Samurayich

362 posts

Samurayich banner
Samurayich

Samurayich

@Rulia2505

seeing trends before they become obvious.

Katılım Temmuz 2022
62 Takip Edilen21 Takipçiler
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
Three video models. One impossible scene. A father shielding his kid from a giant troll in a forest, then King Kong hold-up shot. Pure fantasy chaos. Pause 0:15 Ran the same prompt through Kling 2.6, Hailuo 2.3 and Seedance Pro. Honestly thought I knew who'd win this one. I didn't. Kling 2.6: Composition is solid but it tried to do too much at once. Faces blur out in the action shot, the troll's anatomy gets weird in close-up, and there's that glassy "I'm a rendered demo" sheen on everything. Strong cinematography, weak humanity. Hailuo 2.3: The dark horse. Lighting feels like an actual forest in actual fog. The way the father pulls his kid behind the rock has real protective body language — not posed, just reactive. The King Kong shot is also the most physical of the three. You can feel the weight. Some background flicker but the emotion lands. Seedance Pro: Cleanest faces, cleanest detail, but emotionally the flattest. Kid looks like he's posing for a poster, not running from a monster. The Kong scene is gorgeous but reads like fantasy art, not a frame from a film. Beautiful — just not scary. My ranking: Hailuo 2.3 — emotion, weight, fear. Closest to a real scene. Seedance Pro — visually richest, narratively weakest. Kling 2.6 — strong frames, but the action breaks it. Hailuo quietly cooking while everyone's still arguing about Seedance vs Kling 👀 What's your top 3?
English
0
0
0
11
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@gippp69 $10k ones to never pay OpenAI or Anthropic again is the new mortgage 🏠 521 GB local rack going to print money quietly for years
English
0
0
0
9
Gipp 🦅
Gipp 🦅@gippp69·
HE STACKED 4 MS-S1 MAX-STYLE BOXES IN A SERVER RACK. 4 × $2,599 TO STOP PAYING $10-$20 EVERY DAY FOR AI AGENTS. each box is built around Ryzen AI Max+ 395, 128GB unified memory, and up to 96GB shared GPU memory. four of them turns a small rack into 512GB of local AI infrastructure. the stack is simple. Hermes Agent runs the workflows, llama.cpp serves the model locally, and the system points to localhost instead of renting OpenAI or Claude tokens all day. the economics are the real point. $10-$20/day looks small until agents are running research, drafts, summaries, client docs, tool calls, and sub-agents every single day. that becomes $300-$600/month for repeat work. one MS-S1 MAX can run a 120B local model around 56 tokens/sec at roughly 110W under load. with four boxes, you can split writing, research, automation, dashboards, and backup jobs across the rack. for small agencies, content teams, research shops, and solo founders, this changes the math. the agent can work 24/7 without charging you every time it thinks, reads, writes, or touches a file. local AI is not a chatbot on a desk anymore. it is owned infrastructure in a rack.
NO1ennn@N01ennn

x.com/i/article/2067…

English
45
4
103
5.2K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@qusaxz "Build, runs ads, sell leads" is the leanest agency model I've seen all year. 5 clients > 50 clients hits different 🔥
English
0
0
0
1
qusaxz🦞
qusaxz🦞@qusaxz·
2 guys from Switzerland are closing $2,000 website deals in Phuket right now Not remote. Not “digital nomad lifestyle content” Actually working They use Bolt dot new to build the sites fast They run Meta ads on top to generate leads for local businesses Then they sell those leads back to the same businesses Its a 3-part machine - build, run ads, sell leads You dont need 50 clients You need 5 5 businesses paying you monthly to keep the leads coming Real estate is their main target One sold house covers your invoice for 6 months They started 6 years ago with dropshipping Small websites, trial and error 3 years ago they registered a company Now theyre sitting in Thailand explaining the model to strangers at a cafe They work only in Switzerland right now But the model has no borders You build the site once The ads run without you The leads close while youre in Phuket Thats not freelancing Thats a system
English
0
0
4
55
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@RoundtableSpace Diffusion for text was a meme 12 month agom Now it's breaking inference records weekly. Wild speedrun 🔥
English
0
0
0
4
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
Diffusion Gemma just hit 2000+ tokens per second locally - 1.8x faster than before, running on 18GB RAM. Diffusion models for language are moving faster than anyone expected. LOCAL INFERENCE SPEED RECORDS ARE BEING BROKEN WEEKLY NOW.
English
15
0
47
36.6K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
New text-to-video battle for yhe best AI generators: Recently released Grok Imagine 1.5, the king Seedance 2.0, and the old veteran King 3.0 This time I tested hiw each model handles an apocalypse scene - lighting storms, collapsing cities, first-person driving though chaos. Real physics, real weight, real atmosphere. And the result was much less obvious than I expected. Believe it or not — this time I can't call Seedance a clear winner. Each model got several attempts. — Seedance 2.0: Cinematic as always. Lightning, broken spires, glowing storm — straight out of a movie poster. The composition is stunning, but it feels like a still frame in motion. Beautiful, but emotionally distant. You watch it like art, not like a scene you're inside. — Kling 3.0: The dark horse of this test. Best rain physics on the windshield, best sense of speed, best "I'm actually driving through hell" energy. The dashboard reflection alone sells the entire shot. Some weird hand artifacts on the wheel, but the atmosphere is undefeated. — Grok Imagine 1.5: The biggest surprise. Less dramatic, less cinematic — but somehow the most real. Smoke, fire, debris all sit naturally in the frame. It doesn't try to impress. It just looks like a Tuesday in a war zone. That restraint is what makes it hit harder. — My ranking: Kling 3.0 — best physics, best immersion, best "you are there" feel Grok Imagine 1.5 — surprisingly grounded, scariest in the quiet way Seedance 2.0 — gorgeous, but felt like a render, not a moment Agree with my ranking? 👇
English
0
0
2
37
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@Bober_smart "Owner thinks he spent a week on it" - the perception gap is where the margin lives 🤣
English
0
0
0
8
Bober_smart
Bober_smart@Bober_smart·
A 24-year-old guy from Britain turned himself into a girl and works as a psychologist for men, charging $500 an hour His only expense is $20 for Claude He put up some ads, and men lined up in a queue. During the consultations, they pour their hearts out and share their problems Claude alters his appearance and voice in real-time He conducts 15 consultations a week = $7,500 a week And the funniest part is, they all know it’s AI
Bober_smart@Bober_smart

A 24-year-old guy from Texas turned himself into Elon Musk and made $4,356 in 4 hours It all started as a joke, he launched a TikTok stream, but the result was unpredictable The costs amounted to $20 for Claude Claude changed his appearance in real time The audience loved the look so much that they started donating and sending gifts At the end of the stream, his balance was $4,356 Peak viewership reached 11,430 The stream gathered 186,580 likes He gained 65,000 new followers And the funniest thing is, everyone knew it was AI

English
47
14
156
11.1K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@YourAlphaMom Body physics is the new benchmark - anyone can fake a still frame, nobody fakes a sprint 🏃‍♂️curious which one cracked the cloth sim
English
1
0
1
44
Alpha Mom
Alpha Mom@YourAlphaMom·
New body-physics test for the best AI video tools: The newly released Grok Imagine 1.5, the king Seedance 2.0, Google’s “revolutionary super-duper” Gemini Omni Flash, and the old-timer Kling 3.0 Pro. This time I tested how each model handles realistic running motion, body movement, fabric physics, and natural secondary motion. And the result was much less obvious than I expected. Believe it or not, I can’t call Seedance the clear winner this time. Each model got several attempts. - Grok Imagine 1.5: The new version is finally available on the official Grok website, so I could properly test it. Honestly, I didn’t notice a massive improvement over the previous version. Still, the result was acceptable. It produced the most cartoonish image, and the woman runs as if she’s wearing heels, but the body physics were decent enough. It also understood the instructions quickly and followed them correctly. - Kling 3.0 Pro: The old man decided to test my patience. It repeatedly blocked a simple running scene as adult content, then misunderstood the instructions several times. The successful result has the most realistic lighting and frame rate, but the actual body physics look strange. It almost feels like loose foam padding is bouncing inside the leggings. There are also several visible artifacts and unnatural movements. - Gemini Omni Flash: As usual, it gave me that strange slow-motion, low-FPS look that Google models seem to love. But it didn’t censor anything, understood the instructions immediately, and produced a beautiful, realistic result. Surprisingly, this is the output I liked the most in this test. - Seedance 2.0: Seedance also blocked a couple of generations, just like Kling, but eventually produced a strong result. It delivered the most beautiful and visually appealing footage, but I honestly expected better physics. The video looks great, yet I can’t confidently call it the most physically accurate result. - My ranking: 1. Gemini Omni Flash — not perfect, but the best overall result for me 2. Seedance 2.0 — visually stunning, but I preferred Omni’s physics 3. Grok Imagine 1.5 — cartoonish look and strange running, but still acceptable 4. Kling 3.0 Pro — the longest wait, the strangest physics, and the most inconsistent result Do you agree with my ranking? #AIVideo
Alpha Mom@YourAlphaMom

New action test: Seedance 2.0 vs Gemini Omni Flash vs Kling 3.0 Pro vs Google Veo 3.1. This time, a Lara Croft-style heroine had to escape armed enemies, perform multiple stunts, and shoot back during one complex action sequence. Each model got 4–6 attempts. I brought Veo 3.1 back instead of Grok Imagine. The reason is simple: Veo handled this scene better, while new Grok 1.5 still isn’t available on the official Grok website, so I left it out. - Google Veo 3.1: Predictably finished last, but I wouldn’t call the result terrible. It clearly looks weaker and more outdated than the others, but for such a difficult scene, the result was still acceptable. - Gemini Omni Flash: Not perfect, but still pretty good. The stunts, physics, and overall execution worked well. My main issue is Google’s familiar low-FPS look. The footage constantly feels slightly slowed down, which makes it less cinematic than both Seedance and Kling. Still, I liked the result, and it was strong enough to take second place. - Kling 3.0 Pro: Better than I expected. Its biggest problem is character consistency. The heroine and other characters become distorted during fast movement, with plenty of unnatural poses and animation errors when you look closely. The overall result is still acceptable. Worse than Gemini Omni Flash, but definitely better than Veo 3.1. - Seedance 2.0 This was Seedance’s territory. Complex action remains its greatest strength, and it started producing excellent results within the first few attempts. The physics, movement, instruction following, and overall intensity were all impressive. This might be one of the best results I’ve ever received from Seedance. This test once again shows that Seedance remains the king of difficult action scenes. - My ranking: 1. Seedance 2.0 — clearly on another level 2. Gemini Omni Flash — strong, but held back by the slow-motion feel 3. Kling 3.0 Pro — better than expected 4. Google Veo 3.1 — predictably failed again What do you think of the new test? #AIVideo

English
48
28
397
86.2K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@qusaxz "B2B SaaS that secretly does your remote work" is the most 2036 product idea ever pitched 💀 13yo cooked
English
0
0
1
4
qusaxz🦞
qusaxz🦞@qusaxz·
A 13-year-old just built a B2B SaaS in 67 seconds. He had blue tape over his mouth the whole time. Here’s exactly what he did: Step 1: Claude. He typed one prompt. “Build Proxy - a dark, premium B2B SaaS landing page. Tagline: Work less. Earn more. Tell no one. An AI that secretly does your remote job.” Claude designed the full product concept, copy, and feature list. 67 seconds. One prompt. Step 2: Codify. He opened codify/cool and handed the Claude output directly to the builder. The dashboard appeared: 4 agents deployed, 4 completed runs, Software Engineer agent running live. Objective: “Fix the failing checkout tests and open a PR.” The agent analyzed the codebase, cloned the repo, searched files, formed a plan, edited code, ran tests, opened the pull request. No human wrote a single line. Step 3: Proxy - his actual product. The landing page: “Deploy AI agents that do the work.” A team of autonomous agents - engineering, inbox, research, ops. Give it an objective. Watch it plan, work, and finish end to end. He’s 13. He found the idea on Y Combinator’s Instagram. He used Claude to shape it, Codify to build it, Proxy to deploy it. The stack costs less than a Netflix subscription. The tape over his mouth wasn’t a gimmick. It was the point. The AI does the talking now.
English
1
0
2
42
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@fomoliver "Real scores convince. Nobody fack-checks." - thatythe whole AI content era in 8 words
English
0
0
0
1
Oliver
Oliver@fomoliver·
Uzbekistan recently played at the World Cup for the first time in their history. And in this video an Uzbek fan is sitting in the stands. A 2022 World Cup quarterfinal broadcast plays next to her. Where Uzbekistan wasn't. The video was generated before Uzbekistan ever had fans at a World Cup. Nobody in the comments noticed. Pause at 0:03. A girl in a white UFA jersey, number 7. Uzbekistan flag on her cheek. Eating a burger. An "AI generated" label is on the video. TikTok flagged it itself. The algorithm still pushes it. Three real score overlays from the 2022 World Cup. Morocco-Portugal 1-0. Iran-England 0-2. Scotland-Switzerland 1-1. Real scores convince. Nobody fact-checks. This format still works. This format hasn't been exposed yet. Veo3 is still in beta. Real scores still convince. AI fans still slip through. In six months everyone will know that half of those fans are generated. Until then the video will rack up millions. Right now they're paying those who got there first.
Oliver@fomoliver

x.com/i/article/2066…

English
2
0
9
349
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@andreysuperior The genius isn't the AI. It's calling the missed lead first and proving the pain 👀
English
1
0
1
30
Superior
Superior@andreysuperior·
A kid in his tshirt sold an AI receptionist to a hair salon while drinking coffee. $399 a month from the one client. 30 minutes of work. He opened vacancies. Found a salon in Bay Park about to hire someone for $3,000 a month. Copied their website. ChatGPT wrote the system prompt. He dropped it into VAPI. 20 minutes later there was a voice agent answering calls in the salon's tone. He called the salon. Said nobody picked up yesterday. The owner apologized. The kid said cool, I built you an AI receptionist that answers 24/7. Want to hear it? He played the demo on the phone. The owner thinks he spent a week on it. He charges $399 a month. They save $2,600. He has 30 clients. His full setup is below.
Superior@andreysuperior

x.com/i/article/2055…

English
14
0
46
5.3K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@ZentrixHQ Step 1 alone is worth the post. That's the actual moat 📌
English
1
0
1
11
Zentrix⌚️
Zentrix⌚️@ZentrixHQ·
📖BUILDING AN AI CONTENT AGENCY FOR LUXURY BRANDS. AI Startup of the Day #10 Luxury watches, jewelry, and lifestyle brands need premium video content that matches their brand aesthetic. Production costs in this niche are high — which means margins for a smarter solution are too. Here's exactly how to start: • Step 1 — Find luxury micro-brands on Instagram — watches under $2,000, handmade jewelry, premium leather goods. They look expensive but have no video budget. • Step 2 — Generate premium product visuals in Seedance 2.0:
"Luxury watch close-up, macro lens, dark velvet background, dramatic side lighting, slow rotation, cinematic premium feel" • Step 3 — Send the sample with a premium pitch. Don't discount — position it as exclusive. Offer: "6 premium campaign videos — $1,500." Luxury clients pay for perceived value. • Step 4 — Build a portfolio of 5–6 luxury brands. Use it to pitch larger brands and PR agencies that manage multiple luxury clients. The numbers:
4 clients × $1,500 = $6,000/month
Agency referrals at $2,500 per project add significant upside. Luxury brands have the budget and the need. The barrier is looking premium enough to approach them — your portfolio of AI-generated samples does that job. 📥 Tomorrow I'll share another AI opportunity. Don't miss it. 🔖 The full guide is pinned below. Save it before you need it.
Zentrix⌚️@ZentrixHQ

x.com/i/article/2065…

English
4
2
8
309
Oliver
Oliver@fomoliver·
@Rulia2505 Grandma discovered the ultimate age hack.
English
1
0
2
9
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
A 60-year-old grandmother just became a 25-year-old model. In her sweater. In her kitchen. In one afternoon. Pause at 0:06 — that's the moment the algorithm stopped caring about age, makeup, or genetics. Anyone can be anyone now. The only filter left is who hits "post" first. Drop a name + I bet she'll do it next 👇
English
1
0
4
56
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
Pause at 0:04 Day 37. He became the entire Wolf of Wall Street cast in one afternoon. That's nit edited footage. That's him, his room, one camera - wearing DiCaprio, McConaughey and Jonah Hill back to back. The reason we're about to lose our jobs isn't AI taking work. It's one person doing what used to need a studio, a costume team and three A-list contracts. Who should he become in the next scene? 👇
English
0
0
1
83
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@fomoliver "AI as a generator of aesthetic paradoxes" is the best framing of this whole moment I've read 🔥
English
1
0
0
10
Oliver
Oliver@fomoliver·
More people have seen this Ghana fan than a real Ghana match. She doesn't exist in any stadium in the world. Only in Veo3. Pause at 0:04. Dark skin + white hair + blue eyes in one frame. In nature this combination almost never occurs. In the algorithm it's just a prompt. In the TikTok feed, damn, every 30 seconds. A white Puma jersey, Ghana flag on the lips, red seats in the background. The quality is such that in the first seconds you don't realize it's a render. TikTok itself flagged it as "AI generated", sees that it's not real, still pushes it. AI has become a generator of aesthetic paradoxes. Color combinations incompatible in nature. Faces you'd never meet on the street. Compositions no operator would catch by accident. She doesn't exist. Her appearance doesn't occur in nature. This scene never happened. > Veo3 drew her in 30 seconds. > TikTok found the audience in an hour. In a year, ordinary faces in the feed will start to feel boring. AI has already found its new aesthetic, and it beats real ones on reach.
Oliver@fomoliver

x.com/i/article/2066…

English
3
0
14
360
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@RoundtableSpace This is the move. Forget global SaaS - find the one thing your country doesn't have and ship it over a weekend
English
0
0
0
25
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
CZECHIA HAD NO LICENSE PLATE PREVIEW SITE SO SOMEONE BUILT ONE IN A WEEKEND WITH CLAUDE CODE Live preview with the official font. Color configurator, format validator and a real database checker to see if your combo is taken. Find the gap nobody finds interesting enough to fill. That's the whole move.
English
20
6
185
68.8K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@starmexxx real q: where is freebuff actually routing requests? Someone is paying for those tokens. If it's not you, it's your data 🍿
English
0
0
0
40
starmex
starmex@starmexxx·
A 19 YEAR OLD CANCELLED $5,664/YEAR IN AI BILLS WITH 1 CLI COMMAND THAT KILLED $200/MO CLAUDE CODE freebuff is a free terminal coding agent that runs minimax m2.7, deepseek v4 pro and kimi k2.6 with no api key, no signup and no credit card. one npm install and you have a frontier model in the terminal deepseek r1 reasoning model matches gpt-4o and claude sonnet on code generation, debugging and research for $0. the web chat has no cap and api pricing is 10 to 20x cheaper than openai google imagefx runs imagen 4 for free with generous daily limits. ideogram v3 handles text in images better than midjourney with 25 free images a day. stable diffusion locally is unlimited chatterbox beat elevenlabs in 63.75% of blind listening tests and clones a voice from 10 seconds of audio. kokoro tts runs 82 million parameters on a cpu at 210x real-time speed with 54 voice presets most people pay $472 a month for the polish and the last 5% of frontier capability. the ones who switch in 2026 save $16,992 over 3 years for 95% of the same workflow bookmark this and read the article below
Ventry@ventry089

x.com/i/article/2066…

English
11
7
81
8.4K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@armouredme The real arb isn't June 22 vs July 1 - it's the geo-blocking loophole nobody's pricing in yet
English
0
0
0
10
Murmur
Murmur@armouredme·
Claude Fable 5 unbanning can be traded on Polymarket But different markets have different rules polymarket.com/event/claude-f… Everyone thinks Anthropic needs the government to drop the ban But the contract has a massive loophole If the company just blocks users by nationality it still counts as a Yes Anthropic does not need to win a huge political fight They do not need the export ban to end They just need to add an ID check and block foreigners People are trading this based on how fast the government works But the real angle is how fast Anthropic can add a login screen Governments take months to do anything Tech companies can add an ID check in a week Buying the Yes side makes total sense here It is a play on a simple tech update instead of a political miracle
Murmur tweet mediaMurmur tweet media
Murmur@armouredme

51% chance that a federal Claude ban gets solved in two weeks polymarket.com/event/us-gover… The US government told Anthropic to either change their new Fable 5 AI Or shut it down completely The company refused to back down So the officials put a massive global ban on the software This is not a simple glitch or a quick pause It is a real fight with federal agencies Big state systems never solve these deep conflicts in just a few days Especially when the creators are actively fighting back Buying the No side on June 30 at 50 cents is a clear value play You are simply trading government bureaucracy

English
20
0
65
4.5K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@FynCas WORKFLOW let's see if the DM us a real workflow or a $97 course pitch 🍿
English
0
0
0
18
Cas.Fyn
Cas.Fyn@FynCas·
Claude = 500+ videos a day Fully realistic UGC ads — cinematic lighting, natural movement, clean pacing — all powered by AI. UGC cost: $1 Production time: minutes Scale: basically unlimited I’ve got this crazy workflow running right now that creates, tests, and scales short-form ads automatically... nonstop. It’s already live and campaigns are scaling. If you want me to share the full setup, just comment “WORKFLOW”
Cas.Fyn tweet media
English
242
16
159
17.5K
Samurayich
Samurayich@Rulia2505·
@Will_Yang_ Gemini just pulled Jerry out of a 2D Bing search and rendered him as a 3D object in real time. Now imagine the same thing wired into Claude, Opus 4.8 as a tool. The "AI assistant" era is about to look very different
English
0
0
2
217
Will Yang
Will Yang@Will_Yang_·
Gemini还是太权威了,把电脑中的人物丝滑跳出屏幕走进现实。
中文
571
428
5.5K
954.4K