Dez

@ReformedMedia_ Agreed

BREAKING 🚨: This a shocking attack on democracy. A Reform UK county councillor Thomas Mallon was assaulted on a doorstep while canvassing in #Kent. Punched in the face, he suffered severe sciatic nerve damage, was bed bound for two weeks and now needs a walking stick to walk around. Violence has absolutely no place in politics.

@RobertJenrick @AndyBurnhamGM Little thought for Reform voters, Reform is structured as a company, not a political party, your membership fee doesn't give you any say in the parties decisions So you are just cash cows for your leadership

Great response on the doors today! We were in the ward where Labour did best in May. But there was a LOT more Reform than Labour today. @AndyBurnhamGM might want to hold off from measuring the No10 curtains yet…

Reform UK claims 268,000 members. Each pays £25 a year. That's potentially £6.7m in annual subscription income. Before you pay, there's something you should know about what you're actually buying. Reform UK is not a traditional political party in any constitutional sense. It is a private limited company. Two private limited companies, in fact, nested inside each other. Understanding the structure matters because it determines who controls the party, who benefits from your money, and what rights you have as a paying member. The main vehicle is Reform 2025 Ltd, company number 11694875, incorporated in 2018. It is a company limited by guarantee, meaning instead of shareholders, it has guarantors who effectively own and control it. The two guarantors are Nigel Farage and Zia Yusuf. They are also the sole directors. Sitting above Reform 2025 Ltd is a second company, Reform UK Party Limited, incorporated 18 February 2025, company number 16260766. This is listed as the Person of Significant Control of Reform 2025 Ltd. It controls the main party vehicle. Reform UK Party Limited itself claims it has no Person of Significant Control. Nobody formally owns the company that owns the party. In a traditional political party, Labour, the Conservatives, the Liberal Democrats, the Greens, membership means something. Members vote on policy. Members elect the leadership. Members have constitutional rights enshrined in a rulebook. The party is an unincorporated association collectively owned by its members. Reform's structure is fundamentally different. When you pay £25 to join Reform, you are not becoming a member of a democratic organisation. You are subscribing to a private limited company. Your £25 buys you no vote on policy. No vote on the leadership. No right to stand for internal office. No constitutional protection if the leadership decides to change direction overnight. In February 2024 Farage announced he was handing over control of Reform. A new constitution was published. But the Companies House filings tell a different story. Under that constitution, Farage retained the power to appoint the majority of Reform's executive committee. The governance reform was announced publicly. The control was never actually transferred. Farage is the sole person with the power to select candidates for elections. There is no primary system, no member ballot, no democratic selection process. The candidate in your constituency is whoever Farage decides it will be. The 268,000 members have no formal mechanism to challenge or change that. This matters in Makerfield specifically. Robert Kenyon was selected as Reform's by-election candidate. His record, the comments about women, the electoral roll discrepancy, the Manchester Arena post, all of it emerged after his selection. Under a traditional party membership structure, members would have a mechanism to raise concerns, call for a review, or trigger a recall. Under Reform's structure, there is no such mechanism. The leader selects. The membership subscribes. Reform claims to be the voice of ordinary people against an out of touch establishment. But its own internal structure concentrates absolute power in two individuals at the top of a private limited company, with no democratic accountability to the people paying £25 a year for the privilege of calling themselves members. Labour members elect their leader. Conservative members elect their leader. Liberal Democrat members elect their leader. Green members vote on policy. Reform members elect nobody and vote on nothing. 268,000 subscribers. £6.7m. Zero democratic rights. That is what Reform membership actually is. The receipts are on Companies House. They always are.

@RobertJenrick @AndyBurnhamGM Good to hear, so no more need for the splitting the vote nonsense then??

@writteninoak Don't panic captain Mannering Forever is a very long time, not even the Messiah of Labour can live forever

If Burnham wins, we'll be locked into this dystopian nightmare forever.

@gabby_cabby @DarrenPlymouth @RestoreBritain @RupertLowe10 Myself I would Restore Britain, England, Wales and Scotland back to Christian heritage countries and a single parliament but I believe many others in Restore include Northern Ireland

While I am all for @RestoreBritain and @RupertLowe10 I have an observation. The flag in this photo represents the British State and its parliament so it leads me to ask the question what do you actually want restore? Parliament and the Union. Or England, Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland (And Cornwall). Their is a difference and an important one. I want to support @RestoreBritain and have been very much but photos like this give me pause.

@TimeForReform29 @IslamIs3rdWorld @simmo1024 He doesn't want to ban halal, he wants to ban halal slaughter in Britain They want to import it, that is their choice Same with the Jewish people, they want kosher, they import it

@ShamanDez @IslamIs3rdWorld @simmo1024 I'm simply saying its ironic giving Lowe has said he wants to ban halal yet had it at his son's wedding

Another Reform policy I've said it before I'll say it again - there is no substantive difference between Reform and Restore. Restore offer nothing new which is why they will fail

@AndrewHWestern You don't agree with defunding the BBC??

Relegation Rupert is such a little snowflake - can’t cope with a bit of accountability

@TimeForReform29 @IslamIs3rdWorld @simmo1024 How terrible of him, you do realise Rupert's son is not a Muslim?? That the bride's family would have wanted halal is not down to Rupert

@IslamIs3rdWorld @ShamanDez @simmo1024 He even had halal food at his son's wedding

@TimeForReform29 @IslamIs3rdWorld @simmo1024 And?? Do you not like Muslims who are here legally and who marry British people??

@IslamIs3rdWorld @ShamanDez @simmo1024 Lowea family has muslims in it

@claire_adams694 So virtue signalling works on you? Fine

I can no longer support the Rupert Lowe grooming gang inquiry. The issue is too important to be turned into personalities, factions, or political point scoring. I have criticised Labour, the Conservatives, the Lib Dems, the Greens, and I will apply the same standards here. My focus has always been the victims and justice for them. I remain a Reform member because I believe Reform is the only party capable of delivering meaningful action, which is why I’m sharing this clip of Nigel Farage speaking about these crimes years before most politicians were prepared to confront them. Victims deserve truth, accountability, and justice, not competing egos

@policylaila The guy’s a fraud…

@MattHarperUK @policylaila You mean the same Nigel that abandoned Brexit before anything was done about it and handed it over to Boris, is that the Nigel you mean??

@policylaila he takes the battles on, no matter how hard, how long, he fights for us, which for me, makes him a most worthy national leader. Good digging @policylaila

He’s the only leader with the guts to take on the establishment and speak truth to power. Unlike others, he always has. And he brings receipts.

@policylaila Seeing as how Reform are the latest manifestation of the Uniparty your post can be seen as nothing but gaslighting

@Urgent_Russia24 Definitely B but C is a close second

If Russia paid for your entire vacation, what would you want to see first? A — Historic landmarks B — Nature and landscapes C — Local culture D — Modern cities

@dannydanon Israel is not Jewish, it is Zionist Zionists (Christian Zionists, Secular Zionists and heretical Jewish Zionists) heap the sins of the Zionists upon the heads of innocent Jews who are faithful to Judaism and the Torah

כמה מרגש לצעוד היום בצעדת ישראל השנתית בניו יורק יחד עם שגרירי או״ם שהגיעו לתמוך, מנהיגי הקהילה היהודית ועשרות אלפי תומכי ישראל. תודה לכל מי שהגיע לעמוד לצד ישראל בגאווה ובנחישות. עם ישראל חי! 🇮🇱

@flowwiththejoe @EthanLevins2 Israel is not Jewish, it is Zionist Zionists (Christian Zionists, Secular Zionists and heretical Jewish Zionists) heap the sins of the Zionists upon the heads of innocent Jews who are faithful to Judaism and the Torah

Criticizing the Israeli government does not make you anti-semitic.

@natalie_Zion_ @EthanLevins2 Israel is not Jewish, it is Zionist Zionists (Christian Zionists, Secular Zionists and heretical Jewish Zionists) heap the sins of the Zionists upon the heads of innocent Jews who are faithful to Judaism and the Torah

No but using the age old nazi tropes like Jews oh sorry "Zionists" k¡|| children, own the world, the banks, Hollywood, America etc IS ANTISEMITIC So let's see if you can criticise Israel without the shitty conspiracy theories that aren't true. You cant because right now all the conspiracies about israel are Nazi ones or from the elders of Zion

@EthanLevins2 Israel is not Jewish, it is Zionist Zionists (Christian Zionists, Secular Zionists and heretical Jewish Zionists) heap the sins of the Zionists upon the heads of innocent Jews who are faithful to Judaism and the Torah

I want people to be abundantly clear about what will happen under a Restore Britain Government. There will be no backtracking, no budging, no retreating. Millions and millions of illegals, foreign sex pests and freeloaders will be deported. We will get our country back.