Scruffy

Hey hey everyone! I hope everyone is feeling good. Welcome to my personal account! This is here for mostly just interacting with my friends! That I totally have- And just for me to speak my mind of random things and maybe some EPIC gaming moments

@OldIronsights @Alchemist8565 Math is math and given knowledge is given knowledge. If given a spectrum of answers the answer the is correct with the given information is the most correct. Moron, there no reason to believe there are any missing boxes more then what were showed. Try again.

@Scruffy5422 @Alchemist8565 Math is math. There is no "most correct" in math unless you have been taught by moron.

I might be dumb but I’m pretty sure there’s not enough info

@OldIronsights @Alchemist8565 That doesn't make all answers equal given the information smart one. In math they care about the "most correct" and seeing as you can't make a better argument over 51 without stretching it. That makes 51 the most correct

@Scruffy5422 @Alchemist8565 The whole fucking point is it is not provable from the information given. It can be any number between the minimum and maximum allowable by the described visual parameters. JFC...

@OldIronsights @Alchemist8565 You can't prove that either and it's more ludicrous to say it's that with no visual indicator of anymore missing boxes (ie shadows). Yours is much more of a stretch then 51 and there for less plausible

@Scruffy5422 @Alchemist8565 Math and volume don't care about your presumptions. You cannot prove that there are any blocks in rows 2 or 3 beyond the back 27, and even that is questionable. From the rear: 9 From above: 21 From the side: 17 (iirc) The base number could be 21+6+8=34.

@OldIronsights @Alchemist8565 Whine about it more I guess

@Scruffy5422 @Alchemist8565 Your assumption is irrelevant to the question.

@LayOnCannaDeez @Alchemist8565 "I made this and left information out" Wow that's a real gottem. However in mathematics you have to make assumptions given the information given so- congrats on the "own" but 51 is still the most correct answer with the given information

@Scruffy5422 @Alchemist8565 I made this and I left 2 boxes out on the other side never assume

@khazarAntlers Kommo-o is fine, but the most forgettable pseudo-legendary for me. The design isn't bad, but compared to the others, it lacks presence and standout quality. He's not ugly, weak, or poorly designed, just bland compared to the more memorable pseudo-characters.

I genuinely cannot find the "chopped" in this. Kommo-o is such an incredible pokemon design. One of the pokemon I will never ever understand the hate for it. Always "gen 7 has so many good pokemon" until it’s him apparently.

@delapilap @PsytheStudent @SoloKruzader psbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Attack_Po… This site as well as other power scaling forms explain it best as well as charts and examples to put it in perspective.

@Scruffy5422 @PsytheStudent @SoloKruzader Where are these definitions even coming from cause I have genuinely never heard this shit defined clearly. Like, what are we referencing here for these definitions? I don't remember seeing ts in a dictionary. Is there some official powerscaling authority?

"Planetary level" implies you can destroy a planet with a single attack This is like calling humans building level because we can destroy a building with enough hits

He literally can't start. Every time he beats Subaru the world restarts

@NeoConquestt @XrayPC @SoloKruzader And to the shock of nobody! All three definitions boil down to- drum roll please 🥁🥁🥁 The thing not being there anymore! Meaning if the planet is still there it's not destroyed meaning it's not planetary

@Scruffy5422 @XrayPC @SoloKruzader Thats not what the definition of destruction is Destruction refers to the act of causing severe damage, resulting in the ruin, demolition, or elimination of something.

I really do wish we would stop trying to redefine words only to make shit more complicated

Kink and Fetish are literally synonyms. Also that's not what fetish means Definition; "an intense, often irrational, sexual fixation on a specific body part or inanimate object." There are people with a foot fetish that can jork it to Big Butts.

@NeoConquestt @XrayPC @SoloKruzader Yes.. yes it literally is. Turning a planet into a barren waste land is not destroying it. To destroy a planet it quite literally needs to not exist anymore. If the floaty rock still exists then you didn't destroy it.

@Scruffy5422 @XrayPC @SoloKruzader Planet destruction isn’t just blowing up the planet btw

@XrayPC @SoloKruzader Brother are you stupid? The planet is literally still there. They literally repopulated on the same planet that planet literally will show up again later

@SoloKruzader He literally destroyed it tho? How does he compare to a human using a tool to slowly destroy one building? When hes flying thru multiple in like 2 secs?

@PsytheStudent @SoloKruzader No "Planetary" in terms of attack potency is the ability to destroy a planet with a single attack. If we used you lala land definition planetary would mean nothing

@SoloKruzader No I'm pretty sure planetary means that you can wipe out the dominant civilization on that planet with little effort. Which is effectively what he does, he basically sends them back to their own stone age.

@tyrenmatt @USARice000 @SoloKruzader So... You were just being a contrarian to be a contrarian. When the point still made sense? Like dawg humans tears down buildings all the time you're just being obtuse

@USARice000 @SoloKruzader I agree w OP i just thought the analogy was super crazy.

We should shame people who play the lottery when; 1. They have kids and rely on EBT 2. Play it in store in the middle of the night. 3. Are too old to not be smart enough to know they're not going to win anything huge.

Same wife who's tried to kill you like twice or more in that game btw while you do PROMISE Zoe a cure at the beginning of the game, Zoe also helps you all throughout the game. That being said I still choose Mia but I can't pretend like Zoe has no reason to be picked

People really think they have to much aura showing off how magic tricks work it shows a real lack of whimsy

FILTER POST; Misandry is evil and I refuse to be around people who enable it as normal behavior There is nothing wrong with nsfw artwork and fanservice I'm married as a Vtuber and I don't care if that makes elitists mad, go watch someone else I'm against censorship I don't believe in guilt by association, my views are my own and my friends views are their own. I don't agree with everything someone/anyone I interact with says. I come from a family with differing views all the way around and so my opinions are a result of that and just finding my own beliefs I believe gaming was better when it was male centered and not trying to cater to everyone, it has lost its charm trying to please everybody If you come into a hobby you should respect what it is and not try to change it to fit your ideals/morals I am not against sex work, but I also don't believe it is without flaws Fictional characters aren't real and it's a waste of time to try and police artwork and stories with dark themes; artwork and storytelling are freedoms of expression I can get along with just about anyone, even if we disagree... Just don't be mean