Sacred Geometry Decoded

@Iganinja007 @Rainmaker1973 Hahahaha name any of the local timbers or cedar that was imported! Wood can’t support the weight? You have to be joking? Cedar is 3t per square inch.

@Rainmaker1973 I will correct the weight-2.5 tons. Still find me a tree or any wood in the Giza area, that will handle this weight of over 2.3mil, stones. Then go for the internal granite in the chambers.

Wally Wallington claims he demonstrated how a single person can manipulate massive monoliths, or how they could have been moved in ancient times. He claims that a pyramid could be completed using primitive tools in 25-year with only 520 workers.

@Iganinja007 @GockOnDemand @Rainmaker1973 I have a playlist of experiments of “impossible” primitive techniques. The lost tech crowd have never touched stone in two decades of griftery mystery.

@GockOnDemand @Rainmaker1973 Find me an example, of those tools, with precision closely to that of a Laser for alignments that close to perfection?

@Apkalluu @archaix138 Why are the lost tech guys so scared to show me rubbing stones together? Your mob are the biggest pack of lying cowards in existence. And you know it.

@archaix138 Is the great Archaix afraid of words? He was hardly rude. You threatened to make him YouTube famous to debunk him? Very weird.

I'm reposting YouTube Community post here because my X feed is auto-fed to all the Archaix Facebook groups and Archaix Underground: Today, a colleague of Graham Hancock named Dan Richards on X got real aggressive with me and challenged me to debate the Atlantis is 9600 BC narrative if I'd only provide him my evidence that Atlantis was NOT 9600 BC. As expected he got real rude and after I posted my evidence he backed out and publicly commented he would not debate, but instead posted this photo of him (the bearded one) with Joe Rogan. Both Rogan and Hancock should be proud. #grahamhancock #randallcarlson #jimmycorsetti #billycarson #mattlacroix #michaelbutton #joerogan #danrichards

RIP Arthur Morgan. He was a good man. As John go back to the devils cave and almost leave but turn back around and shoot out the lanterns. I completely fluked it!!!!

@DanDavisWrites @HistoryBro1 @k1yboardmage The big channels know it’s bunk. Years on youtu.be/VwRYm0uXN2Q?si…

@HistoryBro1 @k1yboardmage There's plenty of stuff about this. People like @SGDecoded have vids on it. youtu.be/X8Q5A1FSWwk?si…

Evidence of drilling in Egypt... There are literally only two explanations for this: either they're modern, or the ancients were capable of things we still don't give them credit for. IF the latter, then where are the tools/drill bits they used? None have ever been found.

@HistoryBro1 @DanDavisWrites @k1yboardmage The picture you are showing comes from Scientists Against Myths with a copper tube. I’ve repeated the experiments to confirm. Cheap and easy.

@DanDavisWrites @k1yboardmage It doesn't Dan.

@Sp0okyScary @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Where’s your evidence for copper not being a capable material? Who told you that absolute BS? Probably the same people who said copper doesn’t work? Many r you should go back to them and interrogate.

@SGDecoded @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Where's the evidence?

Next time someone says archaeologists don’t do science, kindly ask them to remind you what the key steps of the scientific method are.

@Sp0okyScary @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Can you acknowledge that copper absolutely does work first?

@SGDecoded @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Do you have any evidence of these copper tubes that were used to make these holes?

@Sp0okyScary @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Window glass is as hard as steel, both are harder than limestone therefore glass chisels would be great tools? Crumbly sandstone has the same or higher hardness rating than granite. “Hardness” has been totally misused to bamboozle by lost tech for well over a decade at least

@SGDecoded @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Copper is softer than granite. It's like using a knife carved out of frozen butter to cut wood.

@Sp0okyScary @SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Steel has magic circle making abilities? But yes it is possible to drill perfect holes with copper. It’s a technique that exactly the same with steel or a bamboo drill.

@SoilManDan @DeDunkingPast @DrDavidMiano Idgaf egyptologists still think they used copper to carve perfect holes in granite

@TonyTrupp Very cool.

This week I got to take part in the Peruvian Q’eswachaka bridge building ceremony. Every june, this Quechua speaking community re-constructs this last remaining traditional Inca style bridge, made of twisted and braided ichu grass.

@Anyextee abc.net.au/news/2019-07-1… But agree, the naming thing entirely modern. Seed, Flower and Fruit are lovely names though.

🚨 Calling all researchers, symbolists, sacred geometers, and curious minds! 🕵️‍♂️🌼 I’m currently writing an esoteric section for The Adept Initiate’s Guide to the Osireion — and I’ve hit a mystery I can’t ignore: We’ve all seen the symbol popularly known today as the Flower of Life — that overlapping circle geometry found in the Osireion, Chinese temples, Phoenician art, and beyond. But here’s the thing… 👉 Where does the name “Flower of Life” actually come from? Everything online seems to point to Drunvalo Melchizedek in the 1980s — and I can’t find a single reference to it being called that before his book The Ancient Secret of the Flower of Life. Did he invent the term? Or was it already floating around before then? I’ve tracked down some of the earliest appearances of the flower of life (spoiler alert: it’s NOT the Osireion) but what was it called prior to Drunvalo’s 1980s book? If you’re an OG researcher, have early editions of New Age or esoteric texts, or just love chasing origin stories, I’d love your help. Drop any sources, leads, or thoughts in the comments — let’s see if we can get to the root of this. 🌸 Bonus points if you know of any pre-1980s references to the symbol by that name! #FlowerOfLife #Osireion #SacredGeometry #EsotericEgypt #ResearchMystery #HelpWanted

@SGDecoded Ah yes, go ahead and demonstrate a 720Ton stone being moved against a “slow” current 🌊 on a primitive barge 😂 Btw, have you been to Egypt yet? Or is this another couch surfing hypothesis?

@BrightInsight6 Hey Jimmy how about you stop being a coward and do a Lifestream on stone cutting and polishing firdt? Or you actually put in some effort. I’ll put up my work against your purism any day of the week. Then we can go into rigging and lifting. But you’ll keep dodging.

“Ancient Egyptian’s would have sailed large stones on barges down the Nile River” But they never mention the two 720TON Colossi of Memnon statues that were moved 400miles UP RIVER, AGAINST THE CURRENT ⛵️🌊 The mystery is real.

@LostAncientTech @BrightInsight6 The lost ancient technology of compound pulleys? It’s you who needs to demonstrate an interest in this topic. You lot don’t even know how to tie a hitch. It’s not lost tech if you bury it deep.

@BrightInsight6 @SGDecoded Demonstrate a 720T being lifted and moved via crude primitive wooden pulleys full stop. Would love to see it.

@4biddntruth Do you have an explanation for not understanding rigging? Look up the forces on a sail in a light wind. Sailing would be impossible without advanced modern equipment. Why is that part of history conveniently forgotten?

Right, let’s talk. How was it possible to move a 60-foot statue that weighs around 720 tons… without modern machines, thousands of years ago? The Colossi of Memnon, carved over 3,000 years ago, were somehow transported 400 miles from quarries near Cairo to the west bank of the Nile in Luxor. Can you convincingly explain the mystery?

@AncientPuzzles It must have been suck a surprise that Hawass was going to be a complete dud! If only there was some clue he’d make a mockery of things beforehand? I’m sure the honest intention was to try & balance the scales with an archaeology communicator.

@SGDecoded Nope, most of them prefer to claim Flint lied instead. Beyond laughable.

Here's one of the typical lies of the DeDunker, that Hancock has no problem to use. What he has "studied" is no different than what the archaeologists really do: they worked at the sites he mentions in his books, considered the local myths, & care about what's underwater. FRAUD!