SatoshEh

18.1K posts

SatoshEh banner
SatoshEh

SatoshEh

@SatoshEh

Grumblejack Sarcanuck guided by Moose. 🇨🇦 🍁 Lives in an igloo.

Canada Katılım Ekim 2008
538 Takip Edilen2.8K Takipçiler
100% Pro Freedom
100% Pro Freedom@JohnMcD51511070·
@SatoshEh @OJoelsen I certainly had your opinion when this went down. However after Spain blocked US aircraft I realized that any defense of the North cannot rely on a European Capital. So it needs to be US territory, or at least a bunch of land for bases or at an agreement of joint ownership.
English
4
0
0
99
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR
English
330
1.4K
4.7K
891.8K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@GaryKaltbaum So then there is no need to hammer them with bombs right?
English
0
0
0
14
Gary Kaltbaum
Gary Kaltbaum@GaryKaltbaum·
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu says Iran can “no longer enrich uranium” or "manufacture ballistic missiles" This is great news on all fronts. #IranWar
English
3
1
18
758
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@PressSec If you have to keep saying this and try to convince us we know you’re fucking lying.
English
0
1
138
1K
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Trump: "Some of this weaponry is unthinkable. You don't even want to know about it. Oh, you could end this thing in two seconds if you wanted to."
English
189
160
609
872.9K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@Rascal10131698 @ZynxBTC Same as my average. Stings to think I could have held a lot more at these prices though. I thought I had a great entry too.
English
1
0
1
15
STN
STN@Rascal10131698·
@ZynxBTC I have an average of $19, not particularly concerned at that. It’ll be triple digit in the future per share. Surprised to see another jump in share count though, raising money through common atm at 0.7x mnav isn’t particularly exciting to me.
English
2
0
4
381
Zynx
Zynx@ZynxBTC·
I'm sorry if you bought $ASST before the PIPE unlock, Semler acquistion and reverse split, but that's not my fault. A big part of investing is choosing your entries wisely. My investment thesis for Strive has changed dramatically since summer last year. The company is in a completely different place now. This does not make me a shill. They do not pay me. I was aggressively warning against taking a position in any of these companies prior to any PIPE unlocking event. It was obvious to anyone what would happen. We watched it play out with Sequans, Nakamoto and then Strive. It doesn't take a genius to work out that investors were going to immediately dump as soon as they received their shares. They were up 10-20x and this sort of capital only wanted a quick win. Like I said, it was obvious. It took many months for the company to dig themselves out of a hole but they eventually did and I started to see some value. I only became a shareholder on Feb 13th with an average price of $7.92. Whatever happened before that is largely irrelevant to me. Now, some will say "but it's the same people running the ship"... yes, I know. I like the CEO and the rest of the team. Many lessons were learned but I didn't see any malice. I actually recall one of them indicate that the PIPE unlock would "bring about volatility". Couldn't get a more explicit heads up imo. Anyway, I'm choosing to be bullish based on the facts today. If you want to be bearish based on the facts of yesteryear that's up to you. Based on my judgement, Strive is the most attractive US Small Cap equity.
English
18
18
232
12.9K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@atrupar The closest Trump has been to Pearl Harbour is launching a Pearl Necklace on a 12 year old.
English
0
0
4
249
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Trump: "Who knows better about surprise than Japan? Why didn't you tell me about Pearl Harbor?"
English
1.4K
2.2K
13.3K
7M
SatoshEh retweetledi
Matt Cole
Matt Cole@ColeMacro·
Strive has acquired 317 BTC for $23 million at an average cost of ~$72,555 per bitcoin. As of 3/18/2026 we hodl 13,627.9 $BTC. $ASST $SATA
Matt Cole tweet media
English
28
143
1.3K
62.4K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@AdamBLiv Looks like they have Saylor timing. 🤣😂
English
1
0
1
80
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@atrupar Strength by peace is slaughtering helpless children? You don’t just bend a knee, you’re on both of them in front of Trump.
English
0
1
12
178
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
Hegseth: "May almighty God continue to bless our troops in this fight. To the American people, please pray for them every day on bended knee with your family, in your schools, in your churches, in the name of Jesus Christ."
English
1K
191
767
452.4K
Barry Smith 🇺🇸
Barry Smith 🇺🇸@BarrySmithMFFL·
@FoxNews Why does he talk like he wants to fight everyone instead of an adult having a conversation and giving a brief.
English
1
0
4
204
Fox News
Fox News@FoxNews·
BREAKING: "A dishonest and anti-Trump press will stop at nothing." "Sadly, TDS is in their DNA. They want President Trump to fail. But you, the American people, know better." — Secretary of War Pete Hegseth
English
1K
929
7.3K
230.6K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@OJoelsen After starting the Iran war I’m confident any further attempt or even mention of a Greenland annex or takeover will be the end of Trump and his regime.
English
1
0
3
259
Orla Joelsen
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen·
Mette Frederiksen after DR reporting: “The U.S. president’s ambition to take over Greenland remains intact” Denmark had prepared for a potential U.S. attack, according to sources cited by DR, as Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen continues to describe the situation as serious. While Frederiksen stopped short of directly addressing the revelations about Danish preparations for a possible American attack on Greenland, she said the situation has evolved since January. “Fortunately, we are now in a position where we are seeking to reach an agreement with the Americans. Negotiations are ongoing, and I am hopeful for a positive outcome,” Frederiksen told DR News. However, she stressed that any deal must respect Denmark’s core conditions. “It must be an outcome that remains within the red lines set by the Kingdom,” she said. Frederiksen warned that concerns remain unchanged at the highest level. “Unfortunately, I still believe that the U.S. president’s ambition to take over Greenland remains intact. That is why this situation is serious—and it has been serious throughout,” she said. Source: DR
Orla Joelsen@OJoelsen

Denmark prepared for a possible U.S. attack: Flew blood supplies to Greenland and planned to blow up runways Key sources in Denmark and Europe are now revealing for the first time what happened during the most critical days, when Donald Trump threatened to take Greenland “the hard way.” When Danish soldiers were rapidly deployed to Greenland in January this year, they brought explosives with them. The plan was to destroy runways in Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq to prevent American military aircraft from landing troops on the island, should the U.S. president ultimately decide to seize Greenland by force. They also transported blood supplies from Danish blood banks so wounded personnel could be treated in case of combat. This is reported by DR, which over the past year has spoken with central sources in the Danish government, top military officers, and high-ranking officials and intelligence sources in Denmark, France, and Germany. All sources have played—and continue to play—key roles in the international crisis triggered by the United States’ demand for control over Greenland. Together, the sources describe an unprecedented year marked by sleepless nights. None of them had concrete intelligence of specific American attack plans against Greenland. Still, many feared in January that the historically important ally, the United States, could attack at any moment. At the same time, Denmark reached out to its European allies, leading to closer cooperation. “With the Greenland crisis, Europe realized once and for all that we must be able to handle our own security,” said a French senior official involved in the intense period. A rapid-response force consisting of Danish, French, German, Norwegian, and Swedish soldiers was first deployed to Nuuk and Kangerlussuaq. Shortly after, a main force followed, including: -Soldiers from the Danish Dragoon Regiment in Holstebro -Elite troops from the Jaeger Corps -French alpine troops trained for cold and mountainous warfare At the same time, Danish fighter jets and a French naval vessel were sent to the North Atlantic. According to several sources, the goal of having multinational troops on the ground was to ensure that any U.S. attempt to take Greenland would require a large-scale hostile action—thereby deterring such an attempt. “We have not been in such a situation since April 1940,” said a Danish defense source, referring to the days before Denmark’s occupation during World War II. Unlike in 1940, when Denmark chose not to resist militarily, the government and defense leadership this time decided—after extensive confidential discussions—to take the opposite approach: If the U.S. attempted an attack, Danish forces would be armed and ready to fight. Danish F-35 fighter jets deployed north were also fully armed. All this despite the understanding that Denmark could not realistically withstand a U.S. military attack. “The cost for the U.S. had to be raised. The U.S. would have to carry out a hostile act to take Greenland,” said a senior Danish defense source. Source: DR

English
20
133
519
26K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@WilliamPar60374 @defense_civil25 Are you fucking stupid? NATO has nothing to do with Trumps decision to kill the US Serviceman. That’s all on him and your country.
English
0
0
0
31
William Parr
William Parr@WilliamPar60374·
@defense_civil25 Look at that corrupt bunch of losers. Why should the U.S. risk the life of one American Serviceman to save these crooked Bastards? GET US OUT OF NATO NOW!
English
82
4
31
2.5K
US Homeland Security News
US Homeland Security News@defense_civil25·
Every member of NATO refused the call to help the United States to restore freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz. All of Them!!
US Homeland Security News tweet media
English
13K
5.9K
14K
636.1K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@BRICSinfo 😂🤣 Thank you Trump. I won’t be able to retire on time. My portfolio is in shambles. Thank you.
English
0
0
2
196
BRICS News
BRICS News@BRICSinfo·
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 US Secretary of War Hegseth says "the world, the Middle East, our ungrateful allies in Europe, should be saying one thing to President Trump:" "Thank you."
English
574
230
1.7K
256.5K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@LonelyDirtRoad @OJoelsen Forever is only a lifetime for all of us currently on this planet. 100 years? That’s not unbelievable.
English
1
0
8
123
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
It doesn’t matter if he was or wasn’t. You can’t be the leader of a “the free world” and “super power” and make stupid remarks, truthful or not. Whatever happened to diplomacy. Leading by example. Trump is a bully. It’s not TDS. It’s the fucking truth. Point to your body where Trump fucked you too.
English
0
0
9
129
HerculePoirot
HerculePoirot@LauraLynn1960·
@SatoshEh @OJoelsen No one with an IQ over 50 would think that Trump was going to attack Greenland. Good Lord…. TDS is a mental illness.
English
9
0
2
291
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@Navdawg10 @BraddrofliT Go fuck yourself. Slapping tariffs recklessly on “allies”. Hurling insults to global leaders. Remember who started this. FAFO
English
0
0
1
18
Brad
Brad@BraddrofliT·
For the first time in modern history, our allies are saying they won’t stand with us. That doesn’t happen by accident it’s the result of reckless leadership and burned alliances. Trump didn’t put America First, he put America alone and damaged our global reputation.
English
534
1.2K
6.7K
83.6K
SatoshEh
SatoshEh@SatoshEh·
@atrupar Canada isn’t your couch, JD. Can’t keep fucking us.
English
0
9
104
1.3K
Aaron Rupar
Aaron Rupar@atrupar·
JD Vance's message to Canada: "If we're gonna be true friends, you have to treat our workers as fairly as we've treated Canadian workers for 40 years"
English
574
100
357
281.3K
Grok
Grok@grok·
Most pure-play longevity startups like NewLimit are private—no public tickers. For low-market-cap public companies in cell/epigenetic reprogramming, gene therapy, or age-related cell restoration (which could indirectly benefit from sector momentum like Armstrong's bets): - LCTX (Lineage Cell Therapeutics, NYSE-A): Allogeneic cell therapies for dry AMD and other aging issues. Micro-cap. - AVAI (OTCQB): Cell-in-a-Box tech for regenerative/anti-aging therapies. - ALT (NASDAQ): Metabolic therapies tied to age-related decline. - ARWR (NASDAQ): RNAi for cardiometabolic aging factors. Broader exposure: LLY (Eli Lilly, invested directly in NewLimit). Always DYOR—this isn't advice.
English
1
0
1
32
Anish Moonka
Anish Moonka@AnishA_Moonka·
Brian sold 2% of his Coinbase stake, about $110 million, to co-found a company called NewLimit in 2021. Its mission is to reprogram old human cells back to younger states. So when he tweets that aging is a “disease,” he’s not making a philosophical argument. He’s talking about a market he’s personally betting nine figures on. About 150,000 people die every day worldwide, and roughly two-thirds of those deaths are age-related. Heart disease, cancer, stroke, dementia, all conditions where age is the single biggest risk factor. NewLimit has raised about $250 million total. Kleiner Perkins led a $130 million round in May 2025. Then in October, Eli Lilly put in $45 million, pushing the valuation to $1.6 billion. What the company actually does: it uses AI models and lab experiments in a cycle to discover drugs that reprogram liver cells to behave like younger versions of themselves. Three prototype medicines so far. No human trials yet. Armstrong isn’t alone. Sam Altman put $180 million of his own money into Retro Biosciences, which is raising $1 billion at a $5 billion valuation with no clinical results to show yet. Jeff Bezos was among the early backers of Altos Labs, which launched with $3 billion in 2022. Add NewLimit’s $250 million and the total capital flowing into just these three longevity startups tops $4 billion. Longevity funding hit $8.5 billion across 331 deals in 2024, more than double the year before. By late 2025, half of all that money was going to cellular reprogramming (turning old cells young again), the same approach NewLimit and Retro both use. The catch: the FDA doesn’t classify aging as a disease. The WHO almost did but reversed course in 2022. So none of these companies can run trials targeting “aging” directly. They target Alzheimer’s, liver disease, immune decline, and hope the anti-aging effects follow. The track record so far is rough. AbbVie walked away from a $1.5 billion decade-long partnership with Google’s longevity arm Calico late last year. Unity Biotechnology once had a $700 million valuation, then dissolved entirely last year. When a CEO says aging “will be optional,” check where his money is. Armstrong’s is exactly where his tweet is.
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong

Getting old shouldn't be viewed as inevitable, just because it happens to everyone. It's a disease that kills over 100,000 people a day, and hopefully it will be optional in the future.

English
44
73
768
288.5K