Sarodinian

Worse. They take it from Disability Studies. The whole concept comes from the belief that there is no such thing as "defective" for humans. A disabled person isn't so because of the condition of their body, it's because of Society's failure to accommodate them. Taken to its logical conclusion, this results in the disability becoming a core part of someone's identity, such that attempts to cure the disability become regarded as an attack on the identity. Attempts to do so on a wide scale thus are seen as attacks on the identity, and those who hold that identity, thus, genocide. Absurdity at its finest.

You almost get the sense that they've redefined the word "genocide" into nothingness.

The far-left TrackAIPAC, which is run by a Marxist who lives in Germany, doesn’t actually track AIPAC donations. Instead, they selectively count donations from various Jewish groups, including those critical of Israel, based only on whether they like the politician or not.

This is what I’m talking about. Even if you’re critical of AIPAC and sending foreign aid to Israel, you can’t stand with this kind of brain rot. This is nonsense. It destroys your credibility. So anyone spewing this crap is shooting themselves in the foot. Almost like a psyop.

This is earth shattering news. Candace’s good friend and mentor, John Mappin, is now claiming that Charlie reappeared to him on earth. That’s correct. Charlie has supposedly visited John Mappin as a ghost or spiritual entity. It’s also worth noting that John is a devout Scientologist. Dear @JohnMappin - What did Charlie look like when you saw him? Did this happen in a dream, or did he show up on your front porch? Hey @RealCandaceO - Do you believe that Charlie has visited your mentor, John Mappin the Scientologist? You retweet John a lot, so I assume you think he is credible and trustworthy, right?

This is pure, sniveling victim-blaming, wrapped in an *extremely* thin layer of false piety. The idea that people are "misinterpreting" when some edgelord like you pukes up a nonstop rant of Jew hatred, slurs, conspiracies, and f-bombs, then smugly tacks on "Christ is King" like some mic drop? BULLSHIT. The "Fuck You" energy is baked into the post and you're too chickenshit to admit it. A cursory glance at your profile shows you're guilty of doing this very thing yourself. You are not defending Christianity, or even free speech. You're running interference for grifters and frauds who treat Christ's name like a dogwhistle and a middle finger to anyone who doesn't despise Jews the way you do. That is not proclaiming the faith whatsoever. It's taking the Lord's name in vain while LARPing as some "based" warrior. The real indictment is on you and every spineless groyper hack like you that pretends context and malicious intent don't matter. Own your damn bullshit.

@Sarodinian1 @MethodMinistry The idea that Christ is King could be interpreted as Fuck You is an indictment on the person interpreting it that way. Not the person saying it.

The year is 2026 on X... Apostasy is rampant, and men hate true Christianity. Pastors who slept with their church members and lied about degrees that they don't have teach that Christians must hate their enemies, and that Jesus' lineage doesn't matter. Grifters use "Christ is King" followed by f-bombs and curse words to hate and curse Jews but can't understand why that's taking the Lord's name in vain. Frustrated and defeated single men espouse a patriarchy that hates that God can save and forgive women of their past sins and bless them with a beautiful marriage and children, all while being adulterers of the heart who equally need God's forgiveness. Englishmen who believe Protestantism is heresy, rather than helping their homeland which is being overrun by Muslims, flee to Protestant America to Larp as its citizens for clout, wear MAGA hats, and are the allies for the same camp who teach that only "heritage Americans" have a right to be here and have any say, and the rest must go. Oh, and they call heretical women, "sisters in Christ." A wolfe in sheep's clothing considered the greatest theologian of our time has finally decided after years of lacking basic discernment that a man who calls for a "Protestant Hitler" isn't someone to defend, but he's done so only to maintain his social image. Zionism, Jew, and Dispensationalism have replaced the phrase, "hate-speech," to denounce and cancel anyone that quotes the Bible on Israel and how Christians must treat them with love. Pride month has been swapped for white boy summer. BLM riots has been replaced with anon ratios. The cross has been swapped for the flag. The guy considered the political guru of our time tells Conservatives to vote Democrat. But Worst of all, the Gospel is hated and deemed as "Jesus juke" and "pietism," and replaced with a new social justice gospel of, "We're so back,” the crusades didn't far enough, and, we're going to win." In other words, a gospel of earthly power and political victory. If you've read this far, then understand that true Christianity has always been unpopular, and will never be approved by the world until Christ returns, but this is why you're called to pick up your cross and follow Him (Luke 9:23). In the end, we truly win, but you must endure to the actual end first, and then you'll get your crown (Matthew 24:13, Revelation 2:10). Messiah is King.

"Hate what God hates." God hates Pride, Lies, hands that shed innocent blood, and also, misusing His name. Using "Christ is King" as a taunt or a replacement for "Fuck You" isn't holy hatred of sin. It's irreverence. You write, "You are disordered. I would fix that." This is the exact Pride God hates. The replacement test stands. Proclaim His lordship with fear and trembling. Not for the purposes of online feuds.

@Sarodinian1 @MethodMinistry Incorrect. Hate what God hates. You are disordered. I would fix that.

@emzanotti @awstar11 The parallels to TDS are striking.

The Jews: simultaneously believed to be the most nefariously influential secret global cabal of the modern age, and somehow terrified of a three twinks in CVS sunglasses

@ZacharyTCraig1 @thatchthoughts @NoahCRothman Wow. More vague bullshit.

@thatchthoughts @NoahCRothman It means the walls all closing in, and there's no way ol' Donnie is gonna wriggle his way out of this jam.

The verdict from some quarters is in: The war is “quickly becoming a disaster.” The sooner Washington acknowledges its defeat, the better... That dour outlook seems wholly divorced from an objective appraisal of the war in its fourth week.

@admcollingwood @ConceptualJames China Delenda Est.

@ConceptualJames Multipolarity is a description of reality, not something to support like a football team. And, as I asked, why are those most vocally against increased Chinese global influence also those who support most vociferously the war in Iran, which is massively increasing Chinese power?

Such an odd thing to support.

@MethodMinistry If you can replace the phrase “Christ is King” with “Fuck you” and not change the tone or meaning of the overall post in any meaningful way, it’s taking his name in vain.

@reddit_lies China Delenda Est.

Reddit is cooked.

Some ppl have been bamboozled by Joe Kent's "just asking questions" routine, and have failed to detect his bizarre insinuation that Israel may have tried to kill Trump (a truly crazy idea to entertain IMO). Yes, Kent did insinuate that Israel might have been behind the Butler attempt on Trump's life. But you need to listen to Tucker's question in order to see the insinuation. The timestamped link is in the tweet below. Tucker asked, in essence: Since it's clear that Israel pushed Trump into this war, what kind of pressure do you think they applied? Kent answered, in essence: There are two possibilities [of pressure Israel could have applied]. First, it could be the lobbyists in his ear. Or second, it could be much darker. We still don't know what happened at Butler, we don't know what happened to Charlie Kirk, but we know Trump feels like his life is threatened. In the context of Tucker's question, that is a clear insinuation that Israel might have been behind both Butler and Charlie Kirk. How else can you read it? The hedging he does immediately afterwards––"by no means am I saying Israel did this or that"––doesn't undo the insinuation. It just clarifies that it is an insinuation, rather than a confident statement of Kent's beliefs. Either way, it shows that Kent is in La La Land.

I used to consider myself a moderate supporter of Israel. But not anymore. I started listening to those who bring constant criticisms against Israel, and the more I listened and researched, the more I started to recognize a pattern. Some of the criticism was factual and necessary. But much of it was based on exaggeration or untruths. Even the most famous viral photo of the emaciated child in Gaza...the media quietly later admitted to be based on false information. I kept listening, thinking, "If they are so passionately against Israel, they must know something I don't." Then, it finally hit me. The thread tying it all together was not a love for people or the truth, but rather a deep seeded hatred of Israel. So, now I'm not as moderate as I used to be. Those speaking the loudest against Israel have caused me to be more extreme in my support for Israel. Not because Israel is perfect, but because of justice. From what I can see, they get more unjustly attacked than any culture or nation alive today. With that being said, I am also a supporter of truth and justice for all people and nations. Whatever level of injustice is being done against Palestinian civilians, I want it to stop. But whatever injustice is being done against the Jews, I want it to stop too. Truly loving people does not mean picking and choosing who we love. It means letting go of our hatred and offense and being willing to lay our own lives down for the sake of others.

@FrancisMarcus97 @DanBurmawy The postliberals.

What is missing from this is the much larger and stronger group at the intersection of 2 and 3 that do not care about the Jews or Israel, but are interested in constructing an anti-liberal world-order political ideology for the right, as an international movement, and find echoes of past far right thought useful for that purpose. These are Dugin people, Evola people, Christian nationalists, Catholic Integrationists who idolized Franco, and various hangers-on they have been able to accumulate. Yes they have Paleo roots like 3, but they are not "caught" by any left or Palestinian argument, they are simply exploiting a major political concept (antisemitism as a weapon).

I divided the “woke reich” into five different categories: 1: The Cowards: Former pro-Israel conservatives who saw support for Israel after October 7 as a liability, so they folded under shifting polls, online pressure, and accusations of being “neocons.” 2: The Antisemites: Long-fringe voices on the right who finally got a chance to practice their favorite hobby: “Jew hatred.” They adopted the left’s language (“Zionist lobby,” “genocide,” “apartheid”) and seized the opportunity to attack Jews while pretending they were simply opposing “forever wars.” 3: The Deluded “Realists”: Paleoconservatives, libertarians, and isolationists who genuinely believed the propaganda. They framed Hamas’s atrocities as “resistance” and Israel’s response as the real problem, convinced that abandoning Israel would magically end jihad and bring peace. 4: The Paid Voices: Influencers and think tank figures quietly funded by Qatar and Turkey. They suddenly developed a deep concern for Palestinians once the checks started clearing. 5: The Naïve Nice-Guy Conservatives: People with friendly Muslim neighbors, coworkers, or gym buddies who couldn’t reconcile October 7 with their personal experiences. They convinced themselves that Israel is to blame for Islamic violence.

This basic concept is kryptonite to a leftist. It's their per capita.

Call him out on obsession and anti-Jewish screed. Get a response containing more, you guessed it, anti-Jewish screed. What a self-own.

@JoelWBerry @realmikolson If you read carefully, the reason he denounced it is because he used the term "Christian Prince" without a disclaimer stating that Wolfe doesn't endorse his post. Had he just done that, he'd still be in the club.