Scan 🇫🇷🇪🇸🇮🇹🇬🇧🇷🇺🇵🇸🇮🇷

De l'histoire de l'Humanité on n'aura jamais vu de tarés pareils, c'est littéralement l'apogée de la haine.

He actually said that

Je remets mon illustration qui démontre qu'une ZFE n'est qu'une arnaque pour virer les gueux! Les Crit'Air 3 seront donc à nouveau interdites à Paris, Lyon, Grenoble et Montpellier (merci aux gauchistes du Conseil Constitutionnel) A gauche, vous avez le droit de circuler. A droite, vous devez marcher. @AlexandreJardin

🚨🚨Kenia SE RETIRA de la OMS porque descubrió que la vacuna contra el tétano estaba combinada con un agente esterilizante. “Ya no podemos darnos el lujo de confiar en la Organización Mundial de la Salud” “Las vacunas han disminuido la fertilidad” El Tribunal Supremo también suspendió la inmunidad procesal de Bill Gates 🔥

do you understand what Google's AI just did to an artist.. His entire Google account got permanently banned. Not just Drive. Gmail.. YouTube.. Every single service.. His appeal was rejected. No human reviewed it. An algorithm decided his life's work was a violation. He never shared the files publicly. It was a private backup of his own creations. The AI flagged it anyway - probably the filename or art style - and that was enough. - Google banned a developer's 14-year-old Gmail account over a research dataset that contained no illegal content - Google expanded its automated ban policy in October 2025 - violations now trigger immediate termination with zero warning period - No lawsuit against Google for wrongful account termination has ever succeeded in US courts Your Google account is not yours. You are renting access to your own digital life from a company whose AI can end it in seconds - with no appeal, no human, and no recourse.

This has historically been referred to as a "concentration camp."

Leurs parents leur ont bandé les yeux avant de disparaître Deux garçons français de 3 et 5 ans ont été retrouvés seuls sur une route. Leurs sacs à dos contenaient vêtements et provisions, signes d’un abandon prémédité.

@MagdelenatC @veritebeaute @PinguoinSecours À la pluie, vraiment ? Et par beau temps ça marche pas ?

@veritebeaute @PinguoinSecours Tous les Français accuse Macron avec des preuves à la pluie comme quoi l’argent qu’il a donné à cette escroc ukrainien dictateur a disparu mais pas pour tout le monde le FBI a retrouvé la trace de l’argent disparu dans les paradis fiscaux dans une banque des voitures de luxe

🚨 Le scandale des milliards envoyés à l’Ukraine éclate enfin au grand jour ! Alice Weidel a provoqué une onde de choc avec une accusation explosive et a directement défié Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Où est passé l’argent des contribuables ? Alors que les citoyens ukrainiens subissent les destructions du front, des milliards d’aides occidentales disparaîtraient, selon certaines accusations, dans des réseaux opaques et sur des comptes offshore liés au gouvernement. L’AfD exige désormais la suspension immédiate de toutes les livraisons d’armes et de tout soutien financier. L’Allemagne ne peut pas continuer à financer un système présenté comme corrompu! 👇

LA MENTEUSE ÉPINGLÉE. Pendant des mois, Caroline Fourest a donné des leçons de “rigueur”, de “vérité” et de “lutte contre la désinformation” sur Gaza. Problème : le Conseil de déontologie journalistique et de médiation (CDJM) vient officiellement de juger plusieurs de ses affirmations “inexactes” dans une chronique diffusée sur LCI. Le CDJM estime notamment qu’elle a relayé sans recul des éléments du gouvernement israélien concernant la famine à Gaza, en affirmant à tort que l’ONU aurait “changé ses critères”. Même chose concernant la Cour internationale de justice : le CDJM considère que ses propos étaient incomplets et trompeurs sur les motivations de la CIJ concernant le risque de génocide. Ironique. Caroline Fourest passe son temps à traquer les “complotistes”, les “fake news”, les “manipulateurs de l’information”… et finit elle-même épinglée par une instance de déontologie journalistique. Le plus fascinant reste le silence médiatique autour de cette décision. Imaginez une seule seconde qu’un journaliste indépendant, un média alternatif ou une personnalité classée “dissidente” ait été officiellement épinglé pour diffusion d’informations inexactes sur un sujet aussi sensible. BFM tournerait en boucle. France Inter ferait des chroniques indignées. Libération parlerait de “danger informationnel”. Mais quand il s’agit d’une figure protégée du paysage médiatique parisien, tout devient soudainement beaucoup plus discret. Comme souvent, la lutte contre la désinformation semble surtout dépendre de l’identité de celui qui parle.

Voilà. Ça aussi je vous l’avais dit, dès la première seconde ! Tout est sous nos yeux. À vous de voir… ou pas. Et que vive le Festival de Cannes ! Formidable !

Admiral Brad Cooper says the investigation into the U.S. airstrikes on Minab school is "complex". I'd like to remind you: Triple tap U.S Tomahawk cruise missiles were fired on a busy school day. Many children were still alive after the first strike. As some tried to flee to another part of the school, they were targeted again - this time with teachers and parents too. What's 'complicated' about such intentional evil. Not once but THREE missiles.

UK authorities have accused little girls of being prostitutes, “co-conspirators” and willing accomplices in their own grooming and abuse. They have arrested a father for trying to rescue his daughter from her rapists. This was not mere negligence or turning a blind eye. Officials have actively and deliberately protected the perpetrators.

🚨🚨Coup dur pour l'UE de Von der Leyen💥 L'avocate néerlandaise Meike Terhorst a mis à mal les projets illégaux de surveillance de masse de l'UE 🔥 « L'UE n'est PAS un État souverain, elle ne peut RIEN imposer à ses États membres ! » La tyrannie de l'IDENTITÉ NUMÉRIQUE ? À bas ! Bravo 👏🔥 Un excellent exemple, voilà comment nous devons contrer le totalitarisme de Von der Leyen 🔥 Êtes-vous d'accord ? A. Oui 🔥 RT si vous êtes d'accord. B. Non 🇫🇷 Soutenez-nous en nous suivant sur 𝕏 🌐 Notre Telegram en cas de censure : t.me/FranceXTelegram 🇫🇷

A woman was paid $1,650/hr instead of her usual $16.50/hr for a 12 hour shift and now she has been charged with a class C felony for refusing to give the $19,000 back to her employer. Notice how aggressive the law is when something benefits the working class, but if the corporations "mistakenly" don't pay your wages properly, adjust for overtime or violate contractual agreements, suddenly everything slows down. Classism is the real war.

A Norwegian neuroscientist spent 20 years proving that the act of writing by hand changes the human brain in ways typing physically cannot, and almost nobody outside her field has read the paper. Her name is Audrey van der Meer. She runs a brain research lab in Trondheim, and the paper that closed the argument was published in 2024 in a journal called Frontiers in Psychology. The finding is brutal enough that it should have changed every classroom on Earth. The experiment was simple. She recruited 36 university students and put each one in a cap with 256 sensors pressed against their scalp to record brain activity. Words flashed on a screen one at a time. Sometimes the students wrote the word by hand on a touchscreen using a digital pen, and sometimes they typed the same word on a keyboard. Every neural response was recorded for the full five seconds the word stayed on screen. Then her team looked at the part of the data most researchers had ignored for years, which is how different parts of the brain were communicating with each other during the task. When the students wrote by hand, the brain lit up everywhere at once. The regions responsible for memory, sensory integration, and the encoding of new information were all firing together in a coordinated pattern that spread across the entire cortex. The whole network was awake and connected. When the same students typed the same word, that pattern collapsed almost completely. Most of the brain went quiet, and the connections between regions that had been alive seconds earlier were nowhere to be found on the EEG. Same word, same brain, same person, and two completely different neurological events. The reason turned out to be something nobody had really paid attention to before her work. Writing by hand is not one motion but a sequence of thousands of tiny micro-movements coordinated with your eyes in real time, where each letter is a different shape that requires the brain to solve a slightly different spatial problem. Your fingers, wrist, vision, and the parts of your brain that track position in space are all working together to produce one letter, then the next, then the next. Typing throws all of that away. Every key on a keyboard requires the exact same finger motion regardless of which letter you are pressing, which means the brain has almost nothing to integrate and almost no problem to solve. Van der Meer said it plainly in her interviews. Pressing the same key with the same finger over and over does not stimulate the brain in any meaningful way, and she pointed out something that should scare every parent who handed their kid an iPad. Children who learn to read and write on tablets often cannot tell letters like b and d apart, because they have never physically felt with their bodies what it takes to actually produce those letters on a page. A decade before her, two researchers at Princeton ran the same fight using a completely different method and ended up at the same answer. Pam Mueller and Daniel Oppenheimer tested 327 students across three experiments, where half took notes on laptops with the internet disabled and half took notes by hand, before testing everyone on what they actually understood from the lectures they had watched. The handwriting group won by a wide margin on every question that required real understanding rather than surface recall. The reason was hiding in the transcripts of what the two groups had actually written down. The laptop students typed almost word for word, capturing more total content but processing almost none of it as they went, while the handwriting students physically could not write fast enough to transcribe a lecture in real time, which forced them to listen carefully, decide what actually mattered, and put it in their own words on the page. That single act of choosing what to keep was the learning itself, and the keyboard had quietly skipped the choosing and skipped the learning along with it. Two studies. Two countries. Same answer. Handwriting makes the brain work. Typing lets it coast. Every note you have ever typed instead of written went into your brain through a thinner pipe. Every meeting, every book highlight, every idea you captured on your phone instead of on paper was processed at half depth. You did not forget those things because your memory is bad. You forgot them because typing never woke the part of the brain that would have made them stick. The fix is the thing your grandmother already knew. Pick up a pen. Write the thing down. The slower road is the faster one.

20 millones de euros en intereses de demora y costas va a pagar Hacienda, es decir, todos los españoles a Shakira. Y lo peor de todo es que los inspectores que ejecutaron ese atropello seguirán con su bonus de productividad sin consecuencias

🇺🇸🤖FLASH INFO - Eric Schmidt, ex-PDG milliardaire de Google, s’est fait copieusement huer vendredi par les diplômés de l’Université de l’Arizona pour son discours pro-IA. La scène illustre une fracture profonde entre une élite technologique qui vend la révolution de l’IA comme une opportunité, et une jeunesse qui en perçoit avant tout le danger concret. Celui de se retrouver sans emploi avant même d’avoir commencé à travailler. L’IA devrait en effet éliminer environ 15 millions d’emplois aux États-Unis d’ici 2030. En France, selon une étude Coface, 5 millions de postes sont menacés à horizon deux à cinq ans, dans un scénario de déploiement massif de l’IA, et 27 % des tâches pourraient être automatisées d’ici 2030.

Spain just lost a tax fight with Shakira so badly that the court is making the tax agency refund her €60 million AND pay her entire legal bill. That second part is the unusual one. Spanish courts almost never punish their own tax agency. The case came down to one number Spain could never prove: how many days Shakira actually lived in the country in 2011. To be taxed in Spain on money you earn anywhere in the world, you have to be there more than 183 days a year. That's the law. The tax agency tried for years to prove Shakira crossed that line. Even with every record they could find, they could only reach 163 days. Her own records put the number at 143. She spent most of 2011 on tour. 120 concerts in 37 countries. She didn't own a home in Spain, and her business wasn't headquartered there either. The agency's whole case rested on the fact that she was dating a Barcelona soccer player at the time. The original tax bill Spain handed her was €55 million. About half was the tax claim itself. The other half was a fine for not paying it. So Spain was demanding €27 million in tax, plus €27 million in punishment for not paying the €27 million they couldn't prove she owed. Today's ruling wiped all of that out. The court ordered a €60 million refund with interest. Then it ordered the tax agency to cover her entire legal bill from its own budget. It's the kind of penalty Spanish courts rarely impose. They only use it when they think the agency had no business bringing the case in the first place. Spain has done this to other wealthy foreigners before. Lionel Messi was convicted in 2016 of dodging €4.1 million in taxes. Cristiano Ronaldo settled in 2019 for €18.8 million. Shakira herself has paid Spain twice already in other cases: €7.3 million in 2023 to avoid a separate trial, and another €6.6 million in 2024 for a different one. The pattern with rich foreigners has been the same every time: pursue, assess, fine. Shakira pointed something out in her own statement. She had the resources to fight Spain for 8 years. Most people in her position don't. They settle in year one because they can't afford a decade of legal bills against the government. Spain can technically still appeal to the Supreme Court in the next 30 days. Tax lawyers say they almost certainly won't. The ruling is too solid.

Dingue ! « Ça nous a pris 2 jours ! » ⤵️ Miracle ! Big Pharma a déjà un vaccin ARN messager contre l’hantavirus qui a fait 8 cas dans le monde mais 8000 heures d’émission à la télévision et 8 millions d’articles dans la presse !… Fait en 2 jours. (cf : latribune.fr/article/la-tri…) Lisez ça : «  C’est un vaccin ARN messager à nanoparticules conçu grâce à l’intelligence artificielle. Nous avons utilisé le programme AlphaFold qui permet de prédire la structure des protéines en trois dimensions, cela en deux heures quand il fallait des mois avant 2024 » ➡️ Ça vous dit ? Moi non ! Et mon petit doigt me dit que des millions de Français ne suivront pas…