The Semantics Sheriff

8.7K posts

The Semantics Sheriff banner
The Semantics Sheriff

The Semantics Sheriff

@SemanticSheriff

Speak honestly using precision and clarity. Check your premise.

Katılım Kasım 2024
1K Takip Edilen410 Takipçiler
The Semantics Sheriff
The Semantics Sheriff@SemanticSheriff·
Integrity.
Jennifer Sey@JenniferSey

About two weeks ago @xx_xyathletics was suspended from Meta for a few days. A mass reporting triggered the suspension. Since then, we've been given advice about how to avoid triggering the angry trans mob. My personal opinion is you can't avoid triggering them and Meta needs to not automatically suspend an account due to mass reporting. They mass report to gum up the works. They know the suspension will not be permanent but it will certainly mess with our business for a few days. It's a display of power. There's nothing I can say, no way I can say it, to avoid pissing this group of angry men off. That's a fact. But here are some of the suggestions I've been given to try to avoid doing so, to thread the needle, so to speak: 1. Don't say "biology" 2. Don't say "sex is binary" 3. Don't say XX and XY - that's literally in our name so ok 4. Don't say "men in women's sports" 5. Don't say "men pretending to be women" or "men claiming to be women." You get the point. Meanwhile on @instagram some person I never heard of until yesterday who goes by Ethel Cain and has 1.2M followers can hang out in a porny pose in a creepy bedroom wearing a corset with his entire fruit cup squished up and hanging out the bottom of the corset and he's met with nothing but "you're so beautiful" and "her penis..." Here's a smattering of quotes: "Most beautiful woman alive." "My darling." "Iconic." Blah blah blah. Vomit. This is just plain old male exhibitionism. He's a fetishist. You don't see "trans men" hanging their vaginas out for all to see. What a gross creep. And what is wrong with you Meta? (And no I'm not showing the photos here you can find them yourself like I did. 🤮)

English
0
0
0
6
Beth Daranciang
Beth Daranciang@bethsd·
@TCSWashington It's not "transgenders" in girls' sports that they object to - it's males. If females consider themselves transgender they can still perform in female sports, unless they have taken disqualifying drugs.
English
4
7
90
735
The Center Square Washington
“We’re not going to back down.” Two Washington students say they won’t stop speaking out about transgenders in girls' sports. They say their fight isn’t just personal it’s about what they believe is right. Watch ⬇️
English
21
55
389
31.7K
The Semantics Sheriff
The Semantics Sheriff@SemanticSheriff·
@jonatanpallesen "Conversion Therapy"?? Telling a child that there is nothing wrong with their body is not "conversion therapy". Blocking a child's puberty is conversion therapy. "Affirming" a boy is a girl is conversion therapy.
English
0
0
1
13
Jonatan Pallesen
Jonatan Pallesen@jonatanpallesen·
How is it possible to believe (as Justice Jackson does) that talk therapy can be banned, but puberty blockers and hormone treatment cannot? (As she opined in United States v. Skrmetti.) Puberty blockers and hormone treatment are a far more invasive treatment than talk therapy. So if talk therapy can be banned, puberty blockers can too. There is even a further free speech argument in the case for not being able to ban talk therapy. It is quite clear that she makes her rulings not based on the law, or on logical consistency, but on her personal ideological alignment. The use of puberty blockers is viewed favorably by many progressive, while conversion therapy is not. That is why she makes logically inconsistent rulings. Is there anyone who honestly disagrees with this claim? And if not, aren't Democrats embarrassed for having nominated her?
Greg Price@greg_price11

🚨 BREAKING: The Supreme Court just ruled 8-1 in Chiles v. Salazar that Colorado's law banning "conversation therapy" for sexual orientation or gender identity is unconstitutional. Jackson was the lone dissent.

English
9
20
213
7K
Rupert Lowe MP
Rupert Lowe MP@RupertLowe10·
I read how a failed Pakistani 'asylum seeker' who repeatedly abused and raped an eight year old girl has been jailed for 15 years. He abused her in her own home and bedroom. She was told that if she told anyone, she would die. I wouldn't deport him. Under a Restore Britain Government, with the British people's approval, the death penalty would be reintroduced for such evil and undeniable crimes. He would be put to death. If you rape a young child, you do not deserve to live. It's that simple.
Rupert Lowe MP tweet media
English
3.1K
11.3K
72.1K
1.1M
The Semantics Sheriff
The Semantics Sheriff@SemanticSheriff·
@EPoe187 Yes, except when politics is religion and outgroup members are the evil bad people that justify the ingroup loyalty.
English
0
0
0
23
Bo Winegard
Bo Winegard@EPoe187·
One of my strongest convictions is that people are vastly more than the sum of their political beliefs and that friendships among people who disagree about politics are not only healthy, but necessary for a complete and empathetic understanding of the world.
English
50
201
1.2K
52K
Coddled Affluent Professional
A reasonable take I heard (from a millennial) is that wokeness happened because millennials looked around and saw that they had no transcendent belief system to guide them and give their lives meaning and so they just turned up the volume on Boomer anti racism because that was on hand. I think that’s right. It doesn’t explain everything but it’s definitely it’s definitely psychology true in an important way.
English
206
126
2.3K
119.2K
The Semantics Sheriff
The Semantics Sheriff@SemanticSheriff·
@JenniferSey It's not a belief it's a social sorting mechanism. Narrative-alignment as a costly signal of group loyalty.
English
0
0
0
82
Jennifer Sey
Jennifer Sey@JenniferSey·
I’ll never understand how my former friends can defend this. Can they possibly actually believe this person is a woman?? No right?! They don’t really believe it. They have eyes.
English
215
310
3K
44.3K
Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer@michaelshermer·
She needs to read Richard Reeves' book: Of Boys and Men: Why the Modern Male Is Struggling, Why It Matters, and What to Do about It Giving boys dolls and telling them that girls are exactly the same as them is not only not helping, it is hurting them, and it's false.
Election Wizard@ElectionWiz

DISTURBING: Gavin Newsom’s wife on how she raises her son: “I've given our boys dolls… if I'm reading a book and the protagonist is a male, I just change the 'he' to a 'she.'”

English
55
54
505
18.3K
The Semantics Sheriff
The Semantics Sheriff@SemanticSheriff·
@TukiFromKL The unstated premise that "Iran is trying to negotiate a peace deal" is doing a lot of work in that post.
English
0
0
0
87
Tuki
Tuki@TukiFromKL·
🚨 If you’re seeing this, follow me and turn on my post notifications. I unapologetically break down what's really happening before the headlines catch up. Things are only going to get more interesting from here.
English
8
6
152
44.2K
Graham Linehan
Graham Linehan@Glinner·
@supergeekmike Not really. Here are those questions again. "Why do you support men in women's prisons/sports/changing rooms? Why do you support surgical and pharmaceutical interventions for children/teenagers? You won't engage on any of these matters because your position is indefensible."
English
6
1
98
1.1K
Graham Linehan
Graham Linehan@Glinner·
If people are getting frustrated with you, it's because you refuse to explain your positions and you appear to hold them only to hurt women. Why do you support men in women's prisons/sports/changing rooms? Why do you support surgical and pharmaceutical interventions for children/teenagers? You won't engage on any of these matters because your position is indefensible.
SupergeekMike (Mike Christensen)@supergeekmike

Spent the day fielding a flood of annoying comments from idiotic transphobes, all repeating the same mind-numbing arguments over and over. It was so tedious. But all I could imagine is how much worse it would be if I was trans. I KNOW they always get so much more shit than us.

English
20
68
891
23.3K
Michael Shermer
Michael Shermer@michaelshermer·
Decades from now historians, sociologists & linguists will make a list like this as a case study in how, in the early part of the 21st century, the left took liberal tolerance to absurd lengths to the point of illiberalism. (Didn't they have a word for "vagina-haver"?)
Michael Shermer tweet media
English
57
169
720
35.7K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
Conquering the world is always on the minds of the worst power-elites. But the path towards that objective changes with technology. We're being targeted, in a new way. Our rights are paramount, and we need new rights that protect us from a technological assault on our freedom.
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein

It appears big changes are coming where MAHA meets Gov. The objective looks to be technocracy disguised as AI enabled health. Think Covid 2.0. And, as I have said, it won’t look like the Covid "pandemic." Goliath may be a big, dumb giant, but he learns from his mistakes.

English
65
139
687
32K
Luke LRPS
Luke LRPS@LukeLRPS·
@CrunchAlias The MSM headlines don’t help. Dumb, incorrect headlines read by dumb, incorrect heads is a bad combo.
English
2
0
22
413
Sam Morgan
Sam Morgan@CrunchAlias·
One of the main reasons “trans” activists can’t get it into their heads that the Olympic policy is about males, not about “trans”, is because they simply cannot stand the idea that “trans” is utterly, completely irrelevant.
English
33
147
1.7K
22.3K
Kyle Becker
Kyle Becker@kylenabecker·
@PaleoStephen @SwipeWright Scientific understanding is neither “socially constructed” nor “consensus-based.” These Woke clowns are clueless.
English
1
0
4
87
Colin Wright
Colin Wright@SwipeWright·
🚨NEW: Last year I published a paper detailing the gamete-based definition of the sexes and debunking common activist objections to it. This year, the journal published a critique of it rooted in "feminist epistemology." They invited me to respond. It's now published. The final paragraph of my response (not shown in the screenshots) is: "The renowned geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky wrote that 'Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution,' highlighting evolution as the unifying framework that makes life’s diversity, complexity, and interconnectedness comprehensible. I contend that a parallel statement applies similarly to reproductive biology: Nothing in the biology of the sexes makes sense except in the light of gametes." LINKS Mahr's critique of my paper:link.springer.com/article/10.100… My response to Mahr:link.springer.com/article/10.100…
Colin Wright tweet mediaColin Wright tweet media
English
102
362
1.9K
191.8K
Wilfred Reilly
Wilfred Reilly@wil_da_beast630·
Anyone who thinks the modern USA is a "patriarchy" or a "white supremacist state" is a fundamentally unserious person. Actual formal discrimination has been civilly and often criminally illegal for 62 years. Pro-female/minority affirmative action has been the law of the land for 59 years. Of course there are SOME sectors still dominated by cocky white men, just as the reverse is true: I'm a former sales and trading floor guy myself. But, words...MEAN things.
English
34
108
933
12.8K