11

@amberXBT @GUS_player_C Spikeet ?

The more I backtest I more I found there is no edge in sc

@amberXBT @GUS_player_C Y’all backtest with what ?

@GUS_player_C Where the edge is hiding at then

@S6444311 no edge in future too

@RobLassonde @GRANDCROC Bizarrement quand je vois les Stats à l’intérieur du Québec , c’est dans les grandes villes que le QI est le plus élevé. Là où il ya plein d’immigrants lol.

@RobLassonde @GRANDCROC Oui et ? Ça ne change rien au fait qu’il n’y a pas race plus intelligente que l’autre…..renseignez vous avant de dire de la merde sur internet. Vous êtes pathétique.

Anastasia Marcellin nous avait servi le même discours : l'élite du tiers-monde qui nous crache dessus dès qu'on pointe les problèmes. Au Québec, le taux d'homicide chez les Arabes est près de 3 fois celui des Blancs, tandis qu'il est plus de 4 fois supérieur chez les Noirs. Rappelons que ces individus passent par un processus de sélection, ce qui n'est évidemment pas le cas de la population native. En France, les Algériens affichent un taux de chômage 3 fois plus élevé que celui des Français. @Iskan_dzz souligne la présence d'immigrants dans des postes contingentés, mais omet de mentionner la discrimination positive ou les politiques de DEI (Diversité, Équité, Inclusion) intégrées à la Charte des droits et libertés, qui écartent d'emblée l'homme blanc. On utilise le terme générique "immigrants" pour masquer les disparités abyssales entre les groupes. ''Bizarrement'', au Canada comme en France, la population ne semble avoir aucun problème avec les Japonais ou les Coréens. Cela s'explique aussi par les écarts de QI moyen : 77 en Algérie et 68 en Haïti, contre 106 au Japon et 104 en Corée du Sud. Les chiffres parlent d'eux-mêmes.

@GRANDCROC @RobLassonde Donc poster des statistiques bêtement sur internet sans vraiment comprendre les enjeux derrières ne te donne pas raison .

@S6444311 @RobLassonde Alors les noirs Américains devraient être très intelligents puisqu'ils ont eu beaucoup d'éducation, de bonne nutrition et bonne condition de vie sur plusieurs générations. Ce n'est pas ce que je constate.

@GRANDCROC @RobLassonde Justement, ça montre que le QI n’est pas figé ni biologique. La Chine a énormément investi dans l’éducation, la nutrition et les conditions de vie sur plusieurs générations, et les scores ont augmenté avec le temps. Donc ça confirme que c’est surtout environnemental.

@S6444311 @RobLassonde Alors, expliquez moi le QI élever des Chinois avec les inégalités systémiques et les conditions sociales difficile qu'ils ont connus dans leurs histoire pas si lointaine.

@GRANDCROC @RobLassonde Comparer des moyennes de QI sans prendre en compte l’histoire, les inégalités systémiques et les conditions sociales, c’est pas de la science, c’est juste une mauvaise interprétation des données.

@S6444311 @RobLassonde Les noirs Américains ont accès à l'éducation et l'information depuis longtemps, et ont toujours un QI moins élever.

@GRANDCROC @RobLassonde Le QI dépend de plusieurs facteurs, dont l’accès à l’éducation, l’accès à l’information… donc c’est normal que les pays en développement aillent un QI soit disant moins élevé.

@vibetradoor Where did you learn from , I’m searching for a serious mentorship but can’t find none

@S6444311 Kept $80k in the account but pretty sure I could've started with half that and it wouldn't have made a difference.

Q1 recap *hit $100k P&L *0 losing days *~30 sharpe *avg day $1679 / best day $3958 / worst day $137 I want to reiterate how grateful I am to be consistently profitable. There's a lot of hardship out there, and to be able to click buttons from home and make serious money is so soft, it might be insulting to those who show up and work more demanding jobs for less pay. $100k is serious money in just 3 months, but I consider myself a failure. I'm trading scared and focusing too much on each dollar lost, each dollar of income. If it ain't broke, why fix it? Well, in my mind, it is broken. My goals don't align at all with the way I'm trading. I'm not looking for $100k for months of work, I'm looking for $100k for days of work. I'm not here to grind for the next decade to just get by, I'm here to rapidly build wealth in a few years and ride off into the sunset. With that in mind, I'm going to consciously make an effort to move away from trading the way I currently do. Larger size, longer holding periods, more selectivity, and inevitably more risk, losing days, and drawdowns. Maybe some tweaks to execution as I currently use a lot of limit orders, so I'll have to see how adverse selection increases vs crossing spreads. I'll risk at least half if not all of this year's profit's in pursuit of my goals. I'll start from Q2 but it isn't as simple as flipping a switch and forcing the action to achieve the desired result, so I'll work with what the market offers.

Hi, I’m interested in buying your book on building a statistical edge. Before purchasing, I wanted to understand how you approach backtesting do you focus more on manual or automated methods, or both? Since validating a strategy beforehand usually requires some level of automation, I’m curious how you handle that. Also, does the book help develop a solid understanding of randomness and variance in a distribution? And is the content practical, with examples, charts, and explanations, or is it mostly theoretical?

Let me say something extremely important about repeatability. In trading, "repeatability" will probably be your final hurdle. And it is hard to notice. It was for me too. You tested it. You are executing consistently. And yet it is diverging from the test. You will find that puzzling. And then you change the strategy. In this case, the problem is that repeatability is low, no matter how consistent you are. Most people do not think of it as a repeatability problem. They assume the market has changed, or that the system has stopped working. But no matter how many times you change the strategy, you run into the same issue. At that point, it is no longer a market problem or a system problem. It is a repeatability problem on your side. I should say this here because I know some people will misunderstand it. "Even with fully automated testing and fully automated execution," repeatability can still be low. This is not the kind of problem that gets solved simply by turning it into an algorithm. Because even if the process is automated, if the rule set you are trying to reproduce is coarse to begin with, then what gets reproduced will remain coarse as well. That will probably sound strange. Why is repeatability low even though it is automated and even though it is consistent? A repeatability problem can be a problem with your "execution," but it can also be a problem that already exists at the rule-definition stage. Of course, it can also be both. If the problem exists at the rule-definition stage, then no amount of consistency will automatically translate into high repeatability. I will not go into detail here on the rule-definition side, but there are many important settings that most traders never address. Most traders think that as long as they define their entry rules, exit rules, and position sizing, all they have to do is keep repeating what they tested. But that is nowhere near enough. When the problems in rule definition and the problems in execution are both resolved, repeatability becomes high. This is not a matter of parameters. I do not use numerical values in my rules in the first place. This is a matter of "settings." And if you have already built your rules and you are already being consistent, yet something still feels off, then the final piece is probably a repeatability problem. That said, many traders have not even reached that stage in the first place. Many are still repeating the game of wins and losses, without understanding the true game of trading, or without understanding a trader's real responsibility, so for them the first priority is simply to get to the starting line. But if, hypothetically, you have already built your rules, you are already being consistent, and you have repeated that for years and still feel that it is not working, then I want you to think deeply about this. And if you still cannot figure it out, take a look at the blueprint I wrote. I believe it can become a real breakthrough for those who are serious. → payhip.com/b/bqKpV

One win away.

@OnlyTicks @AlexFinn Can you open it one last time🙏

@S6444311 @AlexFinn Bro im busy roasting AI influencers my discord is closed

10 days ago I installed ClawdBot on this Mac Mini Since then my AI employee has accomplished: • Building and launching a full application without me even asking for it (Bot Games) • Wrote a script for a video that has over half a million views on YT and has made over $4,000 in ad revenue • Built new functionality for my SaaS that has added over $10,000 of annual revenue • Spun up its own employees so it has agents working for it • Built its own command center so I can track everything its doing • Got its own phone number and voice and started calling me out of the blue All proactively, all autonomously Yet influencers on X will tell you this is just ChatGPT with a cron job Get your own AI employee ad change your life

@OnlyTicks @AlexFinn In your dms

@AlexFinn This is codex with a cron job get tf outta here

@OnlyTicks @AlexFinn Answered my question mate 🫡

@OnlyTicks Where can I join in ? Really want to learn relearn this

@DutchDaniels @XyzeeeTrades @leothetiger I should just give up right ?😓😭

@S6444311 @XyzeeeTrades @leothetiger I'm saying learn by watching them. There are no secrets. Trading is very hard.

Just waiting for the next pullback and cursing the world, amiright? #NQ_F

@DutchDaniels @XyzeeeTrades @leothetiger That’s all I need for real ?there’s no secret or better way of doing things?

@S6444311 No, study the charts Ive shared and watch @XyzeeeTrades and @leothetiger on NinjatraderLive (youtube).