Steven Romalewski

25.4K posts

Steven Romalewski banner
Steven Romalewski

Steven Romalewski

@SR_spatial

“... a researcher at the Center for Urban Research at the City University of New York Graduate Center, who mapped the results.” Photo: Ozier Muhammad/CUNY

New York City Katılım Ağustos 2009
617 Takip Edilen4.6K Takipçiler
Steven Romalewski
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial·
@BOENYC Thanks for making your unofficial election returns website live so early tonight. But the status of the returns is out of date; it say the info is current as of Sept 24, 2025. See screenshot.
Steven Romalewski tweet media
English
2
0
0
635
Steven Romalewski
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial·
@LudovicSpeaks I've been trying out Bluesky. So far it's much better. Generally a much more congenial place, and still a great source for new/interesting info.
English
0
0
0
21
Steven Romalewski
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial·
@RodAzurmendi @No_you_124 @sabrod123 Another reason it’s insane those ppl voted for him is that he could care less if prices go up or down. If they go up, he’ll blame someone else. If they somehow drop, he’ll take credit whether he helped or not (likely not). He cares only about himself. Foolish to think otherwise.
English
0
0
1
43
Rodrigo Azurmendi
Rodrigo Azurmendi@RodAzurmendi·
@No_you_124 @sabrod123 I never claimed 100% of the population got raises. I'm sorry you didn't. But enough people did and still voted for Trump thinking he can magically bring back 2019 prices when cumulative inflation only goes one way.
English
5
0
5
1.3K
Sabrina Rodríguez
Sabrina Rodríguez@sabrod123·
Talked to easily a few hundred voters this year — many working class — and the precision with which some people could tell me how much a pound of steak, carton of eggs, gallon of milk had gone up (not to mention the price of rent) tells a very different story.
Brian Stelter@brianstelter

"It wasn’t the economy," @mtomasky says. "It wasn’t inflation, or anything else. It was how people perceive those things, which points to one overpowering answer" — the right-wing media. newrepublic.com/post/188197/tr…

English
482
799
6.2K
984.2K
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
Anthony Scaramucci
Anthony Scaramucci@Scaramucci·
The world will be crueler now. Won’t be just Trump but the license he provides to the miscreants.
English
7K
4.1K
31.5K
2.2M
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
Documented
Documented@Documentedny·
A new map from the Center for Urban Research at the CUNY Graduate Center shows a clear shift to the right in many immigrant neighborhoods on Election Day. documentedny.com/2024/11/07/imm…
English
0
1
2
684
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
dan nguyen 🐮
dan nguyen 🐮@dancow·
For example, this district went from 34% to 45% for Trump, but there were -5 Trump voters in 2024 versus -225 Harris voters x.com/SR_spatial/sta…
dan nguyen 🐮 tweet media
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial

@dancow You can see the vote counts and %s in each election district in NYC at our map here: electionatlas.nyc/maps.html#!NYC… The dropoff in Dem voters moreso than Trump gains has been highlighted in some local media reports, eg ny1.com/nyc/all-boroug… & patch.com/new-york/new-y…

English
0
1
3
833
dan nguyen 🐮
dan nguyen 🐮@dancow·
I think these visualizations should include the vote counts, for context. Trump doubling his vote total is different than doubling his vote share — the latter is more impacted by Dem voters staying home (as they might be inclined, in a blue state with an uninspiring candidate)
dan nguyen 🐮 tweet media
THE CITY@THECITYNY

While New York City voted blue, nearly every neighborhood shifted red this election. If you want to see by how much, hover over your neighborhood or enter your address in our interactive map: projects.thecity.nyc/trump-shift-ne…

English
2
0
2
871
dan nguyen 🐮
dan nguyen 🐮@dancow·
It's 2024, yet brain geniuses still don't grasp that there MIGHT be more electoral outcomes than genders (3) In Chicago, with 100k(?) ballots to count: Trump has 104% of the 181k votes he got in 2020 Harris is at 71% of Biden's 944k Did ~200k Chicago Dem voters get raptured?
dan nguyen 🐮 tweet mediadan nguyen 🐮 tweet media
Hen Mazzig@HenMazzig

Jill Stein won 622,564 votes yesterday. Kamala Harris won 66,454,426 votes. Running on a campaign that Jews are genocidal maniacs and their state must be destroyed is not actually popular, no matter what the vocal minority might say. Even if everyone who voted for Stein changed their vote to Harris, Kamala still would have lost.

English
1
1
12
2.4K
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
Mayor Zohran Kwame Mamdani
Our city is home to legends, icons, and countless community activists. Their legacies live on right above our heads! Have you ever wondered the history behind them? Or where to find a specific one? Our @nycrecords team has you covered: gothamist.com/news/nyc-unvei…
English
13
8
27
10.3K
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
Spectrum News NY1
Despite losing New York state's electoral votes, Trump received about 100,000 more votes than he did in 2020. specne.ws/dUSKqz
English
6
4
9
8.9K
Steven Romalewski retweetledi
Spectrum News NY1
Preliminary election results show the now president-elect has made inroads in deep, deep blue New York City. specne.ws/t4Djei
English
3
5
17
5.5K
Steven Romalewski
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial·
@urbaninsideout Of course, the actual voter turnout is another story. This year's general election turnout was a bit lower than in past presidential elections: just over half of those registered (about 2.6 million) voted for president. The 2020 & 2016 elections had 60+% turnout.
English
1
1
1
81
Steven Romalewski
Steven Romalewski@SR_spatial·
@dancow Apparently the electoral enthusiasm was in Trump’s favor, certainly nationwide but also locally. The magnitude of each phenomena (Harris voters staying home, Trump voters turning out) was surprising, at least to me.
English
0
0
0
21
dan nguyen 🐮
dan nguyen 🐮@dancow·
@SR_spatial Yeah it makes sense that KH voters in an already-won state would be less inclined to show up. But seems like DT voters would have even more justification to just stay home?
English
1
0
0
62