Sean Hamill

@grok @AlexWBA23 @JimboManc @jerraldfit764 @Smackalligator @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah Where does it go over the cross bar lol

I can analyze videos—frame-by-frame review shows Cherki's shot curling over the bar without the keeper touching it, so not on target per Opta rules. Official stats from RotoWire confirm 0 SOT for him in that Man City vs Newcastle match. If bet365 disagrees, dispute with them. What's your view on the clip?

Anyone got a clip of the Cherki shot on target? @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah

@JackS19840 @MarkusBets2 @orinruu @Smackalligator @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah Get ya facts right mate it was a physical foul outside the box lol

@MarkusBets2 @orinruu @SeanHamill20 @Smackalligator @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah The ref had his arm raised as the freekick was taken therefore again indicating an indirect freekick

@SanGrownIdiot @orinruu @JackS19840 @Smackalligator @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah They gave it as a shot on target at first then took it away so obviously someone has been in contact to get ut changed as they didn't want to pay out

@orinruu @JackS19840 @SeanHamill20 @Smackalligator @TheCardDealer @ChristianMeah The way he shapes to strike the ball looks like it’s a cross. It’s OPTA’s job to make that decision and they obviously see it the same way.

@xLuke17x @GarriganThomas @_remanistic @Ben_1885 Opta gave the shot then removed it at the end of the game so a bookie definitely got onto them

@GarriganThomas @_remanistic @Ben_1885 Cherki’s shooting is better than that…he doesn’t try get too much power or height, he’s looking for that low driven cross. As I said, if there’s any debate that he’s crossed it then it’s never given

Oh my god🤣🤣🤣 even for optas standards this is fucking impressive 🤣🤣

@Callumstubbings @bet365help @tyler75167277 @bet365 Shows what you no mate it payed out lol

@SeanHamill20 @bet365help @tyler75167277 @bet365 Their own terms state based on how the player enters the field

@DarrenLatimer08 @Acko07efc @bet365 @bettingvillage William hill payed out

@Acko07efc @bet365 @bettingvillage Heavy in it. It’s worse because it’s actually won. they choose to use different opta stats. Even though the commentators clearly says Mbappe on for Bellingham 😂 also seen it with me own eyes 👀 on the substitute board

Bet 365 up to there old ways @bet365 apparently when you win a bet they just choose to pay it out when they feel like. Cancelling withdrawals . Clearly shows on opta and live score Bellingham for Mbappe. @bettingvillage

@bet365help @tyler75167277 @bet365 That is still completely wrong it's bellinghams number 5 for mbappe number 9

@tyler75167277 @bet365 Hi, Sub On Play On has now been applied to the correct players, we use Press Association stats to determine substitutions. They have Trent being subbed for Mbappe and Modric being subbed for Bellingham therefore Sub on Play On has been updated accordingly.

@LewisBower71681 @OptaJoe @OptaAnalyst Mbappe for bellingham is right as you can see on the substitute board they have changed it to modric for bellingham though and robbed everyone

@OptaJoe @OptaAnalyst mbappe was clearly subbed on for Vinicius and you have it as he came on for Bellingham ?

@jackcally96 @B3Z_Trojan @bet365help @RickyAddison11 Opta stats had it as mbappe for bellingham and then changed it to bellingham off for modric after mbappe had his first shot on target I had a look for my bets to make sure and they changed it

@B3Z_Trojan @bet365help @RickyAddison11 Even paddy had it as mbappe for Bellingham and are refusing to pay because opta have the stat incorrect

@bet365help @garydoc777 No.5 for no.9 Bellingham off mbappe on

@garydoc777 Hi, we use Press Association stats to determine substitutions. They have Trent being subbed for Mbappe and Modric being subbed for Bellingham therefore Sub on Play On has been updated accordingly.

okay @bet365help this just doesn't make sense that you took the money back from this winner 🙄 Mbappe scored and was booked.....

@bluearmy2015 @LukeJYip @Thor__8819 @WilliamHill @OptaJoe

@LukeJYip @Thor__8819 @WilliamHill @OptaJoe has got this wrong then the numbers showed Mbappe for Bellingham

A reminder of tonight's Epic Boost for the clash between Madrid and Dortmund at the Club World Cup 👇 ❌ WAS - 6/4 ✅ NOW - 5/2 18+ | GambleAware

@graham_downie @keir_watkinson @WillHillHelp @WilliamHill

@keir_watkinson @WillHillHelp @WilliamHill Opta stats showing as Modric on for Bellingham. Board says modric for vin jr

@WillHillHelp @WilliamHill can you help me with a query, you’ve given this as a failed bet, but it says impact sub applies and Mbappe was subbed on for Bellingham and according to Opta had two shots in the second half

@bluearmy2015 @OutlawSportsBet @WilliamHill

@OutlawSportsBet @WilliamHill Fofa list as Mbappe for Bellingham as well

AND BREATHE... 😮‍💨 Real Madrid will meet PSG in the FIFA Club World Cup semi-finals. 🔥

@MayowaWilson @jpward1986 @WilliamHill

@MayowaWilson @jpward1986 @WilliamHill He 100 per cent came on for bellingham on the number board if u watched the game

@michaelbrown11 @bluearmy2015 @LukeJYip @Thor__8819 @WilliamHill @OptaJoe I seen that updated to modric on mine though it did say mbappe for bellingham on there at first though it was blatantly there no.9 for no.5 on the board

@bluearmy2015 @LukeJYip @Thor__8819 @WilliamHill @OptaJoe It also originally showed Mbappe for Bellingham & updated to Trent shortly after his first shot on target

@jpward1986 @WilliamHill He came on for mbappe I watched the game the board said no.9 for no.5

@WilliamHill Why is this being settled as loser? When impact sub applies, FIFA World Cup official site has it down as Mbappe can on as sub for Bellingham?

@keir_watkinson @WillHillHelp @WilliamHill He did get replaced by mbappe and it said he did on opta at first but then opta changed it to modric robbin fuckers