Jonathan Jones 🦆

144.8K posts

Jonathan Jones 🦆 banner
Jonathan Jones 🦆

Jonathan Jones 🦆

@nmrqip

Part time NMR spectroscopist and quantum mechanic; full time curmudgeon and professional cynic. Heretical Globularist 🌍 All tweets are personal.

Oxford Katılım Haziran 2011
795 Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Chris Musson
Chris Musson@ChrisMusson·
EXCL: Nicola Sturgeon refused to comment and sat in silence for hours during her police interview - despite publicly claiming to be "cooperating fully" with cops thescottishsun.co.uk/news/16305227/…
English
168
1.1K
3.3K
255.1K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Helen Dale (not on your team, but always fair)
Only catching up on the Peter Murrell story now; clearly a bloke who struggled to cast a straight shadow. The Lalique salt & pepper grinders are the cherry on top—I spent five years in my teens/early 20s working in the china & glass section of a pretty decent department store. I sold two Lalique perfume bottles in all that time.
English
10
5
153
14K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
The Leopard In The Basement Is A Sensible Name
Making it problematic to ask the sex of someone seems designed to undermine the Supreme Judgment. This whole "asking" clause seems new and rather shoe-horned in. Even extended to the age category, saying it might be unlawful to refuse service to anyone who looks under 18? Really?
The Leopard In The Basement Is A Sensible Name tweet media
Cathy Larkman 💚🤍 💜🦢🏃‍♀️@JackMerched

There is no law that prevents anyone either asking someone their sex, or pointing out they are in the wrong facility for their sex. It is not ‘special category data’. No data is being ‘processed’. Did they really think women would let this pass unnoticed?

English
0
1
0
105
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Dr Ultra
Dr Ultra@drljultra·
Nicola Sturgeon appears to be channeling Carmela Soprano with DEFINITELY NO KNOWLEDGE of a £120,000 motorhome, £81,000 Jag, £2000 salt & pepper grinders, £9000 pen, and £400 coffee cups. Could happen to ANYONE. #NicolaKnew
English
5
15
86
2.7K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
J.K. Rowling
J.K. Rowling@jk_rowling·
@eNeecie Every other day a new motorhome appears in my mother-in-law's drive and Neil hands me another bucket full of jewellery and cosmetics. I can only assume he's got himself a part time job I'm too busy to ask about.
English
420
2.1K
15.3K
413.2K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Fiona
Fiona@DerryBanShee·
The @EHRC code (section 13) says that a service provider may ask a person’s sex and exclude them from a service or space for the other sex, and also that a person’s sex is special category data and that “it is unlikely to be either practical or appropriate to approach any particular individual to make enquiries about their sex in relation to facilities, such as toilets, which are incidental to the primary service.” The first part is legally correct. The second part is just made up. It cannot stand.
Maya Forstater@MForstater

We have written to Bridget Phillipson to say that it is ultra vires and irrational for the EHRC and the govt to have added the section on "asking about sex" which wrongly claims sex is likely to be "special category data" to the Equality Act guidance at the last minute.

English
5
60
233
8.6K
LGBT+ Labour
LGBT+ Labour@LGBTLabour·
Our statement following the publication of the EHRC's updated code of practice.
LGBT+ Labour tweet media
English
183
28
113
73.3K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Wings Over Scotland
Wings Over Scotland@WingsScotland·
The pot of money Peter Murrell pilfered from was NOT comprised solely of SNP members' money. It came from three chief sources. (1) SNP members - subs, donations etc. (2) UK taxpayers, the vast bulk of the SNP's income. (3) Non-SNP donors to the "ringfenced indyref fund". All of that money was swept into the SNP coffers, from whence Murrell trousered it. Every pound he took came in part from each of those sources. So in fact he robbed ALL of us, not just SNP members. The fact that the party has spent the *entirety* of the "ringfenced" indyref fund, on stuff that is not a second indyref, is an entirely separate issue over and above Murrell's crimes.
Wings Over Scotland tweet media
English
24
285
753
14.4K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Colin Wynter KC
Colin Wynter KC@QcWynter·
This is the point that needs now loudly to be made. Women were told, "use a lockable cubicle if you wish to avoid the blokes". Now that men are once again required to use the men's, trans-claiming men should be told "use a lockable cubicle if you wish to avoid the blokes". Karma.
H.K. Uber.@moriarty747

The trans argument that women have been perfectly safe sharing the ladies with transwomen because of cubicles. then surely that means transwomen will be perfectly safe using the cubicles in the gents.

English
8
288
1.6K
17.4K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Benedict Spence
Benedict Spence@BenedictSpence·
If Restore is a vanity project for Rupert Lowe, Reform shouldn’t have any trouble destroying it without resorting to a wave of media attacks calling it a vanity project.
spiked@spikedonline

Rupert Lowe’s vanity is off the charts. His party, Restore Britain, is shaving votes from Reform UK in Makerfield. This could hand a victory to Andy Burnham and let the ‘King of the North’ become PM. Restore is the enemy of populism, says Brendan O’Neill buff.ly/DbiUXiS

English
63
63
521
10.8K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Ryan Maue
Ryan Maue@RyanWeather·
Massive "heat dome" enveloping United Kingdom and western Europe. A measurement parameter called "geopotential height" is the same over London as Dubai this afternoon: 594 dm This almost "off-the-charts" atmospheric ridge will continue to bake England like a Dutch oven.
Ryan Maue tweet media
English
51
167
701
97.2K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Lola
Lola@thefempire50·
Can someone please explain to me how letting this man self identify into female spaces is progressive, left-wing and good for women?
Lola tweet media
English
139
848
5.7K
67.8K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Naomi Cunningham
Naomi Cunningham@LoudBonnet·
3. Whether true or false doesn’t matter because the story was told (and possibly the scene enacted) in pursuit of a fetish.
English
25
52
1.3K
12.5K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Naomi Cunningham
Naomi Cunningham@LoudBonnet·
2. It’s not true, but a story told to garner sympathy from the gullible.
English
5
37
1.1K
13.9K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Naomi Cunningham
Naomi Cunningham@LoudBonnet·
1. It’s true, and he is so lacking in ordinary resourcefulness and common sense that he should not be out on his own anyway. There’s no shortage of unisex facilities in most public places.
English
8
43
1.2K
13.5K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
stellacreasy
stellacreasy@stellacreasy·
The new EHRC guidance on how to ensure equal rights of all to access basic services falls short of being inclusive or workable in the real world - I will continue to work with other MPs who recognise this to navigate how we change that. Given how toxic discussion of trans rights has become am not going to respond to comments here because doubt will help anyone. Posting this video so residents in Walthamstow know of my concerns and actions. Also want to flag to any Walthamstow resident who wants to talk my next open public forum for political debate is on Thursday 28th May at 7pm and all welcome - email my office to rsvp for venue details.
English
1.3K
65
265
352.3K
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweetledi
Sex Matters
Sex Matters@SexMattersOrg·
NEW: We have written to the Minister for Women and Equalities Bridget Phillipson, calling on her to withdraw the “asking about sex” section of the EHRC code of practice for service providers because it is legally wrong.
Sex Matters tweet mediaSex Matters tweet mediaSex Matters tweet mediaSex Matters tweet media
English
50
446
1.5K
64.8K