S Watt

15K posts

S Watt banner
S Watt

S Watt

@SamWatt8600

Infantry. #NAFO Will engage in debate if I have tea to hand. RT≠ endorsement. All opinions are mine and are in no way related to the MOD.

Langley, Virginia Katılım Ağustos 2009
611 Takip Edilen641 Takipçiler
S Watt retweetledi
Zack
Zack@EliteGolfDad·
Golf Twitter used to feel like the clubhouse after a Saturday morning round. Guys posting flushed 7-irons, muni sunsets, terrible scorecards, gear talk, funny stories, and the occasional completely unhinged swing tip from a 12 handicap. Now it’s the Burnerverse. An entire ecosystem of anonymous accounts pretending to be rich tough guys with all the answers. Every avatar is sunglasses in a truck. Every bio reads: “Scratch. Markets. Violence. Cigars.” And somehow every single one of them: Hits it 340 Is a plus handicap Makes seven figures Trains MMA Has insider sources Knows how to fix pro golf Thinks everyone else is soft And would “absolutely say this to your face” Sure, man. Every conversation immediately turns into a blood feud about TV ratings, ball speed, legacy, or whether Tiger secretly controls world finance. Meanwhile the actual soul of golf gets buried. The walk. The early tee time coffee. The miracle 5-iron. The random retiree you get paired with who tells stories for four hours. The one flushed shot that keeps you coming back after shooting 92. That’s the stuff that made golf Twitter fun in the first place. The Burnerverse doesn’t actually love golf. It loves status. Golf is just the costume. Because if you truly love this stupid game, you eventually realize golf humbles everyone. Eventually your swing leaves. Your putting disappears. You snap hook one into a pond in front of people you respect. Golf strips everybody down eventually. You are not edgy. You are not cool. You’re just another idiot trying to flush one before the sun goes down.
English
89
27
663
63.6K
S Watt
S Watt@SamWatt8600·
I'd do it with one hand on the switch and the other on a delicious, juicy burger. The kind you think if while trying to punch in a BK at a service station. The kind of burger that you remember for months. I would probably forget about the execution except in moments of whimsy.
English
0
0
0
133
S Watt retweetledi
Nick Almond
Nick Almond@DrNickA·
This tweet is a fascinating insight into the dire state of the U.K. Mostly it’s people who find it morally abhorrent for people to be on minimum wage serving coffee. If you can’t use the minimum wage for entry level unskilled work. What can you use it for? Many seem to think Peter should divert his savings to subsidise higher wages effectively operating at a loss. An economically irrational thing to do. Why would you pay (and work) to lose money? Many seem to think he should shut the coffee shop down completely, removing those jobs from the market all together. Presumably no jobs is a better outcome than minimum wage jobs. The minimum wage is now roughly £26k a year. About what I started on as a mathematics lecturer in 2010 after I completed by PhD. I worked 60-80 hours a week. Your take home pay on the national average wage is only £170 a week more than someone on a minimum wage job. Which in order to get you’d need to have a profession and about a decades worth of experience in that profession. That’s like one family meal and maybe a trip to the cinema. Hardly worth a decades hard work is it? And if you’re trying to save for a property, you won’t be able to have that. It also means that the median UK worker is a family meal and some mild entertainment away from morally objectionable abject poverty. What a mess
Peter McCormack 🏴‍☠️🇬🇧🇮🇪@PeterMcCormack

A minimum wage of £15 would end my coffee shop, it would have to close, as would many other businesses. I’ll explain for the economically illiterate. Staff costs are currently half our costs, a £15 minimum wage is actually more than £15 an hour for the company, because you have to add: - 12.07% holiday - Sick pay - Maternity pay if and when required - National insurance - Pension contributions These costs would mean the shop loses money because remember, energy costs are up, rates are up, regulations are up. Now you can pass these costs onto the consumer - that would mean charging a lot more for coffee, people won’t pay it. The likes of Starbucks and Costa can, because they have economies of scale. The independent doesn’t. Now the little socialist will say well this is your fault, if you can’t run a business that can afford to pay its staff properly, but the little socialist has never run a business and does not understand the dynamics. Now I could pay some staff off and fill those hours myself or reduce us to one staff member during certain periods - but this proves the point that a minimum wage costs jobs. There was a time when these jobs were done by kids, perhaps on the weekend, paid a lower wage, no holiday and no silly employment rights. Perhaps they were even paid cash. The dynamic worked and small businesses like this could operate. It was also a great first job. Sadly now it isn’t worth employing entitlement youngsters at this level of pay. So alas, I don’t need the stress, the business would close, a number of jobs would be lost. Economics is about understanding these dynamics, no vibes. The cost of living is not solved through passing on inflation to the business, it is solved by ending high inflation and creating prosperity. This is what socialists don’t understand, they can’t create prosperity, they can only destroy it.

English
223
177
1.9K
229.2K
S Watt retweetledi
US Oil & Gas Association
We see where the Regime has trolled the SecDef. Admirable. But let's show them how it's done.... "If you have to export 1.5 million barrels oil in 5-gallon buckets instead of tankers, because a US Naval blockade has choked off your export capacity, that's 12.6 million Home Depot buckets per day. To assist you in your efforts, here is the link to Home Depot where you can find those buckets for $3.98. There are 17,644 currently available. P.S. For the mullahs: 1 barrel = 42 gallons."
US Oil & Gas Association tweet media
محمدباقر قالیباف | MB Ghalibaf@mb_ghalibaf

If you build two walls, one from NYC to the West Coast and another from LA to the East Coast, the total length will be 7,755 km, which is still about 1,000 km short of Iran’s total borders. Good luck blockading a country with those borders😁 P.S. For Pete Hegseth: 1 km = 0.62 mi

English
90
433
2.6K
277.4K
S Watt retweetledi
The Watcher On The Web
The Watcher On The Web@WatcherontheWeb·
"We must make the world safe for everybody" "Somebody might make a mistake" "Wanting to ensure your own survival and expecting others to do the same is psychopathic thinking" "WoNt SoMeBoDy ThInK oF tHe ChIlDrEn" "I depend on the collective for my saftey" "we must press the blue button" these are all the same thing
English
13
26
381
41.2K
S Watt retweetledi
John Kroencke
John Kroencke@johnkroencke·
Revealing exchange in Scotland Reform leader: I was born in a tenement at 33 Bank Street in Greenock. Back then, Scottish education was the best in the UK and I got it all for free at Greenock Academy and Edinburgh University. I went to London 40 years ago with £2,000 in debt. I was full of ambition, I worked hard and I was successful. Today, I own six houses, five cars and six boats. In a 40-year business career, I've employed thousands of people and paid £45 million in tax. I don't say this to boast - but to ask you this question. Mr Greer, in your Scotland, do you want more people like me, or fewer people like me? Green leader: Fewer people like you. I'm glad you finally admitted how many homes you have, Lord Offord.
Chris McCall@Dennynews

The former Tory party donor - who bought a £1.6 million country house on Loch Lomond without a mortgage - has previously refused to answer questions on his net worth. dailyrecord.co.uk/news/politics/…

English
141
378
3.3K
522.6K
S Watt retweetledi
Jeff Putnam |✍
Jeff Putnam |✍@TheJeffPutnam·
It’s called “Assumed risk” and it should be the baseline judgement for anyone who engages in criminal behavior and gets injured or killed for it. You tried to bash a mailbox with a bat but it was filled with concrete and you broke both your arms? Congrats, you fucking idiot. It’s all your fault. You break into someone’s house and get shot in the face? Congrats. You earned it. Make sure your mom and dad and siblings and cousins get a letter from the district attorney telling them that it’s your fault your birthday subscription was canceled. Two dudes agree to fight and one get his head bounced out gf the curb and drools for the rest of his wheelchair ridden days? Congrats. You can now enter Stephen Hawkin lookalike contests and it’s your fault. Zero legal liability to the ones who hurt your stupid ass.
Metro Nashville PD@MNPDNashville

This afternoon's fatal shooting in the side parking lot of Walgreens in Melrose appears to involve an attempted carjacking. A 44-year-old food delivery driver had just picked up an order from a restaurant next door & had walked back to his black Dodge when he said he was confronted by a gunman who demanded his car. The driver retrieved his own pistol. The driver said he was shot in the leg before he fired on the suspect, killing him. The driver is hospitalized for treatnent of the leg wound. Investigation continuing.

English
1
5
146
25.7K
S Watt retweetledi
Kix
Kix@SpeculatorArt·
This blew up and attracted the horde of USA commies. For my final trick, I will make their brains explode from irony. What country do USA commies point to as the example of successful communism? China How much wealth do the top 10% have in China? 68% (same as USA) What does China score on the Gini metric for income inequality? 0.46 (same as USA) Surely there are no billionaires in communism…. Right? Wrong, China has 516 billionaires. See the truth about real communism is that it’s a terrible way to run an economy. China figured that out after tens of millions of their citizens starved to death. So now the “best example of communism” is actually a capitalist economy with a fascist authoritarian political structure. *bows and exits stage on left*
Kix@SpeculatorArt

If we forcibly seized the net worth of every billionaire in USA and redistributed it amongst US Citizens, each would get about $17,000. One time payment. So please tell me again how that's going to solve all your problems.

English
141
1.1K
8.1K
250.4K
S Watt
S Watt@SamWatt8600·
@Hard_Egg_33 @Devon_Eriksen_ @hasen_95dx I put it to you that if only 1% of mailboxes are concrete this wouldn't happen either. All it takes its a greater than zero chance of seeing your homie having to get help to piss to make you think twice about it.
English
0
1
5
93
Gedrah
Gedrah@Hard_Egg_33·
@Devon_Eriksen_ @hasen_95dx If 50% of all mailboxes were concrete, no one would drive down the road hitting mailboxes with a bat
English
2
1
55
819
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
Never, in the history of history itself, has a judge looked down at the prisoner in the dock and declared "I sentence you to Concrete Mailbox". Why not? Because Concrete Mailbox is not a punishment, you factory-defective lawn gnome. It's a mailbox. Made from concrete. If you hurt yourself with it because you can't be bothered to learn the laws of physics in your own damn universe, that is a you problem. I am not obligated to suffer harm in order to protect you from a stupid action you might someday take. Of course, what you are really doing is engaging in the favorite marxist pastime of "pretending not to understand things". What you are pretending not to understand is the difference between consequences and punishment. For example, if you are a lazy marxist, and you won't work or do anything for anyone else, you'll be broke. This is not a conspiracy to deprive you of stuff. It is simply the consequence of you being selfish. You know this. But you pretend not to because you hope that if you confuse the issue enough, you can get suggestible people to give you free stuff. And in this case, you want to protect vandals at the expense of people who own mailboxes, because you are more likely to vandalize a mailbox than to own one, therefore you fail the Mailbox Test by sympathizing with the vandal.
Devon Eriksen tweet media
Desert Citizen@DesertCity66

@Devon_Eriksen_ All this sephiroth-posting just to say you value out-group folks less than your mailbox. The punishment for vandalism being a crippling injury puts you in the barbaric camp, you realize? Of course you don’t, lol

English
160
857
9.7K
178.3K
S Watt retweetledi
Devon Eriksen
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_·
The Mailbox Test, like the breakfast test, is an excellent way to tell who you can allow to wield power in your society. Goes like this: If someone is hurt trying to destroy someone else's stuff in order to take pleasure from their pain, do you sympathize with... The aggressor because he got hurt? Or with the guy who owns the stuff, because he wasn't the aggressor? You can have people in your society who fail the Mailbox Test. That's okay... they can work at hospices, or shelters for orphaned kittens, or something. But you cannot allow them to vote, or otherwise wield political power. Because if you do, they will open the gates of the city to the enemy. I am personally tired of everyone pretending that people who enjoy ruining things for random strangers are just kewt smol beans who are only aggressive because of all the complex socioeconomic factors and lack of resources. They knew someone would be hurt by what they did. They knew that someone had done literally nothing harmful to them. And those two ideas, in combination made them feel pleasure. And they went and did it. That is the sign of a rotten soul. Defending ourselves and our property is not just a right, it's a moral obligation. Otherwise, we just kick the can down the road for someone else to deal with, someone who may not be able to defend herself. I don't care if a vandal breaks his arms trying to destroy my stuff. Because I value my stuff more than a vandal's arms. And the fact that he tried to destroy somebody else's stuff shows that he, too, values his arms less than the opportunity to hurt somebody. We cannot allow such people inside the city, and we cannot give the keys to those who would open the gates for them.
Devon Eriksen tweet media
The Blessed Salt 🧂@theblessedsalt

This post is an excellent litmus test for understanding of just war theory. Despite the fact that I can see how effective this would be, I must oppose it because the damage it would do to my enemy (who bashes in my mailbox) would far outweigh the good of saving my mailbox. Its disproportionality is opposed by our duty in charity (and even justice) to watch out even for the good of our enemies. (Yes, by the way, I have had my mailbox bashed in by random vandals.)

English
450
2.5K
20.7K
792.5K
S Watt
S Watt@SamWatt8600·
£154 victim surcharge. That won't even cover the monster and snus that were lost that day.
Clive Ward@CliveWardauthor

Motorist Spared Jail After “Completely Avoidable” Crash Sends Military Vehicle Airborne on A43 A motorist has been handed a suspended prison sentence and banned from driving after a dangerous manoeuvre caused a military vehicle to flip violently on a busy dual carriageway, leaving two men seriously injured. Crenguta Aruxandei, 44, of Northampton, appeared at Northampton Crown Court where she was sentenced to six months in prison, suspended for 18 months, after admitting two counts of causing serious injury by careless driving. She was also disqualified from driving for 12 months and must pass an extended driving test before being allowed back on the road. The incident took place at around 8:35am on January 10, 2026, on the A43 near Hulcote. Dashcam footage later released by Northamptonshire Police captured the moment Aruxandei, driving an Audi Q2, slowed down and abruptly moved from the outside lane into the inside lane while attempting to take an exit. This sudden manoeuvre forced the driver of a military Land Rover Defender, which was travelling in convoy and towing a trailer, to take evasive action. As a result, the vehicle lost control, overturned, and began rolling across both lanes of the carriageway. The footage shows the Land Rover flipping multiple times before coming to rest, while another military vehicle behind it narrowly avoided being involved by managing to stop in time. Emergency services were quickly called to the scene. The 36-year-old driver of the Land Rover was thrown from the vehicle during the crash and suffered a suspected fractured back. He was taken to University Hospital Coventry for treatment. His 31-year-old passenger sustained a significant head injury and was transported to Northampton General Hospital. Police described the collision as “completely avoidable,” highlighting that Aruxandei’s actions directly led to the incident. She had initially indicated she would contest the charges but later changed her plea to guilty before the trial began. In addition to the suspended sentence and driving ban, Aruxandei was ordered to pay a £154 victim surcharge. Detective Constable Eleanor Hudson from the Serious Collision Investigation Unit emphasised the seriousness of the case, stating that driving is both a privilege and a responsibility. She noted that behaviour like this has no place on public roads, particularly when it results in life-changing injuries to other road users. The case underlines the severe consequences that can arise from a moment of poor judgment behind the wheel, especially on high-speed routes where other drivers have little time to react. Authorities continue to stress the importance of road safety, with ongoing efforts aimed at reducing the number of serious injuries and fatalities caused by careless and dangerous driving. #StreetCrimeUK #UKCrime #RoadCrime #DangerousDriving #A43 #Northamptonshire #CourtReport #CrashInvestigation #DrivingBan #SeriousInjury #UKCourts #PublicSafety #RoadSafety #JusticeSystem

English
0
0
1
381
S Watt retweetledi
Higgy
Higgy@higgyboson·
"Hello Emily, what's this"? "Well Miss Phillipson, despite me only being six years old my teacher set me some rather challenging homework last night and this is what I've come up with". "Oh, this sounds interesting Emily. Tell me more". "I'm not sure I want to. Every time we talk about my homework you storm off and tell me to piss off because you're not interested". "I promise not to do that this time Emily". "OK. Well my teacher asked me to write about the conflicting treatment given to people who want to visit our country". "In what respect Emily"? "Well, some people are told they're not allowed to come here because they've said nasty things but others are allowed to come here despite the fact they've actually DONE horrible things. It's inconsistent don't you think Miss Phillipson"? "Well, not really because.....". "Well I think it is. Mr Starmer has stopped that lovely lady with the long name from the Netherlands coming here simply because she says we allow to many horrible men to come here on boats and they do horrible things". "There's a bit more to it than that Emily. In fact.....". "And she's right. My Daddy says I might not be safe if some of those men live near me. And that's not a nice feeling". "Well we're trying hard to....". "And there's Mr Y, or Yeezy, or Weezy or whatever he's called. He's that man who's married to the lady who goes to restaurants and shows off her bosoms and her bottom. He was banned from coming here too. Why was that Miss Phillipson"? "Well Emily, he said he admires Hitler. We can't have people here who say they admire Hitler". "But that's only something he said. He hasn't hurt anybody or anything. I know his last album was a bit crap but we all have off days". "Well we believe people who say bad things shouldn't be allowed here Emily". "What about people who actually DO bad things Miss Phillipson"? "The same applies". "What about people who chop other people's heads off"? "We'll leave it there Emily". "No we won't. Why did that man from Syria who cut off people's heads come here? Was he invited"? "As I said Emily, we'll leave it there. I have to go now. Jeremy, where's my car"? "Miss Phillipson, why was the man from Syria invited here"? "Shut up Emily. Where's the bloody car"? "He was given a cream tea in No.10. Why was that"? "Car. Now. Piss off Emily". "He even met the King and had some sandwiches with him". "I said PISS OFF Emily, I'm not interested". "See, I said you'd get annoyed". (Miss Phillipsons car arrives). "Get me out of here. That evil little shit got me again. Bloody hell, can we find a different school next time? Where's that bottle of gin? A large one. Now".
Higgy tweet media
English
0
19
73
4.4K
S Watt retweetledi
UK Decline
UK Decline@UKDecline·
☀️ Good morning Britain. Official debt: £2.9 trillion. Real debt (inc. pensions): £4.8 trillion. That's £78,000 for every person in the UK. Have a lovely day. 🙂 ukdecline.co.uk
English
45
330
1.8K
212.2K
S Watt retweetledi
Dominic McGregor
Dominic McGregor@DominicMcGregor·
Haha let’s all laugh at @RishiSunak You couldn’t have been more wrong about this if you tired. You told us our tax would rise by £2,000. You were wrong. You were like 100% off target with this one. Reports today suggest @RachelReevesMP policy have led to a raise of £4,000 per household; telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/…
Politics UK@PolitlcsUK

🚨 NEW: Keir Starmer receives a round of applause after he details which taxes he will raise Rishi Sunak replies that there are "£2,000 tax raises" for everyone if Labour wins Starmer says Sunak is talking "nonsense" #ITVDebates

English
37
298
2K
335.3K
S Watt retweetledi
Collingwood 🇬🇧
Collingwood 🇬🇧@admcollingwood·
I always weep reading the Wikipedia pages of senior Singaporean politicians. The general career path seems to be: Excel at school and secure a scholarship to study some super difficult subject, like maths or physics, at Cambridge University. Excel at university and get a scholarship to do a post-grad degree in governance or an MBA at Harvard. Join the Singaporean military and excel. Reach at least the rank of Brigadier or General. Enter politics. Excel even compared with others who have similar CVs, rise to become a senior position. Compare that with the career path of the average senior British politican. Get the same results as every other middle class child at school. Do PPE or straight up politics at university. Leverage your contacts to become a SPAD for a cabinet or shadow cabinet member. Get a column writing gig at the Spectator, Economist or New Statesman Become a more senior SPAD. Run in an impossible to win seat to prove you really want to be in parliament. Get parachuted into a safe seat as a rising star. Get a junior ministerial position in the first reshuffle after the election. Get made a cabinet member after the next election. Now, why is Singapore an extremely well run country and we are not?
English
224
890
7.1K
801.5K
S Watt retweetledi
Maxi
Maxi@AllForProgress_·
A British company called Skycutter, based in the East Midlands, just finished first out of the entire field in the Pentagon's Drone Dominance Program. Score of 99.3 out of 100. The largest order goes to them: two and a half thousand units, an initial Pentagon contract of twenty million dollars, with an option to scale up to two hundred million. Read that and really soak it in. It's something that rarely happens anymore. A small British startup beat the entire American defence-tech industrial complex on its own home turf, in a competition the Pentagon designed itself, against companies that get whatever they ask for from Washington on a Tuesday morning. It looks likely to be followed by something that always happens - Skycutter are, by the looks of things, going to pack up their talent and their operations and move all of it to America. Why? The MoD, they say, is too slow. The procurement cycle is too long. There is no clear pathway from "British company that builds something the world wants" to "British company that the British state buys from in serious quantity at serious speed." No byway through which you move from "A potentially world-toppling IP advantage" to "Complete and deserved domination of the global market." So we are about to lose them. Not because they want to leave, but because the country that produced them cannot organise itself fast enough to keep them. The MoD's response, by the way, was to issue a statement saying it wants the UK to be "the best place in the world to start and grow a defence business." It does not want to do this. Indeed it is difficult to convey, in polite English, how galling that sentence is when read alongside the news it is responding to. You're a serious country? You'd fight for a company like Skycutter. You'd fight to take them if they weren't yours, and you'd fight like mad to keep them if they were. A serious country has someone in Whitehall whose entire fucking job is making sure the next Skycutter doesn't end up in Virginia. We have, instead, a Defence Office for Small Business Growth. Which is the kind of name you give a thing that you created for no purpose other than taking the piss out of it.
English
99
710
3.8K
590.8K
S Watt retweetledi
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
The whole idea of "incompetent to stand trial" is fucking nonsense. If you're too "incompetent" to understand that you shouldn't butcher an innocent woman on the train, you should die. Period. Arrest, convict, execute. You are not fit to be a part of human society. How many more innocent people must we sacrifice for the sake of coddling and babying the absolute scum of the Earth? Our ancestors had it right. They would have had this guy hanging from the gallows an hour after conviction. The old system of justice was light years better than this insane bullshit we're dealing with now.
New York Post@nypost

Crazed homeless man accused of slaughtering Iryna Zarutska on train found incompetent to stand trial trib.al/GsJMZC8

English
3K
17.3K
114.4K
3M
S Watt retweetledi
Higgy
Higgy@higgyboson·
"Hello Emily, what's this"? "Well Miss Phillipson, despite me only being six years old my teacher thought it might be a good idea for me to write about Keir Starmers trip to Saudi Arabia yesterday". "Oh lovely, what did you write Emily"? "Well Miss Phillipson, are you sure you REALLY want me to say because you usually tell me to shut up and then get your knickers in a twist and walk away shouting 'piss off Emily' over your shoulder"? "I'm sure this time it will be different Emily". "OK. Well Miss Phillipson, as you are aware Mr Starmer initially said he didn't want anything to do with the war that was started by Mr Trump in Iran, which was lucky because no one actually thought he was important enough to be informed about it. They just dropped some bombs and the first thing Mr Starmer knew about it was when Lord Alii told him about it at breakfast". "I don't think that's exactly what happened Emily. In fact....". "Anyway, he went on the telly to say he wouldn't provide any help and then changed his mind and told Mr Trump he could use our air bases, but only after Mr Trump had called him nasty names. But Mr Starmer is used to being called names by most people. I think even aliens know he's a bit of a twat by now". "OK Emily, that's enough". "See, I told you I thought you'd get all shirty. Anyway, yesterday it was announced that a ceasefire had been agreed. But again, Mr Starmer wasn't involved in this decision. He was visiting his Ukrainian friends in Fulham and he saw it on the telly as his friends were playing silly games on their bed". "I've heard enough now Emily. I'm leaving". "I haven't finished yet. Anyway.... he arranged to go to Saudi Arabia to pretend he was important but no one wanted to see him and...". "OK Emily, shut it". "... and all he did was make himself look stupid again. I don't think the Crown Prince wanted to see him because, like everyone else, he thinks Mr Starmer is a dunce as well so I think Mr Starmer was put to use in the kitchen making sandwiches and doing some washing up". "That's it, shut up you evil little shit, I've had enough of this crap now....". "Oh dear, you've got a really short fuse Miss Phillipson". "Piss off Emily, I'm not interested". Miss Phillipson walks off. "That bloody child. Who put her in front of me? Was it YOU? You stupid bastard, you're fired".
Higgy tweet media
English
9
66
242
15.3K