Chris Hacker

@FormerFeds He gets 24/7 surveillance until he acts. Then room temp conversion therapy.

This man needs to be identified and institutionalized immediately.

@Archer83Able Resurrect the A10. Develop a dedicated ground support-attack aircraft.

Chairman of the JCS Gen. Dan Caine: "The A-10 Warthog is now in the fight across the southern flank and is hunting and killing fast attack watercraft in the Straits of Hormuz."

@cspan @RepRobertGarcia Take the briefing response, flip it 180 degrees, run to media. The only things Dems can do.

.@RepRobertGarcia (D-CA) after briefing on Epstein Investigation with Attorney General Pam Bondi: "She would not commit to actually going under oath and follow the law."

@Osint613 Easy targets once they cross into Iran. Remember the Iraqi highway? A-10s go brrt.

Convoy of trucks reportedly heading from Tajikistan to Iran, claimed by Tajik and Iranian opposition figures to be carrying drones under the cover of humanitarian aid. Iran has established drone manufacturing facilities in Tajikistan, first opened in 2022.

@MichaelARothman They'll suspend the current election process and substitute one favorable to a predetermined democratic candidate outcome.

𝗖𝗔𝗟𝗜𝗙𝗢𝗥𝗡𝗜𝗔 𝗗𝗘𝗠𝗢𝗖𝗥𝗔𝗧𝗦 𝗠𝗜𝗚𝗛𝗧 𝗕𝗘 𝗔𝗕𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗧𝗢 𝗟𝗢𝗖𝗞 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗠𝗦𝗘𝗟𝗩𝗘𝗦 𝗢𝗨𝗧 𝗢𝗙 𝗧𝗛𝗘𝗜𝗥 𝗢𝗪𝗡 𝗦𝗧𝗔𝗧𝗘'𝗦 𝗚𝗢𝗩𝗘𝗥𝗡𝗢𝗥'𝗦 𝗥𝗔𝗖𝗘. This one requires a brief explanation of how California elections work. The state uses a jungle primary — all candidates from all parties run on one ballot in June, and the top two finishers, regardless of party, advance to the November general election. Democrats designed this system to help moderates. It may be about to destroy them. Here's the problem. Eight Democrats are running for governor. Eight. Katie Porter. Eric Swalwell. Tom Steyer. Xavier Becerra. Antonio Villaraigosa. Betty Yee. Tony Thurmond. Matt Mahan. They couldn't agree on a single candidate, the state Democratic Party convention couldn't even produce an endorsement, and every one of them is staying in the race and splitting the Democratic vote into pieces. Meanwhile Republicans have two candidates: Fox News commentator Steve Hilton and Riverside County Sheriff Chad Bianco. Two candidates, consolidated base. Current polls show Hilton at around 17% and Bianco at 16%. Every single Democrat is polling below that. Not one Democrat is leading the field. The California Democratic Party chairman issued an open letter begging candidates to drop out. Planned Parenthood followed with a similar statement. Democrats are practically on their knees asking their own candidates to clear the field — and none of them are listening. A Democratic data expert's simulation model currently puts the odds of a Republican vs. Republican runoff at roughly 12-27% depending on which poll you use. That sounds low until you remember this is California — a state that has gone Democratic in every presidential election since 1992, where Democrats hold nearly three-quarters of the state legislature, and where Republicans haven't won a statewide race since Arnold Schwarzenegger in 2006. Even one Republican making it to November would be extraordinary. Two would be historic. And it wouldn't be because Republicans won California — it would be because California Democrats were too arrogant, too fractured, and too self-important to get out of each other's way. It feels a bit like what happened in NYC between the Democrats. 𝗚𝗮𝘃𝗶𝗻 𝗡𝗲𝘄𝘀𝗼𝗺 𝘀𝗽𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝘆𝗲𝗮𝗿𝘀 𝗿𝘂𝗻𝗻𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗖𝗮𝗹𝗶𝗳𝗼𝗿𝗻𝗶𝗮 𝗶𝗻𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗴𝗿𝗼𝘂𝗻𝗱. 𝗛𝗶𝘀 𝗽𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘆 𝗺𝗶𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗯𝗼𝘂𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗿𝗲𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗱 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘃𝗲𝘀 𝗯𝘆 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗲𝘃𝗲𝗻 𝗺𝗮𝗸𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗶𝘁 𝘁𝗼 𝗡𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗯𝗲𝗿. nypost.com/2026/03/18/us-…

@BasedMikeLee If the SAVE Act fails, I expect Congress and states to walk back ID requirements across the board, including to visit the Capitol and House Rep and Senate Offices.

They’re lying when they say the SAVE America Act imposes burdens that are excessive They’re just plain lying

@RepLuna If it does not pass, I expect a no need ID environment to emerge, as they're clearly racist and suppressive. Especially for visiting the Capitol and offices of my House Rep and Senator.

I talked to multiple Senators today. They know the floor debate is for show and SAVE America is going NOWHERE in the Senate. Ask yourselves why Voter ID, that over 80% of Americans support, is being blocked? Thune this is not a paid influencer campaign. AMERICA: If your Senators do not work for you, it is time to find someone else willing to do the job.

@MichaelARothman Rand Paul won't settle anything. He'll obstruct and sabotage anything DHS cause he can't get over his beef with Mullin. He congirms he's petty and vindictive and not of Senatorial demeanor.

𝗥𝗔𝗡𝗗 𝗣𝗔𝗨𝗟 𝗩𝗢𝗧𝗘𝗦 𝗡𝗢 𝗢𝗡 𝗠𝗨𝗟𝗟𝗜𝗡. 𝗙𝗘𝗧𝗧𝗘𝗥𝗠𝗔𝗡 𝗦𝗜𝗚𝗡𝗔𝗟𝗦 𝗬𝗘𝗦. Rand Paul announced he will not vote to confirm Markwayne Mullin as DHS Secretary. The stated reason is anger issues and temperament. The real reason has been building for years. Mullin called Paul a "freaking snake" at a town hall and told the crowd he completely understood why Paul's neighbor attacked him in 2017 — the assault that broke six of Paul's ribs and damaged his lung. Mullin has also previously challenged the Teamsters president to a fistfight during a Senate hearing. Paul brought all of it to the confirmation hearing today, looked Mullin in the eye, and said: you've never had the courage to say it to my face. Mullin's response: 𝘐'𝘮 𝘯𝘰𝘵 𝘢𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘰𝘨𝘪𝘻𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘱𝘰𝘪𝘯𝘵𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘺𝘰𝘶𝘳 𝘤𝘩𝘢𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘦𝘳. Senate Majority Leader Thune went on Fox tonight and said essentially: these two have personal history they need to work through. Translation: everyone knows what this is. The vote hasn't happened yet. But here's where things currently stand: John Fetterman has signaled support for Mullin, calling his experience with him one of "consistent kindness and professionalism." Which means the Democrat who flipped Pennsylvania may be the vote that offsets a Republican defection and moves Mullin forward. Rand Paul gets to settle a score. Fetterman gets to prove again he'll break with his party. And Mullin is expected to be confirmed anyway. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗦𝗲𝗻𝗮𝘁𝗲: 𝘄𝗵𝗲𝗿𝗲 𝗽𝗲𝗿𝘀𝗼𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗯𝗲𝗲𝗳𝘀 𝘄𝗲𝗮𝗿 𝘀𝘂𝗶𝘁𝘀 𝗮𝗻𝗱 𝗴𝗲𝘁 𝗰𝗮𝗹𝗹𝗲𝗱 𝗽𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗰𝗶𝗽𝗹𝗲𝘀.

@SaP011 Some people are alive only because it's illegal to kill them pre-emptively.

Her name was Leonie, she was a 13-year-old Austrian girl. While she was out with friends, 3 Afghan immigrants secretly put 11 ecstasy pills in her drink. Stunned and unable to defend herself, she was taken to the house of one of the three. The ecstasy dose was way too high, the girl started overdosing but the 3 immigrants, completely indifferent to her suffering, began to undress her and took turns raping her, putting their hands around her neck, strangling her. All of it recorded by themselves on a mobile phone video. That’s how Leonie died, naked, in atrocious suffering, while the beasts raped her. The autopsy would later confirm the cause of death was triple overdose and asphyxiation. When they were done, they wrapped the body in a carpet and dumped it roadside, under a tree. The girl’s body was found the next morning by some passers-by, wearing only her underwear and with clear strangulation marks on her neck. One of the perpetrators fled to the United Kingdom, but was quickly tracked down in a hotel and extradited, the 3 Afghans were sentenced: - Zubaidullah R. life imprisonment; - Ali H. 19 years in prison; - Ibraulhaq A. 20 years in prison. During the closing arguments, the Public Prosecutor told the court she was “stunned” by what the defendants said throughout the proceedings, stating that “there is not a trace of remorse”.

@CynicalPublius When I was working drugs in SE Ky, we had a very zealous defense atty that crusaded against drug cases. Trials were a PITA with him. Found out he sucked at trial efforts, so he made them a theatrical production. But he was hell on wheels on written motions and appeals.

RE: Lawyerly Thoughts I have retired from the law and placed myself in “inactive status” in my two licensed jurisdictions. This finally gives me the freedom to share my unvarnished thoughts on the law and lawyers in a way I have been unable to do so before. I’m thinking of writing a series of lawyerly musings posts that I can later combine into a full length article. This is the first one. I believe I have a unique perspective on the law, having completed a successful military career before I stepped into law school. This meant that I was not wide-eyed and bushy-tailed in law school like most of my full time program (much younger) peers, and my earlier perspectives as a military decision maker made me cautious about some principles that I questioned as potentially being flawed or dangerous. So let’s talk about one: “EVERY CLIENT IS ENTITLED TO ZEALOUS LEGAL REPRESENTATION.” This is a bedrock concept of the practice of law, and one that lawyers are justifiably proud of as it is an essential component of equal justice under the law. But it has its flaws in the modern era. I remember one summer in law school I was an intern in a public defender’s office. One of our cases was a mass rapist who had been terrorizing women in local parks. This guy had blackish eyes that glowed with a sort of deep evil that seemed to come straight from the pits of Hell—it was like out of a horror film. He was as guilty as guilty could be, but we were trying to get him off on a claim of a bad search and seizure of some critical evidence. We were zealously representing a deranged rapist. The guy needed to be locked away for eternity, but we were trying to get him off. I know most lawyers are comfortable with that and consider it righteous, but for me it was the event that convinced me that I wanted nothing to do with criminal law. But that’s small potatoes to what I think is the bigger, profession-wide problem of “zealous representation.” Whether you are a litigator or a corporate lawyer (like I was), “zealous representation” means taking the facts at hand and interpreting them in the way most favorable to your client. I have found that “most favorable” means taking facts and pushing them in a client-favorable way right up to the edge of the line of lying, but not crossing it. You’re not lying, but are you really telling the objective truth? Over time that thought process of twisting facts away from what most reasonable laymen would consider as “true” changes a lawyer’s brain patterns. If you do this enough, you might stop being able to do anything else. Your brain changes, and not in a good way. I often found myself lapsing into this, but thankfully there remained a little portion of my brain that was still an Army colonel, and I think that little voice held me back. What ends up happening to too many lawyers is that every moment of their lives starts to consist of looking for angles to twist whatever facts are at hand into the manner most favorable to them. That’s a slippery slope. That’s why words like “oily” and “sleazy” are so popular when describing lawyers, and why jokes that involve lawyers at the bottom of the ocean as shark food are so popular. The problem is that as long as you never step right over the line into lying, none of this is against legal ethics. I’m not sure how to fix this exactly. Perhaps continuing legal education needs to focus on the limits of “zealous representation.” Or perhaps every lawyer needs to be on watch to not lose their soul. There are so many excellent lawyers that none of this applies to, but there are just as many who have no problem going into total sleaze-mode to win for their client. But then everything they do in life becomes sleaze-mode, and they harm themselves, their families and society as a result. It’s a large-scale problem. Think of this: “It depends of what the meaning of “is” is.” -Slick Willard

@ggreenwald It's almost like a bunch of Deep State loyal individuals openly professed support of Trump, got embedded in the Administration or Media, and then started to sabotage it from within. Nah, that'd be crazy.

There are numerous people who were very popular in MAGA now being expelled: Tucker, MTG, Megyn Kelly, Massie, Joe Kent, etc. They all have one thing -- and only one thing -- in common: They are critics of Israel. But that's the supreme issue for Mark Levin's movement (MAGA).🇮🇱

@ResisttheMS So any idiot with access to AI can spoof an ID. Brilliant.

NEW: Sen. John Fetterman vows to vote "AYE" on legislation that requires photo ID and nothing else. "Keep it basic: PHOTO ID to vote." "Stop turning this into a Christmas list and attacking vote-by-mail. If GOP wants real reform over a show vote––put out a clean, standalone bill and I’m AYE."

@RepMGS Then I shouldn't need to present an ID to do those things, and many others. Including visiting the Capitol and your office. Looking forward to seeing you and the rest of Congress invalidate the need for an ID for many things that are obviously suppressed now by requiring ID.

If you're in Pennsylvania, the driver's license or Real ID you use to buy beer or fly is insufficient to register to vote under the SAVE America Act. That's why it's a voter suppression bill.

@alt_w_v_g Then NYC Sanitation goes on strike because lack of automated trucks to pick up containers. Giant mountains of trash bags develop. Rats feast and breed. NYC sinks further into Third Worldism.

NYC gave McKinsey a $4M contract to answer one question Should trash go in a trash can They studied it for 20 weeks Looked at Paris Looked at Amsterdam Looked at Barcelona Produced a 95-slide deck Titled "The Future of Trash" $42,000 per slide The conclusion after 20 weeks and 95 slides Yes Trash should go in a bin Not on the sidewalk They called it "containerization" Which is a $4 million word for "trash can" The mayor then stood at a podium and unveiled a bin A bin With wheels And a lid Like the one in your garage right now The one you bought at Home Depot for $50 He presented it like he had discovered gravity Camera crews were there Photographers Press releases For a bin I run the finances of an entire company If I handed my board a 95-slide deck that concluded "put the thing in the container" I would be fired by slide 2 My analyst could have done this in an afternoon With one slide That said "yes" And I would have redlined it for being too long But this is government Where common sense costs $4,000,000 And comes with a PowerPoint Make common sense common again Plz fix. Thx. Sent from my iPhone

@gatewaypundit Enjoy the darkness, BTW hurricane season is coming.

Cuban Communist Dictator Miguel Dias-Canal Vows to Resist US Pressure with “Impregnable Resistance” if US Announces Plans to Seize the Country READ: thegatewaypundit.com/2026/03/cuban-…

@Osint613 No shit moron. You're a showpiece. Just now figuring that out?

BREAKING 🔴 Channel 14 reports Pezeshkian is weighing resignation. He told aides: "The IRGC blocks me from all military and strategic decisions and won’t even let me speak to the Supreme Leader. I feel useless."

@ForAmerica This dazzling display of stupidity epitomizes everything wrong with the Senate.

Sen. Blumenthal: "I have to admit, I don't know where my birth certificate is." Also Sen. Blumenthal: "I served in Vietnam."

@ianmiles @hayfarani Hamas agit-prop slop.

@hayfarani Very strange how your post reads verbatim to at least two other posts written with the same verbiage and with the same claims.

I am a US citizen & Surgeon who took care of the Boston Maraton Bombing victims in 2013. I paid for 7 years to own a small apartment in downtown #Beirut for my 3 kids to enjoy summers there. Today, #Israel reduced my dream home to rubble, with american weapons, paid by my taxes.

@tedcruz If it doesn't pass due to bipartisan obstacles, I expect a no ID environment afterwards. Especially to visit the Capitol and my House and Senate reps offices.

We should do everything humanly possible to pass the SAVE America Act. Let’s force the Democrats to do a talking filibuster.

@blarg59117052 @Naumkeeg @Tactical_review It could put a pointy stabby thing on it. So can an AR-15. Ergo, it's not designed for war.

@Naumkeeg @Tactical_review Except there's basically zero record of any US shotgun being used in combat. It got used as a guard's weapon and what it was originally designed for, hunting birds.

They try so hard. Visit Xring3.com