Copy Trader BTC

@Dioclet54046121 When Bitcoin dumps everyone who doesn't own Bitcoin cheers because they think the mistake of not owning Bitcoin will finally turn into something bearable. But it won't. All dips will sooner or later turn into a new rally.

@EliAfriatISR Muslims and it’s not even a debate. Muslims have conqured 57 countries and counting, the result is plain to see. Jews have one, the land that Judaism was born. Jews win Noble prizes, Muslims create chaos.

Who do you think creates more problems in the world? Jews or Muslims?

@1905Almanya @PapkeGerhard There are millions of Muslims in Germany and growing at an insane rate but only 120k Jews. Germany will become Islamic before there’s even 200k Jews in Germany.

@PapkeGerhard Aber jüdisch ist ok oder ? Islamfeindlichkeit ist ein Teil von Rassismus! Nur weil die jüdische Presse den Islam als teuflisch darstellt muss es nicht so sein . 99% der Muslime in D leben friedlich und bezahlen ihre Steuern +SA .

Ich möchte nicht, dass Deutschland ein islamisches Land wird.

@inthezoneuk @Dashytwo I could not find a decent burger in California. Burgers in the Nordic countries are on a completely different level. An ”artisan” burger in San Diego was a joke.

@Dashytwo This from someone in the USA! 😂😂😂 I once asked an American to take me to a typical lunch place in San Diego. He took me to Subway 😂😂😂

This is literally the worst culinary region in the world

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Exactly what have I said that makes you think I don’t know the difference?

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal You still have not realized the difference between authoritative and binding. ICJ concluded that Gaza is still under effective occupation. That gives the inherent right to the occupied population to resist it. Israel's occupation of the WB is also inherently illegal

🇮🇱 Israel has quietly seized roughly 1,000 sq km of territory across Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria. More than half is in southern Lebanon. Israeli forces now control more than half of Gaza, squeezing 2 million people into 40% of the enclave's pre-war territory. In Syria, Israel has established positions covering around 233 sq km near the border. Netanyahu says troops are "not leaving" Lebanon. Diplomats say Israeli officials privately insist otherwise. Far-right ministers are less subtle, with Smotrich calling for the Litani River to become Israel's new northern border. An Arab diplomat said exactly what most of us think: "What Israel is doing now in the West Bank, 20 years ago we would have thought that was extreme. This shows the trajectory of this society." Source: Financial Times

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Jus cogens norms would only apply if territory would have been forcefully acquired. Israel has not acquired any territory in Gaza. Sticking to facts is not a matter or being zionist or anti-zionist, everyone should be able to do that.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal Like I said, jus cogens norms are legally binding and Israel is violating them in the OPT. Israel itself made it clear for years that the blockade had the aim of putting the population "on a diet". Again, you are just a born again Zionist

@kkalev @MarioNawfal AO is not legally binding, there is no question about that. You know that by now but you can’t let it go. There is also no question that Israel is not starving Gaza. That’s really not even debatable considering how thoroughly disproven that clam is.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal As ICJ/2024 authoritatively concluded, Gaza is under effective Israeli occupation which is an act of aggression. As is an illegal blockade with the aim of starving the civilian population

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Glad you agree regarding the AO. Israel hasn’t acquired Gaza or parts of Gaza so no jus cogens norms have been violated.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal Fortunately, Israel is violating BINDING jus cogens norms in the OPT (prohibition of acquisition of territory by force, right to self-determination) so its obligation IS binding due to the nature of the violations. Glad I could help

@kkalev @MarioNawfal

@kkalev @MarioNawfal They carry no less weight in the sense of accuracy is what it means. They not legally binding. It is clearly stated in the ICJ section below. ”These opinions are non binding”. There is nothing to misinterpret here. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advisory_…

@kkalev @MarioNawfal You highlighted the wrong part. You should have highlighted the sentence before that where it says ”potential legal effect of ICJ advisory opinions”. The AO itself is not a ruling or legally binding, even though it is correct.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal Here, I've highlighted it even for the willfully ignorant. I am sure you will remain even more "ignorant" since international law and courts destroy all your arguments

@kkalev @MarioNawfal No ruling, not binding. Case closed. The law doesn’t care about your opinion.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal Now we've concluded that you cannot even understand English words. The ICJ, UNGA, ITLOS were clear. Cry harder

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Now you are grasping at straws and it won’t save you.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal I suggest you try and refresh your English since you really seem to have a hard time with the meaning of the word authoritative

@kkalev @MarioNawfal You are now saying you don’t care about law if you claim one is breaking the law because an AO. There is no way that’s the case. You are simply lying if you claim that. An AO is non-binding and there is no way around that.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal The dude who says he doesn't care about international law is telling us he also doesn't know about international law Like I said. ICJ decisions are authoritative about int law. ICJ/2004 & ICJ/2024 made authoritative conclusions on Israel's conduct

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Of course it matters.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal The ICJ is the authoritative source on international law. It doesn't matter at all if it was an AO Glad I could help

@adrianlitvinoff @BeckettUnite Because the flotilla is illegal and a publicity stunt.

@BeckettUnite I can’t understand why no nation is prepared to provide a naval escort for the flotilla. Anyone?

Once again: Off the coast of Crete 600 miles off the coast of 🇮🇱 A humanitarian flotilla seized By fascist ‘military’ Over 100 activists kidnapped in international waters For seeking to break an illegal siege of Gaza 🇵🇸 Can anyone still deny 🇮🇱 is not a terrorist state?

@kkalev @MarioNawfal You can say it a million times but they didn’t conclude that. An advisory opinions is not a ruling nor binding.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal I don't know how many times I have to write it. The reality is what ICJ/2024 concluded, that Israel remained the effective occupier of Gaza. You just don't like it

@khalidi79397 Feeding fish with plastic.

Why are the Gaza flotilla activists polluting the Mediterranean Sea while pretending to save humanity?

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Not in Gaza.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal Yap, an illegal occupier, who was conducting a continuous act of aggression against the people of the state of Palestine as well as the crime of apartheid

@kkalev @MarioNawfal And Hamas attacked Israel in 2023.

@ShadowTraderCT @MarioNawfal As ICJ/2024 concluded, Israel was effectively occupying Gaza

@kkalev @MarioNawfal Yes it is. There was no occupation in Gaza after 2005.

@kkalev @MarioNawfal That’s just your opinion.