Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Ryan Gilden
68 posts

Ryan Gilden
@RyanGilden
https://t.co/GxWzyxIDyL
Los Angeles Katılım Kasım 2011
245 Takip Edilen38 Takipçiler

@GayRepublicSwag @EdKrassen The only thing worthwhile taking seriously in this thread and…1 comment. Signed!
English

@EdKrassen Please give 2 seconds of your time to sign Concerned Veterans for America's petition!
Veterans deserve the best possible Healthcare!!
They've sacrificed so much for us!! Now it's our turn to help them!!!
bit.ly/43mkxU2
English

To everyone who believes that the Trump indictment is "selective prosecution," I want to explain something.
As William Barr and others scathingly attack Trump, the argument Republicans are making is that Hillary Clinton used bleachbit, Bill Clinton had a sock drawer, and Joe Biden took documents too.
They argue that none of them were prosecuted for their actions while Trump has been prosecuted for his.
Let me review:
Trump's Case:
Trump is accused of taking top-secret documents, US Nuclear Documents, extremely sensitive military documents, defense documents, and more from the White House without notifying anyone. He took these documents to an unsecured location after he left office. He was subpoenaed for these documents by the US government but did not turn them over after receiving a court order to do so. His attorneys lied to the courts, saying they had searched and found no more. Meanwhile, he is accused of having an aide move the documents to a storage room after receiving the subpoena and then not allowing the FBI to search boxes in that storage room when they came to gather the documents he was subpoenaed for. He also apparently shared these documents with others who didn't have clearances while admitting that they were still classified. The indictment outlines that the government believes they have clear evidence of these actions.
Hillary's Case:
Hillary Clinton used a private email server without approval to conduct work as U.S. Secretary of State. This likely violated the Freedom of Information Act and national security legislation. However, many other individuals in office have done the same thing. For example, Ivanka Trump used a private email server to conduct official US business, and Jared Kushner used WhatsApp to privately conduct US business without allowing the rest of the government to gain access to what he was discussing. Nikki Haley sent multiple classified emails over unclassified systems. All of these actions would likely violate the same Freedom of Information Act law. None of them were prosecuted, but there is no evidence that any of them ignored a subpoena or took part in a cover-up. A third party did delete some of Hillary's emails a year after she had requested. She had requested the deletion well prior to the subpoena, and there is no evidence that she had any contact with that third party after the subpoena. Under an immunity deal, that third party said that Hillary did not know or ask them to delete the emails after the subpoena was issued. Whether or not that is true is up to us to have opinions on, but there was no evidence for the government to prove a crime.
Joe Biden's Case:
Joe Biden discovered documents in his home and office. He notified the FBI about the documents and freely allowed them to search wherever they wanted for more documents. There is no evidence that the public has seen that shows intent. Intent is a requirement to show that someone violated the Espionage Act. Biden would have had to knowingly keep documents from the government that he knew he was not allowed to have in order to violate the act. If there is/was evidence of this, then he could and should be charged with a crime when he leaves office. A special counsel is still investigating it.
Bill Clinton's Case:
Bill Clinton kept voice recordings between himself and a historian in his sock drawer. Upon leaving the White House, he took the tapes with him, claiming they were "personal records" rather than "Presidential Records." NARA and the government agreed that they were classified as "personal records" and never attempted to claim them. Judicial Watch tried to obtain them but could not because they were not "Presidential Records." There was absolutely no crime there, and no potential crime there. This doesn't mean that if these recordings had top-secret information on them, the government couldn't ask for them back.
So while there seems to be blatant evidence of obstruction and withholding classified documents on Trump's behalf, this is not the case thus far with the others.
I'd love to know your thoughts, and feel free to subscribe to me on Twitter if you support my content.

English

@ItsTabu @EdKrassen You're too either too young to understand or you're too naive ..
Either way! Evidence is right there.
nationalreview.com/2014/08/how-ob…

English

Why is there so much outrage that some person in Ukraine alleged Biden was paid $5 million, but no outrage that Trump's family has actually been proven to receive billions of dollars from the Saudis, Qataris, and Chinese?
I understand that politics are involved, but there is no proof that Burisma gave Biden $5 million to change foreign policy, yet there is already an assumption that he is guilty of bribery.
Meanwhile it's fact that Kushner and Ivanka were given billions of dollars, and those same people don't say a word? It's also fact that Trump changed foreign policy to help the Qataris, and made multiple pro-Saudi moves while in office.
I know I can unequivocally say that if Biden really did receive $5 million in order to change foreign policy, and he changed foreign policy in exchange for that money, I would admit he was corrupt.
Would Trump supporters do the same about the billions his family received?
Just wondering.

English

The climate cultists do not operate in science because they fail Popper's falsification principle.
It's too hot: Climate change.
It's just right: Climate change.
It's too cold: Climate change.
Forest fire: Climate change.
No Forest fire: Climate change.
Heavy snowfall: Climate change.
Light snowfall: Climate change.
Hurricanes: Climate change.
No hurricanes: Climate change.
Islamophobia causes climate change.
Climate change cause islamophobia.
Anxiety is caused by climate change.
Climate change causes anxiety.
Every phenomenon is caused by climate change; climate change is at the root of every phenomenon.
If you wish to discuss the policies surrounding climate change, you are a science denier who is likely causing climate change.
Jane Fonda explained that racism causes climate change as does toxic masculinity.
It is a grotesque 21st century new religion masquerading under the guise of science.
English

Mike Rogers lunges at Matt Gaetz during House speaker voting, other members forced to intervene: video fxn.ws/3ifUqMh
English

@BurningSkunkBud @darrell_e28 @RobLagrossi @newsmax Instead of paying $500 a month in interest to banks I can now put that money back into the economy, I’m sure many small businesses will benefit from people having extra money.
English

BREAKING: Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett rejected an appeal from a Wisconsin taxpayers group seeking to stop the Biden administration's student debt cancellation program. bit.ly/3SgolzH

English

What Does Rich-Kid Art Look Like? - ArtReview #art #richkids #artworld artreview.com/what-does-rich…
English

Color swatch studies and formulas for next piece. Process is everything.
.
.
.
.
#paintingprocess #oilpainting #colorswatch #losangeles #workinprogress #wip @ Grand View Fine Art Studios instagram.com/p/CfzljWIPo_i/…
Los Angeles, CA 🇺🇸 English
Ryan Gilden retweetledi
Ryan Gilden retweetledi

Hi Fam, I don't want to miss the Contest @Benjaminbitcoin and @RealKatoOG, This is the result of my WIP 🥰
Queen Cheetah
1/1 Editions
Price 0.1 $ETH
opensea.io/assets/ethereu…
#BenjaminKato #Benjaminbitcoin #KatoOGgo #etherstulist

English
Ryan Gilden retweetledi


A Stunning Exhibition in an Athens Park Sets A New Standard for Digital Art artnews.com/list/art-news/… via @artnews #digitalart #nft #futureart
English











