Rupal

This man has more admirers than US President Donald Trump! RT if you agree

Hello, What kind of behavior is this? @ECISVEEP @bihar_police @SpKatihar @DM_Katihar

Rajdeep quietly posted an apology video on Instagram after making false corruption allegations against BJP Councillor Ajit Singh Tokas. Ajit Singh has dragged him to court for defamation. Funniest part? He thought posting it on Insta would go unnoticed. Share this max on X!😂

Himalaya’s visibly from Madhubani ❤️ This happened during covid time too.

Congress leader #OscarFernandes, talks about his cure from Cancer with #Gaumutra & Ayurveda when death seemed inevitable, he was finally admitted to a Sanatan Ashram near Meerut, where he recovered. For the people throwing Gaumutra jibes.

Respected HM @AmitShah Ji, Gajanan Bhaskar Mehendale’s work on Maratha History is unparalleled. His monumental work - ‘Shivaji - His Life and Times’ is a timeless masterpiece and the most accurate biography of Chhatrapati Shivaji the great. I humbly request the Government of Bharat to bestow upon him the posthumous Padma award. CC. @Dev_Fadnavis @RajThackeray

A giant has left us yesterday. Gajanan Bhaskar Mehendale, just as his middle name said, he was a Bhaskar, a sun of history. He wasn’t just a historian, he was an encyclopedia who carried the weight of Bharat’s truth in his words. He stood firm against distortions, never afraid of Leftist narratives, because he came armed with evidence, with primary sources that no one could challenge. Through his works, he gave us Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj in his true form, not diluted, not diminished, but as the Hindutva warrior, the guardian of Dharma, the builder of Swarajya. His books are not just books. They are foundations. They are the bedrock of Maratha history for generations to come. Today we bow our heads to a man whose light will never fade. You may have left this mortal world, but your words, your courage, your truth will guide us forever. Om Shanti

Dalla .@sardesairajdeep gets brutal fact-check from former CEC N. Gopalaswamy. "Allegations against SIR are absolutely false" "In 2007, we deleted 52 Lakh entries before UP Elections, same happened in Karnataka. Corrections had to be made" CONgress was in power in 2007, but BJP never cried foul nor did try to provoke people by spreading LIES.

BREAKING NEWS 🚨 Indian Army releases a detailed video on Operation Sindoor and Operation Mahadev — a treat to watch 😎

Arab & Turks Took Many Decades To Have A Base In Sindh & Punjab.. It Was Embarrassing For Caliphs

Mahadev Ki Kripa Hui and Hindus realised in 2014 how dangerous Congress is for India If not, they would have put Mohan Bhagwat Ji in Jail and proved Hindutva Terror Exists Such is the hate of Christian rulers in Congress towards Hindus

Fact Check: 62 % of Kashmiri vocabulary comes directly from Sanskrit and 33% of Kashmiri vocabulary comes indirectly from Sanskrit. Most Kashmiri place names come from Sanskrit: Shrinagar (Śrīnagara), Baramulla (Varāhamula), Anantnag (Anantanāga), Pampore (Padmapūra), Sopore (Suyyāpura), Harmukh(Haramukha) etc. Kashmir produced great Sanskrit poets like Bhāmaha, Bilhaṇa, Kṣemendra and Ānandavardhana long before Islam came to Kashmir and long before Urdu was born. If anything is alien to Kashmir, it is not Sanskrit but Urdu and Islam.

This is the kind of Narrative that states need to encourage Kudos to you @revanth_anumula

This is NOT a primary source. It is an outdated, second-hand, colonial source written by someone who worked for British colonial Government to produce their version of history. He quotes rumors of EIC colonial merchants to claim that Shivaji Maharaja indulged in looting. My thread disproves this lie: x.com/TrueIndology/s…

I barely post anything these days. But today, an abominable lowlife called Ruchika Sharma abused Shivaji Maharaj. She falsely dubbed him as a 'looter' on Live TV. She made a factually inaccurate and slanderous statement. The man who gave Hindus freedom, respect and dignity gets insulted. Thankless Hindu nation doesn't even bother. Fact-check thread🧵:

I have finally finished what may be the most definitive biography of a man whom Hindustan, for far too long, saw through a fogged-up mirror—Babur. A figure whose sword carved rivers, and whose pen bled poems. A man, both the rain and the rot. How did it begin? It was six winters ago, amidst a polite duel of minds with the erudite Dalrymple. Words crossed, ideas clashed, but always with civility, as old-school scholarly duels demand. The exchange lingered. It fermented. That’s when I made a vow—not a momentary rebellion, but a tapasya. I would chronicle the lives of the Timurids—who were never ‘Mughals’, but a Turkic horde clinging to the façade of Persianate grace. I taught myself Farsi. I hunted manuscripts. And eventually, I held in my hands the original Baburnama, in Farsi (translation from Chagtai Turki was commissioned by Akbar) —becoming only the tenth person in history to access that treasure. Many have written on Babur. Few touched his truth. Fewer still dared to tell it. Now, the books are here. Two volumes. Nearly 3 lakh words. Five years of relentless writing. A mirror held up to a man who called himself ‘a conqueror of kafirs’ and ‘a lover of beauty’—in every sense of the phrase. To write a biography is not to sculpt a statue. It is to exhume a corpse. You uncover the elegance and the stench alike. And Babur had both. He was a poet with a scimitar. He found beauty in gardens and in boys. He poured his soul into verses, and his rage into temples. Yes, he was gay. Yes, he glorified jihad against Kafir Hindus. He spilled blood in the name of Islam. His Baburnama does not conceal this—it sings it. He hated “kafirs” with a passion sharpened by his belief. His own words celebrate the desecration of temples. His memoir is not merely a chronicle; but it is a confessional. As a Bhartiya, I say this without flinching: Babur was a villain. A soft-spoken one. A well-versed one. But a villain nonetheless. Yet, this story began not in the archives of Delhi or the libraries of Samarkand—but in a middle-class home in Bharat, on 6 December 1992. I was barely a child, but I remember the tension in the air. That day was not just about a structure—it was about history crashing into living rooms, sparking debates that would outlast generations. Every family gathering, every drawing-room conversation, swirled around one question: Who was this Babur? Soon, Doordarshan added to the confusion, serving up a syrupy serial on Akbar. I had already seen Mughal-e-Azam in monochrome, where Prithviraj Kapoor roared as Akbar and Dilip Kumar pined as Salim. School textbooks fed me tales of Mughal grandeur. But my parents—both historians—whispered different names into my ears: Maharana Pratap. Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj. Rani Durgavati. Hemchandra Vikramaditya. It was this dissonance between textbook and truth, between cinema and chronicles—that sowed the seed. I didn’t know it then, but I was being pulled by history’s undertow. Today, that undertow has become a wave. The Babur biography is only the beginning. The ink is already drying on the Akbar volume. And soon shall come Jahangir, Shah Jahan, and the darkest of them all—Aurangzeb. But for now, I invite you—reader, seeker, questioner—to pick up these two volumes on Babur. Read them. Gift them. Debate them. Let the libraries embed this tale. Let drawing rooms argue again. Let history walk out of the footnotes and into the firelight. Let Bharat decide: Did the Timurid tide bring prosperity, or did it drown a civilization beneath its horses’ hooves? Buy the books. Let truth—ugly, poetic, complex—breathe again. Links here: 1) Babur-2 (Babur: The Quest for Hindustan) Amazon amzn.in/d/g78fUAW @PadhegaIndia_ padhegaindia.in/product/babur-… 2) Babur-1 (Babur: The Chessboard King) Amazon amzn.in/d/85eaAyL @PadhegaIndia_ padhegaindia.in/product/babur-…

🚨INDIAN EDUCATION SYSTEM TILL 1823 ***ALL CASTE PEOPLE ARE TAUGHT RAMAYANA MAHABHARATAM BHAGAWATHAM So now understand who brought DISCRIMINATION in Education. It’s Bristish & Not Bramhins. “Blue Batch Must Watch”

Rana Safvi ji, your post blurs the distinction between cultural-linguistic evolution and political imposition. I am explaining it below: 1) Urdu ≠ Hindavi/Hindi: a) The earliest mentions of Hindavi (also called Dehlavi or Rekhta in poetic usage) appear in texts like Khadi Boli literature of the 13th century. Amir Khusrau himself referred to this emerging vernacular as “Hindwi” or “Hindavi”, written in Nagari script and associated with Braj, Awadhi, or Delhi dialects (See: Khusrau’s Nuh Sipihr, c. 1318 CE). b)“Urdu” as a term only becomes prominent in late 18th century, deriving from “Zabān-e-Urdu-e-Mualla” (Language of the exalted camp)—the Mughal military camp’s Persianised lingua franca. c)Sir Syed Ahmad Khan himself distinguished between Urdu and Hindi, claiming Urdu was the “language of Muslims”, whereas Hindi was seen as associated with Hindus. (Causes of the Indian Revolt, 1858) 2. Urdu was politically weaponized by the Muslim League: a) The Muslim League, under Jinnah, explicitly used Urdu as a communal identifier. In his March 21, 1948, speech in Dhaka, Jinnah said: “The state language of Pakistan is going to be Urdu and no other language. Anyone who tries to mislead you is really the enemy of Pakistan.” (Source: Jinnah’s Dhaka Speech, 21 March 1948, published in Dawn archives) b) This was not a neutral linguistic policy — it ignited the Bengali Language Movement, leading to mass protests and eventually deaths on 21 February 1952 (now commemorated as International Mother Language Day by UNESCO). 3) Hindi as a separate identity predates the politicisation of Urdu: a) Bharatendu Harishchandra (19th-century) is considered the father of modern Hindi, promoting Hindi in Devanagari script, distinct from Urdu. His movement was against the imposition of Persianised Urdu in courts and administration under British rule. b) The Hindi-Urdu controversy of 1867–1900 is a watershed, where Hindi advocates sought replacement of Urdu (in Persian script) with Hindi (in Devanagari) in courts. (See: Christopher King, One Language, Two Scripts: The Hindi Movement in Nineteenth Century North India, Oxford University Press) 4. Urdu was not native to Bengal or Gujarat either: a) Jinnah’s mother being Gujarati or Suhrawardy’s Bengali has no bearing on Urdu’s roots. b) Both Gujarat and Bengal had their own vernacular literary traditions — Gujarati and Bangla. Urdu was never a mother tongue in those regions but adopted for elite Muslim identity in colonial politics. 5) Colonial backing of Urdu: a)The British administration favored Urdu in Punjab and NWFP (now Pakistan) over local scripts like Gurmukhi and Sindhi (See: Report on Vernacular Education in the Punjab, 1854). b) The political elevation of Urdu by colonial structures aided its dominance among Muslim elites, and was later carried forward by Muslim separatist politics. The assertion that Urdu is “originally Hindavi or Hindi” is historically misleading. While Hindavi was a common spoken base, Urdu emerged as a Persianised, elite military-camp dialect and was later politicized by Muslim elites, especially the Muslim League, to push for a pan-Islamic identity in India and Pakistan. The demand for Urdu as the sole national language in Pakistan directly contributed to partition-era tensions and later, Bangladesh’s secession. Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj’s Haindavi Swarajya was the earliest known movement of de-Persianisation. His first declaration of sovereignty involved replacing the Persian royal seal with a Sanskrit Rajmudra, consciously rejecting the symbols of Islamic imperialism. The term “Haindavi Swarajya” was coined to express Hindu civilisational self-rule, rooted in Indic values, not Turko-Persian ones. This proves that “Hindavi” or “Haindavi” in historical usage had nothing to do with Urdu, and in fact was an ideological rebellion against Perso-Islamic impositions (including language).

Gurdev Nidar Singh Ji Nihang is a great gift to Sikhi panth, Hindu sanskriti, Bharat desh. Govt should seek his counsel, celebrate him, spread his work.

Not 1st Meitei or Manipuri but the first Indian! This time, the name is Hanjabam Langlentombi Devi. Meiteis are diff breed in sports. Give us China-level support, we’ll take 🇮🇳 to the top of the world. We are Meiteis, we refuse to be reduced to just a face of North East.