SLictionary

Do you love words? Are you poetic, artistic, creative, or good at making art of your words? SLicitonary.com/WordBounty is a definition-smithing contest with cash prizes upto $500 (record bounty) Create for others & be happy: Click a word you like DEFINE Most votes💡wins

@LisaNEdwards @orangegatewayx The @orangegatewayx already has BSV listed; in fact, it’s the denominator to all the cryptocurrency pairs it offers. I’m sure they would appreciate your trading business/liquidity— especially if you buy and sell BSV for any reason. It’s a rare fair exchange

@orangegatewayx I have no control in listings

Hi @LisaNEdwards help us move #BSV trading from the cartel trading platforms and get some real price discovery starting...

@hascendp6 @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl @tuftythecat @BSVCasey @FrankRundatz @zara_larue @namesnik386120 @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @JinglesBTC Coinbase nor Kraken disclosed a record of trades for “expert” Madden, despite it being brought up in court. They would have, if he had no trading record, surely to make CSW look bad, but they did not. Telling. Ager-Hansen hired CSW’s “expert” and owes 10 months prison

@Pat_McCat @GavinMehl @SLictionary @tuftythecat @BSVCasey @FrankRundatz @zara_larue @namesnik386120 @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @JinglesBTC Not to mention that experts are independent, and both sides agreed Wright's documents were forged. And no other expert could have found differently, because the forgeries were so sloppy. Read the forgeries appendix to the judgment. "Citrix did it" doesn't cut it.

What do my fellow legal expertooors have to say? @EricChennells @hascendp6 @JinglesBTC @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl

@JinglesBTC @tuftythecat @namesnik386120 @BSVCasey @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl So was your Mom when she passed on abortion.

@SLictionary @tuftythecat @namesnik386120 @BSVCasey @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl You are very dumb.

@tuftythecat @BSVCasey @FrankRundatz @zara_larue @namesnik386120 @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @JinglesBTC @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl This is incorrect. In law, lawyer, one submits file-based evidence whether it’s been tampered-with or not. You either know this bc you’re a lawyer and play dumb, or you are a bold-faced liar.

No. Wright submitted the reliance documents and testified under oath to their authenticity. Many of them had previously been submitted in the Hodlonaut and Kleiman cases in the exact same form. If someone had tried to tamper with them at some point to make them look forged, it surely would have been noticed at some point. Wright only tried to pull the CAH interference line once the forgeries had been pointed out.

@tuftythecat @namesnik386120 @BSVCasey @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @JinglesBTC @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl That’s just not true. He can sue everyone on the basis of Bitcoin copyright— just not in the backwater UK where judges accept wine and cheese parties from known btc zealots during functions in which no one knows who is financing them! You want people to think he’s neutered.

@namesnik386120 @BSVCasey @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @JinglesBTC @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl That’s just not true. He can’t sue anyone on the basis of any claim to rights in Bitcoin but he is free to say whatever he likes, including that he is Satoshi. He wants people to think he’s been gagged because that makes him a martyr but he’s not.

@MoonCoinRising You could use them to make your own app— one that doesn’t suck. Can’t wait to try it, comrade.

LOL.. Use them? Where? @Slictionary? 😆😅😂🤣🤪 Show me a single useful project on BSV that doesn't suck like all the rest of these retarded WEB3 nonsense. ALL I ever cared about was USING my coins to buy/sell as Electronic Cash. They KILLED that in exchange for Data Storage.

@MoonCoinRising You can keep using Wikipedia …for “free” 😀😂🤣🤪☹️🤦‍♂️🤷🏻‍♂️🤢🤮

$BSV Insiders are frantically trying to tamp down on price. It comes from the very top - and all of it is intentional. Buy & HODL some. Yes, you can use some too - but where? I have seen ZERO useful BSV Projects? Maybe we can pay to make up words on @SLictionary ??😆😂🤣

@tuftythecat @BSVCasey @FrankRundatz @zara_larue @namesnik386120 @BHatooor13304 @EricChennells @hascendp6 @JinglesBTC @Pat_McCat @GavinMehl thank you for your explanation— keep them coming!

Ager-Hanssen was brought in by nChain precisely because of his background with dirty tricks, e.g. the Kyle Roche incident, presumably in the expectation that he would be able to use these to swing the case in Wright's favour. Once he realised that the whole nChain/Wright thing was a massive fraud, he backed out because he figured out that there was no way Wright was going to win and he wouldn't be getting the big payoff promised by Ayre. Twisting the story after the event into CAH being some kind of double agent is just gaslighting and obvious total nonsense.

@CsTominaga @RamG101_777 @ComedyLond Sounds a bit like the OP-PUSH-TX methodology. Looking forward to it— we could certainly use something like that. As is typical, we will want to be able to put a couple gigabytes of unique data on them— call it “original artwork” but more like published micro-information.

No, I will not be releasing a new type of crypto. That would be the sort of thing expected from people who think innovation means changing the label on a bucket and selling the same dirty water twice. This will exist on existing tokens on Bitcoin. What I am releasing is closer to the holy grail: digital goods with real ownership, real transfer, real scarcity, real privacy, and rules that move with the object rather than sitting in some platform’s database waiting to be altered by a committee with a branding budget. Those in the know already understand what that means. Most of them will, naturally, say it is impossible. Then they will say it is nonsense. Then they will say it was obvious. Then it will bite them.

I do not want the power. I do not want the money. I do not want the control. That will confuse a certain type of person, because a certain type of person cannot imagine building anything except as a prelude to owning the throat through which everyone else must breathe. They think invention is merely the larval stage of monopoly. They think every road must have a tollbooth, every tool must have a landlord, every market must have a priest, and every creator must eventually be reduced to a tenant. That is their disease. I have seen what power does. I have seen what money does. I have seen what control does. I have seen it in others, and I have seen it trying to work its way into me. Anyone who says power does not corrupt is usually either lying, already corrupted, or too dull to notice the smell. I have a good life. I do not need to build another cage. What I want is simple. I am developing this. I am releasing it this year. It is already underway. And when it is ready, I am handing it to everybody. Not to a foundation. Not to a platform. Not to a cartel. Not to a board of soft-handed little managers who will spend three years discussing governance while quietly writing themselves into the rent stream. Not to anyone to control. For everyone. Anyone, anywhere on Earth, who wants to build with it will be able to build with it. No permission ceremony. No kneeling at the polished altar of Silicon Valley. No begging some intermediary to please allow innovation this quarter, provided it does not disturb the advertisers, the banks, the exchanges, the app stores, the regulators, the consultants, the custodians, or whatever other magnificently useless creature has inserted itself between work and value. Everything tied to a blockchain. Everything provable. Everything private. Everything controlled without needing gatekeepers and intermediaries standing in the way, charging rent on movement, access, ownership, identity, distribution, or trust. That is the point. Not another monopoly. Not another walled garden. Not another empire of managed dependency dressed up in the cheap perfume of innovation. A system where digital goods can exist as property. Where ownership can be proven. Where transfer can be recorded. Where rules can follow the object. Where privacy can remain intact. Where creators can create, buyers can own, and markets can form without asking permission from people whose chief economic function is obstruction with a logo. The old world was built by middlemen who discovered that if they stood close enough to value, they could convince everyone they had created it. They did not. They merely blocked the road and charged admission. The new world is coming. And no, it will not be dragged in by me alone, kicking and screaming against the weight of the old order. That is not how worlds change. Worlds change when enough people stop accepting the lie that the cage is there for their protection. It will come because builders want to build. Because creators want to own their work. Because families want more than managed decline and subscription life. Because people want a better world than the one designed by intermediaries, bankers, platforms, and the thin little men who confuse custody with civilisation. I am not giving this to the powerful. I am giving it to those who are tired of needing the powerful. I am giving it to the people who want more for their families. I am giving it to the people who want to build businesses without permission, publish without dependence, sell without surrender, create without being farmed, and own without being told that access is the modern substitute for property. The middle will hate it. Good. The gatekeepers will sneer. Let them.

In academia, a paper cannot pass through the pearly gates of peer review without the author confessing who paid for the wine, the dinner, and the indignation. Funding disclosures exist because bias, like cheap perfume, lingers in the air long after the speech has ended. Yet politicians — those wandering salesmen of conviction — are permitted to legislate, regulate, moralise, and bankrupt nations without so much as a sponsor label stitched to their lapel. Every speech should come with a disclosure statement. This taxation bill brought to you by: Goldman Sachs, BlackRock, and three gentlemen from Davos who insist they are “philanthropists.” This environmental policy sponsored by: The same corporations flying private jets to climate conferences while lecturing farmers about cows. This war approved with generous support from: Defence contractors who become wealthier every time peace is delayed another quarter. One cannot demand transparency from scientists while allowing politicians to masquerade as virginal thinkers descending from Olympus untouched by money. A politician without disclosed sponsors is merely an advertisement pretending to be philosophy. At the very least, Parliament should resemble Formula One. The jackets would finally be honest.

@TeamSatoshi @InvestWithDiego Earn some actua Bitcoin every time your definition of FAAFO helps someone: slictionary.com/CreateWord/FAA…

@InvestWithDiego Faketoshi got fucked by himself trying to fuck Satoshi Nakamoto & quickly experienced FAAFO.

Dr Craig Wright was the good guy #bitcoin

WORD OF THE DAY: ostensibly How do you like this picture as help to define it? Seek it here slictionary.com/seek/ostensibly for just 1 penny and no annoying ads! Don't forget to vote 💡

@HaileyLennonBTC Why did you leave Coinbase? Was it the smell?

Some personal news - I’m no longer with Fold Excited for new opportunities in 2026. Stay tuned 🔥

@PeterSchiff @TFTC21 Until the gold-holding counterparty decides not to pay off your gold tokens with gold. There’s a reason humans used silver coins and other metals— it’s the actual commodity and not a promise.

@TFTC21 That's why the future is tokenized gold. That solves both problems at once. No need for Bitcoin.

Stanley Druckenmiller just told Morgan Stanley that stablecoins will power the entire global payment system within 15 years. He also said Bitcoin "wasn't needed" as a store of value. He's half right and completely wrong at the same time. Stablecoins ARE more efficient than legacy payment rails. The market crossed $315 billion, up $180B since early 2024. Bessent projects $3 trillion by 2030. No debate there. But calling stablecoins the future while dismissing Bitcoin misses the point entirely. Stablecoins are tokenized fiat. They make the dollar faster, not better. They still inflate. They still get debased. They still depend on the same central banks that destroyed 99% of the dollar's purchasing power since 1913. Making a broken currency more efficient doesn't fix the currency. It just helps you lose purchasing power faster. Bitcoin fixes the money itself. 21 million. No CEO. No reserve requirements. No government that can print more when spending gets out of control. Druckenmiller bought BTC around $15,000 in 2020. It's $71,000 today. Nearly 5x on an asset he says "wasn't needed." The payments system needs fixing. But the money needs fixing more.

@PeterSchiff @TFTC21 You’re missing the fundamental thing bitcoin accomplishes— it commoditizes information and that’s a MUCH more logical money than gold— whether tokenized digitally or used as coins. It may not be possible to make a better money than commoditized information containers. BSV

@CalvinAyre “yellow” newspapers “vulgar” Nickelodeon “hysteria” radio “home invasion” TV “boob-tube” that damn rock and roll music Dirty Dancing Video Game brain rot Social Media … Next!

Society is having a hard time dealing with the downsides of social media because technology moves faster than humans can adapt to the changes. Maybe it’s time to pump the brakes. Food companies learned to manipulate salt, sugar and fat to keep us coming back for more. Similarly, social media companies developed algorithms to keep us ‘engaged’, while identifying and exploiting fault lines that keep us on the edge and at each other’s throats. Eating too much crap food means doing harm to yourself. Social media’s impact on attention spans is bad enough, but consuming too much alarmist/divisive content means some people are ready to do harm to others because they’re perceived as different or dangerous. Moral panics are nothing new. I’m old enough to remember when TV was going to rot kids’ brains. But here’s the thing: when we left the house, the TV didn’t come with us. Same thing with the early internet: it was tethered to a hardwired computer, so we had a life that was separate from it. Look at any historic trend line and you’ll see the 1-2 punch of smartphones and social media leading to alarming increases in stress levels and mental health issues, particularly among young people. Unlike that earlier tech, these followed wherever you went and never shut off. Many schools are now banning phones during class hours, while a growing number of countries are enacting age-related restrictions for social media. These programs have both advocates and critics, and only time will tell what the long-term results will be. These interventions come too late for the generation that grew up with these distractions in the palms of their hands, and society will be dealing with that fallout for decades to come. Before you say it, yes, I’m aware that I’m spreading this message via social media. Technology is a tool, and it’s up to us to use it responsibly. But moderation is a lot harder to achieve when the product is engineered to be addictive. Enough evidence has leaked showing social media companies were aware of the damage their products were doing, but didn’t do anything that might curb user growth numbers or negatively impact their share price. It’s time to reclaim the agency we’ve surrendered in this fight. I’m not so naïve to think we can stuff this genie back into its lamp. But we need to ask ourselves whether we’d be better off by reducing its ubiquity, particularly for kids whose brains are still developing. For their sake, let’s unplug, unwind and try to undo the damage. Would the world have been better off without social media?

Love this interview; love the definitions and etymologies packed inside even more!

@thecoastguy @vrev20935 Every podcast is like an advertisement for @SLictionary: slictionary.com/CreateWord/mee… What if advertisements could add to the content? What if a podcaster could finance his interviews via defining the key words used in the podcast & making money from the traffic it generates?

Talking good and evil with Craig Steven Wright. youtu.be/heRLOnYMhSc

Sometimes I have to remind myself of how insane the small blockers were. Here's Greg Maxwell of Blockstream in dec 2017 celebrating with "champaign" that the blocks were full, fees & backlogs skyrocketing and adoption absolutely crashing and burning. According to him and Adam Back it was of course spam, or "contrieved traffic". 7 tps for a world currency was more than enough. During this Greg used all the tricks that got him banned from Wikipedia to censor and block discussion on r/bitcoin and related forums. He also had a puppet account agreeing with himself which he once forgot to switch between and got busted for all to see. These are the people BTC maxis respect and look up to. Just amazing. #btc #bitcoin #hijackingbitcoin #blockwars

@MineLikeAnApe @SignatureEntUK SLictionary isn’t a bounded “book”; that’s what makes it great; it changes with language. Final “Come to Terms”: English speakers: “Own Your Words” so we can “Agree to Terms” with our nieghbors and live harmoniously! Follow us!

@MineLikeAnApe Definitions now have names, like “Ty Ev’s definition of indexer” and they also have signatures, and that’s important for language to be free inside a dictionary’s bounded walls. (5/6) cont. ⬇️

Watch @TyEverett11’s good video on scalable blockchain youtu.be/Ur45fOVNxjA?si… Only 1 criticism: definitions! What @SLictionary internally called an “indexer” slictionary.com/CreateWord/ind… sounds like what Ty calls an “overlay” slictionary.com/CreateWord/ove… but does he? (1/3)