Scamcoin

Official Scamcoin Links: X: @ScamcoinSPL CA: 9mNjA6BizTwpvd4DS3o7BjwZ6aPM9DC2jLHS7JFGbonk TG: t.me/ScamcoinSPL Web: scamcoin.lol CMC: coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sca… CG: coingecko.com/en/coins/scamc… DEX: dexscreener.com/solana/Duz92ts… JUP: jup.ag/swap?sell=So11… RAY: raydium.io/swap/?inputMin…

🔔🔨

@FabianoSolana So you're saying pumpfun has the potential to negate SOL's inflation long term?

People will hate this but PumpFun might be the best thing that happened to SOL 200K graduated tokens with ~40% SOL stranded in dead LPs = ~5M SOL + Ungraduated bonding curves hold ~300K SOL Combined that's 1% of SOL's cicrulating supply gone

@wenaltseason Because it's all a scam.

Looks like it's over for $PIPPIN It just dipped over 61% in 24h, and it doesn't feel like the bottom is in. Congrats to all the supply controllers. That's literally peak state of crime

@MidCurveMortal @bonkfun Sorry boys, it's all a scam it seems.

In hindsight, it was ridiculous to think that @bonkfun’s exit scam was in any way a surprise.

@toly Solana is a $scam! 🤣

Fud solana

@wenaltseason We'll be there! Thanks for the invite.

🚨 What Is More Important For Memecoins: Narrative or Community? From Launch to $1B 🚨 Launching a meme ain't as easy as it seems. Decoding this Thursday: what separates $1B+ legends from the flops. And how to build (or spot) the next one. 🗓 March 19 | 3 PM UTC | 11 AM ET 👇

@bonkfun So it's all a $scam?

This is the final post in this thread, do not click links in comments.

Update on the BONKfun domain compromise: - We've identified the attack vector and are actively working to regain control of the domain - This was a web2/front-end attack — Solana smart contracts and tokens are NOT affected - If you connected to BONKfun BEFORE the breach, you are safe - If you trade bonkfun tokens via terminals, you are safe ONLY users who signed a fake Terms of Service prompt on the site during the breach window may be affected. Users should remove approvals from connected apps in wallet. We'll post a full update as soon as the site is secured. Thank you for your patience.

Bonk.Fun breach recap: March 11: team account compromised. Site injected with a fake ToS prompt that triggered a wallet drainer. ~35 wallets affected, limited losses. March 12: “fixes coming,” contracts safe, trades unaffected. Since then: silence... Community frustrated. 😠 Rivals watching. 👀 Rumors flying. (Was Pump.Fun responsible?) Trust disappears faster than funds. $SCAM

Pump.fun solved one real problem: launch friction. But the structure it introduced quietly killed meme infrastructure. Before PumpFun: Launching a token meant creating a Raydium liquidity pool and seeding it with real SOL. Creators had skin in the game, and projects had to attract liquidity, build culture, and grow communities. Trading volume strengthened those markets because every swap on Raydium generated fees that flowed back into LPs, slowly deepening liquidity and stabilizing projects over time. After PumpFun: Anyone can launch a token in seconds with zero capital and zero commitment. Most trading now happens inside the launch machine, where fees are captured by the platform and creators instead of compounding into liquidity. The PumpFun model breaks the compounding liquidity loop that once strengthened meme markets. Millions of tokens later, the ecosystem has more memes than ever — but less liquidity depth and less infrastructure than the cycle before it. Pump.fun didn’t just change how tokens launch. It changed the incentives of the entire market. Where the fastest profit comes from launching the next coin instead of building the next ecosystem. Builders disappear... That’s not growth. That’s extraction. $SCAM

Meet one of the biggest scammers in the industry: Alon Cohen, founder of Pump.fun Pump.fun extracted close to a billion dollars from the trenches and gave nothing back. Not one useful product. Not one real innovation. Just an endless slot machine draining liquidity from every corner of the market. Every dollar that went into their fee machine is a dollar that didn’t flow into projects actually building something. $SCAM

@toly They are likely buying X accounts that you previously followed and are afterwards re-branding them into a project of their own. It's all a $scam. 😉

How do the bots exploit getting a follow from me? Like why does it matter? Just spam reply with cas?

Debate lately: Is Dexscreener a $SCAM? It costs $300 to update a token logo/banner. Meanwhile, the platform is earning $20K+ a day. Apparently changing a JPEG is premium infrastructure now :)

@seeexbt Because the whole thing's a scam.

we have a lot of traders leaving the trenches how did we go from 4.5M trenchers to sub 750k trenchers in a year. the space is supposed to keep growing not failing. Back when we traded with just tg bot and tg calls the trenches was growing insane now it’s just too advanced. a normal human with average iq is having an hard time in this space. these un required axiom updates are makin it worse. funding 100 wallets anonymously is not what we need. all we need is a simple ui to trade. space got toxic, no one has dreams for tokens to reach 100M mcap. just straight axiom affiliates bundling 10 wallets and farming at 100k mcap the traders declining in number is starting to look like the end if a change doesn’t happen

@MastrXYZ @zachxbt @binance @cz_binance That's why more people should invest in the irony :) $SCAM Scamcoin

Tbh, for me it is already enough to know that @zachxbt receives money directly from @binance / @cz_binance and to see that he never says anything that could harm the biggest scammer in the space. At least not so far. And before you start the storm, yes, he did some great investigations in the past. But I’d personally rather cut off my fingers than join forces with the biggest problem (Binance) and scammer in the space. Anyway: I cannot confirm the things mentioned by the thread author, at least not in a way that you could be certain. But there are many questions and I am surprised how aligned and how quickly ZachBNB announced an investigation in the Polymarket insider bet case. This is just an observation. Nothing else. But the most intelligent question was not asked, and that is what this is really about: Axiom itself apparently has NOT paid for the investigation. If that is true, then you can definitely ask who had the interest (and why) and enough money to pay ZachBNB to sponsor this investigation and why.

@bubblemaps @WheresBroox The insiders are always scheming. Invest in irony. Scamcoin $SCAM

1/ We found a connection between @WheresBroox and the #1 Polymarket trader who made $400k betting on a ZachXBT's investigation 🧵

@MarcellxMarcell $SCAM everywhere. Buy the irony...

You know after getting abused on X for the past fucking year for "farming on side wallets" and getting 100 wallets i've never seen before listed on threads and shit on every play id make i mostly ignored the noise because the sheep on X always like to make up shit but honestly it got to a point that was ridiculous. I'd have to change wallets every week because i was getting heavily copy traded on every new wallet id make and it never made any sense until now. any time id buy a token a bunch of wallets would come in and buy the token and dump it as soon as it goes higher. @AxiomExchange were farming the shit out of me this whole time. and you niggas blamed me lol. ngl i feel exposed abused and naked. thank god i've moved to @TradingTerminal in time and finally in the hands of people that we can trust. Join terminal for a safe place to trade and a 30% cash back on all your trades. trade.padre.gg/rk/marcell

@zachxbt Thanks @zachxbt for the report. Very thorough! Who's invested in the biggest narrative in the space? Scamcoin $SCAM

10/ I was retained to independently investigate alleged misconduct at Axiom and these findings are the result of that investigation. Earlier today I reached out to the Axiom team for comment. Their statement is attached. Regardless of whether Cal or Mist were aware, there was little to no monitoring or access controls in place to mitigate this abuse from happening in the first place. The extent of data granted to employees in an easily accessible dashboard is unusual for BD roles, including a user's entire wallet list with date/time, the wallets they are tracking, transaction history, the nickname of wallets, and linked accounts. Given Broox is based in NYC I think the case presents itself as a good opportunity for SDNY since it may fall within their jurisdiction. Whether or not criminal charges are filed, I hope the Axiom co-founders further investigate the abuse and consider taking legal action against the employees involved.

1/ Meet @WheresBroox (Broox Bauer), one of the multiple @AxiomExchange employees allegedly abusing the lack of access controls for internal tools to lookup sensitive user details to insider trade by tracking private wallet activity since early 2025.