Brian

@racheltravuavel @SoonerOnSONAR @cnnloll @SECNAV yup it never ends

@Scott_Brian30 @SoonerOnSONAR @cnnloll @SECNAV This is what I hate: everything has to be tied to politics. They're busy blaming each other.

Flight debrief complete. No reprimands. No firings. No problem. That’s the sound of Freedom! Semper fi and Hooyah.

Trust me, I’m not happy with a lot of the choices this administration has made either. But a Blue Angels flight demonstration team doing a low pass has absolutely nothing to do with who is in the White House or the Pentagon. It’s just standard naval aviation training and public outreach, not a political statement." they are trained professionals and they actually do these low passes sometimes

@Scott_Brian30 @cnnloll @SECNAV He's the CIC and his drunk frat boy SecDef is the reason these keep happening, so yeah, he and the attitude of the entire administration are at the very center of the debate.

@jakesyma @alexboge Hopefully, a Flat Earther will save this image, put a caption on it, and then post it. LMFAO 😂

@alexboge In all (well, more) seriousness, I don't know how you do it... but mad respect for doing it day in and day out. 🙂

Ask any flat earther which way is down. They'll look at their feet. “Down is toward the ground, obviously, Globie!” Ask them why and they'll deny gravity, mumble something about density. Doesn't matter. The answer is the same. Down is toward your feet. Down is toward the ground. That's where things go. When something falls, it falls down to the ground. When you jump, you come back down to the ground. When you stand, your feet are planted on the ground. Universal. You will never hear a Flerf tell you otherwise. Which is why when a Flerf posts this graphic it makes me laugh - at them. Every person in this image is doing exactly what a flat earther will tell you people do. Feet planted firmly on the ground. If any of them jumped, they'd fall right back down to the ground beneath them. Just as everyone knows happens. Just as every Flerf would tell you. They post this thinking it's a gotcha. But there's no one in this picture violating a single thing they believe about which way is down. The only thing being mocked here is an assumption the image never makes: that down points the same direction everywhere in space. It doesn't. Down is toward the ground. Their words, not mine. So the real joke is the irony. Flat earthers cannot stop posting proof of the globe and gravity, and they don't even know it.

@SoonerOnSONAR @cnnloll @SECNAV I don't particularly like Trump, but this flyover literally has nothing to do with Trump, lol. You've gotta shoehorn your hatred of him in it somehow, lol. Your next post is gonna be something about the Epstein Files, lmfao 😂 do you like being so Predictable?

@cnnloll @SECNAV Your lord and savior Trump is from New York you fucking retard.

Your argument makes absolutely no sense. Globe-specific physics? What other physics are you talking about? Not a single flat earther agrees on the "physics" of a flat earth. They literally make things up on the fly.Please give us an example of "flat earth physics" and we can go from there. If you have nothing, then you are just being a contrarian.

Yes. Yes, some of it is globe specific. Your concept of the Sun resides in globe specific physics. Again, I don't really care aside from pursuing what is true. I write to point out if you want their serious attention, or mine regarding sound argumentation, apply the physics they claim and show why its wrong. o/

Flat earthers have a mountain problem. In their model, the sun is small, local, and roughly 3,000 miles overhead. A heat lamp on a track. That raises an obvious question: if heat primarily comes from proximity to this nearby sun, why are the parts of Earth closest to it - the mountaintops - frozen solid? Everest's summit sits about 5.5 miles closer to their sun than sea level. Their own model should predict more solar heating at the summit, not dramatically less. Instead, it can be -30°C on a good day. Here's what actually happens 🤓 The atmosphere has a pressure gradient because of gravity. Air is compressed near Earth's surface by the weight of all the air above it, and that pressure steadily decreases with altitude. (Flat earthers, of course, still have to explain why atmospheric pressure falls with height in the first place - they can’t) The atmosphere absorbs only a relatively small fraction of incoming sunlight directly. Most solar energy reaches the ground first, and the ground heats the air from below. As that warm air rises into regions of lower pressure, it expands and cools. This is called adiabatic cooling, and it produces the familiar decrease in temperature with altitude. It's the same basic physics that makes a can of compressed air turn cold when you spray it. Expansion costs internal energy. That's why a weather balloon at 30,000 feet isn't roasting despite being "closer to the sun." It's why commercial jets cruise through air around -55°C. Distance to the sun changes by about 0.000006 percent. Atmospheric pressure drops by roughly 75 percent. One of those numbers matters. On a globe with the sun 93 million miles away, climbing five miles changes your distance to the sun by essentially nothing while changing the surrounding pressure enormously. The model predicts cold summits because that's exactly what the underlying physics predicts. A flat earth with a sun only 3,000 miles overhead predicts the opposite trend. The summit is measurably closer to its supposed heat source, yet dramatically colder. Instead of explaining that contradiction, the model quietly borrows the globe's atmospheric physics while rejecting the globe itself. And that's before we ask what happens inside the dome. A sealed dome containing a continuously shining sun has nowhere to dump the heat it continuously receives. Unless energy is somehow leaving the system, every watt the sun produces stays trapped inside. Run that model for a few thousand years and the dome isn't a snow globe. It's an oven. The globe explains cold mountaintops with freshman physics. The flat earth model can't explain cold summits, warm valleys, the pressure gradient in the atmosphere... or why we haven't all been slowly roasted under glass. Reality votes globe.

@GroveStudios7 @alexboge You live in a house? IDK why but I pictured something.... else...

@alexboge That is so funny. So if I stand on the roof of my house and can see further down the street, Alex thinks it means I'm seeing over the curve. 🤣

Watching the sun set twice. A reminder that it is literally this easy to debunk flat earth.

When a Flerf keeps mindlessly repeating “perspective” after you remind them that the sun would never ever set on a flat earth - it (and the moon) would be visible to literally everyone 24 hours day:

You ran the curvature calculator and it showed over 1,066 feet of the skyline hidden. The Willis Tower is 1,450 feet tall meaning you're only seeing the very top of the buildings while the bottom 1,000+ feet are completely gone below the horizon. You literally posted proof of Earth's curvature... and then hashtagged #NoCurve. Thanks for the self-own, bud. Math doesn't care about your feelings. 😂

@alexboge Nope! That ALL of the skyline which should be practically missing except for the very tops of the highest skyscrapers. Go to earth curve calculator and you will see how many feet of buildings you will actually see. Your post also doesn’t say anything about impact of rough water.

Flerf posts video to show “all of” the Chicago skyline from a great distance. Video shows the bottoms of the distant buildings all cut off, behind the horizon… ya know… the effect of the curvature of the globe. And then does a hashtag “NoCurve” Man, these people are just … 🙄

@HkuNurd59520 @SupremePintade @bayraktar_1love Bro it looks so ridiculous that it was hard for me to except it was real lol. I just picture circus music

@SupremePintade @Scott_Brian30 @bayraktar_1love It's not as bad as I feared. I deserve worse.

Russian mobile fire group training goes wrong while using a YakB-12.7 rotary machine gun originally built for Mi-24 helicopters.

@HkuNurd59520 @SupremePintade @bayraktar_1love well I apologize for thinking You are just like everybody else on the internet. because you actually admitted that you were incorrect and that's extremely rare so I'm happy to see that from somebody. shows character

@SupremePintade @Scott_Brian30 @bayraktar_1love Here, I unblocked everyone except Julia. I'll take the lashes.

@HkuNurd59520 @SupremePintade @bayraktar_1love well man it looks like I'm going to have to take all the bad things I said back

@Scott_Brian30 @SupremePintade @bayraktar_1love You're a good guy Brian.

@HkuNurd59520 @SupremePintade @bayraktar_1love x.com/i/status/20763…

@bayraktar_1love x.com/i/status/20763…

@HkuNurd59520 @bayraktar_1love x.com/i/status/20763…

@HkuNurd59520 @bayraktar_1love I thought it was too. I looked into the weapon and then this incident and it is real. I wouldn't believe it unless I looked.

@_Lars_Johnson_ @envyiius @Kekius_Sage Exactly. A lot of people don't see the risk, but in the age of instant Google/AI searches, this kind of thing is one quick lookup away from being debunked. Most won't dig deeper once it confirms their bias; they just move on feeling justified in their skepticism.

@Scott_Brian30 @envyiius @Kekius_Sage This was my point, biodiversity loss is real but posting incorrect clips just pours gasoline on the fire of skepticism. Even with my current gear, returning to the same spot to record a fair comparator clip a year later is fiddly, never mind over 5 decades of recording advances.

Listen to the haunting silence of an ecosystem gradually dying out over half a century. This acoustic profile captures the progressive erasure of birdsong, serving as a stark and alarming warning of catastrophic biodiversity loss. Listen closely to realize exactly what we have lost.

I’m not disputing that biodiversity is declining. The evidence for that is solid. The issue is posting this video disguised as scientific analysis when it isn’t. “Lived experience” and “directionally correct” don’t make uncontrolled clips with unknown recording details into valid evidence. That’s exactly what gives critics easy ammunition to dismiss the whole thing. This isn’t evidence. That’s the problem.

@Scott_Brian30 @_Lars_Johnson_ @Kekius_Sage Yea obviously i know this type of thing could be manipulated to a varying extent based off mic quality, setting of recording, etc. but just going off of my lived experience i have found this to be directionally correct & is worth showing people even if it’s not 100% correct