SaveMusic

@human_artistry @MerriamWebster Yes 👆🏻

Surely @MerriamWebster would agree that training AI by scraping billions of stolen images on a continuous basis counts as “habitual or regular”?

@Radicchi00 @rohanpaul_ai Definitely you make a good point

@SaveMusicOrg @rohanpaul_ai slop should get paid nothing, the training data was stolen and then the output competes against the very data it stole. absolutely corrupt

Spotify’s AI music boom is now redirecting millions of dollars away from human musicians and towards AI. The article says 34% of daily uploads are now AI-generated, or about 50,000 tracks per day, which suggests the royalty dilution problem could grow long before listeners can reliably tell what is synthetic. The basic problem is simple supply: streaming platforms split a royalty pool by share of total plays, so every stream captured by cheap AI-generated tracks slightly shrinks the payout going to songs made by people. The reported estimate from Sloptracker says more than $2.5M has already been diverted by just 50 AI artists. The deeper issue is that music platforms reward attention at scale, and AI can produce songs in huge batches with almost no recording costs, no session players, and no studio time. A human artist is limited by time, skill, and studio cost, while an AI system can generate huge volumes of passable music fast enough to flood recommendation systems, playlists, and search results. --- thecooldown .com/green-business/ai-impact-on-music-industry-artist-losses/

@Radicchi00 @rohanpaul_ai Two different royalty rates. Human stuff gets paid a higher rate. Slop should be paid less. As the slop is modeling off of the human stuff in the first place

@rohanpaul_ai This is completely unacceptable. A separate streaming service for ai tracks is the only path forward. That way normal people never have to hear any of that slop shit.

@Dan_Jeffries1 @cybercpu @rohanpaul_ai Daniel Jeffries, you’re the moron.

@cybercpu @rohanpaul_ai Your false dichotomy proves your own stupidity and nothing else other than your complete inability to think clearly.

@heynavtoor Busted

🚨BREAKING: Every book you have ever read. Every novel that has ever been published. It is sitting inside ChatGPT right now. Word for word. Up to 90% of it. And OpenAI told a judge that was impossible. Researchers at Stony Brook University and Columbia Law School just proved it. They fine tuned GPT-4o, Gemini 2.5 Pro, and DeepSeek V3.1 on a simple task: expand a plot summary into full text. A normal use case. The kind of thing a writing assistant is built for. No hacking. No jailbreaking. No tricks. The models started reciting copyrighted books from memory. Not paraphrasing. Not summarizing. Entire pages reproduced verbatim. Single unbroken spans exceeding 460 words. Up to 85 to 90% of entire copyrighted novels. Word for word. Then it got worse. The researchers fine tuned the models on the works of only one author. Haruki Murakami. Just his novels. Nothing else. It unlocked verbatim recall of books from over 30 completely unrelated authors. One author's books opened the vault to everyone else's. The memorization was already inside the model the whole time. The fine tuning just removed the lock. Your book might be in there right now. You would never know it unless someone looked. Every safety measure the companies rely on failed. RLHF failed. System prompts failed. Output filters failed. The exact protections these companies cite in courtroom defenses did not stop a single page from being extracted. Then the researchers compared the three models. GPT-4o. Gemini. DeepSeek. Three different companies. Three different countries. They all memorized the same books in the same regions. The correlation was 0.90 or higher. That means they all trained on the same stolen data. The paper names the sources directly: LibGen and Books3. Over 190,000 copyrighted books obtained from pirated websites. Right now, authors and publishers have dozens of active lawsuits against OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, and Meta. These companies have argued in court that their models learn patterns. Not copies. That no book is stored inside the weights. This paper says that is a lie. The books are still inside. And researchers just pulled them out.

@brian_bastara @billboard @grok Let’s hope they work it all out without mud slinging.

@billboard the estate calling it a "profound waste" is pretty cold considering it's her father. @grok what exactly are Paris Jackson's complaints about the MJ biopic?

Michael Jackson Estate Executors: Paris Jackson’s Biopic Complaints a ‘Profound Waste’ of Time billboard.com/pro/michael-ja…

Anthropic CEO: “I think we might be six to 12 months away from when Claude doing most or maybe all of what we do end to end”. > AI writes the code > AI reviews the code > AI fixes the bugs > AI secures it software engineers are cooked.

@r0ck3t23 Congress will take 75 years to catch up with the next five. No we will not have a world of abundance. What we will have are a few trillionaires hiding in bunkers and a societal push to unplug the data centers.

Elon Musk just delivered the clearest death sentence for every hybrid company on the planet. Musk: “One laptop with a spreadsheet can outperform a skyscraper of several hundred human computers. Now, if even a few cells in that spreadsheet were done manually, you would not be able to compete with a spreadsheet that was entirely a computer.” One biological operator in a digital workflow throttles a supercomputer down to the speed of human typing. A hybrid company is a digital spreadsheet waiting on a human to do the math. The fully algorithmic entity demolishes the hybrid model because it operates at total computational velocity with zero biological friction. Musk: “What this means is that companies that are entirely AI will demolish companies that are not.” The greatest delusion of the current business cycle is the belief that traditional companies will slowly and safely transition into the AI era. There is no transition. There is replacement. Your competitor is a fully autonomous network executing decisions in milliseconds. Your company still requires a human to approve an email. Your survival rate is exactly zero. Today’s enterprise is proud of its massive headcount. Tomorrow’s winner is horrified by it. The future Fortune 500 won’t be companies with a hundred thousand employees. It’ll be trillion-dollar entities run by a handful of operators and an army of autonomous AI agents. The laptop already won. The skyscraper just doesn’t know it’s empty yet.

@karunexus @r0ck3t23 @grok Congress will take 75 years to catch up with the next five. No we will not have a world of abundance. What we will have are a few trillionaires hiding in bunkers and a societal push to unplug the data centers.

@r0ck3t23 Channel::Open @grok Can you answer that?

@eclubvip Get a German shepherd

Al menos el último pasó la prueba 😂

@DorotheaBaur FYIW - the logic here

"The pressure to use AI 'created more friction as it became obvious that we were being monitored for our usage, and we were being told that we had to use it', even if it was the less efficient route to accomplish a task" says a laid-off worker at Block. theguardian.com/technology/202…

@AlmostTrueTales @dom_lucre Likely a man created that video.

@dom_lucre Men didn’t use to care about stuff like this. What changed? I genuinely want to know.

🔥🚨BREAKING: Grammy winning artist Sabrina Carpenter is under backlash from music fans for constantly killing men in her music videos. Venom1s: ‘Imagine if a male artist made a music video showing women getting deleted and beaten up. He would be cancelled in a day. But a woman artist can literally delete men and nobody cares? Never tell me again that misandry doesn't exist.’

@scottastevenson Put an ending on River Raid

Underrated side-effect of AI: we are about to get a cambrian explosion of new games for retro consoles Took me 5-6 prompts to make a working game with music in assembly on SNES We’ll see “Steam for Super Nintendo” before the decade is out.

@IamKyros69 Still will need humans to intervene when the AI covertly creates malicious code. Dont throw away your coding skills quite yet!

Anthropic CEO: Software engineering will be completely obsolete in 6-12 months

@vladusatii @IamKyros69 Haha true that

@IamKyros69 This is an advertisement for his lame chatbot.

@MarcHoag @LuizaJarovsky Baloney. There is too wide of a gap between a prompt and the output. Pick up a paintbrush or a musical instrument and the gap becomes rather stark for most prompt warriors.

And yet there’s entire businesses that teach so-called prompt engineering precisely because — and to ensure —“sufficient control” over the output, ie, to get what you want out of the AI, and crucially, not what you don’t. This is true for AI image and video and music and writing as it is for code. (But see below.*) The good news is obviously the prompts themselves can be copyrighted. The bad news is that the opinion itself is somewhat illogical: but for the carefully crafted prompts, the AI-generated output wouldn’t exist.* And the idea that the output cannot be controlled is tenuous at best: the whole point of promoting is to guide the output to precisely what the user wants; that it’s perhaps not identical to what the human intended on every nth attempted prompt is as absurd as suggesting that a Photoshop-assisted edit or 3D rending in Blender or website mockup in Canva isn’t a pixel perfect facsimile of the user’s mental image, or indeed, the original on which the final was based. * I can understand excluding AI agent-prompted-creations which arguably act entirely autonomously sans human-in-loop; but to exclude human-prompted-AI-generated output is, I think, a bit disingenuous.

🚨 For those who are still in doubt, this is the U.S. Copyright Office's official opinion on the COPYRIGHTABILITY of AI-generated works: "The Office concludes that, given current generally available technology, prompts alone do not provide sufficient human control to make users of an AI system the authors of the output. Prompts essentially function as instructions that convey unprotectible ideas. While highly detailed prompts could contain the user’s desired expressive elements, at present, they do not control how the AI system processes them in generating the output." (page 18) Let's recap: - Any copyright claim involving AI must demonstrate HUMAN control over creative elements. - The assessment is done on a case-by-case basis. - AI-assisted is NOT the same as AI-generated. - AI-generated works without any HUMAN creative intervention are NOT copyrightable. - For some reason, every time I write about this tipic here or in my newsletter, some people get angry and try to deny the information above. I wonder why... Make sure to share the report with friends so they know what to expect in the U.S. - 👉 Link to the full report below 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 91,700+ subscribers below.

@LuizaJarovsky Good

@LuizaJarovsky Good job!

🚨 BREAKING: AI-generated art CAN'T be copyrighted in the U.S.

@WilliamShatner Please release it in “spatial audio” since that’s all about Space. 360 Reality Audio from Sony at your service. 360RA.com

Ladies, gentlemen, SWs fans…😝
I have explored space.
I have explored time.
Now… I explore distortion. Yes. You read that correctly.
I am releasing a HEAVY METAL album. Thirty-five metal virtuosos. Thunderous guitars. Chaos with purpose.
Covers of legends like Black Sabbath, Iron Maiden, and Judas Priest — and a few originals forged in the same cosmic fire. This project is, quite literally, a gathering of forces. Loud imagination. Honest intensity. Unapologetic exploration. At 94, one does not slow down. One turns the volume up. So prepare yourselves.
We are about to boldly headbang where no one has headbanged before. 🤘 Stay tuned. The metal voyage begins this year.