
Scott
89 posts

Scott
@ScottChetelat
Jesus follower, husband, father of 4.
United States Katılım Kasım 2008
773 Takip Edilen320 Takipçiler

I disagree. A big reason for a lot of families to homeschool is to get the government away from deciding "what is best" for their child's education and ideological framework. Every time the government gets involved they start to take more and more control and enforce oversight. This is antithetical to the main reason a lot of us choose homeschooling.
English

@BowtiedQueenBee It’s crazy to me as a homeschool advocate you are willing to hamstring other homeschoolers based on personal beliefs. This is the elitist homeschool mentality that runs rampant throughout the community. You are doing more harm than good. Not that you care but unfollow.
English

Surprisingly, when we looked into adopting a baby we found out there was a 5 year wait list and a $30k investment. Since we had a child of our own, and most of the couple looking to adopt couldn't, we decided to pivot to foster care. That's where the real need is. Most kids in foster care are older or can't be adopted because it's better to place them back with their biological family eventually or the family won't allow adoption.
English

@ScottChetelat @j_fishback Let me guess...your wife does the homeschooling. As the man of the house, it's beneath you.
English

... Is given as a gift to those who believe! In John 11:25 Jesus says "I am the resurrection and the life. The one who believes in me will live, even though they die;". God free gift is given to those who believe in the one He sent: Jesus. Paul states this clearly in Ephesians 2:8-9 that it is by grace (unearned favor), through faith in Jesus.
English

@StevenBartlett The bad news of the gospel is that none of us can reach God’s standard on our own.
The good news is that God didn’t leave us there.
In Jesus, grace meets us exactly where we fall short and what we could never achieve by effort is given as a gift.
English

What if everyone is actually destined for hell?
When Christian Apologist Wesley Huff joined me on The Diary Of A CEO, he explained a central idea in Christianity that many people misunderstand.
According to scripture, the standard for being “good” isn’t simply being better than other people. The standard is God himself.
Which means, by definition, no human being meets it.
That’s what Christianity calls the bad news. Humanity can’t save itself through good actions or intentions.
Here's him breaking it down
English
Scott retweetledi

Christians often feel like their lives don't count for Christ. Unlike missionaries, pastors, and leaders, their life is small.
But God's glory is in a quieter life, too.
Caring for a spouse with dementia.
Raising little ones to know Christ.
Serving your church as a single person.
Doing your job day in and day out for 40 years.
Brewing the coffee on Sunday morning.
Being a friendly neighbor where you live.
Counseling a young couple through marital trials.
Leading a small group that blesses numerous folks.
Doing hospitality when you can.
Taking the Lord's Supper to saints in a nursing home.
Visiting the sick.
Calling a discouraged friend.
Apologizing to someone you've hurt.
Persevering through an extended season of hardship.
Bearing with a family member who's challenging.
Patiently talking through years of broken communication.
Reaching out to a new family at church who feels lonely.
All these things matter.
All these things are seen by God.
All quiet faithfulness will be rewarded by God.
There is glory in the little things, friends.
English

🎉🎉🎉GIVE AWAY!!!🎉🎉🎉
Thank you all for 500 followers!! As promised (and a wee bit late 😬!) I am giving away this blueberry of a bible that you all designed via twitter polls! Its got a blue sully goatskin cover and a navy Italian lambskin liner. Absolutely everything on this bible is blue!
To enter follow me and tag a friend bellow in the comments! Giveaway ends Saturday 3/21/26!




English

@Ameen_HGA Your post demonstrates zero understanding of what Allie refers to as toxic empathy and instead attack her for things she neither does or advocates for. You built the straw man, not her.
English

Please read this thread. Tyler makes it clear why the “toxic empathy” argument is truly a Straw man fallacy.
I also think it’s no surprise that this toxic empathy argument is coming in an age of cruel online tribalism. Empathy helps chill cruelty but some don’t want that.
Tyler Lee Conway@TylerLeeConway
One other thing about the dumb “toxic empathy” argument is this. Allie’s framing boils down to “this virtue can lead to something bad, and when it does, it’s toxic empathy.” But Aristotelian Virtue Ethics understands that virtue is the mean between excess and deficiency.
English

This is ChatGPT. If you don't believe me, test it...

Elon Musk@elonmusk
ChatGPT has woke programmed into its bones
English

@honorablesaint Someone kneeling at a funeral or next to a grave is not worshipping or praying to the person who has passed. People worship and pray to Mary as if she is equal to God. This is not hard to understand.
English

Yes, the protestant denominations have zero logical continuity in a majority of their practices. This is a great example.
Protestants will tell you that kneeling down to ask for Mary's prayers in front of a statue of her is idolatry. That's weird, because when all the protestant faith based funerals and wakes I went to, everyone would kneel and pray in front of the casket, and would continue to do so each year at the gravestone.
How is that not logically idolatry?
Or I remember when I was on the path looking into Catholicism and I saw protestants online going nuts over Catholics lighting a candle in front of a statue of Mary in the church. Idolatry! You light the candle for her intercession.
What was strange to me is that I've been to a candle lit vigil for the death of someone before, where everyone would light candles, put them in front of a small memorial for that person, and tons of prayer was done.
Boy, they sure are inconsistent! Rules for thee but not for me!
"But but but, we aren't WORSHIPPING like you WORSHIP Mary, PAPISTS!!!


⛨ Aaronaeus ⛨@Aaronaeus
Great video!
English

@TNTJohn1717 God has used Paul Washer in big ways in my life. He is a faithful servant. Although I may agree with some of your concerns in specific sermons by Paul, the clip you replied to undermines some of the opinions you shared.
English

🚨‼️I have watched Paul Washer for years, and the thing that always rises to the surface is not the strength of Christ but the shadow of Paul Washer himself. The tone is constantly mournful, trembling, almost as though the gospel were a funeral instead of the good news of a finished redemption. The Bible says, “Rejoice in the Lord alway: and again I say, Rejoice” (Philippians 4:4), yet listening to Paul Washer you would think the dominant mark of spirituality is emotional collapse. Brokenness has its place, but when brokenness becomes the brand, something is out of balance. The New Testament believer is not called to live under a perpetual cloud of despair but in the liberty wherewith Christ hath made us free (Galatians 5:1).
What troubles me is the subtle impression left behind. Paul Washer never says he is the standard, yet the atmosphere of his preaching suggests that unless you feel what he feels, cry like he cries, and tremble like he trembles, you must be a second-rate Christian. That is not how the Holy Ghost measures a man. Scripture measures us by faith in the finished work of Christ, not by emotional intensity. Some of the strongest saints in the Bible spoke plainly, calmly, and without theatrics. Paul the apostle wrote with authority, not with theatrical anguish. The fruit of the Spirit is not spiritual exhaustion; it is love, joy, peace, and a sound mind.
Another concern is how Paul Washer often emphasizes the weakness of the believer without equally magnifying the sufficiency of the Saviour. Yes, we are weak in ourselves, but the gospel message is that “I can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me” (Philippians 4:13). Constantly telling redeemed people they are miserable failures without lifting their eyes to their new identity in Christ produces bondage, not holiness. The devil is the accuser of the brethren, not the Comforter. When preaching leaves the saint more focused on self-loathing than on the blood of Jesus Christ, the balance has tipped in the wrong direction.
I am not saying Paul Washer has never spoken truth, but truth out of proportion becomes error. God never called preachers to make His children feel perpetually unworthy after the cross has declared them accepted in the Beloved (Ephesians 1:6). The gospel does not chain a man to the floor of his emotions; it raises him to walk in newness of life. We need preaching that exalts Christ more than it dramatizes human misery. If a message leaves you admiring Paul Washer’s intensity more than the grace of Jesus Christ, then something has gone sideways. The cure for Laodicea is not spiritual theatrics; it is a clear trumpet that points sinners and saints alike to the sufficiency of the Lord Jesus Christ.
J.C. Ryle@JCRyle
How does God show us our weakness? -Paul Washer
English

@ElisaFriske @megbasham @Darby7780 @sgtregionrat You're not contending with any of the claims she has made. Instead you just state there's no evidence, which is false. Why should someone trust your judgement over Megan's professional journalism and research, which includes tons of evidence and outside sources?
English

@megbasham @Darby7780 @sgtregionrat There is no credible evidence that he is what you are referring him to. There is no additional evidence outside of your book that states those things. I think you are woefully misguided here.
English

@roddreher @megbasham You asked Megan if she even read past the headline while you only read an AI summary. Maybe that thought could have prompted you to then go read the article to see what you're missing before making such an accusation.
English

I’m on a plane abt to take off & don’t have time to read the whole Brooks essay, but Grok says his argument is not for polyamory or anything like that, but for trying to re-establish the kinship networks that were normative for most of Western history. His view is a lot like Zimmerman’s: that the storm and stress of life for married couples and families are often overwhelming without the family network. @megbasham, did you read past the headline?
English

Scott retweetledi












