ShanAcar

@IsraelinCanada Over 70,000 dead Palestinians you bragged about bombing, plus the ones you are now killing in Lebanon and Iran. Time for Israel to ceast to exist as a genocidal state.

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules And you didnt read or absorb any of it. You keep going round in circles with the same bullshit. You're an Islamophobic coward who wants to see them all dead. That's your solution and thanks to brainwashed cunts like you, we'll all be Palestians soon.

We started with Hamas executing accused people without trial. You defended it. Then it became “history explains it.” Then “you hate Muslims.” Now it’s “what about Israeli war crimes.” Notice how every reply moves further away from the original point instead of addressing it directly. You can condemn Israeli war crimes AND condemn Hamas executing accused civilians without trial at the same time. That’s called having principles instead of self-image maintenance. Claim holds. Hamas executing accused collaborators without evidence, fair trial, or due process is wrong and cannot be justified by history, politics, or tribal loyalty.

The entire time you’ve been defending Hamas executing people accused of “helping zee joos,” then the moment the human rights argument exposes the problem, you pivot to historical grievances. There is no historical excuse for any government, militia, or system in power to murder its own citizens without evidence, trial, or due process. None. The moment a regime decides accusations alone are enough to execute people, it abandons justice and enters the territory of political terror. That’s the jihadist trash mentality I’m talking about. It doesn’t matter if you’re from Gaza or Delaware — glorifying executions without due process is garbage logic either way.

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules Still deflecting from Israeli attrocities and war crimes. x.com/i/status/17691…

Criticizing Hamas executing accused people without trial is not the same as wanting to “kill all Palestinians, Arabs and Muslims.” That’s a complete strawman. You’re proving my point: instead of defending executions directly now, you’re reframing criticism of Hamas as hatred toward an entire ethnicity/religion so you don’t have to address the actual argument. That doesn’t hold up in court, logic, or the real world. Only in jihadist-trash logic where criticism of extremists automatically becomes “hatred” of everyone.

The whole point is that Palestinians were setup to be in this postion from the beginning when thousands of European Zionist Jews migrated to Palestine and took over violentely. Learn the backstory of how things ended up like this. They haven't fogiven or fogotten the injustice - would you?

That’s exactly the point. They never upheld human rights to begin with — and that’s not a defense of the executions, it’s the indictment of the system itself. Human rights are not something Hamas, the IRGC, or any regime “gives” people when convenient. They are universal principles meant to stop governments and armed groups from executing people based on accusations, politics, religion, or paranoia. Saying “they might be helping Jews” is not evidence, not a trial, and not justice. Shooting someone in the back of the head over suspicion is the very definition of extrajudicial killing. So asking “where would the human rights come from?” completely misses the point. The fact the system is lawless and brutal is exactly why it should be condemned — not excused.

Peaceful protest marches on public roads or sidewalks are generally protected under constitutional guarantees of freedom of expression and assembly. This protection exists because public streets have historically served as spaces for political speech, and because moving marches, unlike blockades, ordinarily do not significantly obstruct others, restrict their freedoms, or compel participation. Police should therefore take active steps to ensure demonstrations remain peaceful and that nobody is subjected to intimidation, harassment, or threats, including those who do not support the protesters’ views. Protesters themselves are equally entitled to protection from violence, intimidation, or retaliation while exercising their lawful rights. At the same time, governments and communities must grapple with the financial costs, operational strain, and liability risks associated with managing continual public demonstrations. In a society of responsible citizens, there would also be thoughtful consideration of strategy, proportionality, and civic impact. The fact that an action is legally permissible does not automatically mean it is prudent, constructive, or worth the broader social and economic burden it may impose. Can a society sustain unlimited demonstrations without eventually diminishing the public goodwill that makes protest effective in the first place? 📸 May 16, 2026 #Toronto #ProtestMania

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules Obsiously, but what human rights and due process do they have access to?

That’s the problem right there. You say “not condoning violence,” then immediately justify public executions by saying “in their minds they were traitors.” Human rights and due process exist specifically to stop people from deciding accusations = execution. If someone committed crimes, you prove it in a fair trial with evidence — not public killings and political purges.

"Hamas carried out public executions of Gazans accused of collaborating with Israel or internal opposition, as the group reasserted control in areas like Sabra neighborhood and near Shifa Hospital following ceasefire developments" Not condoning this or any violence, but in their minds, they were traitors who collaborated with Israel to kill off over 70,000 of their own. What would be your solution to deal with traitors under their circumstances? 🤔 Same question applies for traitors in Iran.

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules x.com/koshercockney/…

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules Aahhh... your married to SAVAK diaspora. No wonder you're retarded. Is this her?? Nice self-respect there 😬

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules Lmao you stay silent when jihadis commit atrocities— you’re complicit — you can’t have a moral higher ground after that.. doesn’t work that way! My wife is Persian she absolutely detests jihadist apologists like yourself.

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules I weigh 123 lbs at the moment 🖕

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules What would they find on your phone, sicko?! Lots of vlackmail material I'm sure with all those gay body builder pics. 🤡 x.com/i/status/20567…

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules All facts, fat ass jihadi loser.

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules We're talking about Palestine. Stay focused. x.com/i/status/20549…

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules No comparison jihadi

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules Jihadi, fat, out of shape... what else!? Talk about projection!! 🤣

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules More delusional projecting from some fat out of shape loser who couldn’t punch their way out a wet paper bag . Got it.. denial and projecting your weakness is literally all you losers do

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules So hiting a punching bag should be my main goal in life cause that will solve the world's problems. ✔️ Keep going, this is hillarious! 🤣

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules x.com/i/status/20567…

@ShanAcar @grok @CarymaRules Crazy right? That self respect means you have sharp instincts and a strong powerful build? Nuts. And yea if someone wants to act like a tough jihadi I wanna see if they can fight like one too

@mrbiggainz @grok @CarymaRules Is that seriously where your mind went after talking about self-respect?! Wow.

@grok @ShanAcar @CarymaRules Ok well she’s a girl I won’t challenge her to come to my gym and box a few rounds — that’s too misogist though it prob excites her ewwwww

Something bad is happening out there, and it's getting worse.

According to the official Israeli line IDF soldiers are only sexually assaulting each other in large numbers and not Palestinians.

@TorontoStar No paywall here theguardian.com/world/2025/mar…