:31:55 am • John begins to take 36 steps at 12:32 am • Karen’s Lexus Telemetry records high-speed reverse event at 12:32:09 am • John’s phone records his final movement at 12:32:16 • John never moves again until 6:15 am • His phone battery temperature NEVER warms, proving he didn’t enter a warmer environment To believe the “inside the house” theory, you have to believe: the phone stopped tracking movement the moment he entered, recorded no steps inside, showed no temperature fluctuations, and somehow ended up back outside without logging movement during an attack and dog mauling event. That’s not how these systems work. And the data is crystal clear: 2:27 am is a misdirection, John NEVER entered the house, and not one piece of data points to anyone other than #KarenRead. To be honest, this is the weakest narrative, and the fact that it still holds your attention after all these years says more about you at this point than it does about Karen and Aidan.

@benchslappedtv @mabbe_8 this is all very easily tested and validated. anyone with basic forensic software can do this.

@benchslappedtv @mabbe_8 what you're suggesting isn't something BrowserState (the db in question) does or records. the records of the 6:23/6:24 searches are from MobileSafari and KnowledgeC, which records timestamped browser activity. there's nothing in there for a 2:27 search because it didnt happen.

@sheetnwinch I'm still confused why people think this about Higgins. The only source of it is his testimony, where he clearly stated he had his phone available the whole time and only got rid of it afterward, because it was an old phone he wasn't using anymore.

Just a periodic reminder that Higgins followed the court’s order to the letter and any information on Brian Albert’s old phone would’ve transferred to the new one anyway. (Not that it matters….we saw what was on them anyway)

@Dan_Donovan_17 Katie McLoughlin’s report of this was also in the first arrest affidavit, filed only a couple days later.

It's interesting that the FKR Cult members point to Jen McCabe's "I hit him, I hit him, I hit him" not being in a police Report. Jackson would have tried to boot it if it was as he considers police reports to be hearsay so, not admissible.

@Angiegeff and conspiracy theorists repeating these things on the internet is why there's currently a defamation lawsuit.

@RuPaulver Youre never gonna convince me. My opinion will always be that mccabe, higgins, and Alberts brought this on themselves. Their conduct did this. The commonwealth put it on display for us to see. Now their mad people formed an opinion

But im blocked and cant reply. So we can do it this way. Its not a resolved issue or we wouldnt be here. And Tuesday still remains the worst pr person. She cant answer real questions, from real people who want to know truth. Shy away n block is her game. 🤮

@Angiegeff I'd also point out that she resigned after a major controversy, and has a court-documented history of being more of an advocate for a party than for anything factual.

@RuPaulver Oh please. That woman was as blunt and truthful as they came. No stuttering in her testimony. 🤷‍♀️ we are on opposite sides and thats okay. Whats not okay is there is a murderer out there and it's not karen and her vehicle.

@Angiegeff I mean, listen to her talk about the small abrasion on his forehead. Brennan asks her if it's consistent with a piece of glass. She says no. Brennan then tells her that Karen reported pulling a small piece of glass out. She suddenly changes her answer to yes. lol

@Angiegeff don't take her seriously. she generally just seemed like she was advocating for the defense case which is what she's paid to do.

@RuPaulver What about the defense ME?

@Angiegeff She did not. She point blank she refused to say that. She was purely talking about his legs in the part of the testimony you're referring to, which people have dishonestly taken out of context to pretend she's referring to an overall assessment.

@RuPaulver Sir she point blank said his injuries dont line up with what their saying. Add in the defense ME who also works for brennan, saying the same thing. Dude got knocked out and attacked by a dog. The end

@Angiegeff that's not what the ME said. she was saying this with regard to his lower body not sustaining injuries, which would obviously be the case if he wasn't struck in the lower body. she outright refused to otherwise call his injuries inconsistent with an accident.

@RuPaulver Ok so u agree with the ME there. Do u agree that his injuries are not consistent with a motor vehicle accident LIKE THE ME SAID?!

@Angiegeff they were examined by the ME. they were surface-level abrasions with no measurable depth.

@RuPaulver Do u have kids? Those are not scrapes lol

@Angiegeff scraped him. that's why they're just surface-level scratches.

@RuPaulver So did the taillight grow claws n bite him?

@Angiegeff evidence doesn't fit with a punch. While it can look that way at first glance, his facial bruising was due to brain swelling in the occipital area from the injury sustained to the back of his head. every medical expert agreed with this.

@RuPaulver Stop lol. In pauls words, "looks like he went a couple rounds with mike tyson". I bet he did fall after being knocked out with a punch. I would too. So would you!

@Angiegeff because he also fell.

@RuPaulver I have never seen someone get clipped and die. Sorry. Being clipped is lower body injuries. He had none. If she plowed into his arm at 24mph his arm would be severed like my friends legs were. Real life comparisons.