Scabby McScabberson
3.2K posts




Can we get a Protestant on Tucker who actually represents us accurately without the strawmen? Jay Dyer (Orthodox) reduces the Calvinistic/Reformed view of salvation to "mere mental assent" — with the only change being God's disposition toward a person. That's not what any Protestant teaches, other than the hyper free-grace OSAS antinomian fringe. We teach justification by faith alone in Christ: a sinner goes from hating God to repenting and trusting Him. This is a real spiritual regeneration by God's grace alone, not just rubber-stamping an individual as "saved" and sending him on his way. Yes, we are legally declared righteous at the moment of faith: Romans 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus. But Scripture also teaches sanctification — not as a means to achieve salvation, but as a byproduct of becoming a new creation in Christ: 2 Corinthians 5:17 Therefore, if anyone is in Christ, he is a new creation. The old has passed away; behold, the new has come. Those whom God justifies in Christ, He will also glorify: Romans 8:30 And those whom he predestined he also called, and those whom he called he also justified, and those whom he justified he also glorified.


Today we get to see what the lunatics do when they are on defense. Having noted that none of them are willing to debate or have any sort oppositional conversation about their views it's beyond obvious they don't do well on defense.



Fedsloppers can't satire. Ryan's joke doesn't land, womp womp. Allegedly Ryan is an attorney but hasn't responded to my debate request. Should be an easy W for you, need a date and time from you Ryan? Is Candace Owens a net negative?? You won't be muted.









@Alex_Ortodoxie vs Pastor Evan If we can't say Nestorians aren't Christian, what are we even doing here?






So let me get this straight… This week’s hearing absolutely nuked a year’s worth of influencer fan fiction by showing the public that the prosecution actually has the kind of evidence they’ve been insisting didn’t exist. Cue the collective meltdown. After spending the entire week desperately trying to poke holes in literally everything, they’ve finally settled on what to move forward with: “Well… you couldn’t clearly see Tyler’s face in the publicly released footage!” Or my personal favorite: “The prosecution is lying about the footage the judge wouldn’t let the public see.” 😂 Imagine watching a case with surveillance footage, forensic evidence, DNA, phone records, witness testimony, recovered weapon, and everything else presented… and deciding your grand conclusion is, “Yeah, but the pixels.” The grift has to keep grifting.




Guys, there is "devastating" and "overwhelming" evidence, "clear as the noon day sun" — "4K video" of Tyler Robinson shooting Charlie Kirk. Can we see it? No, but trust us.



I will match it. 160,000 dollars.




