Sam

9.6K posts

Sam banner
Sam

Sam

@Sam_kuyp

Quantum physicist 🇳🇱 Anglophile 🇬🇧 Fellow at @ConjectureInst · Founder of @OxfordPopper DMs not monitored.

Amsterdam, The Netherlands Katılım Mayıs 2016
282 Takip Edilen4.9K Takipçiler
Surly
Surly@eulersnightmare·
@Sam_kuyp @DavidDeutschOxf It’s not so much not being worried, but you can’t really avoid UV radiation without going into a coal mine
English
2
0
0
125
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
It’s ironic to me that people who worry intensely about radiation from 5G towers and the like are almost never concerned about a genuinely well-established carcinogenic form of radiation: UV.
English
11
9
83
7.3K
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
A petition for homeschooling in the Netherlands. Homeschooling is effectively forbidden by law here. If you live in the Netherlands and support educational freedom, consider signing it. petities.nl/petitions/erke…
English
0
3
13
336
Sam retweetledi
Neil Hudson
Neil Hudson@NeilHudsonexp·
'''Bernard Williams "Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry" (1978): Now if I want to acquire a collection of flints, and only prehistoric flints, one way is to collect a lot of flints, and then investigate which of them, if any, are prehistoric. This might be inefficient, compared with a method of acquiring them in the first place which made it more likely that any flints I acquired were pre-historic ones. But the analogous process with acquiring true beliefs would be not just inefficient, but incomprehensible. Since to believe something is to believe that it is true, to acquire a belief is already to assume an answer to the question of whether it is true. So a method which A uses as an enquirer ... must be a method of acquiring beliefs which itself makes it likely that the beliefs A acquires by it will be true ones.' What Williams is saying in effect is that the process of falsification and error elimination cannot be carried out wholly within the realm of beliefs or convictions. This is a point of the greatest significance (though Williams himself draws absolutely the wrong conclusion from it). It shows to what extent scientific activity, if it is to be the pursuit of truth, must be conducted in the objective-but humanly created—world of statements-in-themselves [Popper 's 1972/1979 "Objective Knowledge", especially Chapters 3 and 4)." Extract from David Miller "Critical Rationalism: A Restatement and Defence" (1994)
English
1
4
12
4.4K
Sam retweetledi
Ebru Umar
Ebru Umar@umarebru·
Lekker in de trein. Love dit landschap.
Ebru Umar tweet media
Nederlands
10
2
101
2.5K
Sam retweetledi
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
@leecronin What's the difference?
English
1
0
13
402
Prof. Lee Cronin
Prof. Lee Cronin@leecronin·
AI does not write, it produces text. Humans uniquely write.
English
139
108
965
126.8K
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
@nmrqip I just read the article on the Paolo Macchiarini you shared. Pretty horrifying. But the Korean work does seem substantially more cautious and technologically advanced. The short follow-up is still a concern, though. I’m cautiously optimistic, but less so than initially.
English
0
0
1
33
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
@sutherlandphys Indeed. So a conclusion is that those can’t be mere scribbles, although they look like it.
English
0
0
3
119
Sam retweetledi
Chris
Chris@sutherlandphys·
think about how some scribbles on paper predict and describe some of the most gigantic and violently energetic entities in the universe
Akshat@star_stufff

absolutely remarkable

English
1
3
35
2.2K
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
@DavidDeutschOxf @IMAO_ “When I was a child, I soon realised that every new breath of air I took left me wanting for more soon after. So I stopped breathing.”
English
2
0
11
383
David Deutsch
David Deutsch@DavidDeutschOxf·
@IMAO_ Oh dear. That was a psy-op and you fell for it. That children stop playing with each particular toy and want a stream of new ones is not a defect in them. It is the same phenomenon as their not reading each particular book again and again and wanting a stream of new ones.
English
7
6
242
10.1K
Frank J. Fleming
Frank J. Fleming@IMAO_·
My earliest memory of existential dread was when I was 5yo in the toy section of a store, looking at a toy thinking, “If I could get my mom to buy me that, I would be so happy.” But I remembered all my previous toys and how the happiness they brought me was fleeting and realized this new toy would be the same as would be all toys after it.
English
28
9
757
37.1K
Sam
Sam@Sam_kuyp·
@tohonestycom Someone in 1900 could not have predicted ChatGPT. Even events much closer to their own time, such as the discovery of quantum theory and special relativity, would have been impossible for them to predict, unless they themselves were the ones who discovered those ideas.
English
0
0
0
18
Sam retweetledi
Conjecture Institute
Conjecture Institute@ConjectureInst·
Recovering Time from Timeless Models in Physics ~Conjecture Institute Fellow @Sam_kuyp
English
0
3
20
1.9K